Evaluating Safe Ketone Thresholds To Minimise Ketosis in People With Type 1 Diabetes Using Dapagliflozin
NCT ID: NCT07225465
Last Updated: 2025-11-06
Study Results
The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.
Basic Information
Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.
NOT_YET_RECRUITING
PHASE2
115 participants
INTERVENTIONAL
2026-02-28
2028-02-29
Brief Summary
Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.
SGLT2 inhibitors are mainly used in T2D, however some studies show they might also help people with type 1 diabetes (T1D). The same health benefits observed in people with T2D the investigators anticipate may help those with T1D. Currently, there is a safety concern that people with T1D using these medicines can raise the risk of diabetic ketoacidosis (DKA). DKA occurs when the body doesn't have enough insulin (a hormone made in the pancreas that helps your body use sugar (glucose) for energy), it starts to break down fats as a source of energy. This breakdown of fats produces ketones. Very high levels of ketones in the blood can make the blood acidic (toxic) and lead to DKA. If not treated in time, this can make the person living with T1D very ill and can be life-threatening. Because of this risk, health agencies like the FDA in the U.S., and the TGA in Australia have not approved use of SGLT2 inhibitors for people with T1D.
Still, some experts believe SGLT2 inhibitors may safely be used alongside insulin in T1D if DKA risk is carefully managed. This might be possible with early detection and treatment of rising ketone levels. One approach is using continuous ketone monitors, which track ketone levels in real time and can alert users early. People would also need proper education on what to do if ketone levels start rising.
To date, there's no official agreement on the exact ketone level that should trigger action. Some suggest action when ketone levels reach 1.0 or 1.5 mmol/L. A lower limit like 1.0 mmol/L may be safer, but it could also lead to too many alarms and extra stress, or unnecessary eating to bring ketones down.
Therefore, the aim of this study is to assess if initiating responses to elevated ketone levels at a threshold of 1.0 mmol/L, compared to a threshold of 1.5 mmol/L, will reduce the risk of DKA in people with T1D using Dapagliflozin.
The investigators will recruit 115 adults with T1D and provide Dapagliflozin (SGLT2 inhibitor) and continuous glucose and ketone monitoring (DGK) devices. Participants will be randomly assigned to two groups. Group 1 will wear a DGK with alarms set at ketone level of 1.0 mmol/L and receive education about taking action when ketone levels are ≥1.0 mmol/L. Group 2 will wear a DGK with alarms set at ketone level of 1.5 mmol/L and receive education about taking action when ketone levels are ≥1.5 mmol/L. Participants will be assessed for time spent with critically high ketone levels, incidence of DKA, glucose and person reported outcomes.
Findings from this study will provide real life data and clinical evidence to help guide safe use of SGLT2 inhibitors in people with T1D by informing protocols for monitoring and managing associated DKA risks.
Detailed Description
Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.
While SGLT2 inhibitors as adjunctive therapy to insulin may benefit people with T1D, in general their use has been associated with a significantly increased risk of diabetic ketoacidosis (DKA) which may occur in the absence of hyperglycaemia. DKA represents a life-threatening acute emergency of T1D, which occurs when insulin deficiency leads to lipolysis and accumulation of ketones, resulting in metabolic acidosis. It requires prompt identification and action, and delays in management are associated with an increase in mortality. For example, the pooled analysis of DEPICT-1 and DEPICT-2 participants showed that over 52 weeks of treatment, the incidence of adjudicated DKA was numerically higher with Dapagliflozin 5 mg/day or 10 mg/day than with placebo (4.0% and 3.5% vs. 1.1%). Therefore, SGLT2 inhibitors in general have failed to receive approval in the USA (FDA) and Australia (TGA) for use to control glucose levels in people with T1D due to an unacceptable increase in DKA. It is possible that SGLT2 inhibitor therapy may be viable in people with T1D if an intervention is able to shift the risk-benefit balance in favour of benefit e.g. if the risk of DKA could be recognized and addressed in a timely manner. The early recognition of impending DKA is of critical importance. However, symptoms of ketosis which include nausea, vomiting, fatigue, loss of appetite, malaise, weakness, and tachypnoea appear late and those associated with dehydration may be absent in the setting of normoglycaemia. Therefore, timely ketone measurement represents a cornerstone of management allowing therapeutic measures to be initiated.
A continuous ketone sensor (CKS) would address many of the shortcomings associated with current standard-of-care blood ketone testing using a handheld meter. Ketones can be quantified in interstitial fluid using a similar approach to that taken with widely commercially used continuous glucose monitor (CGM), using an enzymatic reaction. While feasibility of CKS devices has previously been demonstrated, the optimum thresholds for alerts, balancing the burden of alarms vs. timely intervention, have yet to be determined. Preliminary at home CKS data provided by Abbott indicate free-living people with T1D who are not using SGLTi spend \<1% of the time with ketone levels \>1.0mmol/L. Ketone levels in free-living with T1D using SGLT2 inhibitors remains unknown. To provide insights into appropriate ketone thresholds for alerts a literature search was undertaken in May 2024.
Studies included were published between January 2000 and April 2024 involving those aged ≥16 years of age which described capillary β-OHB levels in relation to suspected DKA and which reported sensitivity, specificity, negative predictive value, or positive predictive value. Eight of the 11 studies provided capillary β-OHB levels that excluded DKA; these ranged from 0.7 to ≥3.0 mmol/L 13-23 and the most recommended cut-off level was 1.0 mmol/L (n=3) followed by 1.5 mmol/L (n=2). The β-OHB cut-offs for the diagnosis of DKA ranged from 1.8 mmol/L to 3.5 mmol/L, with 3.0 mmol/L being most proposed by five of the studies. The investigators therefore concluded that capillary β-OHB cut off values of \<1.0 mmol/L and \<1.5 mmol/L exclude DKA. The investigators also conclude that a capillary β-OHB level ≥3.0 mmol/L exhibited high sensitivity and specificity in detecting DKA with levels between 1.5 mmol/L and 3.0 mmol/L representing a transition range with increasing risk.
The investigators propose that to pre-empt DKA in people with T1D using SGLTi that responses to CKS data could be initiated at levels of either 1.0mmol/L or 1.5mmol/L with alerts aligned accordingly. The lower alert may provide an additional safety margin though could come at the cost of a greater number of alarms and carbohydrates eaten that may not have necessarily been required. The investigators also suggest that there may be high DKA-risk subgroups (female sex, lower baseline body mass index (BMI), β-hydroxybutyrate levels pre-treatment, use of an insulin pump, and lower insulin requirements at baseline with dose reductions required post SGLT inhibitor commencement to avoid hypoglycaemia) who may benefit from the lower alarm thresholds facilitating earlier intervention. Finally, the risk for DKA may vary according to illness, fasting and high intensity exercise requiring alerts to be adjusted according to circumstances. However, data are required to inform protocols.
Conditions
See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.
Keywords
Explore important study keywords that can help with search, categorization, and topic discovery.
Study Design
Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.
RANDOMIZED
PARALLEL
TREATMENT
NONE
Study Groups
Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.
Dual glucose and ketone (DGK) sensor threshold 1.0mmol/L
The DGK will be set with threshold alarms activated at 1.0mmol/L for participant response to ketosis
FORXIGA
All participants will take FORXIGA (Dapagliflozin) orally at a dose of 10mg/day for 12 weeks
Dual glucose and ketone (DGK) sensor threshold 1.5mmol/L
The DGK will be set with threshold alarms activated at 1.5mmol/L for participant response to ketosis
FORXIGA
All participants will take FORXIGA (Dapagliflozin) orally at a dose of 10mg/day for 12 weeks
Interventions
Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.
FORXIGA
All participants will take FORXIGA (Dapagliflozin) orally at a dose of 10mg/day for 12 weeks
Eligibility Criteria
Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.
Inclusion Criteria
* Diagnosed with T1D (made on clinical criteria) for at least 1 year
* Insulin regimen either on MDI or insulin pump with at least 40% in one mode
* Minimum total daily insulin dose 0.4 Units per kg / day (can be on insulin pump or MDI);
* HbA1c \<10% (86mmol/ mol)
* Minimum daily carbohydrate intake of 100g
* Willing to adhere to the study protocol
* Ability to perform high-intensity exercise (specific to the exercise sub-study)
Exclusion Criteria
* eGFR \<30ml/min/1.73m2
* History of DKA in the last 12 months
* Use of low carbohydrate diet (\<100g/day)
* Diabetic gastroparesis
* Tape allergy
* Heavy alcohol use (15 standard drinks per week or binge drinking)
* Use of SGLT inhibitor in the last month
* Medications increasing the risk of DKA e.g. steroids, anorectic agents (eg phentermine, naltrexone HCl/bupropion HCl, and GLP 1 agonists).
* Major medical or psychiatric illness that in the opinion of the investigator would interfere with protocol adherence or impact participant safety.
24 Years
85 Years
ALL
No
Sponsors
Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.
Baker Heart and Diabetes Institute
OTHER
National Institute of Diabetes and Digestive and Kidney Diseases (NIDDK)
NIH
University of Melbourne
OTHER
Melbourne Health
OTHER
Austin Health
OTHER_GOV
St Vincent's Hospital Melbourne
OTHER
Responsible Party
Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.
David O'Neal
Coordinating Principal Investigator
Locations
Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.
St Vincent's Hospital Melbourne
Fitzroy, Victoria, Australia
Austin Health
Heidelberg, Victoria, Australia
Baker Heart and Diabetes Institute
Melbourne, Victoria, Australia
The Royal Melbourne Hospital
Parkville, Victoria, Australia
Countries
Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.
Central Contacts
Reach out to these primary contacts for questions about participation or study logistics.
Facility Contacts
Find local site contact details for specific facilities participating in the trial.
Dr Yee Wen Kong
Role: primary
Prof Elif Ekinci
Role: primary
Adele Manzoney
Role: backup
Prof David O'Neal
Role: primary
Prof Spiros Fourlanos
Role: primary
Other Identifiers
Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.
235/25
Identifier Type: -
Identifier Source: org_study_id