Implementing a Group Physical Therapy Program for Veterans (GroupPT): Function QUERI 3.0

NCT ID: NCT07215572

Last Updated: 2025-10-10

Study Results

Results pending

The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.

Basic Information

Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.

Recruitment Status

NOT_YET_RECRUITING

Clinical Phase

NA

Total Enrollment

20 participants

Study Classification

INTERVENTIONAL

Study Start Date

2026-10-01

Study Completion Date

2030-09-30

Brief Summary

Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.

Implementing Group Physical Therapy for Veterans with Knee Osteoarthritis (Group PT): Function QUERI 3.0 aims to compare implementation approaches while also gathering information on clinical effects of the EBP in its new context. The overall goal is to address a key priority within the implementation science field - identifying and refining metrics for equity and impact. The overall goal is to implement, evaluate, and sustain GroupPT in 20 VA facilities using a type III effectiveness-implementation hybrid study framework and parallel CRT design.

Detailed Description

Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.

Background/Purpose. Exercise-based PT is a key component of guideline concordant knee OA management. However, PT is underutilized for knee OA, resulting in missed opportunities to improve outcomes for the many Veterans with this health condition. A key challenge is the high demand for PT services for knee OA, paired with limited availability of PT services, which can lead to long wait times for Veterans or high community care costs for the VA. Group-based delivery of PT for knee OA can enhance access and efficiency. Following the RCT that supported the effectiveness of Group PT relative to individual PT, the Durham Veterans Affairs Healthcare System (DVAHCS) offered Group PT as a clinical service, and found that patients achieved clinically relevant improvements in pain and functional outcomes that were comparable to those observed in the RCT. Most recently, the investigators conducted a 19-site trial comparing implementation strategies to support delivery of Group PT in the VA. Overall, 16 sites successfully delivered a Group PT program, enrolling a total of 366 Veterans. There were clinically relevant improvements in pain interference and functional outcomes among participating Veterans.

Aims:

Aim 1: Refine foundational REP and Reach+Equity to support implementation of Group PT.

Key Questions: How can the Reach+Equity bundle be optimized to facilitate equitable reach? What are shareholder perspectives on refinements needed for Group PT foundational REP activities, as well as strategies to enhance equitable reach (Reach+Equity bundle)? Aim 2: Evaluate implementation of Group PT with foundational REP versus foundational REP and Reach+Equity. Key Questions: Are there differences in implementation outcomes (reach, fidelity, adoption, cost) at six, 12 and 18 months between arms? Is reach representative of patients experiencing knee OA at participating sites (equitable reach) and does this differ between foundational REP and Reach+Equity arms? Are there differences in effectiveness outcomes (function, pain) between arms? How do sites experience implementation strategies in each arm?

Methodology. To evaluate implementation of Group PT (Aim 2), the investigators will randomize sites (n=20) 1:1 to either foundational support or foundational support plus the Reach+Equity bundle. Implementation activities will occur over a 12-month period. Foundational REP will feature an extensive Implementation Toolkit that includes specific guidance for EBP delivery (e.g., flow of the class, specific exercises, didactic content), along with comprehensive patient resources including videos to guide home exercise. The Reach+Equity bundle will include: 1) external facilitation (provide an outside perspective to help sites identify barriers, develop effective strategies, and navigate complex change processes particularly through the lens of achieving equitable reach); 2) equity in implementation toolkit (guide that supports awareness and consideration of health equity during the implementation process); and 3) equity-focused data-driven monitoring (inform progress regarding equitable reach-related goals). The Group PT sessions includes 6 sessions that include exercise and educational content. Patients will be eligible for Group PT if they have a clinician diagnosis of symptomatic knee OA and ineligible if they have a substantial fall risk or co-occurring health conditions that would make participation in a group exercise class unsafe. The primary follow-up outcome time point will be 18 months; metrics will also be evaluated at 6 and 12 months. Implementation outcomes include: Reach (primary), defined as the number of patients initiating Group PT, Fidelity, defined as the average number of sessions attended by patients who initiate the EBP, and Adoption, defined as launching a Group PT program and enrolling 5 Veterans. Effectiveness Outcomes/Quality Metrics will be collected during the Group PT sessions and documented in the electronic health record. These outcomes include the PROMIS Pain Interference and Function scales, a 30-second chair stand test, and patient satisfaction. Generalized linear models will be used to examine the effect of foundational vs. Reach+Equity on reach and fidelity. Generalized linear mixed effect models will be used to compare effective outcomes between implementation arms.

Conditions

See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.

Knee Osteoarthritis

Study Design

Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.

Allocation Method

RANDOMIZED

Intervention Model

PARALLEL

Parallel cluster-randomized trial (parallel-CRT): used in pragmatic evaluations of health program or policy interventions, where half the clusters (in this case, VA sites) are randomly assigned to two interventions: Foundational support only (active comparator) vs. Foundational support plus Reach+Equity Implementation Bundle (experimental).
Primary Study Purpose

HEALTH_SERVICES_RESEARCH

Blinding Strategy

NONE

Study Groups

Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.

Foundational Support

Foundational Support uses the Replicating Effective Program (REP) implementation strategy and includes 5 elements that were developed and tested in our prior Function QUERI work: shareholder engagement, Group PT toolkit, Online shared resources (SharePoint) access for clinical program training materials, data reports to assist sites with tracking their data, and Diffusion Networks to promote peer-to-peer sharing and implementation support.

Group Type ACTIVE_COMPARATOR

Implementation Strategy: Foundational Support

Intervention Type OTHER

Foundational Support uses the Replicating Effective Program (REP) implementation strategy and includes 5 elements that were developed and tested in our prior Function QUERI work: shareholder engagement, Group PT toolkit, Online shared resources (SharePoint) access for clinical program training materials, data reports to assist sites with tracking their data, and Diffusion Networks to promote peer-to-peer sharing and implementation support.

Reach+Equity Bundle

The Reach+Equity bundle will include the same activities as foundational support plus the Reach+Equity bundle activities which include: 1) external facilitation (provide an outside perspective to help sites identify barriers, develop effective strategies, and navigate complex change processes particularly through the lens of achieving equitable reach); 2) equity in implementation toolkit (guide that supports awareness and consideration of health equity during the implementation process); and 3) equity-focused data-driven monitoring (inform progress regarding equitable reach-related goals).

Group Type EXPERIMENTAL

Implementation Strategy: Reach+Equity Bundle

Intervention Type OTHER

The Reach+Equity bundle will include the same activities as foundational support plus the Reach+Equity bundle activities which include: 1) external facilitation (provide an outside perspective to help sites identify barriers, develop effective strategies, and navigate complex change processes particularly through the lens of achieving equitable reach); 2) equity in implementation toolkit (guide that supports awareness and consideration of health equity during the implementation process); and 3) equity-focused data-driven monitoring (inform progress regarding equitable reach-related goals).

Interventions

Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.

Implementation Strategy: Foundational Support

Foundational Support uses the Replicating Effective Program (REP) implementation strategy and includes 5 elements that were developed and tested in our prior Function QUERI work: shareholder engagement, Group PT toolkit, Online shared resources (SharePoint) access for clinical program training materials, data reports to assist sites with tracking their data, and Diffusion Networks to promote peer-to-peer sharing and implementation support.

Intervention Type OTHER

Implementation Strategy: Reach+Equity Bundle

The Reach+Equity bundle will include the same activities as foundational support plus the Reach+Equity bundle activities which include: 1) external facilitation (provide an outside perspective to help sites identify barriers, develop effective strategies, and navigate complex change processes particularly through the lens of achieving equitable reach); 2) equity in implementation toolkit (guide that supports awareness and consideration of health equity during the implementation process); and 3) equity-focused data-driven monitoring (inform progress regarding equitable reach-related goals).

Intervention Type OTHER

Other Intervention Names

Discover alternative or legacy names that may be used to describe the listed interventions across different sources.

Foundational REP Enhanced Support

Eligibility Criteria

Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.

Inclusion Criteria

Sites are eligible to participate if they have:

* 2 outpatient PT clinicians (one primary and one back-up) for delivering Group PT
* space to conduct group sessions (if delivering Group PT in person) or ability to conduct visits via telehealth (video)

Patients will be eligible for Group PT if they have a clinician diagnosis of symptomatic knee OA.

Exclusion Criteria

* Site will be ineligible to participate if they are already conducting a group physical therapy class for patients with knee OA.
* Patients will be ineligible for Group PT if they have a substantial fall risk or co-occurring health conditions that would make participation in a group exercise class unsafe.
Eligible Sex

ALL

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Sponsors

Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.

VA Office of Research and Development

FED

Sponsor Role lead

Responsible Party

Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.

Responsibility Role SPONSOR

Principal Investigators

Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.

Kelli Dominick Allen, PhD

Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR

Durham VA Medical Center, Durham, NC

Locations

Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.

Durham VA Medical Center, Durham, NC

Durham, North Carolina, United States

Site Status

Countries

Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.

United States

Central Contacts

Reach out to these primary contacts for questions about participation or study logistics.

Caitlin B Kappler, MSW

Role: CONTACT

(919) 286-6936

Facility Contacts

Find local site contact details for specific facilities participating in the trial.

Heidi D Bassani

Role: primary

(919) 286-0411

Other Identifiers

Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.

QUX 25-002

Identifier Type: -

Identifier Source: org_study_id

More Related Trials

Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.