The Efficacy of Intralesional Bleomycin as Compared to 5-Flourouracil (5-FU) and Triamcinolone Acetonide (TAC) for the Treatment of Keloids: A Randomized Control Trial.

NCT ID: NCT07201766

Last Updated: 2025-11-25

Study Results

Results pending

The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.

Basic Information

Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.

Recruitment Status

NOT_YET_RECRUITING

Clinical Phase

NA

Total Enrollment

104 participants

Study Classification

INTERVENTIONAL

Study Start Date

2025-12-02

Study Completion Date

2026-02-28

Brief Summary

Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.

The goal of this clinical trial is to learn if drug bleomycin intralesionally is beneficial than intralesional 5FU and Triamcinolone Acetonide in treating Keloids. The main questions it aims to answer are:

Does drug Bleomycin injected intrasleisonally lower the time duration to effectively treat the keloids in participants as compared to intralesional Triamcinolone Acetonide and 5-Flourouracil? Researchers will compare drug Bleomycin and 5FU plus Triamcinolone Acetonide and determine if bleomycin is better.

Participants will:

Treatment will be given in two groups by a researcher blinded of the treatment being given in each group. POSAS patient and observer scar scale will be used to assess the keloids at 0, 2, 4, 6, 8, 10, and 12 weeks and during follow ups afterwards, assessments will be carried out by another researcher who will assess the improvement on the scale of 0-no improvement, to excellent-75-100% improvement in terms of POSAS variables. Effectiveness will be indicated by 50% reduction in POSAS score from the baseline.

Detailed Description

Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.

The goal of this clinical trial is to learn if drug bleomycin intralesionally is beneficial than intralesional 5FU and Triamcinolone Acetonide in treating Keloids. The main questions it aims to answer are:

Does drug Bleomycin injected intrasleisonally lower the time duration to effectively treat the keloids in participants as compared to intralesional Triamcinolone Acetonide and 5-Flourouracil? Researchers will compare drug Bleomycin and 5FU plus Triamcinolone Acetonide and determine if bleomycin is better.

An informed, written consent will be taken from the patients. Clinical data including demographic data will be recorded. Patients will be randomly divided into two groups by using random allocation software 2.0. Group A will be given 1ml if 0.9ml/22.5mg (25mg/ml) of 5-FU with 0.1 ml/4mg (40mg/ml) of Triamcinolone Acetonide, intralesionally 1cm apart, as 0.1- 0.2ml/cm2 with max dose of 5ml per session and repeat after every 2 weeks. Group B will be given injection Bleomycin 1.5 IU /ml (15 units vial dilution in 10ml Normal saline) 1 ml of this 1cm apart intralesionally as 0.1- 0.2ml/cm2 with max dose of 5ml per session and repeat after 2 weeks. Treatment will be given in two groups by a researcher blinded of the treatment being given in each group. POSAS patient and observer scar scale will be used to assess the keloids at 0, 2, 4, 6, 8, 10, and 12 weeks and during follow ups afterwards, assessments will be carried out by another researcher who will assess the improvement on the scale of 0-no improvement, to excellent-75-100% improvement in terms of POSAS variables. Effectiveness will be indicated by 50% reduction in POSAS score from the baseline. All the data will be noted on a specially designed pro forma.

Conditions

See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.

Keloids Scars

Study Design

Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.

Allocation Method

RANDOMIZED

Intervention Model

PARALLEL

Study Design: Randomized Control Trial Place of Study: Plastic Surgery department, Mayo Hospital Lahore Duration of Study: 6 months after approval of synopsis Sample Size: sample size of 104 patients (52 in each group) Sampling Technique Non probability consecutive sampling All, patients aged 13-60 years of age, either gender enrolled for Keloid treatment under local anaesthesia.

Exclusion Criteria:

Allergic to bleomycin, 5-FU DIABETICS VASCULAR INSUFFICIENCY AT THE AFFECTED SITE
Primary Study Purpose

TREATMENT

Blinding Strategy

SINGLE

Investigators

Study Groups

Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.

The Efficacy of 5-fluorouracil (5-FU) and Triamcinolone Acetonide in treatment of keloids

Group A will be given 1ml if 0.9ml/22.5mg (25mg/ml) of 5-FU with 0.1 ml/4mg (40mg/ml) of Triamcinolone Acetonide, intralesionally 1cm apart, as 0.1- 0.2ml/cm2 with max dose of 5ml per session and repeat after every 2 weeks.

Group Type EXPERIMENTAL

5-flourouracil and triamcinolone acetonide

Intervention Type DRUG

The role of intralesional bleomycin for the treatment of keloids needs further establishment in terms of effective concentration, number of sessions and post treatment ulceration or/and hypopigmentation. Additionally, its comparison to the commonly used and proven, more effective combination than intralesional steroid alone i-e 5-FU in combination with the intralesional steroid, need also be done so that if found affective will be able to deal with the pathological scar as a 1 st line therapeutic drug. With a strong study design and an adequate sample size, and particularly in a specialized tertiary care clinical setup, Our study, seeks to get over the aforementioned limitations, and will delineates the appropriate guidelines for the management of these pathological scars, and suggest option with the best outcomes, as well as lesser side effects and recurrence rates.

The Efficacy of Intralesional Bleomycinin treatment of keloids

Group B will be given injection Bleomycin 1.5 IU /ml (15 units vial dilution in 10ml Normal saline) 1 ml of this 1cm apart intralesionally as 0.1- 0.2ml/cm2 with max dose of 5ml per session and repeat after 2 weeks. Treatment will be given in two groups by a researcher blinded of the treatment being given in each group. POSAS patient and observer scar scale will be used to assess the keloids at 0, 2, 4, 6, 8, 10, and 12 weeks and during follow ups afterwards, assessments will be carried out by another researcher who will assess the improvement on the scale of 0-no improvement, to excellent-75-100% improvement in terms of POSAS variables.

Group Type EXPERIMENTAL

intralesional bleomycin

Intervention Type DRUG

The role of intralesional bleomycin for the treatment of keloids needs further establishment in terms of effective concentration, number of sessions and post treatment ulceration or/and hypopigmentation. Additionally, its comparison to the commonly used and proven, more effective combination than intralesional steroid alone i-e 5-FU in combination with the intralesional steroid, need also be done so that if found affective will be able to deal with the pathological scar as a 1 st line therapeutic drug. With a strong study design and an adequate sample size, and particularly in a specialized tertiary care clinical setup, Our study, seeks to get over the aforementioned limitations, and will delineates the appropriate guidelines for the management of these pathological scars, and suggest option with the best outcomes, as well as lesser side effects and recurrence rates.

Interventions

Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.

intralesional bleomycin

The role of intralesional bleomycin for the treatment of keloids needs further establishment in terms of effective concentration, number of sessions and post treatment ulceration or/and hypopigmentation. Additionally, its comparison to the commonly used and proven, more effective combination than intralesional steroid alone i-e 5-FU in combination with the intralesional steroid, need also be done so that if found affective will be able to deal with the pathological scar as a 1 st line therapeutic drug. With a strong study design and an adequate sample size, and particularly in a specialized tertiary care clinical setup, Our study, seeks to get over the aforementioned limitations, and will delineates the appropriate guidelines for the management of these pathological scars, and suggest option with the best outcomes, as well as lesser side effects and recurrence rates.

Intervention Type DRUG

5-flourouracil and triamcinolone acetonide

The role of intralesional bleomycin for the treatment of keloids needs further establishment in terms of effective concentration, number of sessions and post treatment ulceration or/and hypopigmentation. Additionally, its comparison to the commonly used and proven, more effective combination than intralesional steroid alone i-e 5-FU in combination with the intralesional steroid, need also be done so that if found affective will be able to deal with the pathological scar as a 1 st line therapeutic drug. With a strong study design and an adequate sample size, and particularly in a specialized tertiary care clinical setup, Our study, seeks to get over the aforementioned limitations, and will delineates the appropriate guidelines for the management of these pathological scars, and suggest option with the best outcomes, as well as lesser side effects and recurrence rates.

Intervention Type DRUG

Eligibility Criteria

Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.

Inclusion Criteria

* All, patients aged 13-60 years of age, either gender enrolled for Keloid treatment under local anaesthesia.

Exclusion Criteria

* Allergic to bleomycin, 5-FU DIABETICS VASCULAR INSUFFICIENCY AT THE AFFECTED SITE
Minimum Eligible Age

13 Years

Maximum Eligible Age

60 Years

Eligible Sex

ALL

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Sponsors

Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.

King Edward Medical University

OTHER

Sponsor Role lead

Responsible Party

Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.

Shumaila Dogar

Consultant

Responsibility Role PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR

Locations

Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.

King Edward Medical University

Lahore, , Pakistan

Site Status

Countries

Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.

Pakistan

Central Contacts

Reach out to these primary contacts for questions about participation or study logistics.

Sayyeda Ifrah Ali, MBBS

Role: CONTACT

+923078696383

References

Explore related publications, articles, or registry entries linked to this study.

Khan HA, Sahibzada MN, Paracha MM. Comparison of the efficacy of intralesional bleomycin versus intralesional triamcinolone acetonide in the treatment of keloids. Dermatol Ther. 2019 Sep;32(5):e13036. doi: 10.1111/dth.13036. Epub 2019 Aug 8.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 31361934 (View on PubMed)

Bijlard E, Kouwenberg CA, Timman R, Hovius SE, Busschbach JJ, Mureau MA. Burden of Keloid Disease: A Cross-sectional Health-related Quality of Life Assessment. Acta Derm Venereol. 2017 Feb 8;97(2):225-229. doi: 10.2340/00015555-2498.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 27378582 (View on PubMed)

Moravej H, Forghanian A, Dadkhahfar S, Mozafari N. Intralesional bleomycin versus intralesional triamcinolone in the treatment of keloids and hypertrophic scars. Dermatol Ther. 2022 Sep;35(9):e15730. doi: 10.1111/dth.15730. Epub 2022 Aug 3.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 35871490 (View on PubMed)

Other Identifiers

Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.

645/RC/KEMU

Identifier Type: -

Identifier Source: org_study_id

More Related Trials

Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.