Study Results
The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.
Basic Information
Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.
COMPLETED
NA
17 participants
INTERVENTIONAL
2020-08-24
2022-12-20
Brief Summary
Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.
While the KT1000 and GNRB have previously been compared in several studies, it's mostly been compared in healthy subjects. The current study aim to analyse the results in a clinical environment on injured objects and compare the results both before and after ACL reconstruction. The main hypothesis was that the GNRB offers high inter-rater reliability between two examinors and can replace the KT1000 in the everyday clinical setting.
Methods Consecutively, 20 patients \> 18 years of age, 12 men and 8 women, with an ACL injury scheduled for surgical reconstruction, were included. All patients were screened between August 2020-2021 at the NU Hospital Group in Trollhattan, Sweden. To be eligible, the patients had to present with a first time ACL injury verified by clinical examination with or without an magnetic resonance imaging, a healthy contralateral knee and to not have sustained multi-ligament injuries to the knee. Minor collateral ligament injuries and meniscal and cartilage injuries were included.
All patients received both spoken and written information before signing an informed consent. The study was approved by the Swedish ethical committee.
All patients were examined both pre- and postoperatively, in accordance with local standard protocol, including range of motion, knee laxity measurements (manual Lachman test, pivot shift test) The participants were examined starting with the healthy/uninjured knee. Who of the two examinors started the testing was randomly decided, however alternated at the follow-up. Clinical examination and KT1000 testing were only performed by examiner 2, given the need for experience with the KT1000 for accurate results.
Statistically, a side-to-side difference (SSD) of 3 mm was set to indicate ACL injury according to general concensus. For the dichotomous values, an SSD of ≥3 mm was considered a yes to ACL injury and \<3mm a no, respectively, for both the GNRB and the KT1000.
A power analysis was performed estimating a difference of 1 mm between examiners with an SD of 1 mm, resulting in 17 patients needed to reach a power of 80% with a significance level of 0.05.
As for the inter-rater reliability, the intra-correlation coefficient (ICC) was calculated and considered poor (\<0.5), moderate (0.5-0.75), good (0.75-0.9) or excellent (\>0.9).
Related Clinical Trials
Explore similar clinical trials based on study characteristics and research focus.
Aquamid Reconstruction for Osteoarthritis of the Knee
NCT03067090
Non-Invasive Distractor During Knee Arthroscopy
NCT06458816
Post-Market Study of Robotic-Arm Assisted Total Knee Arthroplasty
NCT03106558
Diagnostic Knee Needle Arthroscopy in Predicting Unicompartmental Knee Osteoarthritis
NCT05002387
DIGITAL-KNEE Study: Adequately Diagnosing Total Knee Arthroplasty Loosening by Evaluating the AtMoves Knee System in a Routine Clinical Setting
NCT06839807
Detailed Description
Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.
Conditions
See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.
Study Design
Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.
NA
SINGLE_GROUP
OTHER
NONE
Study Groups
Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.
GNRB arthrometer
Reliability testing GNRB arthrometer between two examinors
Knee laxity arthrometer
Inter-reliability analysis of the GNRB arthrometer between two examinors compared to standard KT 1000 arthrometer
Interventions
Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.
Knee laxity arthrometer
Inter-reliability analysis of the GNRB arthrometer between two examinors compared to standard KT 1000 arthrometer
Eligibility Criteria
Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.
Inclusion Criteria
Exclusion Criteria
18 Years
ALL
No
Sponsors
Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.
Vastra Gotaland Region
OTHER_GOV
Responsible Party
Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.
Ninni Sernert
Professor, Research director
Locations
Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.
NU Hospital Group
Trollhättan, Europe, Sweden
Countries
Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.
Other Identifiers
Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.
Dnr 2020-02062
Identifier Type: -
Identifier Source: org_study_id
More Related Trials
Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.