Study Results
The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.
Basic Information
Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.
RECRUITING
128 participants
OBSERVATIONAL
2025-09-27
2026-01-15
Brief Summary
Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.
Related Clinical Trials
Explore similar clinical trials based on study characteristics and research focus.
High-dose Chemotherapy+G-CSF in Peripheral Blood Stem Cell Mobilization in Patients With Multiple Myeloma
NCT05517213
Comparison Study of EAP and CG Regimens for Mobilizing Hematopoietic Stem Cells in Multiple Myeloma Patients
NCT06520176
Acupuncture as add-on to G-CSF for Febrile Neutropenia-related Hospitalization in Doxorubicin-treated Patients With Sarcoma
NCT06500715
Safety Study of Parathyroid Hormone in Patients Needing Additional Stem Cell Mobilization.
NCT00299780
Clinical Study of Thiopegfilgrastim for Preventing Bone Marrow Suppression in Thoracic Tumor Chemoradiotherapy
NCT07205536
Detailed Description
Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.
Study Cohort:
All enrolled patients will be adults (aged 18-70 years) with histologically or cytologically confirmed solid tumors receiving chemotherapy with prophylactic G-CSF (filgrastim, pegfilgrastim, or lipegfilgrastim). Participants will be consecutively recruited and assessed for bone pain and supportive care needs before and one week after G-CSF administration. If different G-CSF agents are used, subgroup analyses will be performed according to the type of G-CSF received.
Study Design and Visits:
Eligible patients will be assessed at baseline (before G-CSF administration) and one week after G-CSF. Data will include demographic and clinical characteristics, treatment details, laboratory parameters, and patient-reported outcomes. Pain intensity will be measured using the Visual Analog Scale (VAS), with scores ranging from 0 (no pain) to 10 (worst possible pain). A ≥20% reduction will be considered a clinically meaningful improvement.
Patient-Reported Outcomes and Validation:
EORTC QLQ-C30 (Quality of Life Questionnaire-Core 30): Validated in Turkish cancer populations. Scores range from 0-100; higher functional and global health scores indicate better outcomes, whereas higher symptom scores reflect greater symptom burden.
FACT-G (Functional Assessment of Cancer Therapy-General): Turkish validation is available. Scores range from 0-108; higher scores indicate better overall quality of life.
FACT-F (Fatigue Subscale): Part of the FACT measurement system, validated in Turkish cancer patients. Scores range from 0-52; higher scores indicate lower fatigue severity.
PHQ-9 (Patient Health Questionnaire-9): Turkish validation established. Scores range from 0-27. Cut-offs: 5-9 mild, 10-14 moderate, 15-19 moderately severe, ≥20 severe depression.
GAD-7 (Generalized Anxiety Disorder-7): Validated in Turkish. Scores range from 0-21. Cut-offs: 5 mild, 10 moderate, ≥15 severe anxiety.
Beck Depression Inventory (BDI): Validated Turkish version used. Scores range 0-63. Cut-offs: 0-9 minimal, 10-18 mild, 19-29 moderate, 30-63 severe depression.
PSQI (Pittsburgh Sleep Quality Index): Turkish validation established. Global scores range from 0-21; scores \>5 indicate poor sleep quality.
Study Outcomes:
The primary outcome is the change in VAS bone pain scores from baseline to one week after G-CSF administration. Secondary outcomes include changes in QLQ-C30, FACT-G, FACT-F, PHQ-9, GAD-7, BDI, and PSQI scores. Analgesic use and correlations between demographic/clinical features (age, ECOG status, tumor type) and supportive care strategies will also be explored.
Significance:
This study is expected to generate real-world evidence on the prevalence, severity, and management of G-CSF-induced bone pain in patients with solid tumors. Incorporating validated patient-reported outcome tools with established cut-offs ensures methodological rigor and facilitates cross-study comparability. Results may guide clinicians in selecting effective supportive interventions, reduce symptom burden, and improve adherence to chemotherapy.
Conditions
See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.
Study Design
Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.
COHORT
PROSPECTIVE
Study Groups
Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.
Patients Receiving G-CSF During Chemotherapy
Adult patients (aged 18-70 years) with histologically or cytologically confirmed solid tumors who are receiving chemotherapy with prophylactic G-CSF (granulocyte colony-stimulating factor). Patients are consecutively enrolled and assessed for bone pain and supportive care needs before and one week after G-CSF administration.
Granulocyte colony-stimulating factor (G-CSF)
Patients receive chemotherapy with prophylactic G-CSF (granulocyte colony-stimulating factor) as part of routine clinical care. Both short-acting (filgrastim) and long-acting formulations (pegfilgrastim, lipegfilgrastim) may be used according to standard oncology practice. The study does not assign the intervention but observes supportive care strategies and patient-reported outcomes related to G-CSF-induced bone pain.
Supportive Care (Analgesic and Non-Pharmacological Strategies)
Supportive care strategies including analgesic use (NSAIDs, opioids, antihistamines) and non-pharmacological interventions (rest, exercise, local heat/cold, relaxation techniques) will be recorded as part of routine practice. The study does not randomize or assign supportive care but documents their use and association with bone pain outcomes.
Interventions
Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.
Granulocyte colony-stimulating factor (G-CSF)
Patients receive chemotherapy with prophylactic G-CSF (granulocyte colony-stimulating factor) as part of routine clinical care. Both short-acting (filgrastim) and long-acting formulations (pegfilgrastim, lipegfilgrastim) may be used according to standard oncology practice. The study does not assign the intervention but observes supportive care strategies and patient-reported outcomes related to G-CSF-induced bone pain.
Supportive Care (Analgesic and Non-Pharmacological Strategies)
Supportive care strategies including analgesic use (NSAIDs, opioids, antihistamines) and non-pharmacological interventions (rest, exercise, local heat/cold, relaxation techniques) will be recorded as part of routine practice. The study does not randomize or assign supportive care but documents their use and association with bone pain outcomes.
Other Intervention Names
Discover alternative or legacy names that may be used to describe the listed interventions across different sources.
Eligibility Criteria
Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.
Inclusion Criteria
* Histologically or cytologically confirmed solid tumor
* Receiving chemotherapy with prophylactic or secondary prophylactic G-CSF (filgrastim, pegfilgrastim, or lipegfilgrastim)
* ECOG performance status 0-3
* Able to complete patient-reported outcome questionnaires (VAS, QLQ-C30, FACT-G, FACT-F, PHQ-9, GAD-7, BDI, PSQI)
* Written informed consent provided
Exclusion Criteria
* Use of NSAIDs, opioids, or antihistamines within 48 hours prior to G-CSF administration
* Patients not indicated for G-CSF prophylaxis
* Severe cognitive impairment or communication barrier preventing completion of questionnaires
* Active concurrent malignancy requiring systemic therapy
* Known hypersensitivity to G-CSF or supportive care medications
* Investigator judgment that participation may compromise data integrity or patient safety
* ECOG performance status 4
18 Years
70 Years
ALL
No
Sponsors
Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.
Ankara Etlik City Hospital
OTHER_GOV
Responsible Party
Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.
Galip Can Uyar
Medical Oncology Specialist
Principal Investigators
Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.
Enes Yeşilbaş, MD
Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR
Etlik City Hospital Medical Oncology Department
Locations
Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.
Etlik City Hospital Medical Oncology Department
Ankara, Yenimahalle, Turkey (Türkiye)
Countries
Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.
Central Contacts
Reach out to these primary contacts for questions about participation or study logistics.
Facility Contacts
Find local site contact details for specific facilities participating in the trial.
Other Identifiers
Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.
AEŞH-EK-2025-196
Identifier Type: OTHER
Identifier Source: secondary_id
AEŞH-EK-2025-196
Identifier Type: -
Identifier Source: org_study_id
More Related Trials
Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.