Sub-threshold DRG Stimulation vs Sham in Established Responders
NCT ID: NCT07170722
Last Updated: 2025-12-05
Study Results
The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.
Basic Information
Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.
COMPLETED
NA
20 participants
INTERVENTIONAL
2025-09-01
2025-11-30
Brief Summary
Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.
* Does sub-threshold DRG stimulation reduce daily pain intensity compared with sham stimulation?
* How does sub-threshold stimulation affect sleep, mood, and daily activity?
Researchers will compare active sub-threshold DRG stimulation to sham (device switched off) to see if stimulation has a genuine effect on pain and wellbeing.
Participants will:
* Be randomly assigned to receive either active sub-threshold DRG stimulation or sham stimulation for 5 days, followed by the opposite condition for another 5 days.
* Complete short electronic diaries twice daily about their pain, sleep, mood, and activity.
* Attend study visits for safety checks and assessments.
Related Clinical Trials
Explore similar clinical trials based on study characteristics and research focus.
TransGrade Multimodal Neuromodulation of the Dorsal Root Ganglion Ensemble for Refractory Neuropathic Pain
NCT03318250
Intermittent Dosing of Dorsal Root Ganglion Stimulation as an Alternate Paradigm to Continuous Low-Frequency Therapy
NCT04909138
Theta Burst Brain Stimulation in Diabetic Neuropathy Patients With Neuropathic Pain: Investigating Neural Mechanisms
NCT04988321
Effects of Repetitive Electric Sensory Stimulation (RSS) as Intervention in Complex-regional-pain-syndrome Type I (CRPS)
NCT01915329
Comparative Study in Patients With Refractory Chronic Lower Limb Neuropathic Pain and/or Back Neuropathic Pain.
NCT04852107
Detailed Description
Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.
Over the past decade, DRGS has become an established treatment for conditions such as complex regional pain syndrome (CRPS), causalgia, chronic low back pain, and post-surgical neuropathic pain. Modern programming favors sub-threshold settings, in which stimulation is delivered below the level that causes tingling sensations (paresthesias). Although widely adopted, the specific contribution of sub-threshold stimulation has never been confirmed in a sham-controlled trial.
This study is the first randomized, double-blind, sham-controlled trial to directly evaluate whether sub-threshold DRG stimulation provides pain relief beyond placebo. Adults with an implanted DRG stimulator who have shown sustained pain relief will be randomized in a two-period crossover design to receive either active sub-threshold stimulation or sham stimulation, each for 5 days, with a washout period in between.
The primary objective is to determine whether sub-threshold DRG stimulation reduces mean daily pain intensity compared with sham. Secondary objectives include assessing sleep quality, mood, daily activity, and safety/tolerability. Exploratory measures include device logs and rescue medication use.
The findings of this trial will provide critical evidence on the efficacy of sub-threshold DRG stimulation, helping to inform clinical guidelines, payer decisions, and neuromodulation programming strategies worldwide.
Conditions
See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.
Study Design
Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.
RANDOMIZED
CROSSOVER
TREATMENT
QUADRUPLE
Study Groups
Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.
Subtreshhold DRG-S
Active Sub-threshold DRG Stimulation Participants receive sub-threshold dorsal root ganglion (DRG) stimulation. Device amplitude is individually titrated to 80% of the perception threshold, ensuring no paresthesia is felt. Frequency and pulse width remain unchanged from each participant's established clinical settings. Stimulation is delivered continuously for 5 days.
Subtreshhold DRG-S
Continuous electrical stimulation delivered through an implanted DRG neurostimulator. Amplitude is set individually to 80% of each participant's perception threshold, ensuring no paresthesia is produced. Frequency and pulse width remain unchanged from the participant's established therapeutic settings. This sub-threshold programming distinguishes the intervention from suprathreshold (paresthesia-based) DRG stimulation used in earlier studies.
Sham
Sham Stimulation Participants receive sham stimulation. The implanted DRG stimulator is switched off, with device interrogation logs masked to maintain blinding. The sham condition lasts for 5 days.
Sham
The implanted DRG stimulator remains switched off for the entire 5-day period. Device interrogation logs are masked to maintain blinding. No electrical stimulation is delivered, allowing a placebo-controlled comparison with active sub-threshold stimulation.
Interventions
Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.
Subtreshhold DRG-S
Continuous electrical stimulation delivered through an implanted DRG neurostimulator. Amplitude is set individually to 80% of each participant's perception threshold, ensuring no paresthesia is produced. Frequency and pulse width remain unchanged from the participant's established therapeutic settings. This sub-threshold programming distinguishes the intervention from suprathreshold (paresthesia-based) DRG stimulation used in earlier studies.
Sham
The implanted DRG stimulator remains switched off for the entire 5-day period. Device interrogation logs are masked to maintain blinding. No electrical stimulation is delivered, allowing a placebo-controlled comparison with active sub-threshold stimulation.
Eligibility Criteria
Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.
Inclusion Criteria
* Implanted with a dorsal root ganglion (DRG) stimulator for chronic neuropathic pain
* Have experienced at least 50% reduction in pain for 3 months or longer on standard DRG therapy
* Stable pain medication regimen for at least 4 weeks before enrollment
* Able and willing to complete electronic diaries and attend study visits
Exclusion Criteria
* Significant psychiatric illness (for example, uncontrolled depression or psychosis)
* Planned surgery, device reprogramming, or medication changes during the study period
* Currently pregnant or breastfeeding
* Occurrence of any adverse event that meets predefined withdrawal criteria during the study (such as intolerable pain or device-related complications)
18 Years
ALL
No
Sponsors
Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.
Umeå University
OTHER
Responsible Party
Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.
Principal Investigators
Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.
Pedram Tabatabaei Tabatabaei, M.D, Ph.D
Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR
Univeristy hospital of northern sweden
Locations
Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.
Neurokirurgiska kliniken. Neuromodulationsenheten
Umeå, Västerbotten County, Sweden
Countries
Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.
References
Explore related publications, articles, or registry entries linked to this study.
Huygen FJPM, Kallewaard JW, Nijhuis H, Liem L, Vesper J, Fahey ME, Blomme B, Morgalla MH, Deer TR, Capobianco RA. Effectiveness and Safety of Dorsal Root Ganglion Stimulation for the Treatment of Chronic Pain: A Pooled Analysis. Neuromodulation. 2020 Feb;23(2):213-221. doi: 10.1111/ner.13074. Epub 2019 Nov 15.
D'Souza RS, Kubrova E, Her YF, Barman RA, Smith BJ, Alvarez GM, West TE, Abd-Elsayed A. Dorsal Root Ganglion Stimulation for Lower Extremity Neuropathic Pain Syndromes: An Evidence-Based Literature Review. Adv Ther. 2022 Oct;39(10):4440-4473. doi: 10.1007/s12325-022-02244-9. Epub 2022 Aug 22.
Deer TR, Levy RM, Kramer J, Poree L, Amirdelfan K, Grigsby E, Staats P, Burton AW, Burgher AH, Obray J, Scowcroft J, Golovac S, Kapural L, Paicius R, Kim C, Pope J, Yearwood T, Samuel S, McRoberts WP, Cassim H, Netherton M, Miller N, Schaufele M, Tavel E, Davis T, Davis K, Johnson L, Mekhail N. Dorsal root ganglion stimulation yielded higher treatment success rate for complex regional pain syndrome and causalgia at 3 and 12 months: a randomized comparative trial. Pain. 2017 Apr;158(4):669-681. doi: 10.1097/j.pain.0000000000000814.
Chapman KB, Sayed D, Lamer T, Hunter C, Weisbein J, Patel KV, Dickerson D, Hagedorn JM, Lee DW, Amirdelfan K, Deer T, Chakravarthy K. Best Practices for Dorsal Root Ganglion Stimulation for Chronic Pain: Guidelines from the American Society of Pain and Neuroscience. J Pain Res. 2023 Mar 14;16:839-879. doi: 10.2147/JPR.S364370. eCollection 2023.
Piedade GS, Gillner S, McPhillips PS, Vesper J, Slotty PJ. Effect of low-frequency dorsal root ganglion stimulation in the treatment of chronic pain. Acta Neurochir (Wien). 2023 Apr;165(4):947-952. doi: 10.1007/s00701-023-05500-1. Epub 2023 Jan 27.
Provided Documents
Download supplemental materials such as informed consent forms, study protocols, or participant manuals.
Document Type: Study Protocol and Statistical Analysis Plan
Other Identifiers
Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.
DRG-SHAM-2025
Identifier Type: -
Identifier Source: org_study_id
More Related Trials
Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.