Early Versus Delayed Cholecystectomy After Percutaneous Cholecystostomy in Moderate and Severe Cholecystitis (ESCAPE)

NCT ID: NCT07161960

Last Updated: 2025-09-25

Study Results

Results pending

The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.

Basic Information

Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.

Recruitment Status

RECRUITING

Clinical Phase

NA

Total Enrollment

64 participants

Study Classification

INTERVENTIONAL

Study Start Date

2025-07-01

Study Completion Date

2027-11-01

Brief Summary

Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.

Abstract:

Acute cholecystitis (AC) is typically managed according to the 2018 Tokyo Guidelines, with treatment strategies determined by the severity of the disease, patient comorbidities, and hospital capabilities. In cases of moderate AC, treatment options include antibiotics with delayed laparoscopic cholecystectomy (LC), antibiotics with early LC, or antibiotics with percutaneous cholecystostomy (PCC) followed by delayed LC. However, the Toyo Guideline 2018 suggested that there is a lack of consensus regarding the optimal timing for surgery following PCC due to insufficient scientific evidence. In practice, delayed LC is often performed approximately 6 weeks after PCC insertion.

While PCC can serve as a treatment option before definite surgery, complications such as tube dislodgment, obstruction, and failure to ambulate are common, leading to further hospital admissions and increased comorbidities. The ESCAPE trial was conducted to evaluate the optimal timing for LC following PCC in moderate and severe forms of acute cholecystitis, with the goal of improving treatment standards and reducing complications associated with PCC retention. We hypothesize that early LC after PCC insertion will be a feasible and effective alternative.

Methods:

This prospective, randomized controlled trial enrolled patients diagnosed with moderate to severe acute cholecystitis who underwent PCC. Clinical manifestations and laboratory parameters were monitored for 72 hours following PCC insertion. Patients demonstrating clinical or laboratory improvement were subsequently randomized into two groups: early LC and delayed LC.

* Early LC group: Laparoscopic cholecystectomy was performed during the same hospitalization.
* Delayed LC group: Laparoscopic cholecystectomy was performed more than 6 weeks after PCC insertion.

The primary endpoint/outcome is comprehensive complication index (CCI) from PCC and LC. Secondary endpoints include Nasaar Difficulty Scoring, length of hospital stay, rate of subtotal cholecystectomy, rate of conversion to open cholecystectomy and incidence of bile duct injury.

Results and Discussion:

The results of this study will provide valuable insights into the timing of LC following PCC and may influence future treatment protocols for moderate and severe acute cholecystitis. By assessing the feasibility and safety of early LC after PCC insertion, the ESCAPE trial aims to reduce the burden of PCC-related complications and optimize patient outcomes.

Detailed Description

Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.

Conditions

See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.

Acute Cholecystitis Percutaneous Cholecystostomy Laparoscopic Cholecystectomy

Study Design

Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.

Allocation Method

RANDOMIZED

Intervention Model

PARALLEL

Primary Study Purpose

TREATMENT

Blinding Strategy

SINGLE

Outcome Assessors

Study Groups

Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.

Early Laparoscopic Cholecystectomy

The patients will undergo laparoscopic cholecystectomy (LC) within the same admission of PCC and after PCC for 72 hours, usually not more than 2 weeks.

Group Type EXPERIMENTAL

Laparoscopic cholecystectomy

Intervention Type PROCEDURE

Laparoscopic cholecystectomy is the definite treatment for acute cholecystitis. According to Tokyo Guideline 2018, the proper timing of delay LC remains unclear due to lack to proper evidence.

Delay Laparoscopic Cholecystectomy

The patients will undergo laparoscopic cholecystectomy (LC) after 6 weeks from PCC insertion, avoiding active inflammation and swelling

Group Type EXPERIMENTAL

Laparoscopic cholecystectomy

Intervention Type PROCEDURE

Laparoscopic cholecystectomy is the definite treatment for acute cholecystitis. According to Tokyo Guideline 2018, the proper timing of delay LC remains unclear due to lack to proper evidence.

Interventions

Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.

Laparoscopic cholecystectomy

Laparoscopic cholecystectomy is the definite treatment for acute cholecystitis. According to Tokyo Guideline 2018, the proper timing of delay LC remains unclear due to lack to proper evidence.

Intervention Type PROCEDURE

Eligibility Criteria

Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.

Inclusion Criteria

* The patients are diagnosed moderate or severe from of acute cholecystitis according to Tokyo Guideline 2018.
* PCC insertion was performed by body interventionists or surgeons.
* Laparoscopic cholecystectomy will be performed in Maharaj Nakorn Chiang Mai Hospital, Lampang Hospital and Phrae Hospital.
* Age equal or more than 20 years-old

Exclusion Criteria

* The patients that suspected CBD stone and need to undergo EUS / ERCP.
* Coincidence perihepatic abscess or liver abscess
* The patients with active or severe underlying disease, whom specialists suggest to postpone an operation.
Minimum Eligible Age

20 Years

Eligible Sex

ALL

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Sponsors

Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.

Chiang Mai University

OTHER

Sponsor Role collaborator

Lampang Hospital

OTHER

Sponsor Role collaborator

Phrae Hospital

UNKNOWN

Sponsor Role collaborator

Maharaj Nakorn Chiang Mai Hospital

OTHER

Sponsor Role collaborator

Yada Suwan

OTHER

Sponsor Role lead

Responsible Party

Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.

Yada Suwan

Yada Suwan, Doctor of Medicine

Responsibility Role SPONSOR_INVESTIGATOR

Locations

Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.

Faculty of Medicine, Chiang Mai University 110 Inthawarorot Road, Sri Phum, Mueang, Chiang Mai 50200, Thailand

Chiang Mai, , Thailand

Site Status RECRUITING

Countries

Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.

Thailand

Central Contacts

Reach out to these primary contacts for questions about participation or study logistics.

Yada Suwan, Doctor of Medicine

Role: CONTACT

+66 084-6561191

Facility Contacts

Find local site contact details for specific facilities participating in the trial.

Yada Suwan, Doctor of Medicine

Role: primary

+66 084-6561191

References

Explore related publications, articles, or registry entries linked to this study.

Yamazaki S, Shimizu A, Kubota K, Notake T, Yoshizawa T, Masuo H, Sakai H, Hosoda K, Hayashi H, Yasukawa K, Umemura K, Kamachi A, Goto T, Tomida H, Seki H, Shimura M, Soejima Y. Urgent versus elective laparoscopic cholecystectomy following percutaneous transhepatic gallbladder drainage for high-risk grade II acute cholecystitis. Asian J Surg. 2023 Jan;46(1):431-437. doi: 10.1016/j.asjsur.2022.05.046. Epub 2022 May 21.

Reference Type RESULT
PMID: 35610148 (View on PubMed)

Woodward SG, Rios-Diaz AJ, Zheng R, McPartland C, Tholey R, Tatarian T, Palazzo F. Finding the Most Favorable Timing for Cholecystectomy after Percutaneous Cholecystostomy Tube Placement: An Analysis of Institutional and National Data. J Am Coll Surg. 2021 Jan;232(1):55-64. doi: 10.1016/j.jamcollsurg.2020.10.010. Epub 2020 Oct 21.

Reference Type RESULT
PMID: 33098966 (View on PubMed)

Okamoto K, Suzuki K, Takada T, Strasberg SM, Asbun HJ, Endo I, Iwashita Y, Hibi T, Pitt HA, Umezawa A, Asai K, Han HS, Hwang TL, Mori Y, Yoon YS, Huang WS, Belli G, Dervenis C, Yokoe M, Kiriyama S, Itoi T, Jagannath P, Garden OJ, Miura F, Nakamura M, Horiguchi A, Wakabayashi G, Cherqui D, de Santibanes E, Shikata S, Noguchi Y, Ukai T, Higuchi R, Wada K, Honda G, Supe AN, Yoshida M, Mayumi T, Gouma DJ, Deziel DJ, Liau KH, Chen MF, Shibao K, Liu KH, Su CH, Chan ACW, Yoon DS, Choi IS, Jonas E, Chen XP, Fan ST, Ker CG, Gimenez ME, Kitano S, Inomata M, Hirata K, Inui K, Sumiyama Y, Yamamoto M. Tokyo Guidelines 2018: flowchart for the management of acute cholecystitis. J Hepatobiliary Pancreat Sci. 2018 Jan;25(1):55-72. doi: 10.1002/jhbp.516. Epub 2017 Dec 20.

Reference Type RESULT
PMID: 29045062 (View on PubMed)

Molavi I, Schellenberg A, Christian F. Clinical and operative outcomes of patients with acute cholecystitis who are treated initially with image-guided cholecystostomy. Can J Surg. 2018 Jun;61(3):195-199. doi: 10.1503/cjs.003517.

Reference Type RESULT
PMID: 29806817 (View on PubMed)

Bao J, Wang J, Shang H, Hao C, Liu J, Zhang D, Han S, Li Z. The choice of operation timing of laparoscopic cholecystectomy (LC) after percutaneous transhepatic gallbladder drainage (PTGBD) for acute cholecystitis: a retrospective clinical analysis. Ann Palliat Med. 2021 Aug;10(8):9096-9104. doi: 10.21037/apm-21-1906.

Reference Type RESULT
PMID: 34488395 (View on PubMed)

Lyu Y, Li T, Wang B, Cheng Y. Early laparoscopic cholecystectomy after percutaneous transhepatic gallbladder drainage for acute cholecystitis. Sci Rep. 2021 Jan 28;11(1):2516. doi: 10.1038/s41598-021-82089-4.

Reference Type RESULT
PMID: 33510242 (View on PubMed)

Other Identifiers

Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.

SUR-2568-0197

Identifier Type: -

Identifier Source: org_study_id

More Related Trials

Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.

Complications of Cholecystostomy in ACC
NCT06227936 NOT_YET_RECRUITING
Bile Aspiration vs Drain in Acute Cholecystitis
NCT03012243 NOT_YET_RECRUITING NA