Evaluation of the Auryzon™ EAR 2.0 System in Ear Reconstruction

NCT ID: NCT07154667

Last Updated: 2025-12-29

Study Results

Results pending

The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.

Basic Information

Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.

Recruitment Status

RECRUITING

Clinical Phase

NA

Total Enrollment

30 participants

Study Classification

INTERVENTIONAL

Study Start Date

2025-10-01

Study Completion Date

2030-12-31

Brief Summary

Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.

This study aims to improve surgical outcomes for children and young adults with ear differences severe secondary to congenital conditions (like microtia, a condition where the ear is underdeveloped), trauma (such as dog bites), or surgical resections secondary to skin cancer. The investigators have developed a novel medical device to shape cartilage into pre-determined shapes that, once assembled, assists the surgeon in creating an anatomically accurate cartilaginous ear framework, reduce surgery time, and minimize wire need. Other factors that might affect the quality of surgical outcomes will be examined in clinical trial participants.

Detailed Description

Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.

Cartilage-based ear reconstruction addresses congenital anomalies, such as microtia, as well as deformities due to trauma or oncologic resection by replacing like with like tissue. Current technique involves the use of the autologous cartilage as the gold standard and involves harvesting patient's own rib cartilage and carving them into different ear subunits, which are then assembled with numerous steel wires. Challenges of this technique include high operator-dependency due to extensive carving, inconsistent outcomes, prolonged anesthesia, and need for wire or suture fixation, leading to wire extrusion, cartilage resorption, and overall high cost. The previously published prototype device utilized specialized blades to standardize this process. Given the complexity of auricular reconstruction and the suboptimal outcomes by most plastic surgeons globally, there is a pressing need for a standardized, enhanced and accessible method for an accurate ear framework.

If successful, this project has the potential to improve plastic surgeons' technical proficiency in producing anatomically accurate auricular frameworks. Achieving these aims could substantially advance reconstructive clinical techniques in clinical practice and broaden access to satisfactory ear reconstruction beyond the limited number of highly specialized centers. Furthermore, the novel blade design has the potential to reduce the need for wire suturing, while also reducing overall framework production time, anesthesia duration, and costs.

Comparing hand-carved and blade-cut techniques for cadaveric cartilage, the study will enhance understanding of potential differences in resorption rate between these methods. This study aims to: 1. Promote framework production through precise bladecutting, facilitating the construction of cartilaginous ear frameworks while improving outcomes and reducing operative time and costs; 2. Standardize framework production independently of operator skill. 3. Reduce the number of wires required for construct fixation, further contributing to decreased operative time and cost; 4. Minimize the risk of wire extrusion by limiting wires usage during framework production through the novel blade design. 5. Compare differences in framework appearance, stability, time to production, operative time, intraoperative morbidity, and construct resorption within the first year postoperatively when using cadaveric cartilage.

Conditions

See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.

Ear Deformities, Acquired Ear Deformity External Ear Malformation Ear Cartilage Microtia, Congenital Microtia Microtia-Anotia

Keywords

Explore important study keywords that can help with search, categorization, and topic discovery.

microtia ear reconstruction craniofacial difference anotia plastic surgery ear defect ear trauma ear deficit

Study Design

Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.

Allocation Method

NON_RANDOMIZED

Intervention Model

PARALLEL

Primary Study Purpose

TREATMENT

Blinding Strategy

NONE

Study Groups

Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.

AuryzoN™ EAR 2.0 arm

Participants in the AuryzoN™ EAR 2.0 arm will receive ear reconstruction surgery using the AuryzoN™ EAR 2.0 device

Group Type EXPERIMENTAL

Use of AuryzoN™ EAR 2.0 device

Intervention Type PROCEDURE

AuryzoN™ EAR 2.0 is an investigational non-significant risk device developed to improve cartilage construct shape and stability prior to use in ear reconstructive surgery.

Hand Carved

Participants in this arm will receive ear reconstruction surgery using the hand carved technique

Group Type ACTIVE_COMPARATOR

Hand carving

Intervention Type PROCEDURE

Standard hand carving using standard surgical blades will be performed in this intervention arm of the study.

Interventions

Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.

Use of AuryzoN™ EAR 2.0 device

AuryzoN™ EAR 2.0 is an investigational non-significant risk device developed to improve cartilage construct shape and stability prior to use in ear reconstructive surgery.

Intervention Type PROCEDURE

Hand carving

Standard hand carving using standard surgical blades will be performed in this intervention arm of the study.

Intervention Type PROCEDURE

Eligibility Criteria

Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.

Inclusion Criteria

* Patients aged 5-20 years seeking to undergo surgical ear reconstruction or microtia repair under general anesthesia through NCH-FL
* Pre-existing physical deformity of the ear necessitating surgical reconstruction
* Patient of sufficient health to undergo surgery under general anesthesia
* Parental or legally acceptable representative (LAR) permission obtained for inclusion in the study; patient assent obtained where age-appropriate
* Sufficient fluency in English or Spanish to complete patient/parent surveys

Exclusion Criteria

* Patients who will be ≤4 years old, or ≥21 years old at time of surgery
* Patients with ear deformities do not require surgical correction
* Patient's whose ear reconstruction surgery will be performed somewhere other than Nemours Children's Hospital - Florida
* Patients determined to be in poor health to undergo surgery under general anesthesia
* Parental or LAR permission cannot be obtained, and/or patient of sufficient age and cognitive capacity declines to assent
* Lack of fluency in English or Spanish to complete patient/parent surveys
Minimum Eligible Age

5 Years

Maximum Eligible Age

20 Years

Eligible Sex

ALL

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Sponsors

Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.

Nemours Children's Clinic

OTHER

Sponsor Role lead

Responsible Party

Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.

Angelo Leto barone

Craniofacial and Pediatric Plastic Surgeon

Responsibility Role PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR

Principal Investigators

Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.

Angelo A Leto Barone, MD

Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR

Nemours Children's Hospital, Florida

Locations

Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.

Nemours Children's Hospital, Florida

Orlando, Florida, United States

Site Status RECRUITING

Countries

Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.

United States

Central Contacts

Reach out to these primary contacts for questions about participation or study logistics.

Heaven Sippio - Executive Assistant

Role: CONTACT

Phone: 407-650-7358

Email: [email protected]

Ishpriya Sharma - Research Project Specialist, PhD

Role: CONTACT

Email: [email protected]

Facility Contacts

Find local site contact details for specific facilities participating in the trial.

Heaven Sippio, Executive Assistant

Role: primary

References

Explore related publications, articles, or registry entries linked to this study.

Su-Genyk P, Quatela O, Quatela V. Our Evolution of Approaches to Microtia Reconstruction. Facial Plast Surg Clin North Am. 2024 Feb;32(1):105-125. doi: 10.1016/j.fsc.2023.09.002.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 37981407 (View on PubMed)

Tanzer RC. Microtia--a long-term follow-up of 44 reconstructed auricles. Plast Reconstr Surg. 1978 Feb;61(2):161-6. doi: 10.1097/00006534-197802000-00001.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 622405 (View on PubMed)

Nagata S. A new method of total reconstruction of the auricle for microtia. Plast Reconstr Surg. 1993 Aug;92(2):187-201. doi: 10.1097/00006534-199308000-00001.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 8337267 (View on PubMed)

Related Links

Access external resources that provide additional context or updates about the study.

Other Identifiers

Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.

STUDY00000371

Identifier Type: -

Identifier Source: org_study_id