Topical Versus Injection PRP for Olfactory Dysfunction

NCT ID: NCT07151703

Last Updated: 2025-09-03

Study Results

Results pending

The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.

Basic Information

Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.

Recruitment Status

NOT_YET_RECRUITING

Clinical Phase

PHASE3

Total Enrollment

60 participants

Study Classification

INTERVENTIONAL

Study Start Date

2025-10-01

Study Completion Date

2028-12-31

Brief Summary

Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.

The goal of this clinical trial is to determine whether two different delivery methods of autologous platelet-rich plasma (PRP) can improve olfactory function in adults with persistent olfactory dysfunction lasting more than three months. The main questions it aims to answer are:

1. Does carrier-assisted topical application of PRP lead to comparable or better improvement in smell function than intranasal injection of PRP?
2. Which method provides greater patient comfort and fewer adverse effects?

Researchers will compare carrier-assisted topical PRP application to intranasal PRP injection to see if one approach is more effective in restoring olfactory function.

Participants will:

1. Receive a single PRP treatment delivered either by injection or via a PRP-soaked carrier placed into the olfactory cleft.
2. Continue daily olfactory training for three months following the intervention.
3. Undergo smell testing (Sniffin' Sticks) before and after treatment and complete quality-of-life questionnaires.

Detailed Description

Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.

Persistent olfactory dysfunction (OD) is a common sequela of viral upper respiratory tract infections, including COVID-19, and can significantly affect patients' quality of life, nutrition, and safety. Current treatment options are limited, with olfactory training being the primary evidence-based non-pharmacological therapy. Autologous platelet-rich plasma (PRP) is a concentration of platelets obtained from a patient's own blood, rich in growth factors and cytokines that promote neuronal regeneration, tissue repair, and neuroplasticity. Early clinical studies suggest PRP may improve olfactory function, but the optimal method for delivering PRP to the olfactory cleft remains unknown.

This randomized controlled trial will include a total of 60 adult patients aged 18-80 years old with olfactory loss (hyposmia or anosmia) persisting for more than 3 months despite standardized olfactory training, confirmed by a reduced Sniffin' Sticks TDI score.

PRP will be prepared on-site immediately before application using a standardized centrifugation protocol to achieve a platelet concentration 2-3 times above baseline. efficacy and safety of two PRP delivery methods will be compared:

Intranasal Injection Group: Autologous PRP will be injected directly into the mucosa of the olfactory cleft under endoscopic guidance. After topical anesthesia with lidocaine spray and decongestion with oxymetazoline, a 25-gauge needle will be used to deliver approximately 1 mL of PRP into multiple sites along the superior nasal cavity bilaterally.

Carrier-Assisted Topical Application Group: Four pieces of sterile, bioabsorbable carrier (Gelfoam sponge) will be soaked with approximately 5 mL of autologous PRP. Under endoscopic guidance, two pieces of PRP-soaked carrier will be placed gently into each side of olfactory cleft, ensuring contact with the olfactory mucosa. Carriers will remain in place for a short duration to allow diffusion of PRP before dissolving naturally or being removed.

Primary Outcome: Change in TDI score from baseline to 3 months post-treatment.

Secondary Outcomes: Patient-reported olfactory-related quality of life (QOD, SNOT-22, PQ), subjective improvement ratings, 20-item retronasal olfactory test, SSParoT, procedure tolerability, and adverse event rates.

Post-intervention care: All participants will continue standardized daily olfactory training for at least 12 weeks after PRP administration. Follow-up visits at 2 weeks, 1 month and 3 months will assess smell function, symptom changes, and safety.

This study aims to determine whether carrier-assisted topical PRP application is as effective or superior to intranasal PRP injection for improving olfactory function, while potentially offering a less invasive and more tolerable treatment approach. Results will help define optimal PRP delivery strategies for olfactory rehabilitation in clinical practice.

Conditions

See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.

Olfactory Dysfunction Anosmia Hyposmia

Study Design

Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.

Allocation Method

RANDOMIZED

Intervention Model

PARALLEL

Parallel two-arm design with participants randomly assigned to either carrier-assisted topical PRP application or intranasal PRP injection. Each participant receives only one type of intervention throughout the study.
Primary Study Purpose

TREATMENT

Blinding Strategy

DOUBLE

Participants Outcome Assessors
Both participants and outcome assessors were blinded to the group assignment to minimize expectation bias. Interventions were prepared using an identical procedure to ensure blinding. The principal investigator, who was responsible for administering the intervention, was aware of group allocation. However, participants and outcome assessors had no access to allocation information throughout the study.

Study Groups

Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.

Intranasal PRP injection

Participants in this arm will receive an intranasal injection of autologous platelet-rich plasma (PRP) into the olfactory cleft. The procedure will be conducted under local anesthesia using endoscopic guidance. All participants will also perform standardized daily olfactory training for three months following the intervention.

Group Type EXPERIMENTAL

Intranasal Injection of Autologous PRP

Intervention Type PROCEDURE

Under topical anesthesia and decongestion, approximately 1 mL of freshly prepared autologous platelet-rich plasma will be injected into multiple sites of the olfactory cleft mucosa bilaterally using a 25-gauge needle under endoscopic guidance. Single treatment session.

platelet-rich plasma

Intervention Type COMBINATION_PRODUCT

This study adopts a fully automated, closed-system PRP preparation technique to ensure the stability of the blood product. A total of 60 mL of whole blood is drawn and processed using the Phoenix Q1 centrifuge (TFDA Medical Device Manufacturing License No. 004461) for blood component separation in a closed, sterile environment. An optical sensor identifies and automatically collects the buffy coat layer (rich in platelets and monocytes), yielding approximately 6 mL of autologous platelet-rich plasma (PRP). The centrifugation and PRP collection process takes about 5 minutes. Compared with traditional methods requiring manual identification and collection, this approach enhances the precision and safety of centrifugation-based preparation.

olfactory training

Intervention Type DEVICE

Participants will perform olfactory training for 12 weeks following the PRP intervention. Training is conducted twice daily using four odor bottles containing standardized odorants from Sigma-Aldrich (Germany): lemon (citronellal, #27470), rose (phenylethanol, #77861), clove (eugenol, #W246700), and eucalyptus (eucalyptol, #C80601). Each odor is sniffed gently for about 20 seconds, with a 20-second pause between bottles. Participants will record the perceived intensity of each odor in a training diary after every session.

Topical PRP application arm

Participants in this arm will receive a topical application of autologous PRP delivered via PRP-soaked absorbable material (Gelfoam) placed into the olfactory cleft. No needle will be used. The placement will be guided by nasal endoscopy under local anesthesia. Daily olfactory training will be continued for three months post-application.

Group Type EXPERIMENTAL

Carrier-Assisted Topical Application of Autologous PRP

Intervention Type PROCEDURE

Four pieces of sterile, bioabsorbable carrier (Gelfoam sponge) will be soaked with approximately 5 mL of freshly prepared autologous platelet-rich plasma. Under endoscopic guidance, two pieces will be placed gently into each olfactory cleft, ensuring contact with the olfactory mucosa. Carriers will remain briefly to allow PRP diffusion before dissolving naturally or being removed. Single treatment session.

platelet-rich plasma

Intervention Type COMBINATION_PRODUCT

This study adopts a fully automated, closed-system PRP preparation technique to ensure the stability of the blood product. A total of 60 mL of whole blood is drawn and processed using the Phoenix Q1 centrifuge (TFDA Medical Device Manufacturing License No. 004461) for blood component separation in a closed, sterile environment. An optical sensor identifies and automatically collects the buffy coat layer (rich in platelets and monocytes), yielding approximately 6 mL of autologous platelet-rich plasma (PRP). The centrifugation and PRP collection process takes about 5 minutes. Compared with traditional methods requiring manual identification and collection, this approach enhances the precision and safety of centrifugation-based preparation.

olfactory training

Intervention Type DEVICE

Participants will perform olfactory training for 12 weeks following the PRP intervention. Training is conducted twice daily using four odor bottles containing standardized odorants from Sigma-Aldrich (Germany): lemon (citronellal, #27470), rose (phenylethanol, #77861), clove (eugenol, #W246700), and eucalyptus (eucalyptol, #C80601). Each odor is sniffed gently for about 20 seconds, with a 20-second pause between bottles. Participants will record the perceived intensity of each odor in a training diary after every session.

Interventions

Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.

Intranasal Injection of Autologous PRP

Under topical anesthesia and decongestion, approximately 1 mL of freshly prepared autologous platelet-rich plasma will be injected into multiple sites of the olfactory cleft mucosa bilaterally using a 25-gauge needle under endoscopic guidance. Single treatment session.

Intervention Type PROCEDURE

Carrier-Assisted Topical Application of Autologous PRP

Four pieces of sterile, bioabsorbable carrier (Gelfoam sponge) will be soaked with approximately 5 mL of freshly prepared autologous platelet-rich plasma. Under endoscopic guidance, two pieces will be placed gently into each olfactory cleft, ensuring contact with the olfactory mucosa. Carriers will remain briefly to allow PRP diffusion before dissolving naturally or being removed. Single treatment session.

Intervention Type PROCEDURE

platelet-rich plasma

This study adopts a fully automated, closed-system PRP preparation technique to ensure the stability of the blood product. A total of 60 mL of whole blood is drawn and processed using the Phoenix Q1 centrifuge (TFDA Medical Device Manufacturing License No. 004461) for blood component separation in a closed, sterile environment. An optical sensor identifies and automatically collects the buffy coat layer (rich in platelets and monocytes), yielding approximately 6 mL of autologous platelet-rich plasma (PRP). The centrifugation and PRP collection process takes about 5 minutes. Compared with traditional methods requiring manual identification and collection, this approach enhances the precision and safety of centrifugation-based preparation.

Intervention Type COMBINATION_PRODUCT

olfactory training

Participants will perform olfactory training for 12 weeks following the PRP intervention. Training is conducted twice daily using four odor bottles containing standardized odorants from Sigma-Aldrich (Germany): lemon (citronellal, #27470), rose (phenylethanol, #77861), clove (eugenol, #W246700), and eucalyptus (eucalyptol, #C80601). Each odor is sniffed gently for about 20 seconds, with a 20-second pause between bottles. Participants will record the perceived intensity of each odor in a training diary after every session.

Intervention Type DEVICE

Eligibility Criteria

Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.

Inclusion Criteria

* Aged between 18 and 80 years, regardless of sex
* Subjective complaint of olfactory dysfunction with confirmed hyposmia or anosmia based on standardized olfactory testing
* History of at least 3 months of prior olfactory training but with persistent olfactory complaints

Exclusion Criteria

* Congenital anosmia
* Diagnosed neurological or structural brain abnormalities (e.g., brain tumor, major head trauma, stroke) with low likelihood of olfactory recovery
* Inability or unwillingness to comply with study procedures or follow-up assessments
Minimum Eligible Age

18 Years

Maximum Eligible Age

80 Years

Eligible Sex

ALL

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Sponsors

Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.

Taipei Veterans General Hospital, Taiwan

OTHER_GOV

Sponsor Role lead

Responsible Party

Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.

Yun-Ting Chao

Dr.

Responsibility Role PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR

Locations

Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.

Taipei Veterans General Hospital

Taipei, , Taiwan

Site Status

Countries

Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.

Taiwan

Central Contacts

Reach out to these primary contacts for questions about participation or study logistics.

Dr. Yun-Ting Chao Principal Investigator (Attending Physician and Head of Dep.), PhD

Role: CONTACT

886-2-2875-7337 ext. 122

Facility Contacts

Find local site contact details for specific facilities participating in the trial.

Yun-Ting Chao, MD, PhD

Role: primary

+886228757808

References

Explore related publications, articles, or registry entries linked to this study.

Bae AY, Kim DH, Hwang SH. Efficacy of Platelet-Rich Plasma in the Treatment of Persistent Olfactory Impairment After COVID-19: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis. J Rhinol. 2024 Mar;31(1):1-7. doi: 10.18787/jr.2024.00006. Epub 2024 Mar 31.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 39664044 (View on PubMed)

Duffy A, Naimi B, Garvey E, Hunter S, Kumar A, Kahn C, Farquhar D, D'Souza G, Rawson N, Dalton P, Toskala E, Rabinowitz M, Rosen M, Nyquist G, Rosen D. Topical platelet-rich plasma as a possible treatment for olfactory dysfunction-A randomized controlled trial. Int Forum Allergy Rhinol. 2024 Sep;14(9):1455-1464. doi: 10.1002/alr.23363. Epub 2024 May 9.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 38722276 (View on PubMed)

Jiang RS, Chiang YF. The Effect of Platelet-Rich Plasma and Hyaluronic Acid Nasal Injections in the Treatment of Traumatic Olfactory Dysfunction. Ear Nose Throat J. 2024 Oct 15:1455613241291710. doi: 10.1177/01455613241291710. Online ahead of print.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 39404838 (View on PubMed)

Lechien JR, Le Bon SD, Saussez S. Platelet-rich plasma injection in the olfactory clefts of COVID-19 patients with long-term olfactory dysfunction. Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol. 2023 May;280(5):2351-2358. doi: 10.1007/s00405-022-07788-8. Epub 2022 Dec 15.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 36520209 (View on PubMed)

Yan CH, Mundy DC, Patel ZM. The use of platelet-rich plasma in treatment of olfactory dysfunction: A pilot study. Laryngoscope Investig Otolaryngol. 2020 Feb 21;5(2):187-193. doi: 10.1002/lio2.357. eCollection 2020 Apr.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 32337347 (View on PubMed)

Provided Documents

Download supplemental materials such as informed consent forms, study protocols, or participant manuals.

Document Type: Study Protocol

View Document

Other Identifiers

Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.

after funding being approved

Identifier Type: OTHER_GRANT

Identifier Source: secondary_id

2025-06-010C

Identifier Type: -

Identifier Source: org_study_id

More Related Trials

Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.

PRP vs PRP+IVC for Severe nPDR
NCT03863535 UNKNOWN NA