Echo-guided Scalp Blocks and Incidence of Postoperative Pain in Scheduled Supratentorial Intracranial Surgery.

NCT ID: NCT07149077

Last Updated: 2025-08-29

Study Results

Results pending

The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.

Basic Information

Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.

Recruitment Status

NOT_YET_RECRUITING

Clinical Phase

PHASE3

Total Enrollment

230 participants

Study Classification

INTERVENTIONAL

Study Start Date

2026-01-31

Study Completion Date

2028-01-31

Brief Summary

Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.

Up to 30% of patients undergoing intracranial surgery present moderate to severe pain. In this type of surgery, the restriction of the pharmacopoeia, which goes against the concept of multimodal analgesia, results in the important use of opioids not without consequences in terms of complications. Numerous studies have highlighted the benefits of scalp blocks in postoperative pain. The originality of this study lies firstly in the fact that the scalp blocks will be guided by ultrasound and secondly, the incidence of severe pain after scalp blocks will be evaluated

Detailed Description

Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.

In neurosurgery, up to 30% of patients experience severe pain (Numeric Pain Rating Scale \> 5) after craniotomy. In order to ensure optimal patient comfort during the perioperative period, multimodal analgesia is the rule. However, the use of certain analgesics in this type of surgery is discussed.

The two analgesics most used in this type of surgery are paracetamol and opioids. The latter, used in large quantities, can lead to an increase in drowsiness, disrupt the postoperative neurological clinical examination (Glasgow score, etc.), cause nausea/vomiting or respiratory depression which will increase complications and the length of stay of patients. Despite the use of morphine and its adverse effects, some study highlighted the high incidence of pain, particularly severe pain in post-craniotomy surgery.

Whether it is to improve postoperative pain or to decrease the intraoperative hemodynamic response, many studies have underlined the interest of scalp block in the postoperative analgesia of craniotomies. Even if large randomized clinical trials are necessary, scalp blocks have been evaluated in subdural hematoma evacuation surgeries, in awake neurosurgeries or in Arnold neuralgia. Intraoperative arterial hypertension induces a risk of increased bleeding and an increase in intracranial pressure with the consequent consequences on cerebral perfusion pressure. These hemodynamic variations, whether intra or post operative, are a source of adverse events.

However, the results of the different studies appear to be discordant and are more interested in the comparison of pain scores and not in the incidence of severe pain. Scalp blocks are mostly performed from anatomical landmarks. In addition, the scalp, which is richly vascularized, is a source of intravascular passage of local anesthetics. Ultrasound-guided scalp blocks are part of this morphine-sparing and multimodal analgesia approach and would allow the realization of a locoregional anesthesia by decreasing, through the use of ultrasound, the risks of intravascular injection and the quantity of local anesthetic.

This study is one of the first to evaluate the impact of an ultrasound-guided scalp block on the incidence of severe postoperative pain (Numeric Pain Rating Scale \> 4) in supratentorial intracranial surgery.

Conditions

See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.

Anesthesia , Analgesia

Keywords

Explore important study keywords that can help with search, categorization, and topic discovery.

scalp block neurosurgery supratentorial surgery craniotomy

Study Design

Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.

Allocation Method

RANDOMIZED

Intervention Model

PARALLEL

comparative, superiority, single-center, randomized clinical trial with two parallel groups
Primary Study Purpose

TREATMENT

Blinding Strategy

SINGLE

Participants

Study Groups

Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.

Experimental group

Patient managed in the neurosurgical unit for supratentorial intracranial surgery randomized in the experimental group

Group Type EXPERIMENTAL

Classic anesthetic strategy

Intervention Type DRUG

classic anesthetic strategy with postoperative analgesia associating Paracetamol and Morphine with standardized dose.

Control group

Patient managed in the neurosurgical unit for supratentorial intracranial surgery randomized in the control group

Group Type ACTIVE_COMPARATOR

Echo-guided scalp blocks

Intervention Type DRUG

Classic anesthetic strategy in association with echo-guided scalp blocks

Interventions

Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.

Echo-guided scalp blocks

Classic anesthetic strategy in association with echo-guided scalp blocks

Intervention Type DRUG

Classic anesthetic strategy

classic anesthetic strategy with postoperative analgesia associating Paracetamol and Morphine with standardized dose.

Intervention Type DRUG

Eligibility Criteria

Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.

Inclusion Criteria

* Patient managed in the neurosurgical unit for supratentorial intracranial surgery.
* Person affiliated or beneficiary of a social security plan.
* Free, informed, and written consent signed by the participant and the investigating physician (at the latest on the day of inclusion and before any examination required by the research).

Exclusion Criteria

* Surgical procedure under awake surgery (systematic realization of scalp blocks necessary)
* Aphasia of comprehension preoperatively or expected postoperatively or any other neurological impairment making self-evaluation of pain impossible.
* Contraindication to the use of local anesthetics: allergy or history of intoxication to local anesthetics
* Contraindication to adrenaline infiltration: severe ventricular rhythm disorders, severe obstructive cardiomyopathy, unstable coronary insufficiency, hypersensitivity to adrenaline.
* Chronic pain patient or patient with daily preoperative consumption of morphine
* Pregnant or breast-feeding woman
* Patient under legal protection (persons deprived of liberty or under guardianship)
Minimum Eligible Age

18 Years

Eligible Sex

ALL

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Sponsors

Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.

University Hospital, Bordeaux

OTHER

Sponsor Role lead

Responsible Party

Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.

Responsibility Role SPONSOR

Principal Investigators

Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.

Grégoire CANE, MD

Role: STUDY_DIRECTOR

University Hospital, Bordeaux

Grégoire CHADEFAUX, MD

Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR

University Hospital, Bordeaux

Antoine BENARD, MD

Role: STUDY_CHAIR

University Hospital, Bordeaux

Locations

Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.

Bordeaux university hospital

Bordeaux, , France

Site Status

Countries

Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.

France

Central Contacts

Reach out to these primary contacts for questions about participation or study logistics.

Grégoire Chadefaux, MD

Role: CONTACT

Phone: +33 05 57 87 02 02

Email: [email protected]

Grégoire CANE, MD

Role: CONTACT

Phone: +33 05 57 87 02 01

Email: [email protected]

Facility Contacts

Find local site contact details for specific facilities participating in the trial.

Grégoire CHADEFAUX, MD

Role: primary

Grégoire CANE, MD

Role: backup

Other Identifiers

Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.

CHUBX 2023/42

Identifier Type: -

Identifier Source: org_study_id