Electrical Dry Needling Versus Sham Dry Needling in Patients With Chronic Low Back Pain

NCT ID: NCT07148635

Last Updated: 2025-08-29

Study Results

Results pending

The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.

Basic Information

Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.

Recruitment Status

COMPLETED

Clinical Phase

NA

Total Enrollment

70 participants

Study Classification

INTERVENTIONAL

Study Start Date

2025-04-09

Study Completion Date

2025-08-21

Brief Summary

Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.

This study will evaluate the effectiveness of electrical dry needling (EDN) compared to sham dry needling (SDN) in patients with chronic low back pain (CLBP). CLBP is a common musculoskeletal condition associated with persistent pain, functional limitations, and reduced quality of life. Myofascial trigger points (MTrPs) are often implicated in CLBP and represent a key therapeutic target.

Dry needling is a minimally invasive procedure where fine needles are inserted into trigger points to release muscle tension and alleviate pain. Electrical dry needling is an advanced variation that applies low-frequency electrical stimulation through the inserted needles, potentially enhancing therapeutic effects. However, evidence is limited regarding its superiority over sham procedures.

In this randomized controlled trial, 70 adult participants with CLBP persisting for at least three months will be randomly assigned to one of two groups:

Group A (EDN + Conventional Therapy): Patients will receive electrical dry needling at active MTrPs combined with a structured physiotherapy program.

Group B (SDN + Conventional Therapy): Patients will receive sham dry needling at the same anatomical sites (using superficial or blunt needle placement without penetration) alongside the same physiotherapy program.

Interventions will be delivered weekly for six weeks. Assessments will occur at baseline, third week, and sixth week.

Primary outcomes include:

Pain intensity (Visual Analogue Scale, VAS)

Functional disability (Roland-Morris Disability Questionnaire, RMDQ)

Kinesiophobia (Tampa Scale of Kinesiophobia, TSK)

This trial is designed to clarify the clinical value of EDN beyond placebo effects, providing evidence to guide management of CLBP.

Detailed Description

Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.

Chronic low back pain (CLBP) affects approximately 7-8% of the global population and remains a leading cause of disability and healthcare burden. Conventional management strategies, including medication, manual therapy, and exercise, often provide partial or temporary relief. Myofascial trigger points (MTrPs) are highly prevalent in CLBP and contribute to persistent pain and movement restrictions.

Dry needling has emerged as a widely used intervention to deactivate MTrPs. The technique produces a local twitch response, improves blood flow, and reduces muscle tightness. Electrical dry needling (EDN) enhances this effect by delivering low-frequency electrical stimulation through the inserted needles, which may result in improved neuromuscular relaxation and pain modulation.

Despite encouraging findings from prior studies, the literature lacks rigorous trials comparing EDN with sham dry needling (SDN) controls. Sham procedures are critical to distinguish specific treatment effects from placebo or expectancy effects. This study aims to fill that gap.

Study Design:

Randomized controlled trial (parallel groups, single-blind).

Sample size: 70 patients (35 per group), aged 18-25 years, with CLBP \>3 months and confirmed active MTrPs.

Recruitment site: Social Security Hospital, Kot Lakhpat, Lahore.

Duration: 9 months after approval.

Randomization: Lottery method.

Blinding: Single-blind (assessor unaware of treatment allocation).

Interventions:

Group A (EDN + Conventional Therapy): Weekly 30-45 min sessions for 6 weeks. EDN applied at quadratus lumborum, multifidus, and iliocostalis lumborum trigger points, with low-frequency electrical stimulation (2-10 Hz, 10-15 minutes). Physiotherapy includes core strengthening, stretching, posture education, and home-based exercises.

Group B (SDN + Conventional Therapy): Same physiotherapy protocol. Sham needling applied with superficial or blunt needles without tissue penetration; no electrical stimulation.

Outcome Measures:

Pain intensity (VAS)

Functional disability (Roland-Morris Disability Questionnaire)

Kinesiophobia (Tampa Scale of Kinesiophobia)

Data Collection: Baseline, 3rd week, and 6th week.

Statistical Analysis: Data will be analyzed using SPSS v24. Descriptive statistics will summarize demographics. Normality will be tested (Shapiro-Wilk/Kolmogorov-Smirnov). Between- and within-group comparisons will be conducted using ANOVA for parametric data, or Mann-Whitney/Wilcoxon tests for non-parametric data. Significance level set at p \< 0.05.

Ethical Considerations:

The study has received Institutional Research Ethics Board (IREB) approval from the University of Lahore. Informed consent will be obtained from all participants. Confidentiality, anonymity, and voluntary participation will be ensured. Participants may withdraw at any time without penalty.

Potential Impact:

This study will provide high-quality evidence on the clinical effectiveness of EDN compared to SDN in CLBP patients. If successful, EDN may be integrated into physiotherapy practice as an evidence-based intervention for reducing pain, disability, and fear of movement in this population.

Conditions

See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.

Chronic Low Back Pain (CLBP)

Keywords

Explore important study keywords that can help with search, categorization, and topic discovery.

Electrical Dry Needling Myofascial Trigger Points Myofascial Pain Syndrome Kinesiophobia Sham Dry Needling

Study Design

Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.

Allocation Method

RANDOMIZED

Intervention Model

PARALLEL

Primary Study Purpose

TREATMENT

Blinding Strategy

SINGLE

Outcome Assessors

Study Groups

Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.

Electrical Dry Needling with Conventional Therapy

Participants will receive electrical dry needling (EDN) applied to active myofascial trigger points in lumbar muscles (quadratus lumborum, multifidus, iliocostalis lumborum) once weekly for six weeks. Fine monofilament needles will be inserted into trigger points and connected to a low-frequency electrical stimulator (2-10 Hz) for 10-15 minutes per session. In addition, participants will follow a standardized physiotherapy program including core strengthening, lumbar and hamstring stretching, posture education, and a home-based exercise plan.

Group Type EXPERIMENTAL

Electrical Dry Needling (EDN)

Intervention Type PROCEDURE

Electrical dry needling will be performed at active myofascial trigger points in lumbar muscles (quadratus lumborum, multifidus, iliocostalis lumborum). Fine monofilament needles are inserted into trigger points and connected to a low-frequency stimulator (2-10 Hz) for 10-15 minutes per session. Treatment is delivered once weekly for six weeks by a trained physiotherapist. Participants will also receive standardized conventional physiotherapy including core strengthening, stretching, posture education, and a home-based exercise program.

Sham Dry Needling with Conventional Therapy

Participants will receive sham dry needling (SDN) once weekly for six weeks. Needles will be applied superficially or with blunt instruments at the same anatomical points as the experimental arm, but without penetration into muscle tissue and without electrical stimulation. Alongside SDN, participants will receive the same standardized physiotherapy program as the experimental group, including core strengthening, stretching, posture education, and a home-based exercise plan.

Group Type PLACEBO_COMPARATOR

Sham Dry Needling (SDN)

Intervention Type PROCEDURE

Sham dry needling will be administered at the same anatomical sites as the experimental group, using superficial or blunt needle placement without penetration into muscle tissue and without electrical stimulation. Sessions are delivered once weekly for six weeks by a trained physiotherapist. Participants will also receive the same standardized conventional physiotherapy including core strengthening, stretching, posture education, and a home-based exercise program to maintain consistency with the experimental arm.

Interventions

Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.

Electrical Dry Needling (EDN)

Electrical dry needling will be performed at active myofascial trigger points in lumbar muscles (quadratus lumborum, multifidus, iliocostalis lumborum). Fine monofilament needles are inserted into trigger points and connected to a low-frequency stimulator (2-10 Hz) for 10-15 minutes per session. Treatment is delivered once weekly for six weeks by a trained physiotherapist. Participants will also receive standardized conventional physiotherapy including core strengthening, stretching, posture education, and a home-based exercise program.

Intervention Type PROCEDURE

Sham Dry Needling (SDN)

Sham dry needling will be administered at the same anatomical sites as the experimental group, using superficial or blunt needle placement without penetration into muscle tissue and without electrical stimulation. Sessions are delivered once weekly for six weeks by a trained physiotherapist. Participants will also receive the same standardized conventional physiotherapy including core strengthening, stretching, posture education, and a home-based exercise program to maintain consistency with the experimental arm.

Intervention Type PROCEDURE

Eligibility Criteria

Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.

Inclusion Criteria

* Both male and female gender will be included (Fernández-Carnero, 2021).
* Clinically diagnosed of chronic low back pain persisting for at least three months (Tüzün et al., 2017)
* Identifiable active myofascial trigger points in the lower back muscles, confirmed through palpation or another standardized method (Donohoe, 2016).
* Moderate to severe pain intensity, measured by a visual analog scale (VAS) (Tüzün et al., 2017)
* Sufficient cognitive and physical ability to engage in assessments and interventions (Tüzün et al., 2017)

Exclusion Criteria

* Known hypersensitivity to needles, history of severe bleeding disorders, or any condition that contraindicates dry needling (Tüzün et al., 2017)
* Use of other physical therapy interventions or dry needling treatments in the last three months for low back pain (Fernández-Carnero, 2021).
* Presence of specific spinal conditions (e.g., disc herniation, spinal stenosis, fractures, or recent spinal surgeries) (Tüzün et al., 2017)
* History of neurological conditions affecting movement, sensation, or pain perception, such as multiple sclerosis or peripheral neuropathy (Donohoe, 2016)
* Pregnant women will be excluded due to potential risks associated with the interventions (Tüzün et al., 2017)
* Unstable psychiatric conditions or active substance abuse that could interfere with participation or adherence to study procedures
Minimum Eligible Age

18 Years

Maximum Eligible Age

25 Years

Eligible Sex

ALL

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Sponsors

Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.

University of Lahore

OTHER

Sponsor Role lead

Responsible Party

Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.

Ammar Sanaullah

Student

Responsibility Role PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR

Locations

Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.

The University of Lahore Teaching Hospital

Lahore, , Pakistan

Site Status

Countries

Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.

Pakistan

References

Explore related publications, articles, or registry entries linked to this study.

Tuzun EH, Gildir S, Angin E, Tecer BH, Dana KO, Malkoc M. Effectiveness of dry needling versus a classical physiotherapy program in patients with chronic low-back pain: a single-blind, randomized, controlled trial. J Phys Ther Sci. 2017 Sep;29(9):1502-1509. doi: 10.1589/jpts.29.1502. Epub 2017 Sep 15.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 28931976 (View on PubMed)

Other Identifiers

Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.

UOL/IREB/25/09/0026

Identifier Type: -

Identifier Source: org_study_id