Treatment Validation for Myofascial Pain

NCT ID: NCT07133139

Last Updated: 2025-12-24

Study Results

Results pending

The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.

Basic Information

Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.

Recruitment Status

RECRUITING

Clinical Phase

NA

Total Enrollment

80 participants

Study Classification

INTERVENTIONAL

Study Start Date

2025-10-06

Study Completion Date

2027-08-31

Brief Summary

Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.

The goal of this clinical trial is to see if a body test called the NUN biomarker can track changes in chronic low back pain after dry needling and predict who will feel better. This study is for adults with chronic low back pain from muscle pain (Myofacial Pain).

The main questions are:

* Does the biomarker drop when pain improves?
* Can it predict who benefits most?
* Do higher starting levels mean better results with real dry needling?

Investigators will compare real and fake (sham) dry needling using ultrasound, muscle pressure tests, and pain reports before and after treatment.

Detailed Description

Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.

The goal of this clinical trial is to see if a special body measurement biomarker (called the NUN biomarker) can show changes after dry needling treatment and if it can predict who will get the most pain relief. The study focuses on adults with chronic low back pain (cLBP) that also has a muscle pain (myofascial pain, MP) component.

The main questions it aims to answer are:

1. Does the NUN biomarker go down after dry needling when muscle pain gets better?
2. Can the biomarker predict who will feel better after treatment?
3. Do people with higher biomarker levels at the start respond better to dry needling than to a fake (sham) treatment?

Investigators will compare real dry needling to sham dry needling (fake treatment) to see if the biomarker changes more with real treatment and if this matches pain relief.

Participants will:

1. Get either real dry needling or sham dry needling in a single-blinded setup (participant won't know which one they're getting).
2. Have ultrasound imaging to measure the biomarker before and after treatment.
3. Take a pressure pain test to see how sensitive their muscles are.
4. Report their pain levels after treatment.

Conditions

See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.

Chronic Low-back Pain (cLBP) Myofacial Pain

Study Design

Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.

Allocation Method

RANDOMIZED

Intervention Model

PARALLEL

Primary Study Purpose

BASIC_SCIENCE

Blinding Strategy

SINGLE

Participants

Study Groups

Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.

Dry needling

Group Type ACTIVE_COMPARATOR

Dry Needling

Intervention Type DEVICE

The examiner will use the "repeated tapping" technique of Travel and Simmons in the active condition in the painful tender points and TPs. In the sham treatment, the needle tip retracts when pushed against the skin (like a ballpoint pen), and the subject feels a pointy object on their skin, which does not penetrate. Prior studies have shown that this is a credible placebo condition. Prior studies have also shown that one dry needling session is effective at least temporarily for 1-2 weeks, AND that US correlates of TPs improve as well

NUN Biomarker

Intervention Type OTHER

A NUN biomarker measurement means checking the level of a certain substance (the "NUN" biomarker) in your body that can give investigators clues about your condition.

Measuring the NUN biomarker helps investigators see if a treatment is working or if your condition is changing.

Sham Dry Needling

Group Type SHAM_COMPARATOR

Sham Dry Needling

Intervention Type DEVICE

Half of the subjects will receive a sham needle instead which puts pressure on the skin but does not penetrate the skin (like a ballpoint pen with the tip retracted pushing on the skin). Since manual pressure over myofascial tender and trigger points is also an accepted treatment, the sham procedure could also be therapeutic, although we do not think it will be very effective.

NUN Biomarker

Intervention Type OTHER

A NUN biomarker measurement means checking the level of a certain substance (the "NUN" biomarker) in your body that can give investigators clues about your condition.

Measuring the NUN biomarker helps investigators see if a treatment is working or if your condition is changing.

Interventions

Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.

Dry Needling

The examiner will use the "repeated tapping" technique of Travel and Simmons in the active condition in the painful tender points and TPs. In the sham treatment, the needle tip retracts when pushed against the skin (like a ballpoint pen), and the subject feels a pointy object on their skin, which does not penetrate. Prior studies have shown that this is a credible placebo condition. Prior studies have also shown that one dry needling session is effective at least temporarily for 1-2 weeks, AND that US correlates of TPs improve as well

Intervention Type DEVICE

Sham Dry Needling

Half of the subjects will receive a sham needle instead which puts pressure on the skin but does not penetrate the skin (like a ballpoint pen with the tip retracted pushing on the skin). Since manual pressure over myofascial tender and trigger points is also an accepted treatment, the sham procedure could also be therapeutic, although we do not think it will be very effective.

Intervention Type DEVICE

NUN Biomarker

A NUN biomarker measurement means checking the level of a certain substance (the "NUN" biomarker) in your body that can give investigators clues about your condition.

Measuring the NUN biomarker helps investigators see if a treatment is working or if your condition is changing.

Intervention Type OTHER

Eligibility Criteria

Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.

Inclusion Criteria

* Ages 20-70;
* Predominantly axial LBP (meeting NIH definition of cLBP with daily pain for at least 3 months) with a MP component as determined by the standardized examination for MP;
* Average pain score of \> 3/10, with low back pain being the primary pain site;
* CLBP meeting Quebec Task Force Classification System categories I-III (from axial pain only to pain radiating beyond the knee without neurological signs). Constant radicular pain associated with sensory loss is likely a confounder to dry needling treatment success;
* NO HISTORY of receiving dry needling, to improve the effectiveness of the blind;
* Demonstration of healthcare seeking at some point for LBP.

Exclusion Criteria

* Back surgery within the past six months;
* Active workers' compensation or litigation claims, since these patients are more likely to have exaggerated pain behavior;
* New pain treatments within 2 weeks of enrollment;
* Any clinically unstable systemic illness or condition that is judged to interfere with the trial;
* Non-ambulatory status;
* Not able to complete the questionnaire
* Currently pregnant or have intentions to become pregnant during the study.
Minimum Eligible Age

20 Years

Maximum Eligible Age

70 Years

Eligible Sex

ALL

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Sponsors

Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.

National Center for Complementary and Integrative Health (NCCIH)

NIH

Sponsor Role collaborator

Ajay Wasan, MD, Msc

OTHER

Sponsor Role lead

Responsible Party

Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.

Ajay Wasan, MD, Msc

Professor

Responsibility Role SPONSOR_INVESTIGATOR

Principal Investigators

Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.

Kang Kim, PhD

Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR

University of Pittsburgh

Ajay Wasan, MD, MSc

Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR

University of Pittsburgh

Locations

Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.

Kauffman Medical Building

Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania, United States

Site Status RECRUITING

Countries

Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.

United States

Central Contacts

Reach out to these primary contacts for questions about participation or study logistics.

Ajay Wasan, MD, MSc

Role: CONTACT

Phone: 412-665-8048

Email: [email protected]

Kunal Lohana, MPH

Role: CONTACT

Phone: 412-648-4925

Email: [email protected]

Facility Contacts

Find local site contact details for specific facilities participating in the trial.

Zhiyu Sheng, PhD

Role: primary

Other Identifiers

Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.

R61AT012282

Identifier Type: NIH

Identifier Source: secondary_id

View Link

STUDY25060095

Identifier Type: -

Identifier Source: org_study_id