Influence of Antiseptic Washes on Wound Healing Complications After THA
NCT ID: NCT07104084
Last Updated: 2025-10-15
Study Results
The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.
Basic Information
Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.
RECRUITING
NA
420 participants
INTERVENTIONAL
2025-10-08
2028-01-01
Brief Summary
Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.
Study participants will be randomized into one of two groups: washing the surgical wound with povidone-iodine solution (Surgiphor, Becton Dickinson, Franklin Lakes, NJ) or chlorhexidine solution (Irrisept, Irrimax Corporation, Lawrenceville, GA). All patients will undergo standard of care total hip replacements without any other change in surgery. The best type of solution that cleans the wound and potentially leads to better wound healing is unknown. This study will evaluate whether there is difference in surgical wound healing between the two washing solutions. The study will pay for the washing solutions. Patients will follow up for standard postoperative visits. At the 2-week and 6-week visits, pictures of the surgical incision will be taken and saved in the electronic medical record and evaluated in a standardized way for healing of the incision and the appearance of the scar. Postoperative complications and returns to the hospital or additional surgeries will be collected from the electronic medical record.
Related Clinical Trials
Explore similar clinical trials based on study characteristics and research focus.
Preoperative Bath in Patients Submitted to Hip Arthroplasty
NCT03001102
Bacterial Colonization With and Without Iodophor-impregnated Adhesive Drapes in Hip Surgery: a Prospective, Randomized Trial
NCT02919410
Role of Topical Vancomycin in Reducing Infections in Hip and Knee Arthroplasty
NCT05972603
Evaluating the Effectiveness of 2 Surgical Skin Preparation Methods in Reducing Surgical Wound Drainage After Total Hip or Knee Replacement
NCT01097135
Comparison of Negative Pressure Wound Therapy vs. Conventional Dressings for Prevention of Wound Complications After Revision THA
NCT03321799
Detailed Description
Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.
Conditions
See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.
Study Design
Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.
RANDOMIZED
PARALLEL
PREVENTION
SINGLE
Study Groups
Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.
Chlorhexidine washing solution
Following component implantation a 3-minute chlorhexidine lavage followed by saline lavage will be performed.
lavage chlorhexidine
Patient will receive a chlorhexidine lavage for 3 minutes following total hip component placement followed by saline lavage.
Povidone-iodine washing solution
Following component implantation a 3-minute povidone-iodine lavage followed by saline lavage will be performed.
lavage povidone-iodine
Patient will receive povidone-iodine lavage for 3 minutes following total hip component placement followed by saline lavage.
Interventions
Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.
lavage chlorhexidine
Patient will receive a chlorhexidine lavage for 3 minutes following total hip component placement followed by saline lavage.
lavage povidone-iodine
Patient will receive povidone-iodine lavage for 3 minutes following total hip component placement followed by saline lavage.
Eligibility Criteria
Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.
Inclusion Criteria
Exclusion Criteria
18 Years
ALL
No
Sponsors
Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.
Irrimax Corporation
INDUSTRY
F. Johannes Plate
OTHER
Responsible Party
Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.
F. Johannes Plate
Associate Professor
Principal Investigators
Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.
Frank J Plate, MD, PhD
Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR
University of Pittsburgh
Frank J Plate, MD, PhD
Role: STUDY_DIRECTOR
University of Pittsburgh
Frank J Plate, MD, PhD
Role: STUDY_CHAIR
University of Pittsburgh
Locations
Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.
UPMC East
Monroeville, Pennsylvania, United States
UPMC Shadyside
Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania, United States
Countries
Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.
Central Contacts
Reach out to these primary contacts for questions about participation or study logistics.
Facility Contacts
Find local site contact details for specific facilities participating in the trial.
Other Identifiers
Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.
STUDY25020138
Identifier Type: -
Identifier Source: org_study_id
More Related Trials
Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.