Comparative Analysis of Hearing Outcomes: Robotic vs. Manual Insertion of Cochlear Implants

NCT ID: NCT07081542

Last Updated: 2026-01-02

Study Results

Results pending

The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.

Basic Information

Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.

Recruitment Status

NOT_YET_RECRUITING

Clinical Phase

NA

Total Enrollment

32 participants

Study Classification

INTERVENTIONAL

Study Start Date

2026-01-01

Study Completion Date

2027-01-31

Brief Summary

Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.

This research study is evaluating two different methods of cochlear implant (CI) insertion - robotic-assisted insertion and manual insertion - to better understand how they affect hearing outcomes. Participants in this study will be randomly assigned to receive their cochlear implant using one of these two techniques. Both methods are performed in a standard operating room by qualified surgeons, and both are considered safe and approved for use.

The main goal is to compare how well participants hear one year after surgery based on the insertion method used. The study will also look at things like surgical time, inner ear health, and how the hearing nerve responds. All participants will receive the same type of cochlear implant device and follow-up care.

This study may help guide future surgical techniques and improve outcomes for individuals receiving cochlear implants.

Detailed Description

Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.

Conditions

See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.

Sensorineural Hearing Loss Bilateral Hearing Loss Cochlear Implantation Hearing Disorders Hearing Disorders and Deafness Inner Ear Disorders Hearing Impairment

Study Design

Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.

Allocation Method

RANDOMIZED

Intervention Model

PARALLEL

Primary Study Purpose

TREATMENT

Blinding Strategy

SINGLE

Outcome Assessors

Study Groups

Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.

Robotic-Assisted Cochlear Implant Insertion

Surgical technique using robotic assistance (IotaSoft system) to perform the cochlear implant electrode array insertion into the cochlea.

Group Type EXPERIMENTAL

IotaSoft Robotic Insertion System

Intervention Type DEVICE

The IotaSoft robotic insertion device is an FDA-approved tool designed to provide precise and controlled insertion of the cochlear implant electrode array to minimize trauma during implantation.

Manual Cochlear Implant Insertion

Standard surgical technique for inserting the cochlear implant electrode array without robotic assistance. This represents the standard of care method.

Group Type ACTIVE_COMPARATOR

Manual Cochlear Implant Insertion

Intervention Type PROCEDURE

Standard surgical technique for manually inserting the cochlear implant electrode array. This method reflects the current standard of care without the assistance of robotic tools.

Interventions

Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.

IotaSoft Robotic Insertion System

The IotaSoft robotic insertion device is an FDA-approved tool designed to provide precise and controlled insertion of the cochlear implant electrode array to minimize trauma during implantation.

Intervention Type DEVICE

Manual Cochlear Implant Insertion

Standard surgical technique for manually inserting the cochlear implant electrode array. This method reflects the current standard of care without the assistance of robotic tools.

Intervention Type PROCEDURE

Eligibility Criteria

Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.

Inclusion Criteria

* Cochlear implant candidates \>18 years of age
* LFPTA (125Hz, 250Hz, 500Hz) \<80dB

Exclusion Criteria

* Pediatric patients (below the age of 18)
* LFPTA (125Hz, 250Hz, 500Hz) \>80dB
* Revision cases
* Severe comorbidities that contraindicate surgery.
* Preexisting cochlear anomalies.
* Do not speak English or Spanish
Minimum Eligible Age

18 Years

Maximum Eligible Age

80 Years

Eligible Sex

ALL

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Sponsors

Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.

AdventHealth

OTHER

Sponsor Role lead

Responsible Party

Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.

Responsibility Role SPONSOR

Locations

Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.

AdventHealth Celebration

Kissimmee, Florida, United States

Site Status

Countries

Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.

United States

Central Contacts

Reach out to these primary contacts for questions about participation or study logistics.

Petronio Senior Clinical Research Operations Manager, MHA

Role: CONTACT

407-303-5503

Bridget Clinical Research Operations Manager, MS, MPH

Role: CONTACT

407-303-5503

Facility Contacts

Find local site contact details for specific facilities participating in the trial.

Petronio Martins, MHA

Role: primary

407-303-5503

Bridget Miller, MS, MPH

Role: backup

407-303-5503

References

Explore related publications, articles, or registry entries linked to this study.

Barriat S, Peigneux N, Duran U, Camby S, Lefebvre PP. The Use of a Robot to Insert an Electrode Array of Cochlear Implants in the Cochlea: A Feasibility Study and Preliminary Results. Audiol Neurootol. 2021;26(5):361-367. doi: 10.1159/000513509. Epub 2021 Apr 26.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 33902040 (View on PubMed)

Gersdorff G, Peigneux N, Duran U, Camby S, Lefebvre PP. Impedance and Functional Outcomes in Robotic-Assisted or Manual Cochlear Implantation: A Comparative Study. Audiol Neurootol. 2025;30(1):80-88. doi: 10.1159/000540577. Epub 2024 Aug 23.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 39182488 (View on PubMed)

Heuninck E, Van de Heyning P, Van Rompaey V, Mertens G, Topsakal V. Audiological outcomes of robot-assisted cochlear implant surgery. Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol. 2023 Oct;280(10):4433-4444. doi: 10.1007/s00405-023-07961-7. Epub 2023 Apr 12.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 37043021 (View on PubMed)

Maheo C, Marie A, Torres R, Archutick J, Leclere JC, Marianowski R. Robot-Assisted and Manual Cochlear Implantation: An Intra-Individual Study of Speech Recognition. J Clin Med. 2023 Oct 17;12(20):6580. doi: 10.3390/jcm12206580.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 37892718 (View on PubMed)

Caversaccio M, Gavaghan K, Wimmer W, Williamson T, Anso J, Mantokoudis G, Gerber N, Rathgeb C, Feldmann A, Wagner F, Scheidegger O, Kompis M, Weisstanner C, Zoka-Assadi M, Roesler K, Anschuetz L, Huth M, Weber S. Robotic cochlear implantation: surgical procedure and first clinical experience. Acta Otolaryngol. 2017 Apr;137(4):447-454. doi: 10.1080/00016489.2017.1278573. Epub 2017 Feb 1.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 28145157 (View on PubMed)

Other Identifiers

Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.

2269273

Identifier Type: -

Identifier Source: org_study_id

More Related Trials

Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.

Cochlear Implantation Experience
NCT06896864 NOT_YET_RECRUITING
Tinnitus and Cochlear Implants
NCT06085885 ENROLLING_BY_INVITATION