The Effect of Asymmetrical vs. Symmetrical High Flow Nasal Cannula on the Work of Breathing
NCT ID: NCT07066566
Last Updated: 2025-07-18
Study Results
The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.
Basic Information
Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.
RECRUITING
NA
30 participants
INTERVENTIONAL
2024-04-09
2025-09-01
Brief Summary
Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.
1\. Does the asymmetrical NHF interface improve the work of breathing compared to the symmetrical NHF interface? Researchers will compare the symmetrical NHF interface to the symmetrical NHF interface to see if the the asymmetrical interface has a greater impact on the work of breathing.
Participants will :
1. receive NHF via both interfaces (FiO₂ 0.21, 50 L/min) for 15 minutes, in random order, with esophageal pressure monitoring and bioelectrical impedance analysis performed.
2. baseline characteristics will me monitored throughout the interventions
3. Esophageal pressure and minute ventilation will be monitored.
Related Clinical Trials
Explore similar clinical trials based on study characteristics and research focus.
DUET Versus Standard Interface for Hypercapnic COPD Patients
NCT05829083
Clinical Validation of the Fluispotter System for Serial Sampling of Venous Dried Blood Spots
NCT04594577
Reuse of Intermittent Urethral Catheters
NCT02129738
Treatment of Long COVID Symptoms Utilizing Autologous Stem Cells Following COVID-19 Infection
NCT05669261
Clinical Application and Validation of Innovative Tourniquet
NCT05605990
Detailed Description
Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.
Respiratory mechanics will be assessed using esophageal pressure (Pes) monitoring. A thin latex balloon catheter (10 cm long, 3-5 cm circumference; Cooper surgical, USA), filled with 0.5 mL of air, will be placed in the mid-esophagus (\~45 cm from the nares) and will be connected to a pressure transducer (RSS-100HR, Hans Rudolph Inc., USA). Correct positioning will be confirmed by observing equal fluctuations in Pes and airway pressure (Paw) during occluded breaths. Balloon integrity will be verified before, after, and as needed during the procedure.
Participants will be instructed to breathe quietly on room air (FiO₂ 0.21) to allow for baseline assessment. Volume will be recorded using a heated pneumotachometer (Series 3813; Hans Rudolph Inc., USA) and the Research Pneumotach System (RSS100-HR), sampling at 50 Hz, a sampling rate exceeding the Nyquist criterion for respiratory signals. A bioelectrical impedance technology device (ExSpiron, Respiratory Motion Inc., Waltham, MA) will then be attached around the chest to assess lung volume changes.
Participants will then be randomized in a 1:1 ratio to one of two intervention sequences using a computer-generated randomization schedule.
* Sequence 1: Symmetrical NHF Interface - 3-minute washout period - Asymmetrical NHF Interface
* Sequence 2: Asymmetrical NHF Interface - 3-minute washout period - Symmetrical NHF Interface In the seated position, participants will both 15-minute phases, separated by a 3-minute washout period to prevent residual effects. During the "Symmetrical Interface" phase, participants will breathe using the conventional symmetrical NHF cannula, and during the asymmetrical phase, the asymmetrical interface (DUET, Fisher and Paykel Healthcare, Auckland, New Zealand) will be used. High-flow oxygen will be delivered using a commercial system (AIRVO 3; Fisher and Paykel Healthcare, Auckland, New Zealand) set at a flow of 50 L/min, temperature of 37°C, and FiO₂ of 0.21.
Conditions
See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.
Study Design
Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.
RANDOMIZED
CROSSOVER
BASIC_SCIENCE
SINGLE
Study Groups
Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.
Recovery patients from respiratory disease - Asymmetric or conventional nasal high flow cannula
Patients recovered from acute respiratory disease will be randomized to NHF oxygen therapy with asymmetrical cannula or conventional cannula
Asymmetric nasal cannula - DUET
DUET asymmetric nasal high flow interface that fits best to patients' nostrils (size: one nostril of the patient should be fully occluded) Patients will be crossed - over between the 2 interventions
Conventional nasal high flow cannula
Well - established conventional nasal high flow cannula (size: medium) Patients will be cross - over between the 2 interventions
Recovery patients from respiratory disease - Conventional or asymmetric nasal high flow cannula
Patients recovered from acute respiratory disease will be randomized to NHF oxygen therapy with conventional cannula or asymmetrical cannula
Asymmetric nasal cannula - DUET
DUET asymmetric nasal high flow interface that fits best to patients' nostrils (size: one nostril of the patient should be fully occluded) Patients will be crossed - over between the 2 interventions
Conventional nasal high flow cannula
Well - established conventional nasal high flow cannula (size: medium) Patients will be cross - over between the 2 interventions
Interventions
Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.
Asymmetric nasal cannula - DUET
DUET asymmetric nasal high flow interface that fits best to patients' nostrils (size: one nostril of the patient should be fully occluded) Patients will be crossed - over between the 2 interventions
Conventional nasal high flow cannula
Well - established conventional nasal high flow cannula (size: medium) Patients will be cross - over between the 2 interventions
Eligibility Criteria
Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.
Inclusion Criteria
2. absence of symptoms and signs of respiratory failure (SpO2\>95% at FiΟ2 0.21)
Exclusion Criteria
2. SpO2\<94% at FiΟ2 0.21
3. neuromuscular disease
4. contraindications to esophageal pressure monitoring (e.g., uncontrolled coagulopathy, esophageal disease, nasal trauma, allergy to local lidocaine)
18 Years
ALL
Yes
Sponsors
Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.
Larissa University Hospital
OTHER
Responsible Party
Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.
Ioannis Pantazopoulos
Associate Professor of Respiratory & Emergency Medicine Faculty of Medicine, University of Thessaly, Greece
Principal Investigators
Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.
Demosthenes Makris
Role: STUDY_CHAIR
Professor of Intensive Care Unit, University Hospital of Larissa
Locations
Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.
University Hospital of Larissa, Department of Pulmonary Medicine
Larissa, , Greece
Countries
Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.
Central Contacts
Reach out to these primary contacts for questions about participation or study logistics.
Facility Contacts
Find local site contact details for specific facilities participating in the trial.
Provided Documents
Download supplemental materials such as informed consent forms, study protocols, or participant manuals.
Document Type: Study Protocol and Statistical Analysis Plan
Document Type: Informed Consent Form
Other Identifiers
Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.
16171
Identifier Type: -
Identifier Source: org_study_id
More Related Trials
Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.