The Role of Dysfunctional Schemas and Acceptance Regarding Chronic Fatigue in Oncology Patients After Treatment
NCT ID: NCT07042607
Last Updated: 2025-08-28
Study Results
The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.
Basic Information
Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.
COMPLETED
118 participants
OBSERVATIONAL
2023-01-17
2025-07-31
Brief Summary
Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.
This scientific cross-sectional study is at the intersection of medical psychology and oncology and will address the role of dysfunctional schemas and acceptance in the development of fatigue symptoms after treatment for cancer.
Related Clinical Trials
Explore similar clinical trials based on study characteristics and research focus.
Effect of a Symptom Diary on Symptom Care and Symptom Burden in Patients Treated With Chemotherapy: a Before-and-after-study
NCT02050490
An Explorative Study on Physiological and Neurophysiological Determinants of Fatigue in Cancer Survivors
NCT01096641
A Feasibility Study in Chronically Fatigued Cancer Survivors
NCT04931407
Psychoneurological Symptom Cluster in Oncology
NCT05867966
Symptom Support During Chemotherapy: A Mixed Method Study in Adult Patients With Cancer
NCT02298972
Detailed Description
Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.
This study deals with patients who still suffer from chronic fatigue 6 months to two years after (intentionally curative) cancer treatment. Defined in English as chronic cancer-related fatigue (CCRF). The role of acceptance and dysfunctional schedules in maintaining chronic fatigue after cancer will be investigated.
The question is whether oncology patients with dysfunctional schedules after treatment are more likely to maintain CCRF than oncology patients in whom these dysfunctional schedules are present to a lesser extent. From the literature, we chose to examine the dysfunctional schema Relentlessly strict standards/extremely high demands. Exploratively, we also examine the dysfunctional schemas Abandonment/Instability and Self-Sacrifice.
If the above schemas are indeed associated with higher levels of CCRF, we then ask what role acceptance of fatigue plays on the aforementioned correlation. We hypothesize that acceptance plays a mediating role in the correlation between dysfunctional schemas and fatigue: Dysfunctional schemas hinder acceptance of fatigue. Next, we hypothesize that the lower the degree of acceptance, the higher the perceived fatigue will be.
In addition to mediation, a moderating role of dysfunctional schemas could also be hypothesized. Therefore, the second hypothesis hypothesizes that there is a negative relationship between acceptance and fatigue, but only when the relevant dysfunctional schemas are present at low levels. When these dysfunctional schemas are present to a high degree, the relationship between acceptance and fatigue changes. Most likely, the dysfunctional schemas reduce the beneficial influence of acceptance.
Conditions
See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.
Study Design
Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.
COHORT
PROSPECTIVE
Study Groups
Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.
not appicable
not appicable
not appicable
no intervention
Interventions
Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.
not appicable
no intervention
Eligibility Criteria
Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.
Inclusion Criteria
18 Years
70 Years
ALL
Yes
Sponsors
Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.
Zuyderland Medisch Centrum
OTHER
Responsible Party
Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.
Marianne van der Zijden
drs
Locations
Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.
Marianne van der Zijden
Heerlen, Limburg, Netherlands
Countries
Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.
Other Identifiers
Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.
METCZ20220084
Identifier Type: -
Identifier Source: org_study_id
More Related Trials
Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.