Effects of Hip Bump Manipulation Versus Sham Treatment in Healthy Adults

NCT ID: NCT07025434

Last Updated: 2025-10-14

Study Results

Results pending

The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.

Basic Information

Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.

Recruitment Status

RECRUITING

Clinical Phase

NA

Total Enrollment

60 participants

Study Classification

INTERVENTIONAL

Study Start Date

2025-06-20

Study Completion Date

2026-05-31

Brief Summary

Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.

The purpose of this study is to objectively assess the effects of hip bump manipulation (HBM) on a healthy population aged 18-45 years. We hypothesize that the HBM will improve hip internal rotation passive range of motion, improve the strength of the hip external rotators, decrease compensatory motions in hip flexion during active range of motion, and improve bipodal landing mechanics.

Human participants will be analyzed to determine whether the manipulation produces the intended clinical outcomes. While clinicians commonly use this technique, its effectiveness has yet to be substantiated through research. This technique is a high velocity low amplitude thrust to the greater trochanter which theorizes the quick stretch of the external rotator muscles and may improve a malpositioned femoral head within the acetabulum. These improvements may positively affect functional movements such as bipodal landing.

Detailed Description

Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.

Conditions

See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.

Assessment of Hip Strength, Range of Motion, EMG Activation, and Landing Mechanics in Healthy Subjects Healthy Adult Subjects

Study Design

Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.

Allocation Method

RANDOMIZED

Intervention Model

PARALLEL

Two-Arm Parallel Group Randomized Controlled Trial (RCT) Group A: Intervention Group B: Control (Sham)
Primary Study Purpose

BASIC_SCIENCE

Blinding Strategy

SINGLE

Participants

Study Groups

Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.

Group A: Intervention

Hip Bump Manipulation (UFIR)

Group Type EXPERIMENTAL

Hip Bump Manipulation

Intervention Type PROCEDURE

This technique is a high velocity low amplitude thrust (HVLAT) directly posterior to the greater trochanter which theorizes the quick stretch of the external rotator muscles and may improve a malpositioned femoral head within the acetabulum.

Group B: Control

Iliac Crest Bump Sham Manipulation

Group Type SHAM_COMPARATOR

Sham (No Treatment)

Intervention Type PROCEDURE

Iliac Crest Sham Manipulation

Interventions

Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.

Hip Bump Manipulation

This technique is a high velocity low amplitude thrust (HVLAT) directly posterior to the greater trochanter which theorizes the quick stretch of the external rotator muscles and may improve a malpositioned femoral head within the acetabulum.

Intervention Type PROCEDURE

Sham (No Treatment)

Iliac Crest Sham Manipulation

Intervention Type PROCEDURE

Other Intervention Names

Discover alternative or legacy names that may be used to describe the listed interventions across different sources.

UFIR Unrestrained Femoral Internal Rotation

Eligibility Criteria

Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.

Inclusion Criteria

* Healthy individuals
* Aged 18-45 years old

Exclusion Criteria

* Diagnosed demoroacetabular labral tear
* Diagnosed osteoarthritis (OA)
* Current or recent (within the past 6 months) low back pain
* Hip or pelvic pain
* Lower extremity injury within the past six months
* Diagnosed scoliosis
* History of surgery involving the femoroacetabular joint (FAJ)
* Known allergic reaction to adhesive or shaving cream used for EMG placement
Minimum Eligible Age

18 Years

Maximum Eligible Age

45 Years

Eligible Sex

ALL

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

Yes

Sponsors

Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.

Dominican University New York

OTHER

Sponsor Role lead

Responsible Party

Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.

Responsibility Role SPONSOR

Principal Investigators

Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.

Ayse Edeer, B.S., M.S., Ph.D.

Role: STUDY_CHAIR

Dominican University New York

Locations

Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.

Dominican University New York

Orangeburg, New York, United States

Site Status RECRUITING

Countries

Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.

United States

Central Contacts

Reach out to these primary contacts for questions about participation or study logistics.

Karl Rusch, B.S., DSc, DPT

Role: CONTACT

(845) 848-6046

Stephen Rodriguez, B.S., DSc, MPS PT, DPT

Role: CONTACT

(845) 848-6047

Facility Contacts

Find local site contact details for specific facilities participating in the trial.

Ayse Edeer, B.S, M.S, Ph.D.

Role: primary

(845) 848-7615

Karl Rusch, B.S., DSc, DPT

Role: backup

(845) 848-6046

References

Explore related publications, articles, or registry entries linked to this study.

van Melick N, Meddeler BM, Hoogeboom TJ, Nijhuis-van der Sanden MWG, van Cingel REH. How to determine leg dominance: The agreement between self-reported and observed performance in healthy adults. PLoS One. 2017 Dec 29;12(12):e0189876. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0189876. eCollection 2017.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 29287067 (View on PubMed)

Kazemi M, Leguard SH, Lilja S, Mahaise S. A clinical crossover trial of the effect of manipulative therapy on pain and passive and active range of motion of the painful hip. J Can Chiropr Assoc. 2021 Dec;65(3):318-329.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 35197646 (View on PubMed)

Bazett-Jones DM, Tylinksi T, Krstic J, Stromquist A, Sparks J. PEAK HIP MUSCLE TORQUE MEASUREMENTS ARE INFLUENCED BY SAGITTAL PLANE HIP POSITION. Int J Sports Phys Ther. 2017 Aug;12(4):535-542.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 28900559 (View on PubMed)

Other Identifiers

Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.

2025-0328-01

Identifier Type: -

Identifier Source: org_study_id

More Related Trials

Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.