Comparison of Cardiovascular Risks Between Hip Fracture Surgery With Continued DAPT(Dual Antiplatelet Therapy ) Within 6 Weeks vs After 6 Weeks Post-PCI(Percutaneous Coronary Intervention): A Prospective Observational Cohort Study

NCT ID: NCT07024446

Last Updated: 2025-06-17

Study Results

Results pending

The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.

Basic Information

Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.

Recruitment Status

NOT_YET_RECRUITING

Total Enrollment

50 participants

Study Classification

OBSERVATIONAL

Study Start Date

2025-07-01

Study Completion Date

2027-07-01

Brief Summary

Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.

Percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) is commonly used to treat stable ischemic heart disease. Among patients, 7.5% require surgical treatment, and up to 20% may need noncardiac surgery (NCS) within two years.

Compared to patients without coronary stents, those requiring NCS shortly after PCI face an increased risk of perioperative major adverse cardiac and cerebrovascular events (MACCE), primarily manifested as thrombotic and bleeding events. Guidelines recommend 6-12 months of dual antiplatelet therapy (DAPT) post-PCI to prevent stent thrombosis, which is associated with an elevated risk of perioperative bleeding during NCS. Multiple retrospective studies suggest that the incidence of MACCE decreases as the interval between PCI and NCS lengthens, reaching a risk level similar to non-PCI patients after 12 months. However, other studies indicate that the risk in patients with similar PCI-NCS intervals correlates more with surgical complexity and urgency. Guidelines advise adequate antiplatelet therapy post-PCI to prevent stent thrombosis and recommend avoiding elective surgery within 4-6 weeks after PCI, contingent on bleeding and thrombotic risk assessments.

Many post-PCI patients facing NCS option to delay surgery after weighing the risks of discontinuing antiplatelet therapy versus postponement, which not only reduces quality of life but also increases the risks associated with delayed surgery. Additionally, retrospective studies have found that in unavoidable emergency or time-sensitive surgeries, the heightened perioperative cardiovascular risk is primarily due to the underlying surgical condition affecting organ function, rather than the PCI-NCS interval or antiplatelet therapy discontinuation.

Recent advancements in minimally invasive surgical techniques have reduced trauma and bleeding, leading to broader indications for surgery in patients on anticoagulant or antiplatelet therapy. The widespread use of newer-generation drug-eluting stents (DES) with advanced antiproliferative drugs has further lowered stent thrombosis rates. Moreover, refined PCI techniques minimize vascular injury during stent placement, reducing the likelihood of extra-stent restenosis. From an anesthesiology perspective, concerns for post-PCI surgical patients extend beyond bleeding risks to whether cardiac function can withstand perioperative hemodynamic changes. As surgical and anesthetic techniques evolve, traditional single-method anesthesia is increasingly replaced by combined techniques that ensure adequate analgesia while minimizing hemodynamic disturbances, maintaining oxygen supply-demand balance, and reducing ischemic and bleeding events.

Hip fractures in elderly patients, often termed the "last fracture in life," carry high surgical and anesthetic risks for those with coronary artery disease. While PCI addresses coronary stenosis, the use or discontinuation of antiplatelet therapy exposes patients to bleeding and ischemic risks. The optimal timing for hip fracture surgery is within 48 hours; delays may lead to malunion, prolonged bedrest complications (e.g., pressure sores, pneumonia), and increased deep vein thrombosis risk. Modern hip fracture surgeries (e.g., internal fixation, hip replacement, Proximal femoral nail antirotation internal fixation) are well-established, with reduced bleeding and faster recovery, making it feasible to perform surgery without interrupting antiplatelet therapy.

Existing research primarily consists of retrospective analyses of cardiovascular risk prediction in post-PCI patients undergoing NCS, with no recent prospective studies. Guideline recommendations on PCI-NCS intervals remain unchanged since 2016. Consequently, many PCI patients must delay surgery, enduring unpredictable risks and diminished quality of life.

This study aims to prospectively observe the incidence of MACCE in hip fracture surgery performed within six weeks post-PCI without discontinuing DAPT. The findings may provide evidence for the feasibility of early post-PCI surgery, offer clinicians and patients safer antithrombotic strategies, and present a new option to improve patient quality of life.

Detailed Description

Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.

Conditions

See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.

PCI Patients DAPT(Dual Antiplatelet Therapy) Hip Fracture Surgeries

Study Design

Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.

Observational Model Type

COHORT

Study Time Perspective

PROSPECTIVE

Study Groups

Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.

Observation group

Within 6 weeks after PCI

The time interval between PCI and NCS

Intervention Type OTHER

Using 6 weeks post-PCI as the demarcation point, patients within 6 weeks were assigned to the observation group, while those beyond 6 weeks formed the control group.

Control group

beyond 6 weeks after PCI

The time interval between PCI and NCS

Intervention Type OTHER

Using 6 weeks post-PCI as the demarcation point, patients within 6 weeks were assigned to the observation group, while those beyond 6 weeks formed the control group.

Interventions

Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.

The time interval between PCI and NCS

Using 6 weeks post-PCI as the demarcation point, patients within 6 weeks were assigned to the observation group, while those beyond 6 weeks formed the control group.

Intervention Type OTHER

Eligibility Criteria

Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.

Inclusion Criteria

Normal hs-cTnI levels prior to NCS BMI 20-28 kg/m² Post-PCI procedure, currently on regular DAPT therapy Complete PCI procedural documentation (date, quantity, stent type) Mentally sound, capable of normal communication

Exclusion Criteria

Abnormal hs-cTnI before NCS; Accompanied by dysfunction of other organs History of other major surgeries Risk factors for stent thrombosis (age \>79 years, impaired left ventricular function, stent implantation due to acute coronary syndrome, multiple stents, diabetes, renal insufficiency with creatinine \>1.5 mg/dl) Abnormal coagulation function Local anesthesia surgery Inability to cooperate
Minimum Eligible Age

18 Years

Maximum Eligible Age

79 Years

Eligible Sex

ALL

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Sponsors

Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.

Fujian Medical University Union Hospital

OTHER

Sponsor Role lead

Responsible Party

Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.

Responsibility Role SPONSOR

Other Identifiers

Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.

Continued DAPT after PCI

Identifier Type: -

Identifier Source: org_study_id

More Related Trials

Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.