Comparison of Cardiovascular Risks Between Hip Fracture Surgery With Continued DAPT(Dual Antiplatelet Therapy ) Within 6 Weeks vs After 6 Weeks Post-PCI(Percutaneous Coronary Intervention): A Prospective Observational Cohort Study
NCT ID: NCT07024446
Last Updated: 2025-06-17
Study Results
The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.
Basic Information
Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.
NOT_YET_RECRUITING
50 participants
OBSERVATIONAL
2025-07-01
2027-07-01
Brief Summary
Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.
Compared to patients without coronary stents, those requiring NCS shortly after PCI face an increased risk of perioperative major adverse cardiac and cerebrovascular events (MACCE), primarily manifested as thrombotic and bleeding events. Guidelines recommend 6-12 months of dual antiplatelet therapy (DAPT) post-PCI to prevent stent thrombosis, which is associated with an elevated risk of perioperative bleeding during NCS. Multiple retrospective studies suggest that the incidence of MACCE decreases as the interval between PCI and NCS lengthens, reaching a risk level similar to non-PCI patients after 12 months. However, other studies indicate that the risk in patients with similar PCI-NCS intervals correlates more with surgical complexity and urgency. Guidelines advise adequate antiplatelet therapy post-PCI to prevent stent thrombosis and recommend avoiding elective surgery within 4-6 weeks after PCI, contingent on bleeding and thrombotic risk assessments.
Many post-PCI patients facing NCS option to delay surgery after weighing the risks of discontinuing antiplatelet therapy versus postponement, which not only reduces quality of life but also increases the risks associated with delayed surgery. Additionally, retrospective studies have found that in unavoidable emergency or time-sensitive surgeries, the heightened perioperative cardiovascular risk is primarily due to the underlying surgical condition affecting organ function, rather than the PCI-NCS interval or antiplatelet therapy discontinuation.
Recent advancements in minimally invasive surgical techniques have reduced trauma and bleeding, leading to broader indications for surgery in patients on anticoagulant or antiplatelet therapy. The widespread use of newer-generation drug-eluting stents (DES) with advanced antiproliferative drugs has further lowered stent thrombosis rates. Moreover, refined PCI techniques minimize vascular injury during stent placement, reducing the likelihood of extra-stent restenosis. From an anesthesiology perspective, concerns for post-PCI surgical patients extend beyond bleeding risks to whether cardiac function can withstand perioperative hemodynamic changes. As surgical and anesthetic techniques evolve, traditional single-method anesthesia is increasingly replaced by combined techniques that ensure adequate analgesia while minimizing hemodynamic disturbances, maintaining oxygen supply-demand balance, and reducing ischemic and bleeding events.
Hip fractures in elderly patients, often termed the "last fracture in life," carry high surgical and anesthetic risks for those with coronary artery disease. While PCI addresses coronary stenosis, the use or discontinuation of antiplatelet therapy exposes patients to bleeding and ischemic risks. The optimal timing for hip fracture surgery is within 48 hours; delays may lead to malunion, prolonged bedrest complications (e.g., pressure sores, pneumonia), and increased deep vein thrombosis risk. Modern hip fracture surgeries (e.g., internal fixation, hip replacement, Proximal femoral nail antirotation internal fixation) are well-established, with reduced bleeding and faster recovery, making it feasible to perform surgery without interrupting antiplatelet therapy.
Existing research primarily consists of retrospective analyses of cardiovascular risk prediction in post-PCI patients undergoing NCS, with no recent prospective studies. Guideline recommendations on PCI-NCS intervals remain unchanged since 2016. Consequently, many PCI patients must delay surgery, enduring unpredictable risks and diminished quality of life.
This study aims to prospectively observe the incidence of MACCE in hip fracture surgery performed within six weeks post-PCI without discontinuing DAPT. The findings may provide evidence for the feasibility of early post-PCI surgery, offer clinicians and patients safer antithrombotic strategies, and present a new option to improve patient quality of life.
Related Clinical Trials
Explore similar clinical trials based on study characteristics and research focus.
Risk Factors for Intertrochanteric Femoral Fractures With Concomitant Lateral Wall Involvement in Elderly Women
NCT07196982
Mini-invasive Preventive Fixation of the Contralateral Femoral Neck in Patients Operated on for a Femoral Neck Fracture
NCT04408053
Trial of Focused Cardiac Ultrasound for Fractured Neck of Femur Surgery
NCT02629484
Early Surgical Fixation of Low-Velocity Hip Fractures in Patients With Direct Oral Anticoagulation
NCT05070169
Evaluation of Perioperative Management of Curative Anticoagulants in the Geriatric Perioperative Unit in Patient Hospitalized for Femoral Neck Fracture.
NCT05286671
Detailed Description
Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.
Conditions
See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.
Study Design
Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.
COHORT
PROSPECTIVE
Study Groups
Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.
Observation group
Within 6 weeks after PCI
The time interval between PCI and NCS
Using 6 weeks post-PCI as the demarcation point, patients within 6 weeks were assigned to the observation group, while those beyond 6 weeks formed the control group.
Control group
beyond 6 weeks after PCI
The time interval between PCI and NCS
Using 6 weeks post-PCI as the demarcation point, patients within 6 weeks were assigned to the observation group, while those beyond 6 weeks formed the control group.
Interventions
Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.
The time interval between PCI and NCS
Using 6 weeks post-PCI as the demarcation point, patients within 6 weeks were assigned to the observation group, while those beyond 6 weeks formed the control group.
Eligibility Criteria
Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.
Inclusion Criteria
Exclusion Criteria
18 Years
79 Years
ALL
No
Sponsors
Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.
Fujian Medical University Union Hospital
OTHER
Responsible Party
Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.
Other Identifiers
Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.
Continued DAPT after PCI
Identifier Type: -
Identifier Source: org_study_id
More Related Trials
Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.