Venetoclax + Azacytidine for Newly Diagnosed ETP-like ALL and T-ALL With Myeloid Mutations

NCT ID: NCT07012447

Last Updated: 2025-06-10

Study Results

Results pending

The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.

Basic Information

Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.

Recruitment Status

RECRUITING

Clinical Phase

PHASE2

Total Enrollment

32 participants

Study Classification

INTERVENTIONAL

Study Start Date

2025-04-01

Study Completion Date

2028-05-01

Brief Summary

Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.

The goal of this clinical trial is to evaluate the efficacy and safety of venetoclax combined with azacitidine in treating newly diagnosed early T-cell precursor (ETP)-like acute lymphoblastic leukemia (ALL), T-ALL with myeloid mutations, or T/myeloid mixed-phenotype acute leukemia (T/My-MPAL).

Participant population: Patients aged ≥14 years diagnosed with ETP-like leukemia, T-ALL with myeloid mutations, or T/My-MPAL, regardless of sex/gender.

The main question it aims to answer: Does venetoclax plus azacitidine achieve a significantly higher overall response rate (ORR: CR + CRi) compared to historical controls (54% vs. 90%) after two induction cycles?

Comparison group: Researchers will compare ORR outcomes to historical data from conventional chemotherapy regimens to assess treatment superiority.

Participants will:

* Receive two 28-day cycles of venetoclax (oral, 100 mg D1, 200 mg D2, 400 mg D3-28) and azacitidine (75 mg/m²/day SC, D1-7).
* Undergo serial bone marrow biopsies, blood tests, and imaging (e.g., PET-CT) for response assessment.
* Follow dose adjustment protocols for toxicity management (e.g., neutropenia, thrombocytopenia).

Detailed Description

Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.

This study addresses the unmet need for effective therapies in high-risk T-ALL subtypes, including ETP-like leukemia and T/My-MPAL, which exhibit myeloid-like genetic profiles (e.g., FLT3, DNMT3A, RUNX1 mutations) and poor outcomes under conventional chemotherapy (5-year OS \<40%). Preclinical and pilot clinical data demonstrate that venetoclax, a BCL-2 inhibitor, synergizes with azacitidine, a hypomethylating agent, to induce apoptosis in leukemia stem cells by targeting oxidative phosphorylation and epigenetic dysregulation. Building on a pilot study, this Phase II trial employs a single-arm design to validate efficacy in a larger cohort.

Patients receive two induction cycles of venetoclax (oral, 100 mg D1, 200 mg D2, 400 mg D3-28) and azacitidine (75 mg/m² SC D1-7), with response assessed via bone marrow morphology, flow cytometry, and molecular testing (Days 22-35).

Early Efficacy Evaluation: After the first induction cycle (Days 22-35), response is assessed via bone marrow morphology, flow cytometry, and molecular profiling.

Stopping Criteria:

Patients failing to achieve at least partial remission (PR) after Cycle 1 will be withdrawn from the study.

Patients failing to achieve CR or CRi at the end of Cycle 2 will also discontinue study treatment.

Consolidation strategies include allo-HSCT or high dose cytarabine (HiDAC) for fit patients or maintenance therapy for unfit individuals.

Rigorous safety monitoring follows NCI-CTCAE v5.0 criteria, with dose adjustments for hematologic/non-hematologic toxicities.

Statistical analysis includes intent-to-treat and per-protocol populations, with ORR analyzed via exact binomial tests and survival endpoints via Kaplan-Meier/Cox regression. The study integrates translational biomarkers (e.g., BCL-2 expression, mutational profiling) to identify predictors of response, aiming to establish a novel, mechanism-driven regimen for these aggressive leukemias.

Conditions

See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.

Early T Acute Lymphoblastic Leukemia T-Acute Lymphoblastic Leukemia Mixed Phenotype Acute Leukemia, T/Myeloid, Nos

Study Design

Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.

Allocation Method

NA

Intervention Model

SINGLE_GROUP

Primary Study Purpose

TREATMENT

Blinding Strategy

NONE

Study Groups

Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.

Investigational ( venetoclax, azacytidine)

Two cycles induction as venetoclax (oral, 100 mg D1, 200 mg D2, 400 mg D3-28) and azacitidine (75 mg/m² SC D1-7); Consolidation: For fit patients, if those with MRD (Minimal Residual Disease) are negative or refuse to undergo allo-HSCT (Hematopoietic stem-cell transplantation), intermediate-dose (2g/m² q12h, days 1-3) cytarabine-based therapy is administered for 3-4 cycles; if patients are MRD-positive, they undergo allo-HSCT.

For unfit patients, each venetoclax combined with azacitidine treatment cycle is anticipated to be 28 days in length until progression of disease, although cycle delays may occur due to delayed blood count recovery.

Group Type EXPERIMENTAL

Venetoclax

Intervention Type DRUG

Orally by mouth

Azacitidine

Intervention Type DRUG

Subcutaneous injection

Cytarabine

Intervention Type DRUG

Intravenous infusion

Interventions

Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.

Venetoclax

Orally by mouth

Intervention Type DRUG

Azacitidine

Subcutaneous injection

Intervention Type DRUG

Cytarabine

Intravenous infusion

Intervention Type DRUG

Other Intervention Names

Discover alternative or legacy names that may be used to describe the listed interventions across different sources.

Venclexta Ara-C

Eligibility Criteria

Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.

Inclusion Criteria

1. No gender restrictions
2. Age ≥ 14 years
3. Confirmed diagnosis of one of the following:

ETP-like leukemia (CD7⁺, CD1a-, CD8-, with CD5 expression stratified as ETP-ALL ≤75% or Near-ETP-ALL \>75%) T-cell acute lymphoblastic leukemia (T-ALL) with myeloid mutations (including FLT3, DNMT3A, STAG2, IDH1/2, RUNX1, EZH2, WT1, ASXL1/2, SF3B1, TET2, BCOR, BCORL1, and MLL-PTD) T/myeloid mixed phenotype acute leukemia (T/My-MPAL) (with concurrent T-lineage and myeloid markers, e.g., cCD3⁺/mCD3⁺, CD7⁺, MPO⁺)
4. Newly diagnosed patients without prior induction therapy Limited prior therapy allowed: hydroxyurea, dexamethasone, or low-dose cytarabine/venetoclax (cumulative dose \<0.5g), and leukocytapheresis
5. Expected survival time ≥ 3 months
6. Liver function: total bilirubin ≤ 2× ULN; ALT/AST ≤ 3× ULN (or ≤ 5× ULN if liver infiltration by leukemia is present) ; Renal function: endogenous creatinine clearance ≥ 30 ml/min; Cardiac function: left ventricular ejection fraction \> 45%
7. Demonstrated capacity to understand the study and willingness to provide informed consent

Exclusion Criteria

1. Presence of recurrent genetic abnormalities such as t(8;21), t(15;17), inv(16)/t(16;16) leukemia
2. Prior hypersensitivity to study drugs or compounds of similar chemical structure
3. Active uncontrolled infections as determined by the investigator
4. Active bleeding
5. Recent history (within 1 year) of thrombosis, embolism, or cerebral hemorrhage
6. Pregnancy, breastfeeding, or unwillingness to use contraception in women of childbearing potential
7. Drug addiction or chronic alcoholism that could interfere with trial evaluation
8. Psychiatric disorders or other conditions that would prevent obtaining informed consent or compliance with trial requirements
9. Any condition deemed unsuitable for trial participation by the investigator
Minimum Eligible Age

14 Years

Eligible Sex

ALL

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Sponsors

Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.

yuejun Liu

OTHER

Sponsor Role lead

Responsible Party

Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.

yuejun Liu

Physician

Responsibility Role SPONSOR_INVESTIGATOR

Principal Investigators

Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.

Yue-jun Liu

Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR

The First Affiliated Hospital of Soochow University

Locations

Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.

Ethical Committee of the First Affliated Hospital of Soochow University

Suzhou, Jiangsu, China

Site Status RECRUITING

Countries

Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.

China

Central Contacts

Reach out to these primary contacts for questions about participation or study logistics.

Yue-jun Liu

Role: CONTACT

008613915535177

Facility Contacts

Find local site contact details for specific facilities participating in the trial.

Zhou-lin Lu

Role: primary

008613914086271

Other Identifiers

Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.

SZ-ETP01

Identifier Type: -

Identifier Source: org_study_id

More Related Trials

Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.