Rituximab Versus Ravulizumab, Inebilizumab, Satralizumab, and Eculizumab in NMOSD

NCT ID: NCT07010302

Last Updated: 2025-06-11

Study Results

Results pending

The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.

Basic Information

Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.

Recruitment Status

NOT_YET_RECRUITING

Clinical Phase

PHASE4

Total Enrollment

160 participants

Study Classification

INTERVENTIONAL

Study Start Date

2025-11-30

Study Completion Date

2030-02-28

Brief Summary

Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.

Neuromyelitis Optica Spectrum Disorder (NMOSD) is a rare autoimmune condition that mainly affects the eyes and spinal cord, causing serious symptoms such as vision loss, paralysis, and severe pain. This trial compares the effectiveness and safety of five medications commonly used to prevent NMOSD relapses: rituximab, ravulizumab, inebilizumab, satralizumab, and eculizumab.

In this study, 160 adults with NMOSD who test positive for a specific antibody (AQP4-IgG) will participate. They will be randomly assigned to receive either rituximab or one of the four other FDA-approved medications. The main goal is to find out which treatment best prevents relapses and has fewer serious side effects. The trial will also measure disability, patient satisfaction, quality of life, and biomarkers that help track disease activity.

Participants will have regular assessments, including medical exams, surveys, and tests for vision, walking ability, and brain function. They will report any side effects or health issues experienced during the study. The trial will last from one to four years for each participant.

This research aims to help patients and doctors make better-informed treatment decisions by providing clear evidence about the best available therapies for NMOSD.

Detailed Description

Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.

Neuromyelitis Optica Spectrum Disorder (NMOSD) is an autoimmune inflammatory disorder primarily affecting the optic nerves and spinal cord, leading to symptoms such as blindness, severe muscle weakness, paralysis, and significant pain. This study aims to directly compare the clinical effectiveness and safety profiles of five distinct therapies widely utilized to prevent disease relapses in patients with NMOSD who test positive for aquaporin-4 antibodies (AQP4-IgG): rituximab, ravulizumab, inebilizumab, satralizumab, and eculizumab.

The study is designed as an international, multicenter, randomized, adaptive clinical trial. It involves enrolling 160 adult participants diagnosed with AQP4-IgG positive NMOSD, who will be randomized in equal numbers to receive either rituximab or one of the four other FDA-approved therapies-ravulizumab, inebilizumab, satralizumab, or eculizumab. Patients randomized to the non-rituximab group will undergo further randomization into one of these four comparator medications. Additionally, the study incorporates an observational cohort for patients who decline randomization but agree to be followed according to the same protocol.

The primary objective is to evaluate the comparative effectiveness of rituximab versus the other treatments in preventing NMOSD relapses and treatment failure due to adverse events. Secondary objectives include comparing disability outcomes, evaluating treatment-related adverse events, and assessing impacts on patient-reported quality of life, as well as examining changes in biomarkers relevant to NMOSD disease activity.

Participants will undergo comprehensive evaluations at regular intervals, including detailed neurological examinations, standardized functional assessments (Expanded Disability Status Scale \[EDSS\], Multiple Sclerosis Functional Composite \[MSFC\]), visual acuity and contrast sensitivity testing, and cognitive assessments. Additionally, patient-reported outcomes such as fatigue, pain, mental health status, and overall quality of life will be collected systematically through validated surveys. Safety assessments will include regular monitoring of blood work, clinical evaluations for infections and other complications, and documentation of all adverse events.

Advanced exploratory analyses will also include biomarker studies involving optical coherence tomography (OCT) to assess retinal nerve fiber layer loss, and assays for serum neurofilament light chain (NfL) and glial fibrillary acidic protein (GFAP) levels. The study will track direct and indirect healthcare costs, as well as impacts on employment and caregiver burden.

The duration of participation will range from one to four years, depending on when participants enroll and their clinical outcomes. All data will be rigorously analyzed using advanced statistical methods, including time-to-event analyses, mixed-effects models, and Bayesian hierarchical approaches to allow robust comparative effectiveness evaluations.

Ultimately, this research aims to provide high-quality, head-to-head data to inform clinical decision-making, optimize treatment strategies, and improve patient outcomes for those living with NMOSD.

Conditions

See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.

NMOSD

Study Design

Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.

Allocation Method

RANDOMIZED

Intervention Model

PARALLEL

Primary Study Purpose

TREATMENT

Blinding Strategy

DOUBLE

Investigators Outcome Assessors

Study Groups

Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.

Rituximab

Group Type ACTIVE_COMPARATOR

Rituximab (R)

Intervention Type DRUG

1000 mg at weeks 0 and 2 followed by 1000 mg every 6 months

Complement inhibitors

Ravulizumab or eculizumab

Group Type EXPERIMENTAL

Eculizumab (Soliris®)

Intervention Type DRUG

900 mg weekly for 4 weeks, followed by 1200 mg every 2 weeks

Ravulizumab

Intervention Type DRUG

* 40 to \< 60 kg: 2400 mg
* 60 to \< 100 kg: 2700 mg
* 100 kg: 3000 mg as an induction dose, followed by
* 40 to \< 60 kg: 3000 mg
* 60 to \< 100 kg: 3300 mg
* 100 kg: 3600 mg Every 8 weeks starting 15 days after loading dose

Inebilizumab

Group Type EXPERIMENTAL

Inebilizumab

Intervention Type DRUG

300 mg on Day 1 and Day 15, followed by 300 mg every 6 months

Satralizumab

Group Type EXPERIMENTAL

Satralizumab

Intervention Type DRUG

120 mg at Weeks 0, 2, 4, followed by 120 mg every 4 weeks

Open-label, non-randomized

Open-label, non-randomized

Group Type OTHER

Rituximab (R)

Intervention Type DRUG

1000 mg at weeks 0 and 2 followed by 1000 mg every 6 months

Eculizumab (Soliris®)

Intervention Type DRUG

900 mg weekly for 4 weeks, followed by 1200 mg every 2 weeks

Ravulizumab

Intervention Type DRUG

* 40 to \< 60 kg: 2400 mg
* 60 to \< 100 kg: 2700 mg
* 100 kg: 3000 mg as an induction dose, followed by
* 40 to \< 60 kg: 3000 mg
* 60 to \< 100 kg: 3300 mg
* 100 kg: 3600 mg Every 8 weeks starting 15 days after loading dose

Satralizumab

Intervention Type DRUG

120 mg at Weeks 0, 2, 4, followed by 120 mg every 4 weeks

Inebilizumab

Intervention Type DRUG

300 mg on Day 1 and Day 15, followed by 300 mg every 6 months

Interventions

Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.

Rituximab (R)

1000 mg at weeks 0 and 2 followed by 1000 mg every 6 months

Intervention Type DRUG

Eculizumab (Soliris®)

900 mg weekly for 4 weeks, followed by 1200 mg every 2 weeks

Intervention Type DRUG

Ravulizumab

* 40 to \< 60 kg: 2400 mg
* 60 to \< 100 kg: 2700 mg
* 100 kg: 3000 mg as an induction dose, followed by
* 40 to \< 60 kg: 3000 mg
* 60 to \< 100 kg: 3300 mg
* 100 kg: 3600 mg Every 8 weeks starting 15 days after loading dose

Intervention Type DRUG

Satralizumab

120 mg at Weeks 0, 2, 4, followed by 120 mg every 4 weeks

Intervention Type DRUG

Inebilizumab

300 mg on Day 1 and Day 15, followed by 300 mg every 6 months

Intervention Type DRUG

Other Intervention Names

Discover alternative or legacy names that may be used to describe the listed interventions across different sources.

Rituxan Truxima

Eligibility Criteria

Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.

Inclusion Criteria

* Diagnosis of NMOSD according to the 2015 International Panel for NMO Diagnosis (IPND) consensus criteria.
* Seropositivity for AQP4 immunoglobulin G (AQP4-IgG) confirmed by a cell-based assay (either live or fixed) that meets the threshold for positivity set by the local testing laboratory.
* Age ≥18 years at the time of consent.
* Ability and willingness to provide informed consent and comply with all study procedures, including scheduled visits, laboratory tests, and assessments.
* Eligible to receive any of the study drugs based on clinical judgment

Exclusion Criteria

* Known active hepatitis B virus (HBV) infection, defined as a positive hepatitis B surface antigen or detectable HBV DNA by PCR.
* Known active hepatitis C virus (HCV) infection, defined as detectable HCV RNA by PCR.
* Known active or latent tuberculosis, evidenced by a positive interferon-gamma release assay (IGRA) unless fully treated per local guidelines before enrollment.
* Known or suspected immunodeficiency disorders, including but not limited to HIV infection with CD4 count \<200 cells/mm³ or any condition requiring chronic immunosuppressive therapy outside the scope of the study drugs.
* Pregnancy or breastfeeding, or intention to conceive during the study period. Pregnancy is excluded due to insufficient safety data for the investigational treatments in this population. Women of childbearing potential must agree to use effective contraception throughout the study and for a defined period following the last dose of study drug, per product labeling or institutional guidance.
* Any medical, psychiatric, or neurological condition that, in the investigator's opinion, may interfere with study participation, pose additional risk to the participant, or confound interpretation of study results.
* Inability or unwillingness to comply with the requirements of the protocol, including scheduled visits, evaluations, or procedures, based on investigator assessment.
* Known hypersensitivity or severe allergic reaction to any component of the study drugs or pre-medications required for infusion.
Minimum Eligible Age

18 Years

Eligible Sex

ALL

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Sponsors

Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.

Patient-Centered Outcomes Research Institute

OTHER

Sponsor Role collaborator

Charite University, Berlin, Germany

OTHER

Sponsor Role collaborator

The Sumaira Foundation

UNKNOWN

Sponsor Role collaborator

Massachusetts General Hospital

OTHER

Sponsor Role lead

Responsible Party

Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.

Philippe A. Bilodeau, MD

Principal investigator

Responsibility Role PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR

Principal Investigators

Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.

Philippe-Antoine Bilodeau, MD

Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR

Massachusetts General Hospital

Locations

Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.

Massachusetts General Hospital

Boston, Massachusetts, United States

Site Status

Brigham and Women's Hospital

Boston, Massachusetts, United States

Site Status

Charité - Universitätsmedizin Berlin

Berlin, , Germany

Site Status

Countries

Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.

United States Germany

Central Contacts

Reach out to these primary contacts for questions about participation or study logistics.

Philippe-Antoine Bilodeau, MD

Role: CONTACT

617-726-7565

Anastasia Vishnevetsky, MD

Role: CONTACT

617-726-7565

Facility Contacts

Find local site contact details for specific facilities participating in the trial.

Michael Levy, MD

Role: primary

(617) 726-7565

Shamik Bhattacharyya, MD

Role: primary

(617) 726-7565

Friedemann, Paul

Role: primary

+49 30 450 539 705

References

Explore related publications, articles, or registry entries linked to this study.

Barreras P, Vasileiou ES, Filippatou AG, Fitzgerald KC, Levy M, Pardo CA, Newsome SD, Mowry EM, Calabresi PA, Sotirchos ES. Long-term Effectiveness and Safety of Rituximab in Neuromyelitis Optica Spectrum Disorder and MOG Antibody Disease. Neurology. 2022 Nov 29;99(22):e2504-e2516. doi: 10.1212/WNL.0000000000201260. Epub 2022 Aug 31.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 36240094 (View on PubMed)

Yamamura T, Weinshenker B, Yeaman MR, De Seze J, Patti F, Lobo P, von Budingen HC, Kou X, Weber K, Greenberg B. Long-term safety of satralizumab in neuromyelitis optica spectrum disorder (NMOSD) from SAkuraSky and SAkuraStar. Mult Scler Relat Disord. 2022 Oct;66:104025. doi: 10.1016/j.msard.2022.104025. Epub 2022 Jul 5.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 36007339 (View on PubMed)

Rensel M, Zabeti A, Mealy MA, Cimbora D, She D, Drappa J, Katz E. Long-term efficacy and safety of inebilizumab in neuromyelitis optica spectrum disorder: Analysis of aquaporin-4-immunoglobulin G-seropositive participants taking inebilizumab for ⩾4 years in the N-MOmentum trial. Mult Scler. 2022 May;28(6):925-932. doi: 10.1177/13524585211047223. Epub 2021 Oct 1.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 34595983 (View on PubMed)

Kumpfel T, Giglhuber K, Aktas O, Ayzenberg I, Bellmann-Strobl J, Haussler V, Havla J, Hellwig K, Hummert MW, Jarius S, Kleiter I, Klotz L, Krumbholz M, Paul F, Ringelstein M, Ruprecht K, Senel M, Stellmann JP, Bergh FT, Trebst C, Tumani H, Warnke C, Wildemann B, Berthele A; Neuromyelitis Optica Study Group (NEMOS). Update on the diagnosis and treatment of neuromyelitis optica spectrum disorders (NMOSD) - revised recommendations of the Neuromyelitis Optica Study Group (NEMOS). Part II: Attack therapy and long-term management. J Neurol. 2024 Jan;271(1):141-176. doi: 10.1007/s00415-023-11910-z. Epub 2023 Sep 7.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 37676297 (View on PubMed)

Nosadini M, Alper G, Riney CJ, Benson LA, Mohammad SS, Ramanathan S, Nolan M, Appleton R, Leventer RJ, Deiva K, Brilot F, Gorman MP, Waldman AT, Banwell B, Dale RC. Rituximab monitoring and redosing in pediatric neuromyelitis optica spectrum disorder. Neurol Neuroimmunol Neuroinflamm. 2016 Jan 21;3(1):e188. doi: 10.1212/NXI.0000000000000188. eCollection 2016 Feb.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 26819962 (View on PubMed)

Rover C, Friede T. Dynamically borrowing strength from another study through shrinkage estimation. Stat Methods Med Res. 2020 Jan;29(1):293-308. doi: 10.1177/0962280219833079. Epub 2019 Mar 1.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 30821201 (View on PubMed)

Wingerchuk DM, Banwell B, Bennett JL, Cabre P, Carroll W, Chitnis T, de Seze J, Fujihara K, Greenberg B, Jacob A, Jarius S, Lana-Peixoto M, Levy M, Simon JH, Tenembaum S, Traboulsee AL, Waters P, Wellik KE, Weinshenker BG; International Panel for NMO Diagnosis. International consensus diagnostic criteria for neuromyelitis optica spectrum disorders. Neurology. 2015 Jul 14;85(2):177-89. doi: 10.1212/WNL.0000000000001729. Epub 2015 Jun 19.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 26092914 (View on PubMed)

Marcinno A, Marnetto F, Valentino P, Martire S, Balbo A, Drago A, Leto M, Capobianco M, Panzica G, Bertolotto A. Rituximab-induced hypogammaglobulinemia in patients with neuromyelitis optica spectrum disorders. Neurol Neuroimmunol Neuroinflamm. 2018 Sep 13;5(6):e498. doi: 10.1212/NXI.0000000000000498. eCollection 2018 Nov.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 30258855 (View on PubMed)

Clardy SL, Pittock SJ, Aktas O, Nakahara J, Isobe N, Centonze D, Fam S, Kielhorn A, Yu JC, Jansen J, Zhang I. Network Meta-analysis of Ravulizumab and Alternative Interventions for the Treatment of Neuromyelitis Optica Spectrum Disorder. Neurol Ther. 2024 Jun;13(3):535-549. doi: 10.1007/s40120-024-00597-7. Epub 2024 May 9.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 38722571 (View on PubMed)

Yamamura T, Kleiter I, Fujihara K, Palace J, Greenberg B, Zakrzewska-Pniewska B, Patti F, Tsai CP, Saiz A, Yamazaki H, Kawata Y, Wright P, De Seze J. Trial of Satralizumab in Neuromyelitis Optica Spectrum Disorder. N Engl J Med. 2019 Nov 28;381(22):2114-2124. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa1901747.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 31774956 (View on PubMed)

Pittock SJ, Barnett M, Bennett JL, Berthele A, de Seze J, Levy M, Nakashima I, Oreja-Guevara C, Palace J, Paul F, Pozzilli C, Yountz M, Allen K, Mashhoon Y, Kim HJ. Ravulizumab in Aquaporin-4-Positive Neuromyelitis Optica Spectrum Disorder. Ann Neurol. 2023 Jun;93(6):1053-1068. doi: 10.1002/ana.26626. Epub 2023 Apr 5.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 36866852 (View on PubMed)

Pittock SJ, Berthele A, Fujihara K, Kim HJ, Levy M, Palace J, Nakashima I, Terzi M, Totolyan N, Viswanathan S, Wang KC, Pace A, Fujita KP, Armstrong R, Wingerchuk DM. Eculizumab in Aquaporin-4-Positive Neuromyelitis Optica Spectrum Disorder. N Engl J Med. 2019 Aug 15;381(7):614-625. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa1900866. Epub 2019 May 3.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 31050279 (View on PubMed)

Tahara M, Oeda T, Okada K, Kiriyama T, Ochi K, Maruyama H, Fukaura H, Nomura K, Shimizu Y, Mori M, Nakashima I, Misu T, Umemura A, Yamamoto K, Sawada H. Safety and efficacy of rituximab in neuromyelitis optica spectrum disorders (RIN-1 study): a multicentre, randomised, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial. Lancet Neurol. 2020 Apr;19(4):298-306. doi: 10.1016/S1474-4422(20)30066-1. Epub 2020 Mar 18.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 32199095 (View on PubMed)

Kim SH, Huh SY, Lee SJ, Joung A, Kim HJ. A 5-year follow-up of rituximab treatment in patients with neuromyelitis optica spectrum disorder. JAMA Neurol. 2013 Sep 1;70(9):1110-7. doi: 10.1001/jamaneurol.2013.3071.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 23897062 (View on PubMed)

Kleiter I, Gold R. Present and Future Therapies in Neuromyelitis Optica Spectrum Disorders. Neurotherapeutics. 2016 Jan;13(1):70-83. doi: 10.1007/s13311-015-0400-8.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 26597098 (View on PubMed)

Trebst C, Jarius S, Berthele A, Paul F, Schippling S, Wildemann B, Borisow N, Kleiter I, Aktas O, Kumpfel T; Neuromyelitis Optica Study Group (NEMOS). Update on the diagnosis and treatment of neuromyelitis optica: recommendations of the Neuromyelitis Optica Study Group (NEMOS). J Neurol. 2014 Jan;261(1):1-16. doi: 10.1007/s00415-013-7169-7. Epub 2013 Nov 23.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 24272588 (View on PubMed)

Sellner J, Boggild M, Clanet M, Hintzen RQ, Illes Z, Montalban X, Du Pasquier RA, Polman CH, Sorensen PS, Hemmer B. EFNS guidelines on diagnosis and management of neuromyelitis optica. Eur J Neurol. 2010 Aug;17(8):1019-32. doi: 10.1111/j.1468-1331.2010.03066.x. Epub 2010 Jun 7.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 20528913 (View on PubMed)

Mealy MA, Kessler RA, Rimler Z, Reid A, Totonis L, Cutter G, Kister I, Levy M. Mortality in neuromyelitis optica is strongly associated with African ancestry. Neurol Neuroimmunol Neuroinflamm. 2018 Jun 7;5(4):e468. doi: 10.1212/NXI.0000000000000468. eCollection 2018 Jul. No abstract available.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 29892608 (View on PubMed)

Kim SH, Mealy MA, Levy M, Schmidt F, Ruprecht K, Paul F, Ringelstein M, Aktas O, Hartung HP, Asgari N, Tsz-Ching JL, Siritho S, Prayoonwiwat N, Shin HJ, Hyun JW, Han M, Leite MI, Palace J, Kim HJ. Racial differences in neuromyelitis optica spectrum disorder. Neurology. 2018 Nov 27;91(22):e2089-e2099. doi: 10.1212/WNL.0000000000006574. Epub 2018 Oct 26.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 30366977 (View on PubMed)

Duchow A, Bellmann-Strobl J, Friede T, Aktas O, Angstwurm K, Ayzenberg I, Berthele A, Dawin E, Engels D, Fischer K, Flaskamp M, Giglhuber K, Grothe M, Havla J, Hummert MW, Jarius S, Kaste M, Kern P, Kleiter I, Klotz L, Korporal-Kuhnke M, Kraemer M, Krumbholz M, Kumpfel T, Lohmann L, Ringelstein M, Rommer P, Schindler P, Schubert C, Schwake C, Senel M, Then Bergh F, Tkachenko D, Tumani H, Trebst C, Vardakas I, Walter A, Warnke C, Weber MS, Wickel J, Wildemann B, Winkelmann A, Paul F, Stellmann JP, Haussler V; Neuromyelitis Optica Study Group (NEMOS). Time to Disability Milestones and Annualized Relapse Rates in NMOSD and MOGAD. Ann Neurol. 2024 Apr;95(4):720-732. doi: 10.1002/ana.26858. Epub 2024 Jan 13.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 38086777 (View on PubMed)

Kleiter I, Gahlen A, Borisow N, Fischer K, Wernecke KD, Wegner B, Hellwig K, Pache F, Ruprecht K, Havla J, Krumbholz M, Kumpfel T, Aktas O, Hartung HP, Ringelstein M, Geis C, Kleinschnitz C, Berthele A, Hemmer B, Angstwurm K, Stellmann JP, Schuster S, Stangel M, Lauda F, Tumani H, Mayer C, Zeltner L, Ziemann U, Linker R, Schwab M, Marziniak M, Then Bergh F, Hofstadt-van Oy U, Neuhaus O, Winkelmann A, Marouf W, Faiss J, Wildemann B, Paul F, Jarius S, Trebst C; Neuromyelitis Optica Study Group. Neuromyelitis optica: Evaluation of 871 attacks and 1,153 treatment courses. Ann Neurol. 2016 Feb;79(2):206-16. doi: 10.1002/ana.24554. Epub 2015 Nov 26.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 26537743 (View on PubMed)

O'Connell K, Hamilton-Shield A, Woodhall M, Messina S, Mariano R, Waters P, Ramdas S, Leite MI, Palace J. Prevalence and incidence of neuromyelitis optica spectrum disorder, aquaporin-4 antibody-positive NMOSD and MOG antibody-positive disease in Oxfordshire, UK. J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry. 2020 Oct;91(10):1126-1128. doi: 10.1136/jnnp-2020-323158. Epub 2020 Jun 23. No abstract available.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 32576617 (View on PubMed)

Briggs FB, Shaia J. Prevalence of neuromyelitis optica spectrum disorder in the United States. Mult Scler. 2024 Jan 27:13524585231224683. doi: 10.1177/13524585231224683. Online ahead of print.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 38279789 (View on PubMed)

Kitley J, Leite MI, Nakashima I, Waters P, McNeillis B, Brown R, Takai Y, Takahashi T, Misu T, Elsone L, Woodhall M, George J, Boggild M, Vincent A, Jacob A, Fujihara K, Palace J. Prognostic factors and disease course in aquaporin-4 antibody-positive patients with neuromyelitis optica spectrum disorder from the United Kingdom and Japan. Brain. 2012 Jun;135(Pt 6):1834-49. doi: 10.1093/brain/aws109. Epub 2012 May 9.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 22577216 (View on PubMed)

Haussler V, Trebst C, Engels D, Pellkofer H, Havla J, Duchow A, Schindler P, Schwake C, Pakeerathan T, Fischer K, Ringelstein M, Lindenblatt G, Hummert MW, Tkachenko D, Butow F, Giglhuber K, Flaskamp M, Schiffmann I, Korporal-Kuhnke M, Jarius S, Dawin E, Revie L, Senel M, Herfurth M, Walter A, Pompsch M, Kleiter I, Angstwurm K, Kaste M, Grothe M, Wickel J, Rommer PS, Sieb JP, Kramer M, Then Bergh F, Tumani H, Klotz L, Wildemann B, Aktas O, Ayzenberg I, Bellmann-Strobl J, Paul F, Kumpfel T, Friede T, Berthele A, Stellmann JP; Neuromyelitis optica study group (NEMOS). Real-world multicentre cohort study on choices and effectiveness of immunotherapies in NMOSD and MOGAD. J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry. 2025 May 14;96(6):582-592. doi: 10.1136/jnnp-2024-334764.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 39730197 (View on PubMed)

Other Identifiers

Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.

40200

Identifier Type: -

Identifier Source: org_study_id

More Related Trials

Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.

Rituximab in Systemic Sclerosis
NCT01748084 COMPLETED PHASE2/PHASE3
FcRn Antagonists (Efgartigimod) for Acute NMOSD Attack
NCT06497374 NOT_YET_RECRUITING PHASE2