The Impact of Paraspinal Muscle Atrophy in Spine Surgeries
NCT ID: NCT07002918
Last Updated: 2025-06-04
Study Results
The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.
Basic Information
Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.
NOT_YET_RECRUITING
55 participants
OBSERVATIONAL
2025-06-30
2027-09-30
Brief Summary
Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.
Does paraspinal muscle atrophy worsen lumbar spine fusion surgeries outcomes? Participants undergoing lumbar spine fusion surgeries as part of their treatment for degenerative lumbar spine diseases will answer survey questions about their low back pain and daily activities for 1 year.
Related Clinical Trials
Explore similar clinical trials based on study characteristics and research focus.
Outcomes of Surgery for Degenerative Lumbar Spine Diseases
NCT06540274
Paraspinal Muscle Degeneration, Bone Mass and Clinical Outcomes in Patients With Lumbar Degenerative Diseases
NCT05190289
Laminectomy Alone Versus Laminectomy and Fusion for Traumatic Cervical Spinal Cord Injury Without Instability
NCT05360524
Trunk Forward Ability in Patients With Lumbar Fusion
NCT01585337
Risk Factors of Paraspinal Muscles in Degenerative Lumbar Spondylolisthesis
NCT06797700
Detailed Description
Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.
* Sample Size Calculation:
Based on determining the main outcome variable, The estimated minimum required sample size is 55 patients.
The sample size was calculated using Epi-info version 7 software, based on the following assumptions:
Main outcome variable is to determine the impact of paraspinal muscle atrophy on lumbar spine fusion outcomes. Previous studies indicate a significant decrease in paraspinal muscle volume one year after surgery, dropping from 67.8% to 60.4%. This reduction correlates significantly with physical and mental outcomes, as well as pain levels. With 80% confidence, the margin of error for these findings is estimated to be within 3%.
\- Study tools (in detail, e.g., lab methods, instruments, steps, chemicals, …):
A. Preoperative:
* Magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) of lumbar spine will be used to measure the total cross-sectional area (TCSA), functional cross-sectional area (FCSA) and fatty infiltration (FI) of erector spinae (ES), multifidus (MF) and psoas major (PM) at the level of diseased segment together with one level above \& below using ImageJ software v1.54p.
* plain X-rays will be used to measure local kyphotic angle and lumbar lordosis using Surgimap software v2.3.2.1.
* Oswerty disability index Arabic version (ODI)
* EuroQol-5-dimension 5-level Arabic version (EQ-5D-5L)
* Visual analogue scale (VAS) B. Day one postoperative: Postoperative X-ray. C. Two weeks postoperative: Wound check. ODI, EQ-5D-5L, Visual Analogue Score. D. Six weeks postoperative: Wound check. ODI, EQ-5D-5L, Visual Analogue Score. E. Three months postoperative: ODI, EQ-5D-5L, Visual Analogue Score. F. Six months Postoperative: ODI, EQ-5D-5L, Visual Analogue Score, X-ray. G. One year Postoperative: ODI, EQ-5D-5L, Visual Analogue Score, X-ray, MRI if the patient is still complaining.
Conditions
See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.
Study Design
Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.
COHORT
PROSPECTIVE
Eligibility Criteria
Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.
Inclusion Criteria
Exclusion Criteria
* History of previous lumbar surgery.
* Patients diagnosed with spondylolysis.
* Other pathological conditions such as fractures, infections or tumors.
* Uncontrolled comorbidities.
18 Years
ALL
No
Sponsors
Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.
Assiut University
OTHER
Responsible Party
Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.
Adnan Ahmad Elkamel
Resident Doctor
Principal Investigators
Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.
Ahmed S Abdelgawaad, Professor Doctor
Role: STUDY_CHAIR
Assiut University
Amr H Ahmed, MD
Role: STUDY_DIRECTOR
Assiut University
Adnan A Elkamel, Bachelor degree
Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR
Assiut University
Locations
Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.
Assiut University
Asyut, Asyut Governorate, Egypt
Countries
Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.
Central Contacts
Reach out to these primary contacts for questions about participation or study logistics.
Facility Contacts
Find local site contact details for specific facilities participating in the trial.
Vice President of graduate studies of Assiut University
Role: primary
References
Explore related publications, articles, or registry entries linked to this study.
Shawky Abdelgawaad A, El-Sharkawi M, Sarhan AM, Hassanien MA, Aziz M. Validation of the arabic version of the EuroQol-5-dimension 5-level (EQ-5D-5 L) in patients with spinal degenerative diseases. BMC Public Health. 2024 Apr 23;24(1):1119. doi: 10.1186/s12889-024-18367-3.
Algarni AS, Ghorbel S, Jones JG, Guermazi M. Validation of an Arabic version of the Oswestry index in Saudi Arabia. Ann Phys Rehabil Med. 2014 Dec;57(9-10):653-63. doi: 10.1016/j.rehab.2014.06.006. Epub 2014 Aug 4.
Waschke A, Hartmann C, Walter J, Dunisch P, Wahnschaff F, Kalff R, Ewald C. Denervation and atrophy of paraspinal muscles after open lumbar interbody fusion is associated with clinical outcome--electromyographic and CT-volumetric investigation of 30 patients. Acta Neurochir (Wien). 2014 Feb;156(2):235-44. doi: 10.1007/s00701-013-1981-9. Epub 2014 Jan 3.
Mayer TG, Vanharanta H, Gatchel RJ, Mooney V, Barnes D, Judge L, Smith S, Terry A. Comparison of CT scan muscle measurements and isokinetic trunk strength in postoperative patients. Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 1989 Jan;14(1):33-6. doi: 10.1097/00007632-198901000-00006.
Cooper RG, St Clair Forbes W, Jayson MI. Radiographic demonstration of paraspinal muscle wasting in patients with chronic low back pain. Br J Rheumatol. 1992 Jun;31(6):389-94. doi: 10.1093/rheumatology/31.6.389.
You KH, Cho M, Lee JH. Effect of Muscularity and Fatty Infiltration of Paraspinal Muscles on Outcome of Lumbar Interbody Fusion. J Korean Med Sci. 2023 May 22;38(20):e151. doi: 10.3346/jkms.2023.38.e151.
Alhaug OK, Dolatowski FC, Solberg TK, Lonne G. Predictors for failure after surgery for lumbar spinal stenosis: a prospective observational study. Spine J. 2023 Feb;23(2):261-270. doi: 10.1016/j.spinee.2022.10.010. Epub 2022 Nov 5.
Sihvonen T, Herno A, Paljarvi L, Airaksinen O, Partanen J, Tapaninaho A. Local denervation atrophy of paraspinal muscles in postoperative failed back syndrome. Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 1993 Apr;18(5):575-81. doi: 10.1097/00007632-199304000-00009.
Ravindra VM, Senglaub SS, Rattani A, Dewan MC, Hartl R, Bisson E, Park KB, Shrime MG. Degenerative Lumbar Spine Disease: Estimating Global Incidence and Worldwide Volume. Global Spine J. 2018 Dec;8(8):784-794. doi: 10.1177/2192568218770769. Epub 2018 Apr 24.
Other Identifiers
Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.
Paraspinal muscle atrophy
Identifier Type: -
Identifier Source: org_study_id
More Related Trials
Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.