Ultrasound-Guided Dry Needling vs PRP for Refractory Lateral Epicondylitis
NCT ID: NCT07002879
Last Updated: 2025-06-04
Study Results
The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.
Basic Information
Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.
COMPLETED
NA
50 participants
INTERVENTIONAL
2022-01-01
2023-09-01
Brief Summary
Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.
Participants were randomly assigned to two groups: 25 received ultrasound-guided dry needling and 25 received platelet-rich plasma (PRP) injections. All participants gave informed consent, and the study adhered to the Declaration of Helsinki. Baseline demographic and clinical data were collected, and the diagnosis was confirmed using Mills, Maudsley, and Thomsen tests, along with grip-strength assessment. Pain and function were evaluated using the PRTEE, Visual Analog Scale (VAS), and QuickDASH questionnaires at baseline, and at 1, 3, and 6 months post-treatment.
Ultrasound imaging was used to identify tendinopathic changes. Local anesthesia was administered with 2 mL of prilocaine.
In the dry needling group, an 18-gauge needle was used to fenestrate the tendon with 40-50 passes in a "peppering" motion under continuous ultrasound guidance.
In the PRP group, 15 mL of blood was drawn, centrifuged, and approximately 2 mL of PRP was injected into the lesion under ultrasound guidance.
After the procedure, patients were advised to apply ice, perform passive stretching, avoid lifting heavy objects, and refrain from NSAID use for two weeks. Gradual return to normal activities was encouraged thereafter to restore full elbow function.
Related Clinical Trials
Explore similar clinical trials based on study characteristics and research focus.
The Effectiveness of the Combination of PRP and ESWT in Lateral Epicondylitis
NCT05602571
5% and 15% Dextrose Prolotherapy Efficacy in Lateral Epicondylitis
NCT05066451
Comparison of the Efficacy of Dextrose Prolotherapy and Mesotherapy in Lateral Epicondylitis
NCT06538194
Comparative Study for the Optimal Treatment Method of Lateral Epicondylosis
NCT02052089
Low and High Dose Dextrose Prolotherapy in the Treatment of Lateral Epicondylitis
NCT04680936
Detailed Description
Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.
Conditions
See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.
Study Design
Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.
RANDOMIZED
PARALLEL
TREATMENT
NONE
Study Groups
Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.
dry needle
An 18-gauge needle was first used to fenestrate the common extensor tendon and lateral periosteum. Once adequate anesthesia was confirmed, an 18-gauge needle was inserted along the tendon's longitudinal axis (without exiting the skin) and advanced in a "peppering" motion 40 to 50 passes from superficial to deep layers over approximately two minutes.
dry needle
An 18-gauge needle was first used to fenestrate the common extensor tendon and lateral periosteum. Once adequate anesthesia was confirmed, an 18-gauge needle was inserted along the tendon's longitudinal axis (without exiting the skin) and advanced in a "peppering" motion 40 to 50 passes from superficial to deep layers over approximately two minutes
platelet rich plasma injection
A 15 mL peripheral blood sample was drawn and centrifuged at 3 000 rpm for 3 minutes. Approximately 2 mL of PRP was aspirated directly from the buffy coat and injected into the epicondylar region under ultrasound guidance.
Platelet Rich Plasma
A 15 mL peripheral blood sample was drawn and centrifuged at 3 000 rpm for 3 minutes. Approximately 2 mL of PRP was aspirated directly from the buffy coat and injected into the epicondylar region under ultrasound guidance.
Interventions
Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.
dry needle
An 18-gauge needle was first used to fenestrate the common extensor tendon and lateral periosteum. Once adequate anesthesia was confirmed, an 18-gauge needle was inserted along the tendon's longitudinal axis (without exiting the skin) and advanced in a "peppering" motion 40 to 50 passes from superficial to deep layers over approximately two minutes
Platelet Rich Plasma
A 15 mL peripheral blood sample was drawn and centrifuged at 3 000 rpm for 3 minutes. Approximately 2 mL of PRP was aspirated directly from the buffy coat and injected into the epicondylar region under ultrasound guidance.
Eligibility Criteria
Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.
Inclusion Criteria
Exclusion Criteria
18 Years
65 Years
ALL
No
Sponsors
Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.
Ankara University
OTHER
Responsible Party
Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.
Yusuf Kıratlıoğlu
Ankara University
Locations
Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.
Ankara University
Ankara, , Turkey (Türkiye)
Countries
Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.
Other Identifiers
Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.
İ07-436-22
Identifier Type: -
Identifier Source: org_study_id
More Related Trials
Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.