Ultrasound-Guided Dry Needling vs PRP for Refractory Lateral Epicondylitis

NCT ID: NCT07002879

Last Updated: 2025-06-04

Study Results

Results pending

The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.

Basic Information

Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.

Recruitment Status

COMPLETED

Clinical Phase

NA

Total Enrollment

50 participants

Study Classification

INTERVENTIONAL

Study Start Date

2022-01-01

Study Completion Date

2023-09-01

Brief Summary

Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.

This single-center, randomized, prospective study was conducted between January 2022 and September 2023 with ethics committee approval. Adults aged 18-65 with a clinical diagnosis of lateral epicondylitis-characterized by lateral elbow pain exacerbated by resisted wrist or middle finger extension-and who had not responded to at least six weeks of conservative treatment were included. Exclusion criteria included cervical disc disease, nerve entrapment, arthrosis, uncontrolled metabolic disorders, bleeding disorders, prior elbow surgery or injection, pregnancy, cognitive impairment, or compromised skin at the injection site. A G\*Power sample size calculation determined that at least 50 patients were needed.

Participants were randomly assigned to two groups: 25 received ultrasound-guided dry needling and 25 received platelet-rich plasma (PRP) injections. All participants gave informed consent, and the study adhered to the Declaration of Helsinki. Baseline demographic and clinical data were collected, and the diagnosis was confirmed using Mills, Maudsley, and Thomsen tests, along with grip-strength assessment. Pain and function were evaluated using the PRTEE, Visual Analog Scale (VAS), and QuickDASH questionnaires at baseline, and at 1, 3, and 6 months post-treatment.

Ultrasound imaging was used to identify tendinopathic changes. Local anesthesia was administered with 2 mL of prilocaine.

In the dry needling group, an 18-gauge needle was used to fenestrate the tendon with 40-50 passes in a "peppering" motion under continuous ultrasound guidance.

In the PRP group, 15 mL of blood was drawn, centrifuged, and approximately 2 mL of PRP was injected into the lesion under ultrasound guidance.

After the procedure, patients were advised to apply ice, perform passive stretching, avoid lifting heavy objects, and refrain from NSAID use for two weeks. Gradual return to normal activities was encouraged thereafter to restore full elbow function.

Detailed Description

Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.

Conditions

See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.

Lateral Epicondylitis

Study Design

Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.

Allocation Method

RANDOMIZED

Intervention Model

PARALLEL

Primary Study Purpose

TREATMENT

Blinding Strategy

NONE

Study Groups

Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.

dry needle

An 18-gauge needle was first used to fenestrate the common extensor tendon and lateral periosteum. Once adequate anesthesia was confirmed, an 18-gauge needle was inserted along the tendon's longitudinal axis (without exiting the skin) and advanced in a "peppering" motion 40 to 50 passes from superficial to deep layers over approximately two minutes.

Group Type ACTIVE_COMPARATOR

dry needle

Intervention Type PROCEDURE

An 18-gauge needle was first used to fenestrate the common extensor tendon and lateral periosteum. Once adequate anesthesia was confirmed, an 18-gauge needle was inserted along the tendon's longitudinal axis (without exiting the skin) and advanced in a "peppering" motion 40 to 50 passes from superficial to deep layers over approximately two minutes

platelet rich plasma injection

A 15 mL peripheral blood sample was drawn and centrifuged at 3 000 rpm for 3 minutes. Approximately 2 mL of PRP was aspirated directly from the buffy coat and injected into the epicondylar region under ultrasound guidance.

Group Type ACTIVE_COMPARATOR

Platelet Rich Plasma

Intervention Type PROCEDURE

A 15 mL peripheral blood sample was drawn and centrifuged at 3 000 rpm for 3 minutes. Approximately 2 mL of PRP was aspirated directly from the buffy coat and injected into the epicondylar region under ultrasound guidance.

Interventions

Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.

dry needle

An 18-gauge needle was first used to fenestrate the common extensor tendon and lateral periosteum. Once adequate anesthesia was confirmed, an 18-gauge needle was inserted along the tendon's longitudinal axis (without exiting the skin) and advanced in a "peppering" motion 40 to 50 passes from superficial to deep layers over approximately two minutes

Intervention Type PROCEDURE

Platelet Rich Plasma

A 15 mL peripheral blood sample was drawn and centrifuged at 3 000 rpm for 3 minutes. Approximately 2 mL of PRP was aspirated directly from the buffy coat and injected into the epicondylar region under ultrasound guidance.

Intervention Type PROCEDURE

Eligibility Criteria

Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.

Inclusion Criteria

\-

Exclusion Criteria

\-
Minimum Eligible Age

18 Years

Maximum Eligible Age

65 Years

Eligible Sex

ALL

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Sponsors

Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.

Ankara University

OTHER

Sponsor Role lead

Responsible Party

Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.

Yusuf Kıratlıoğlu

Ankara University

Responsibility Role PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR

Locations

Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.

Ankara University

Ankara, , Turkey (Türkiye)

Site Status

Countries

Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.

Turkey (Türkiye)

Other Identifiers

Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.

İ07-436-22

Identifier Type: -

Identifier Source: org_study_id

More Related Trials

Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.