Talking for Change: Secondary Prevention of Child Sexual Abuse Perpetration
NCT ID: NCT07001735
Last Updated: 2025-06-12
Study Results
The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.
Basic Information
Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.
RECRUITING
NA
220 participants
INTERVENTIONAL
2025-04-17
2026-12-15
Brief Summary
Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.
Related Clinical Trials
Explore similar clinical trials based on study characteristics and research focus.
Prevent It 2.0/PRIORITY - An iCBT to Reduce the Risk of Committing Child Sexual Abuse
NCT05831657
Tertiary Prevention of Child Sexual Abuse
NCT06126926
Clinical Trial of a Supporter-Targeted Intervention to Improve Outcomes in Recent Sexual Assault Survivors
NCT05345405
Safe Touches: A Rigorous Evaluation of a Sexual Abuse Prevention Program for Children
NCT02181647
Treatment for Problematic Sexual Behavior of Preteen Children
NCT05514730
Detailed Description
Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.
One approach to CSA perpetration prevention that has been historically neglected in Canada is secondary prevention. Secondary CSA perpetration prevention interventions aim to prevent the onset of CSA perpetration by targeting populations that are at elevated risk. These interventions focus on helping at-risk adults understand and manage psychosocial risk factors that are causes of CSA perpetration. By targeting these risk factors, secondary perpetration prevention treatment programs help at-risk individuals live offense-free lives. At present, there is a lack of data on whether secondary CSA perpetration prevention programs are efficacious in reducing CSA perpetration.
Talking for Change (TFC) is a secondary CSA perpetration prevention intervention offering psychotherapy to adults who are concerned about their risk of perpetrating CSA or accessing online child sexual exploitation material (CSEM). The target client population of TFC are adults with a sexual interest in children, those who self-identify as being at-risk of viewing CSEM, or those who self-identify as at-risk of having sexual contact with children. TFC targets dynamic risk factors that are the causes of engaging in CSA or accessing CSEM, including (1) atypical sexual interests and sexual self-regulation problems; (2) problems in relationships; (3) offense-supportive attitudes; and (4) general self-regulation deficits and related traits (e.g., impulsivity, emotion regulation deficits).
The primary objective of the proposed research is to examine the efficacy of TFC via a patient preference randomized controlled trial to test superiority over (a) active psychological control and (b) no-treatment control arms. More specifically, the present trial aims to understand whether TFC produces significantly greater improvement in established risk factors for CSA perpetration and reductions in CSA behavior compared to the two control arms.
The secondary objectives of the research are to examine additional outcomes (including quality of life and treatment indicators) and examine mediators of treatment change. These secondary outcomes will allow for a more fulsome understanding of the effects of TFC and insight into mechanisms of change in TFC.
This is a single-blind patient preference randomized controlled trial of TFC versus active control, with a third non-randomly allocated no treatment control arm (i.e., a natural history benchmarking arm). Briefly, eligible clients referred to TFC who consent to participate in the trial will first be asked if they are willing to be randomized into one of the two trial treatment arms. Those who decline to be randomized will enter the study arm they prefer. The advantage of this approach is that it can accommodate the methodological rigor associated with a randomized clinical trial while reducing trial non-participation among those with a strong treatment preference. Once clients complete one arm of the trial, they will be offered the opportunity to participate in the second arm of the trial. In either case, continuation into the alternate intervention will be optional as will the continued collection of study data.
Benchmarking for natural history processes will involve data collection on online forums for individuals with pedohebephilic interests (i.e., those with an attraction to prepubescent and pubescent minors). Participants in the benchmarking arm will be involved in two assessment time points over the course of 20 weeks, which will allow for estimating change on primary and secondary outcomes over a period of time equivalent to the duration of the TFC and control treatment arms of the trial. Inclusion of a benchmarking sample allows the researchers to compare the effect of TFC to natural history processes (e.g., maturation, the passage of time).
Two groups of benchmarking participants will be recruited, with participants in the two groups receiving a different assessment battery. The first group will complete an online survey of self-report measures and a psychosocial interview focused on risk factors for sexual offending and protective factors. Once an adequate number of benchmarking participants have completed an interview, recruited participants will complete only the online survey containing self-report measures. The decision to use this stopping rule for the benchmarking arm was based on power analyses using effect size data from a pilot evaluation of the TFC program.
Conditions
See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.
Study Design
Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.
RANDOMIZED
PARALLEL
TREATMENT
SINGLE
Study Groups
Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.
Natural History Benchmarking
A subset of participants will participate in a video-conferencing interview and will complete an online survey comprising self-report measures at two time points, 20 weeks apart.
A subset of participants will complete an online survey comprising self-report measures at two time points, 20 weeks apart.
No interventions assigned to this group
General Mental Health Group Psychotherapy
The active therapeutic control is a general mental health intervention that is not specific to managing risk for child sexual abuse perpetration.
Healthier Me: Managing Risk and Stress in Everyday Life
The active therapeutic control is a non-directive supportive psychotherapy that targets general mental health concerns. It consists of psychoeducation about human sexuality and common mental health concerns, as well as instruction and practice in applied relaxation and stress management, and group discussions that will facilitate sharing and problem-solving current stressors. This active control intervention is equivalent in length to Talking for Change (TFC), consisting of 120-minute long occurring weekly over the course of 20 weeks.
Talking for Change (TFC) Group Psychotherapy
Talking for Change (TFC) is a secondary prevention program that targets dynamic risk factors for child sexual abuse perpetration.
Talking for Change Group Psychotherapy
Talking for Change (TFC) is a secondary prevention program that targets dynamic risk factors for child sexual abuse, including (1) atypical sexual interests and sexual self-regulation problems; (2) problems in relationships; (3) offense-supportive attitudes; and (4) general self-regulation deficits and related traits (e.g., impulsivity, emotion regulation deficits). Participants will complete 20 weekly, 120-minute sessions delivered via WebEx.
Interventions
Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.
Talking for Change Group Psychotherapy
Talking for Change (TFC) is a secondary prevention program that targets dynamic risk factors for child sexual abuse, including (1) atypical sexual interests and sexual self-regulation problems; (2) problems in relationships; (3) offense-supportive attitudes; and (4) general self-regulation deficits and related traits (e.g., impulsivity, emotion regulation deficits). Participants will complete 20 weekly, 120-minute sessions delivered via WebEx.
Healthier Me: Managing Risk and Stress in Everyday Life
The active therapeutic control is a non-directive supportive psychotherapy that targets general mental health concerns. It consists of psychoeducation about human sexuality and common mental health concerns, as well as instruction and practice in applied relaxation and stress management, and group discussions that will facilitate sharing and problem-solving current stressors. This active control intervention is equivalent in length to Talking for Change (TFC), consisting of 120-minute long occurring weekly over the course of 20 weeks.
Eligibility Criteria
Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.
Inclusion Criteria
2. Must sign and date the informed consent form;
3. Stated willingness to comply with all study procedures;
4. Be 18 years of age or older upon study commencement;
5. Be referred for care in the TFC program due to concerns about enhanced risk of sexual offending against children.
1. Must self-report concerns about enhanced risk of sexual offending against children
2. Must be deemed to have capacity to provide informed consent;
3. Must check the appropriate box on the informed consent form;
4. Stated willingness to comply with all study procedures;
5. Be 18 years of age or older upon study commencement.
For the benchmarking survey arm, participants must check the appropriate box on the informed consent form.
Exclusion Criteria
1. Inability to engage meaningfully in group psychotherapy (e.g., due to intellectual disability, other neurodiversity, active psychosis or substance use)
2. Those who self-identify as at-risk for reasons better accounted for by non-risk-relevant factors per clinical assessment (e.g., those with obsessive-compulsive disorder including thoughts about CSA, who commonly fear that they are at-risk but are not).
3. Non-male sex.
For the benchmarking interview arm:
1\. Non-male sex.
18 Years
MALE
Yes
Sponsors
Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.
Johns Hopkins Bloomberg School of Public Health
OTHER
Centre for Addiction and Mental Health
OTHER
Responsible Party
Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.
Cory Gerritsen
Collaborating Scientist, Slaight Centre for Early Intervention
Principal Investigators
Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.
Artemis Igoumenou, M.D., Ph.D.
Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR
Complex Care and Recovery Program, Centre for Addiction and Mental Health (CAMH)
Ian McPhail, Ph.D., C. Psych.
Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR
Bloomberg School of Public Health, Johns Hopkins University
Cory Gerritsen, Ph.D., C. Psych
Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR
Slaight Centre for Early Intervention, Centre for Addiction and Mental Health (CAMH)
Locations
Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.
Centre for Addiction and Mental Health
Toronto, Ontario, Canada
Countries
Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.
Central Contacts
Reach out to these primary contacts for questions about participation or study logistics.
Facility Contacts
Find local site contact details for specific facilities participating in the trial.
Other Identifiers
Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.
2024/178
Identifier Type: -
Identifier Source: org_study_id
More Related Trials
Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.