Inhaled Sedation in Critically Ill Patients

NCT ID: NCT07000526

Last Updated: 2025-12-26

Study Results

Results pending

The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.

Basic Information

Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.

Recruitment Status

RECRUITING

Clinical Phase

PHASE4

Total Enrollment

620 participants

Study Classification

INTERVENTIONAL

Study Start Date

2025-12-15

Study Completion Date

2027-12-31

Brief Summary

Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.

The proposal of this study is to compare inhaled sedation with isoflurane administered via the Sedaconda ACD-S system with intravenous sedation with propofol. Patients will be randomized 1:1 to receive either inhaled sedation with isoflurane administered via the Sedaconda ACD device (Sedana Medical, Uppsala, Sweden) or intravenous propofol. The primary endpoint is the number of ventilator-free days at 28 days after randomization.

Detailed Description

Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.

Justification: Isoflurane has recently emerged as an attractive alternative for intensive care unit (ICU) sedation. Due to their favorable pharmaco-kinetic and dynamic profile, this agent has been progressively introduced into clinical practice. Isoflurane has proven to be non-inferior to propofol in terms of efficacy and safety and it has been suggested that it may facilitate ventilator weaning. However, no differences in length of mechanical ventilation were found. These studies have focused on short sedation durations. In fact, long-term effects and outcomes associated with isoflurane for ICU sedation are not yet fully understood.

Hypothesis: Inhaled sedation with isoflurane administered via the Sedaconda ACD-S system in critically ill patients leads to a shorter duration of mechanical ventilation at 28 days and a reduced length of ICU stay compared to intravenous sedation with propofol.

Main objective: To compare the number of ventilator-free days at day 28 post-randomization between critically ill patients receiving sedation with isoflurane versus those receiving intravenous sedation with propofol in critically ill patients expected to require more than 48 hours of invasive mechanical ventilation. Key secondary objective: To compare the number of ICU-free days at day 28 post-randomization in both treatment arms. Secondary objectives: To compare time to extubation after sedation withdrawal, efficacy in maintaining a target level of sedation, compare the percentage of patients requiring one or more additional hypnotics, compare the incidence and duration of delirium at day 28, assess mental, cognitive, and quality of life status at 90 days post-hospital discharge between both treatment groups.

Methodology: Phase IV, low-intervention, open-label, multicenter, randomized controlled trial with intention-to-treat analysis including mechanically ventilated patients expected to require a minimum of 48 hours of mechanical ventilation with a RASS score between -3 and -5. Patients will be randomized 1:1 to receive inhaled sedation with isoflurane administered via the Sedaconda ACD device (Sedana Medical, Uppsala, Sweden) or intravenous sedation with propofol. A total of 620 patients will be included from a pool of 22 participating centers.

Conditions

See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.

Sedation Airway Extubation

Keywords

Explore important study keywords that can help with search, categorization, and topic discovery.

Inhaled sedation Mechanical ventilation Delirium

Study Design

Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.

Allocation Method

RANDOMIZED

Intervention Model

PARALLEL

Primary Study Purpose

TREATMENT

Blinding Strategy

NONE

Study Groups

Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.

Study group

Inhaled sedation with Isoflurane. Initial dose: 3 mL/h. Gradual dose increase until target RASS is achieved. Do not exceed 14 mL/h. Guided by end tidal isoflurane concentration (EtISO), the recommended maximum dose for prolonged use is 1%. Short periods at up to 1.5% may be considered. If the target RASS is not achieved at the maximum dose, a second hypnotic agent may be added.

Group Type EXPERIMENTAL

Isoflurane

Intervention Type DRUG

Inhaled sedation with isoflurane via Sedaconda ACD-S

Control group

Intravenous sedation with propofol (20 mg/mL). Initial dose: 0.5-1 mg/kg/h. Gradual dose increase until target RASS is achieved. Do not exceed 4 mg/kg/h. If the target RASS is not achieved at the maximum dose, a second hypnotic agent may be added.

Group Type ACTIVE_COMPARATOR

Propofol

Intervention Type DRUG

Intravenous sedation with Propofol 20 mg/ml

Interventions

Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.

Isoflurane

Inhaled sedation with isoflurane via Sedaconda ACD-S

Intervention Type DRUG

Propofol

Intravenous sedation with Propofol 20 mg/ml

Intervention Type DRUG

Other Intervention Names

Discover alternative or legacy names that may be used to describe the listed interventions across different sources.

Inhaled sedation with Isoflurane Intravenous sedation with Propofol

Eligibility Criteria

Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.

Inclusion Criteria

\- Adult patients receiving mechanical ventilation, with an anticipated duration \>48 hours after randomization, and requiring deep sedation (target RASS between -3 and -5).

Exclusion Criteria

* Contraindication to isoflurane or propofol
* Allergy to isoflurane or propofol
* Cardiopulmonary arrest
* History of ventricular tachycardia or long QT syndrome
* Tidal volume \< 300 mL or PaCO₂ \> 50 mmHg at the time of randomization.
* Invasive mechanical ventilation for more than 48 hours at the time of randomization.
* Pregnancy
* Breast feeding
* Acute neurological condition
* ECMO
* ECCO2R
* Active humidification strictly required
* Burns
* Lack of informed consent
Minimum Eligible Age

18 Years

Maximum Eligible Age

80 Years

Eligible Sex

ALL

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Sponsors

Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.

Instituto de Salud Carlos III

OTHER_GOV

Sponsor Role collaborator

Instituto de Investigación Hospital Universitario La Paz

OTHER

Sponsor Role lead

Responsible Party

Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.

José Manuel Añón

Head of Department of Critical Care Medicine

Responsibility Role PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR

Principal Investigators

Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.

José M. Añón, MD, PhD

Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR

Hospital Universitario La Paz. IdiPAZ

Locations

Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.

Hospital Vega Baja

Orihuela, Alicante, Spain

Site Status NOT_YET_RECRUITING

Hospital Universitario Doctor José Molina Orosa

Arrecife, Lanzarote-Canary Islands, Spain

Site Status NOT_YET_RECRUITING

Hospital Universitario de Albacete

Albacete, , Spain

Site Status NOT_YET_RECRUITING

Hospital Germans Trias i Pujol

Badalona, , Spain

Site Status NOT_YET_RECRUITING

Corporacio Sanitaria Parc Taulí

Barcelona, , Spain

Site Status NOT_YET_RECRUITING

Hospital Universitario de Bellvitge

Barcelona, , Spain

Site Status NOT_YET_RECRUITING

Hospital Universitario Valle de Hebron

Barcelona, , Spain

Site Status NOT_YET_RECRUITING

Hospital General Universitario Santa Lucía

Cartagena, , Spain

Site Status NOT_YET_RECRUITING

Hospital Arnau de Vilanova

Lleida, , Spain

Site Status NOT_YET_RECRUITING

Hospital Universitario La Paz

Madrid, , Spain

Site Status RECRUITING

Hospital Univeritario Puerta de Hierro

Madrid, , Spain

Site Status NOT_YET_RECRUITING

Hospital Universitario de Getafe

Madrid, , Spain

Site Status NOT_YET_RECRUITING

Hospital Universitario de la Princesa

Madrid, , Spain

Site Status NOT_YET_RECRUITING

Hospital Universitario Gregorio Marañon

Madrid, , Spain

Site Status NOT_YET_RECRUITING

Hospital Universitario Infanta Leonor

Madrid, , Spain

Site Status NOT_YET_RECRUITING

Hospital Universitario Rey Juan Carlos

Madrid, , Spain

Site Status NOT_YET_RECRUITING

Hospital Reina Sofía

Murcia, , Spain

Site Status NOT_YET_RECRUITING

Hospital Universitario Virgen de la Arrixaca

Murcia, , Spain

Site Status NOT_YET_RECRUITING

Hospital Universitario Joan XXIII

Tarragona, , Spain

Site Status NOT_YET_RECRUITING

Hospital Universitario de Toledo

Toledo, , Spain

Site Status NOT_YET_RECRUITING

Hospital Clínico Universitario de Valencia

Valencia, , Spain

Site Status NOT_YET_RECRUITING

Hospital Universitario Rio Hortega

Valladolid, , Spain

Site Status NOT_YET_RECRUITING

Countries

Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.

Spain

Central Contacts

Reach out to these primary contacts for questions about participation or study logistics.

José M. Añón, MD, PhD

Role: CONTACT

Phone: +(34) 912071307

Email: [email protected]

Facility Contacts

Find local site contact details for specific facilities participating in the trial.

Carola Gimenez-Esparza, MD

Role: primary

Andoni García-Muñoz, MD

Role: primary

Jose M. Gutierrez

Role: primary

Paula Pedreira

Role: primary

Manel Santafe, MD

Role: primary

Paola Cardenas

Role: primary

Raquel S. Contreras, MD

Role: primary

Agueda Ojados

Role: primary

Jesús Caballero, MD, PhD

Role: primary

José M Añón, MD, PhD

Role: primary

Sara Alcántara, MD,PhD

Role: primary

Carmen Rodriguez Solís

Role: primary

Aris Perez Lucendo, MD

Role: primary

José M. Gomez, MD

Role: primary

María Paz Escuela, MD, PhD

Role: primary

Manuel Pérez Torres

Role: primary

Julian Triviño

Role: primary

Ana del Saz, MD

Role: primary

Oriol Plans

Role: primary

Mario Dalorzo

Role: primary

Monica García Simon, MD

Role: primary

Ana Prieto

Role: primary

Other Identifiers

Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.

2024-518521-14-00

Identifier Type: CTIS

Identifier Source: secondary_id

HULP6844

Identifier Type: -

Identifier Source: org_study_id