Study Results
The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.
Basic Information
Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.
ENROLLING_BY_INVITATION
NA
88 participants
INTERVENTIONAL
2025-06-17
2026-09-30
Brief Summary
Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.
Normally, doctors deflate the cuff before removing the breathing tube. This is called deflated cuff extubation. Some doctors worry that keeping the cuff inflated while it is removed can damage the throat or vocal cords. However, some doctors keep the cuff inflated when removing the breathing tube. This is called inflated cuff extubation. These doctors think that keeping the cuff inflated can help keep fluids from entering the airway.
Doctors have not studied if deflated cuff extubation is better or worse than inflated cuff extubation. The goal of this study is to see which type of extubation is better at keeping fluids from getting in the airway.
Participants who are part of this study will get general anesthesia and have surgery as planned. Near the end of surgery, a small amount of liquid is placed at the back of a participant's mouth. This liquid is called contrast material, and it is like a dye. The contrast material will help determine if any liquid enters the windpipe or lungs. Then, contrast material is removed, along with any other fluids, using normal methods.
When it is safe to take the breathing tube out, a deflated cuff extubation or an inflated cuff extubation will be performed. This decision will be made at random, like by the flip of a coin. Information will be collected about participants, the surgery, and how well a participant is breathing. After surgery, a chest x-ray will be taken to see if any of the contrast material is in the windpipe or lungs. Otherwise, everything else after surgery would be normal. 24 to 48 hours after surgery, a member of the research team will ask about any symptoms a participant may have, like sore throat or a hoarse voice. Research would conclude at that time.
Detailed Description
Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.
Alternatively, extubation with an inflated endotracheal tube cuff has been advocated as a technique to reduce airway complications in human and veterinary medicine. Tracheal aspiration, even micro-aspiration by oropharyngeal secretions, may increase the risk of pneumonia and other pulmonary complications. Based on an animal model, inflated cuff extubation may reduce airway contamination by oropharyngeal fluid. Additionally, leaving the endotracheal tube cuff inflated may effectively generate a vital capacity breath during extubation, maximizing oxygen reserves and facilitating a secretion-clearing cough. These theorized advantages may prolong the time to which supplemental oxygen is required as well as decrease airway/respiratory complications in the immediate post-extubation period. Within the intensive care setting, unplanned extubation (including accidental extubation and self-extubation) occurs at a rate of 3% to 16% of intubated patients or 0.1 to 3.6 per 100 days of mechanical ventilation. Estimates of national hospitalizations requiring mechanical ventilation approach 800,000, thereby placing the estimated number of unplanned extubations between 24,000 and 128,000. Presumably, the majority of these unplanned extubations are with inflated cuffs, and yet still no epidemic of laryngeal trauma from inflated cuff extubation exists. Furthermore, there have been no significant differences in laryngeal complications reported between planned and unplanned extubation in the intensive care population, suggesting that it is the endotracheal tube itself (and the process of placing it) that confers the risk of laryngeal complications, rather than the circumstances of its removal.
Though several providers have published their success with inflated cuff extubation, to date no prospective, randomized controlled trial has been performed directly comparing these two techniques. This study proposes to evaluate the effect of inflated cuff extubation on airway contamination by oropharyngeal material, extubation quality, post-extubation oxygenation, and laryngeal symptoms compared to the standard technique of deflated cuff extubation.
To assess the difference in aspiration rates between deflated and inflated cuff extubation, radio-opaque contrast material will be introduced into the oropharynx of intubated patients while under general anesthesia. The presence of this radio-opaque contrast at or below the level of the carina will be assessed with a chest radiograph taken postoperatively.
Conditions
See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.
Study Design
Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.
RANDOMIZED
PARALLEL
TREATMENT
TRIPLE
Study Groups
Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.
Inflated Cuff Arm: 44
Extubation with an inflated endotracheal tube cuff
Inflated Cuff Extubation
The adjustable pressure limiting valve will be set to 20 centimeters water pressure. To blind the Anesthesiologist Associate Investigator from the patient's group allocation, sham deflation of the endotracheal tube cuff pilot balloon will be performed with a 10 milliliter syringe. The endotracheal tube will be withdrawn into an opaque blue towel while the reservoir bag is simultaneously compressed to generate at least 20 centimeters water pressure positive airway pressure. In the rare event significant resistance is met with attempted extubation, the principal investigator will deflate the cuff in one milliliter increments until extubation is possible. This process does not unblind the Anesthesiologist Associate Investigator.
Deflated Cuff Arm: 44
Extubation with a deflated endotracheal tube cuff
Deflated Cuff Extubation
The adjustable pressure-limiting valve will be set to 20 centimeters water pressure. All air will be removed from the endotracheal tube cuff pilot balloon with a 10 milliliter syringe. The endotracheal tube will be withdrawn into an opaque blue towel, to prevent the Anesthesiologist Associate Investigator from identifying the patient's allocation, while the reservoir bag is simultaneously compressed to generate at least 20 centimeters water pressure positive airway pressure.
Interventions
Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.
Inflated Cuff Extubation
The adjustable pressure limiting valve will be set to 20 centimeters water pressure. To blind the Anesthesiologist Associate Investigator from the patient's group allocation, sham deflation of the endotracheal tube cuff pilot balloon will be performed with a 10 milliliter syringe. The endotracheal tube will be withdrawn into an opaque blue towel while the reservoir bag is simultaneously compressed to generate at least 20 centimeters water pressure positive airway pressure. In the rare event significant resistance is met with attempted extubation, the principal investigator will deflate the cuff in one milliliter increments until extubation is possible. This process does not unblind the Anesthesiologist Associate Investigator.
Deflated Cuff Extubation
The adjustable pressure-limiting valve will be set to 20 centimeters water pressure. All air will be removed from the endotracheal tube cuff pilot balloon with a 10 milliliter syringe. The endotracheal tube will be withdrawn into an opaque blue towel, to prevent the Anesthesiologist Associate Investigator from identifying the patient's allocation, while the reservoir bag is simultaneously compressed to generate at least 20 centimeters water pressure positive airway pressure.
Eligibility Criteria
Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.
Inclusion Criteria
* Scheduled for surgery, not of the airway, head, or neck, with anticipated case duration of less than 3 hours
* American Society of Anesthesiologists (ASA) Physical Status Classification of 1 to 3
Exclusion Criteria
* Pre-existing laryngeal pathology, obstructive pulmonary disease, pulmonary hypertension, interstitial lung disease, active respiratory infection, recent pneumonia, uncontrolled asthma, or uncontrolled gastroesophageal reflux disease
* Known difficulties with general anesthesia, such as prior anaphylactic reaction, difficult intubation or mask ventilation
* Known allergy to iohexol or a previous severe reaction to any contrast agents
* Unfavorable airway examination, such as Mallampati 4, limited mouth opening, and/or inability to extend neck
* Non-compliance with ASA Practice Guidelines for Preoperative Fasting
* Pregnancy
* Enrollment in another anesthesiology or surgery related interventional research study
* Surgeries scheduled on Friday or a day immediately prior to a holiday
18 Years
50 Years
ALL
Yes
Sponsors
Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.
Naval Medical Center Camp Lejeune
FED
Responsible Party
Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.
Michael Lee
Staff Anesthesiologist
Principal Investigators
Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.
Michael A Lee, MD
Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR
Naval Medical Center Camp Lejeune
Locations
Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.
Naval Medical Center Camp Lejeune
Marine Corps Base Camp Lejeune, North Carolina, United States
Countries
Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.
References
Explore related publications, articles, or registry entries linked to this study.
Sarkar P, Patel N, Chusid J, Shah R, Talwar A. The role of computed tomography bronchography in the management of bronchopleural fistulas. J Thorac Imaging. 2010 Feb;25(1):W10-3. doi: 10.1097/RTI.0b013e31819d12f1.
MacIntyre P, Peacock C, Gordon I, Mok Q. Use of tracheobronchography as a diagnostic tool in ventilator-dependent infants. Crit Care Med. 1998 Apr;26(4):755-9. doi: 10.1097/00003246-199804000-00028.
Little AF, Phelan EM, Boldt DW, Brown TC. Paediatric tracheobronchomalacia and its assessment by tracheobronchography. Australas Radiol. 1996 Nov;40(4):398-403. doi: 10.1111/j.1440-1673.1996.tb00434.x.
Deutsch ES, Smergel E, Crisci K, Panitch H. Tracheobronchography in children. Laryngoscope. 1996 Oct;106(10):1248-54. doi: 10.1097/00005537-199610000-00016.
Cooper RM, O'Sullivan E, Popat M, Behringer E, Hagberg CA. Difficult Airway Society guidelines for the management of tracheal extubation. Anaesthesia. 2013 Feb;68(2):217. doi: 10.1111/anae.12139. No abstract available.
Lai K. Chinese National Guidelines on Diagnosis and Management of Cough: consensus and controversy. J Thorac Dis. 2014 Oct;6(Suppl 7):S683-8. doi: 10.3978/j.issn.2072-1439.2014.10.06. No abstract available.
Sivanandam LK, Verghese RJ, Balan S, Balamurugesan K. Accidental iohexol bronchography. BMJ Case Rep. 2021 Aug 5;14(8):e244942. doi: 10.1136/bcr-2021-244942. No abstract available.
Lin EC. Radiation risk from medical imaging. Mayo Clin Proc. 2010 Dec;85(12):1142-6; quiz 1146. doi: 10.4065/mcp.2010.0260.
Lasser EC, Lyon SG, Berry CC. Reports on contrast media reactions: analysis of data from reports to the U.S. Food and Drug Administration. Radiology. 1997 Jun;203(3):605-10. doi: 10.1148/radiology.203.3.9169676.
Caro JJ, Trindade E, McGregor M. The risks of death and of severe nonfatal reactions with high- vs low-osmolality contrast media: a meta-analysis. AJR Am J Roentgenol. 1991 Apr;156(4):825-32. doi: 10.2214/ajr.156.4.1825900.
Wolf GL, Arenson RL, Cross AP. A prospective trial of ionic vs nonionic contrast agents in routine clinical practice: comparison of adverse effects. AJR Am J Roentgenol. 1989 May;152(5):939-44. doi: 10.2214/ajr.152.5.939.
Katayama H, Yamaguchi K, Kozuka T, Takashima T, Seez P, Matsuura K. Adverse reactions to ionic and nonionic contrast media. A report from the Japanese Committee on the Safety of Contrast Media. Radiology. 1990 Jun;175(3):621-8. doi: 10.1148/radiology.175.3.2343107.
Molfenter SM, Amin MR, Balou M, Herzberg EG, Frempong-Boadu A. A scoping review of the methods used to capture dysphagia after anterior cervical discectomy and fusion: the need for a paradigm shift. Eur Spine J. 2023 Mar;32(3):969-976. doi: 10.1007/s00586-022-07515-1. Epub 2023 Jan 10.
De Bodt MS, Wuyts FL, Van de Heyning PH, Croux C. Test-retest study of the GRBAS scale: influence of experience and professional background on perceptual rating of voice quality. J Voice. 1997 Mar;11(1):74-80. doi: 10.1016/s0892-1997(97)80026-4.
Ghio A, Revis J, Smithson-Barriere D, Jarze S, Giovanni A. Reliability and Correlations Between Overall Severity, Roughness and Breathiness in the Perception of Dysphonic Voices: Investigating Cognitive Aspects. J Voice. 2024 Jan;38(1):136-143. doi: 10.1016/j.jvoice.2021.07.010. Epub 2021 Aug 25.
Tung A, Fergusson NA, Ng N, Hu V, Dormuth C, Griesdale DGE. Pharmacological methods for reducing coughing on emergence from elective surgery after general anesthesia with endotracheal intubation: protocol for a systematic review of common medications and network meta-analysis. Syst Rev. 2019 Jan 24;8(1):32. doi: 10.1186/s13643-019-0947-2.
Minogue SC, Ralph J, Lampa MJ. Laryngotracheal topicalization with lidocaine before intubation decreases the incidence of coughing on emergence from general anesthesia. Anesth Analg. 2004 Oct;99(4):1253-1257. doi: 10.1213/01.ANE.0000132779.27085.52.
Bazaz R, Lee MJ, Yoo JU. Incidence of dysphagia after anterior cervical spine surgery: a prospective study. Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2002 Nov 15;27(22):2453-8. doi: 10.1097/00007632-200211150-00007.
Dejonckere PH, Wieneke GH. GRBAS-scaling of pathological voices: reliability, clinical relevance and differentiated correlation with acoustic measurements, especially with central measurements. Proceedings of the 22nd IALP Congress. Hannover, Germany: 1992.
Hirano M. Clinical examination of voice. New York: Springer Verlag, 1981:81-4.
Lin R, Zhu L, Pan X. Validation of the simplified cough symptom score in non-small cell lung cancer patients after surgery. Gen Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 2022 Aug;70(8):735-739. doi: 10.1007/s11748-022-01791-w. Epub 2022 Feb 28.
Hwang CH. Swallowing study using water-soluble contrast agents may increase aspiration sensitivity and antedate oral feeding without respiratory and drug complications: A STROBE-compliant prospective, observational, case-control trial. Medicine (Baltimore). 2022 Jul 8;101(27):e29422. doi: 10.1097/MD.0000000000029422.
Harris JA, Bartelt D, Campion M, Gayler BW, Jones B, Hayes A, Haynos J, Herbick S, Kling T, Lingaraj A, Singer M, Starmer H, Smith C, Webster K. The use of low-osmolar water-soluble contrast in videofluoroscopic swallowing exams. Dysphagia. 2013 Dec;28(4):520-7. doi: 10.1007/s00455-013-9462-0. Epub 2013 Mar 26.
Sun J, Li Z. Study on the Correlation between Barium Radiography and Pulmonary Infection rate in the Evaluation of Swallowing Function. Clinics (Sao Paulo). 2018;73:e182. doi: 10.6061/clinics/2018/e182. Epub 2018 Jun 18.
Morcos SK. Review article: Effects of radiographic contrast media on the lung. Br J Radiol. 2003 May;76(905):290-5. doi: 10.1259/bjr/54892465.
Claussen D. Omnipaque (iohexol). Gastroenterol Nurs. 1992 Jun;14(6):307-9. doi: 10.1097/00001610-199206000-00007.
Brick SH, Caroline DF, Lev-Toaff AS, Friedman AC, Grumbach K, Radecki PD. Esophageal disruption: evaluation with iohexol esophagography. Radiology. 1988 Oct;169(1):141-3. doi: 10.1148/radiology.169.1.3420250.
Yan GW, Deng JF, Bhetuwal A, Yang GQ, Fu QS, Chen H, Hu N, Zeng H, Fan XP, Yan GW, Wu XL. A case report and literature review of barium sulphate aspiration during upper gastrointestinal examination. Medicine (Baltimore). 2017 Nov;96(47):e8821. doi: 10.1097/MD.0000000000008821.
Cork RC, Depa RM, Standen JR. Prospective comparison of use of the laryngeal mask and endotracheal tube for ambulatory surgery. Anesth Analg. 1994 Oct;79(4):719-27. doi: 10.1213/00000539-199410000-00018.
Mraovic B, Hipszer B, Loeum C, Andonakakis A, Joseph J. Evaluation of continuous aspiration of subglottic secretions in prevention of microaspiration during general anesthesia: a randomized controlled pilot study. Croat Med J. 2022 Dec 31;63(6):553-563. doi: 10.3325/cmj.2022.63.553.
Mehta S. The risk of aspiration in presence of cuffed endotracheal tubes. Br J Anaesth. 1972 Jun;44(6):601-5. doi: 10.1093/bja/44.6.601. No abstract available.
Whiffler K, Andrew WK, Thomas RG. The hazardous cuffed endotracheal tube--aspiration and extubation. S Afr Med J. 1982 Feb 13;61(7):240-1.
Atkins PM, Mion LC, Mendelson W, Palmer RM, Slomka J, Franko T. Characteristics and outcomes of patients who self-extubate from ventilatory support: a case-control study. Chest. 1997 Nov 5;112(5):1317-23. doi: 10.1378/chest.112.5.1317.
Boulain T. Unplanned extubations in the adult intensive care unit: a prospective multicenter study. Association des Reanimateurs du Centre-Ouest. Am J Respir Crit Care Med. 1998 Apr;157(4 Pt 1):1131-7. doi: 10.1164/ajrccm.157.4.9702083.
Wunsch H, Linde-Zwirble WT, Angus DC, Hartman ME, Milbrandt EB, Kahn JM. The epidemiology of mechanical ventilation use in the United States. Crit Care Med. 2010 Oct;38(10):1947-53. doi: 10.1097/CCM.0b013e3181ef4460.
da Silva PS, Fonseca MC. Unplanned endotracheal extubations in the intensive care unit: systematic review, critical appraisal, and evidence-based recommendations. Anesth Analg. 2012 May;114(5):1003-14. doi: 10.1213/ANE.0b013e31824b0296. Epub 2012 Feb 24.
Kiekkas P, Aretha D, Panteli E, Baltopoulos GI, Filos KS. Unplanned extubation in critically ill adults: clinical review. Nurs Crit Care. 2013 May;18(3):123-34. doi: 10.1111/j.1478-5153.2012.00542.x. Epub 2012 Nov 22.
de Groot RI, Dekkers OM, Herold IH, de Jonge E, Arbous MS. Risk factors and outcomes after unplanned extubations on the ICU: a case-control study. Crit Care. 2011;15(1):R19. doi: 10.1186/cc9964. Epub 2011 Jan 13.
Cosentino C, Fama M, Foa C, Bromuri G, Giannini S, Saraceno M, Spagnoletta A, Tenkue M, Trevisi E, Sarli L. Unplanned Extubations in Intensive Care Unit: evidences for risk factors. A literature review. Acta Biomed. 2017 Nov 30;88(5S):55-65. doi: 10.23750/abm.v88i5-S.6869.
Baftiu N, Krasniqi I, Haxhirexha K, Domi R. Survey about the Extubation Practice among Anaesthesiologists in Kosovo. Open Access Maced J Med Sci. 2018 Feb 12;6(2):350-354. doi: 10.3889/oamjms.2018.083. eCollection 2018 Feb 15.
Vance A, Hofmeister EH, Laas C, Williams J. The effects of extubation with an inflated versus deflated endotracheal tube cuff on endotracheal fluid volume in the dog. Vet Anaesth Analg. 2011 May;38(3):203-7. doi: 10.1111/j.1467-2995.2011.00610.x.
Ephgrave KS, Kleiman-Wexler R, Pfaller M, Booth B, Werkmeister L, Young S. Postoperative pneumonia: a prospective study of risk factors and morbidity. Surgery. 1993 Oct;114(4):815-9; discussion 819-21.
Brown C. Endotracheal intubation in the dog. Lab Anim (NY). 2007 Feb;36(2):23-4. doi: 10.1038/laban0207-23.
Priebe HJ. Could "safe practice" be compromising safe practice? Should anesthetists have to deflate the cuff of the endotracheal tube before extubation? Minerva Anestesiol. 2016 Feb;82(2):236-9. Epub 2015 Jul 1.
Shamsai J. A new technique for removal of endotracheal tube. Anesth Analg. 2006 Oct;103(4):1040. doi: 10.1213/01.ane.0000239021.80428.cb. No abstract available.
Hulme J, Agarwal S. Failure to deflate an endotracheal cuff. Acta Anaesthesiol Scand. 2008 May;52(5):719. doi: 10.1111/j.1399-6576.2007.01467.x. No abstract available.
Sriramka B, Natarajan A, Sharma K, Zubair S. Failed endotracheal tube cuff deflation due to unusual kinking of inflation tube. J Dent Anesth Pain Med. 2023 Aug;23(4):241-243. doi: 10.17245/jdapm.2023.23.4.241. Epub 2023 Jul 29. No abstract available.
Kamata M, Hakim M, Tobias JD. Residual volume in the cuff of the endotracheal tube when the pilot balloon is torn off instead of deflated using a syringe. Int J Pediatr Otorhinolaryngol. 2016 Jul;86:15-8. doi: 10.1016/j.ijporl.2016.04.012. Epub 2016 Apr 12.
Suman S, Ganjoo P, Tandon MS. Difficult extubation due to failure of an endotracheal tube cuff deflation. J Anaesthesiol Clin Pharmacol. 2011 Jan;27(1):141-2. No abstract available.
Saidman LJ. Where is the evidence? Anesth Analg. 2007 Jul;105(1):285. doi: 10.1213/01.ane.0000278606.10006.fa. No abstract available.
Provided Documents
Download supplemental materials such as informed consent forms, study protocols, or participant manuals.
Document Type: Study Protocol, Statistical Analysis Plan, and Informed Consent Form
Other Identifiers
Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.
NMCCL.2025.0007
Identifier Type: -
Identifier Source: org_study_id