To Compare the Clinical Efficacy of Arthroscopic Lateral Retinacular Release and Exercise Therapy in the Treatment of Lateral Patellar Crush Syndrome
NCT ID: NCT06988930
Last Updated: 2025-05-25
Study Results
The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.
Basic Information
Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.
ENROLLING_BY_INVITATION
NA
100 participants
INTERVENTIONAL
2024-03-01
2026-12-31
Brief Summary
Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.
Related Clinical Trials
Explore similar clinical trials based on study characteristics and research focus.
The Clinical Effect of Different Lateral Retinaculum Relaxation Methods in the Treatment of LPCS
NCT04958603
Rehabilitation Efficacy of Low-Load Blood Flow Restriction Training for Lateral Patellar Compression Syndrome
NCT06988917
Novel Method for Diagnosing Lateral Patellar Compression Syndrome Using X-ray: a Retrospective Case-Control Study
NCT04454593
Retrospective Clinical Study of Excessive Lateral Pressure Syndrome
NCT04977492
Clinical Outcome of Arthroscopic Lateral Release for Lateral Patellar Compression Syndrome
NCT04313556
Detailed Description
Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.
In the clinical practice of the Institute of Sports Medicine and the previous scientific research of our group, we found that a considerable number of patients, after arthroscopic patella molding, lateral retinaculum release and joint cleaning, their pain was obviously relieved, the patella trajectory almost returned to normal, and the knee joint symptoms were well improved and returned to normal life.
Both arthroscopic surgery and conservative rehabilitation can be used to treat LPCS, but it has not been proved that the functional improvement and symptom improvement rate of the two treatment methods are better in the medium and long term follow-up. Based on the above background, this study will conduct a prospective cohort study, and plan to recruit 100 patients and divide them into two groups, namely the arthroscopic group and the conservative treatment group, for a 2-year follow-up. The patients' subjective scores of 5 scales and 3 objective indicators were used to evaluate the recovery of knee function after different treatment methods, and to further clarify the medium and long-term therapeutic effects of different treatment methods on patients with LPCS, in order to provide guidance and reference for the clinical treatment of LPCS.
Conditions
See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.
Study Design
Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.
NON_RANDOMIZED
PARALLEL
TREATMENT
NONE
Study Groups
Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.
Experimental group:arthroscopic surgery
The patients with lateral patellar extrusion were treated with arthroscopic minimally invasive surgery.
Control group
The non-operation group was treated with rehabilitation therapy for 6 weeks, and the operation group was treated with arthroscopic surgery and the pathological tissue of cartilage and subchondral bone was taken. Assessment was performed at three months, one year, and two years after treatment and recorded in the database.
Conservative rehabilitation training group
The patients in this group were treated with exercise therapy
Control group
The non-operation group was treated with rehabilitation therapy for 6 weeks, and the operation group was treated with arthroscopic surgery and the pathological tissue of cartilage and subchondral bone was taken. Assessment was performed at three months, one year, and two years after treatment and recorded in the database.
Interventions
Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.
Control group
The non-operation group was treated with rehabilitation therapy for 6 weeks, and the operation group was treated with arthroscopic surgery and the pathological tissue of cartilage and subchondral bone was taken. Assessment was performed at three months, one year, and two years after treatment and recorded in the database.
Eligibility Criteria
Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.
Inclusion Criteria
Exclusion Criteria
ALL
No
Sponsors
Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.
Peking University Third Hospital
OTHER
Responsible Party
Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.
Locations
Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.
Peking University Third Hospital
Beijing, , China
Countries
Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.
Other Identifiers
Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.
M2024181
Identifier Type: -
Identifier Source: org_study_id
More Related Trials
Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.