Difficult Airway Incidence in Cardiovascular Surgery and a Prediction Model Development
NCT ID: NCT06986187
Last Updated: 2026-02-05
Study Results
The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.
Basic Information
Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.
RECRUITING
2000 participants
OBSERVATIONAL
2025-06-01
2027-12-01
Brief Summary
Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.
Related Clinical Trials
Explore similar clinical trials based on study characteristics and research focus.
Comparison of Airway Management With Bronchial Blocker and Double-Lumen Tube in Single-Lung Ventilation
NCT06299735
Lung Protection Strategy in Open Heart Surgery: Which Tidal Volume is Better 8ml/kg or 6ml/kg
NCT03651817
Early Evaluation After Cardiac Surgery
NCT05932368
The Effect of Video-supported Education on Anxiety Levels and the ICU Experience
NCT06801145
Deep Breathing Exercise With Incentive Spirometer Started in the Preoperative Period
NCT05428722
Detailed Description
Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.
Different diagnostic criteria for all components of difficult airway and similarly different predictive criteria for the risk of occurrence in a patient have been defined. The LEMON Score, El-Ganzouri Risk Index, and Arne Score, which are evaluated by physical examination of the upper airway structures during the pre-anesthetic examination, and the Cormack-Lehane Classification (CL) used to evaluate the laryngoscopic image during intubation, can be counted among the difficult airway prediction tests.
Difficult airway situations that occur during anesthesia application can be defined by the Han Score for mask ventilation, the Intubation Difficulty Scale (IDS) for endotracheal entubation, the videolaryngoscopic intubation and difficult airway classification (VIDIAC) in patients using videolaryngoscopy, and the difficult SGA placement score.
Previous studies have reported that the incidence of difficult airway is higher in patients undergoing cardiovascular surgery compared to other patient groups. Borde et al. reported the rate of difficult intubation in patients undergoing cardiac surgery as 24%. The rate of difficult laryngoscopy in patients undergoing coronary artery surgery was reported as 10% by Ezri et al. and 7% by Heinrich et al. However, it is seen that the predictive criteria and diagnostic criteria for the components of the difficult airway are used interchangeably and incorrectly in these studies. Therefore, the current information on the incidence of difficult airways in patients undergoing cardiovascular surgery is contradictory and open to debate.
Accurate information on the incidence of difficult airway in this patient population can contribute to anesthesiology education, equipment and personnel planning, and most importantly, patient safety. Unwanted hemodynamic changes that may occur following anesthesia induction in patients undergoing cardiovascular surgery, combined with hemodynamic changes caused by underlying cardiac pathologies, may lead to the emergence of a physiological difficult airway condition. Since all these interactions, when combined with hemodynamic changes caused by difficult airway interventions, may lead to catastrophic outcomes, predicting difficult airway in this patient population is of vital importance.
Despite its clinical importance, to our knowledge, this subject has not yet been investigated in the literature with artificial intelligence algorithms.
The aim of this study is to investigate the incidence of difficult airway and difficult intubation in patients undergoing cardiovascular surgery and the associated factors and to develop a machine learning model that can predict difficult airway using artificial intelligence algorithms.
Conditions
See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.
Study Design
Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.
OTHER
PROSPECTIVE
Eligibility Criteria
Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.
Inclusion Criteria
* ASA I-IV physical status
* Over 18 years of age
Exclusion Criteria
* Head-neck and upper airway pathology
* Patients at risk of aspiration
18 Years
ALL
No
Sponsors
Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.
Diskapi Teaching and Research Hospital
OTHER
Responsible Party
Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.
DILEK YAZICIOGLU
Professor of Anesthesiology
Principal Investigators
Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.
Dilek Unal, Prof.
Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR
Ankara Etlik City Hospital
Locations
Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.
Etlik City Hospital
Ankara, , Turkey (Türkiye)
Countries
Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.
Central Contacts
Reach out to these primary contacts for questions about participation or study logistics.
Facility Contacts
Find local site contact details for specific facilities participating in the trial.
References
Explore related publications, articles, or registry entries linked to this study.
Kohse EK, Siebert HK, Sasu PB, Loock K, Dohrmann T, Breitfeld P, Barclay-Steuart A, Stark M, Sehner S, Zollner C, Petzoldt M. A model to predict difficult airway alerts after videolaryngoscopy in adults with anticipated difficult airways - the VIDIAC score. Anaesthesia. 2022 Oct;77(10):1089-1096. doi: 10.1111/anae.15841. Epub 2022 Aug 25.
Cormack RS, Lehane J. Difficult tracheal intubation in obstetrics. Anaesthesia. 1984 Nov;39(11):1105-11.
doi: https://doi.org/10.1097/ALN.0000000000004002
Other Identifiers
Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.
AEŞH-EK-2025-087
Identifier Type: -
Identifier Source: org_study_id
More Related Trials
Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.