Dry Eye in Upper Eyelid Surgery: Muscle Versus Fat Removal
NCT ID: NCT06985264
Last Updated: 2025-05-22
Study Results
The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.
Basic Information
Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.
ENROLLING_BY_INVITATION
NA
142 participants
INTERVENTIONAL
2025-05-01
2025-12-30
Brief Summary
Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.
The collected data will be used to analyze the differences in dry eye parameters between the two surgical techniques. OSDI scores, BUT times, Oxford staining degrees, Schirmer test results and visual acuity values will be compared at pre- and postoperative time points. Differences between groups will be analyzed by one-tailed independent samples t-test and p\<0.05 will be considered significant. These analyses will be performed to determine the effect of surgical techniques on dry eye symptoms.
Related Clinical Trials
Explore similar clinical trials based on study characteristics and research focus.
Evaluation of Dry Eye and Meibomian Gland Dysfunction After Cataract Surgery
NCT01942642
A Comparative Study Between Preservative With Benzalkonium Chloride vs Preservative Free Eye Drops on the Ocular Surface
NCT06404541
A Newly Modified Technique for Levator Muscle Tucking in Blepharoptosis Surgery: An Egyptian Tertiary Center Study
NCT04883853
Efficacy of LipiFlow in Patients Affected by Meibomian Gland Dysfunction in Reducing Post-cataract Surgery Dry Eye
NCT05062564
Iris Suture Fixation vs Iris Claw for Correction of Aphakia
NCT06933654
Detailed Description
Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.
Conditions
See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.
Study Design
Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.
RANDOMIZED
PARALLEL
TREATMENT
NONE
Study Groups
Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.
1) Patients who are currently undergoing Upper Eyelid Blepharoplasty 2) Patients between the ages o
Upper Eyelid Blepharoplasty surgery
Orbicularis oculi excision
Interventions
Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.
Upper Eyelid Blepharoplasty surgery
Orbicularis oculi excision
Eligibility Criteria
Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.
Inclusion Criteria
2. Patients between the ages of 18-80
3. Patients with a 6-month postoperative follow-up
4. Patients without a preoperative dry eye diagnosis
5. Patients who have not had previous eyelid surgery
6. Those who signed the Informed Consent Form/Written Consent Form
7. Patients with complete treatment and follow-up files
Exclusion Criteria
2. Having a history of previous eyelid surgery
3. Diabetics
4. Having diseases that cause dry eyes such as Sjögren, Systemic Lupus Erythematosus
5. Having dry eye disease before surgery
18 Years
80 Years
ALL
No
Sponsors
Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.
Mersin Training and Research Hospital
OTHER_GOV
Responsible Party
Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.
Furkan Çiftci
MD
Locations
Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.
Mersin City Education and Research Hospital
Mersin, Çukurova, Turkey (Türkiye)
Countries
Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.
References
Explore related publications, articles, or registry entries linked to this study.
Bottomley A, Jones D, Claassens L. Patient-reported outcomes: assessment and current perspectives of the guidelines of the Food and Drug Administration and the reflection paper of the European Medicines Agency. Eur J Cancer. 2009 Feb;45(3):347-53. doi: 10.1016/j.ejca.2008.09.032. Epub 2008 Nov 14.
Schiffman RM, Christianson MD, Jacobsen G, Hirsch JD, Reis BL. Reliability and validity of the Ocular Surface Disease Index. Arch Ophthalmol. 2000 May;118(5):615-21. doi: 10.1001/archopht.118.5.615.
Other Identifiers
Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.
MEŞEH
Identifier Type: -
Identifier Source: org_study_id
More Related Trials
Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.