Using Diaphragm Ultrasonography, Sugammadex Recovers Diaphragmatic Function More Effectively Than Neostigmine.
NCT ID: NCT06982092
Last Updated: 2025-05-21
Study Results
The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.
Basic Information
Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.
COMPLETED
PHASE1
60 participants
INTERVENTIONAL
2024-08-26
2025-01-15
Brief Summary
Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.
Related Clinical Trials
Explore similar clinical trials based on study characteristics and research focus.
Role of Sugammadex and Neostigmine for Recovery From Rocuronium
NCT06432621
Comparative Efficacy and Safety of Sugammadex and Neostigmine
NCT04997759
Diaphragm Ultrasound to Evaluate the Antagonistic Effect of Sugammadex
NCT05028088
Impact of Sugammadex Versus Neostigmine on Early Postoperative Pulmonary Function
NCT07309393
The Clinical Effect of Sugammadex Sodium (Domestic) for Antagonizing Neuromuscular Blockade After Thoracic Surgery
NCT06334562
Detailed Description
Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.
The diaphragm is a major respiratory muscle, accounting for 60-70% of the respiratory workload. Its dysfunction involves post-operative respiratory failure.
Diaphragm ultrasound imaging is a cheap and portable technique that allows assessment of diaphragm thickness, thickening, and excursion at a point in time or over time, in ambulatory patients and in mechanically ventilated patients.
Acetylcholinesterase inhibitors can reverse muscle block, but their short half-life may lead to residual curarization in the ward, especially when intermediate or long-acting NMBAs have been administered. Sugammadex is the first selective reversal drug for steroidal NMBAs; it has been shown to give full and rapid recovery of muscle strength, thus minimizing the occurrence of residual curarization.
This study was designed to assess differences in the recovery of the diaphragmatic function, using diaphragm ultrasonography, after reversal of a rocuronium-induced block, using neostigmine versus sugammadex.
It was conducted to 60 patients of both sexes, scheduled for FESS surgeries who underwent deep neuromuscular block with rocuronium. Cases were aged 18-65 years, ASA physical status ІІ or III.
The patients were randomized by computer software randomization and divided into two equal groups; SUG group (n =30 patients) that received 2 mg/kg sugammadex and NEU group (n =30 patients) that received 50 mic/kg and 0.01-0.02 mg/kg atropine.
The following parameters were assessed and recorded; diaphragmatic thickening fraction, diaphragmatic excursion, number of patient with baseline diaphragmatic functionat 30min, spirometry volume, post extubation heart rate, respiratory rate, saturation, bronchospasm, nausea and vomiting.
Conditions
See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.
Study Design
Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.
RANDOMIZED
PARALLEL
OTHER
DOUBLE
Study Groups
Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.
sugammadex
Group A: receive sugammadex (SUG group) as the reversal drug
sugammadex
: patients will receive the reversal drug according to the group to which they had been randomised. in the Sugammadex Group will receive 2 mg/kg sugammadex.
neostigmine
receive neostigmine (NEO group) as reversal drug.
Neostigmine
Patients in the NEO Group will receive 50 mic/kg neostigmine and .01-.02 mg/kg atropine
Interventions
Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.
sugammadex
: patients will receive the reversal drug according to the group to which they had been randomised. in the Sugammadex Group will receive 2 mg/kg sugammadex.
Neostigmine
Patients in the NEO Group will receive 50 mic/kg neostigmine and .01-.02 mg/kg atropine
Other Intervention Names
Discover alternative or legacy names that may be used to describe the listed interventions across different sources.
Eligibility Criteria
Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.
Inclusion Criteria
* Adult patients aging (18-65) years of both sexes. who undergoing deep neuromuscular block with rocuronium.
* Patients Scheduled for elective FISS surgery
Exclusion Criteria
* ASA class IV.
* History of hepatic disease (Child Pugh B or C class).
* History of renal disease.
* Allergy or hypersensitivity to sugammadex or neostigmine.
* History of neuromuscular disease.
* Diaphragmatic palsy, pregnancy, nursing.
18 Years
65 Years
ALL
Yes
Sponsors
Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.
Ain Shams University
OTHER
Responsible Party
Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.
Principal Investigators
Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.
Mostafa Hamed Mahmoud, M.B.B.CH
Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR
Anesthesia resident Ain Shams University
Locations
Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.
faculty of medicine, ain shams University
Cairo, , Egypt
Countries
Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.
Other Identifiers
Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.
FMASU MS535/2024
Identifier Type: -
Identifier Source: org_study_id
More Related Trials
Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.