Comparison Between a Rush and a Conventional Oral Immunotherapy Protocol to Treat Cow's Milk and Hen´s Egg Allergy. CompITO Study
NCT ID: NCT06976775
Last Updated: 2026-02-18
Study Results
The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.
Basic Information
Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.
RECRUITING
PHASE2/PHASE3
40 participants
INTERVENTIONAL
2025-06-03
2027-04-30
Brief Summary
Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.
Related Clinical Trials
Explore similar clinical trials based on study characteristics and research focus.
Safety of Oral Immunotherapy for Cow's Milk Allergy in School-aged Children
NCT01361347
Subcutaneous-Sublingual Immunotherapy With Depigmented and Polymerized Dermatophagoides Pteronyssinus Allergen Extract
NCT00622362
Specific Immunotherapy for Allergic Child
NCT02965612
Real World, Open Label, QOL Assessment of Peanut Immunotherapy AR101 in Children and Adolescents
NCT03703791
Allergic Rhinitis, Immunotherapy and Vitamin d
NCT02738619
Detailed Description
Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.
A Phase II/III randomized clinical trial enrolling a total of 40 patients with non-severe food allergies (20 cow's milk allergic children and 20 hen's egg allergic children) to assess the safety and efficacy of a rush/rapid versus a conventional OIT protocol.
Schemes are comparable in terms of the number of doses, the relative increment between doses and the final amount of protein, with one exception: the "rush" regimen includes several doses given the same day over the first week of treatment while in the "conventional" regimen Induction Phase is based upon single doses given every 2 weeks.
There are two different parts in the study, during Induction Phase (Part 1, 1 week up to 7 months), participants in both groups will receive incremental doses of milk/egg, depending on their allergy, until they tolerate 6600 mg or 4680mg of milk or egg protein respectively. The occurrence of adverse events in both groups will result in dose adjustments and delay in completion Induction Phase. During Maintenance Phase (Part 2), patients will ingest the same dose (daily for milk and every 48h for egg) until the end of study, that will last for a total duration of 7 months.
The study features a dual primary outcome. Safety and efficacy variables are primary outcomes, and parents and patient-reported food allergy-related quality of life (HRQoL) are secondary outcomes, as well as burden of treatment and immunological changes. Molecular changes underlying OIT will be studied, and biomarkers of safety and efficacy will be sought
Conditions
See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.
Study Design
Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.
RANDOMIZED
PARALLEL
TREATMENT
NONE
Study Groups
Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.
Rush protocol
Milk and egg allergic children undergoing OIT following a Rush regimen
"Rush" regimen
The "rush" regimen consists of the administration of several incremental doses daily, every day, over the first week of the Induction Phase (Part 1)
Conventional protocol
Milk and egg allergic children undergoing OIT following a Conventional regimen
"Conventional" regimen
The "conventional" regimen consists of the administration of only one incremental dose every 2 weeks, throughout all the Induction Phase (Part 1)
Interventions
Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.
"Rush" regimen
The "rush" regimen consists of the administration of several incremental doses daily, every day, over the first week of the Induction Phase (Part 1)
"Conventional" regimen
The "conventional" regimen consists of the administration of only one incremental dose every 2 weeks, throughout all the Induction Phase (Part 1)
Eligibility Criteria
Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.
Inclusion Criteria
* sIgE levels to milk 0.35 to 35kUA/L for milk allergic subjects and egg 0.35 to 35kUA/L for egg allergic subjects
* Entry DBPCFC discrete milk eliciting dose (ED)≥ 22.2mg of milk protein and discrete egg ED≥18.5mg of egg protein, that are the population-based reference values for the ED20
* Having a mild to moderate food allergy severity per DEFASE score (\<13 points)
Exclusion Criteria
* Entry DBPCFC discrete milk ED\<22.2mg of milk protein or discrete egg ED\<18.5mg of egg protein
* Entry DBPCFC discrete ED for milk\>2112mg of milk protein (cumulative amount of 4193,7mg of milk protein) and egg discrete ED\>1560mg of egg protein (cumulative amount of 3110.8mg of egg protein)
* Having severe food allergy per DEFASE score (≥13 points)
6 Years
16 Years
ALL
No
Sponsors
Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.
Pablo Rodríguez del Rio
OTHER
Responsible Party
Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.
Pablo Rodríguez del Rio
Sponsor-Investigator
Principal Investigators
Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.
Dr. Pablo Rodriguez del Río, MD, PhD
Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR
Hospital Infantil Niño Jesús, Instituto de Investigación La Princesa
Locations
Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.
Hospital Infantil Universitario Niño Jesús. Avenida de Menéndez Pelayo, número 65
Madrid, , Spain
Countries
Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.
Central Contacts
Reach out to these primary contacts for questions about participation or study logistics.
Facility Contacts
Find local site contact details for specific facilities participating in the trial.
References
Explore related publications, articles, or registry entries linked to this study.
Eusebio-Cartagena I, Jimenez-Saiz R, Esteban V, Nunez-Borque E, Ruiz-Sanchez A, Escudero C, Sanchez-Garcia S, Trujillo J, Dunn-Galvin A, Ibanez-Sandin MDP, Rodriguez Del Rio P. Comparison Between a Rush and a Conventional Oral Immunotherapy Protocol to Treat Cow's Milk and Hen's Egg Allergy. CompITO Study Methodology. Clin Exp Allergy. 2025 Oct 30. doi: 10.1111/cea.70168. Online ahead of print. No abstract available.
Other Identifiers
Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.
compITO
Identifier Type: -
Identifier Source: org_study_id
More Related Trials
Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.