Comparison Between a Rush and a Conventional Oral Immunotherapy Protocol to Treat Cow's Milk and Hen´s Egg Allergy. CompITO Study

NCT ID: NCT06976775

Last Updated: 2026-02-18

Study Results

Results pending

The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.

Basic Information

Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.

Recruitment Status

RECRUITING

Clinical Phase

PHASE2/PHASE3

Total Enrollment

40 participants

Study Classification

INTERVENTIONAL

Study Start Date

2025-06-03

Study Completion Date

2027-04-30

Brief Summary

Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.

This study investigates the efficacy and safety of two different OIT schemes to treat milk and egg allergic children

Detailed Description

Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.

Food immunotherapy, especially oral immunotherapy (OIT), is now a standard treatment option for patients allergic to cow´s milk, hen´s egg or peanuts. While peanut OIT has drawn considerable attention from the scientific community, milk and hen´s egg OIT still remain as the most common immunotherapy administered in daily routine. Optimization of these treatments is a priority to offer to a wider number of candidates a more efficient and safe way of treatment.

A Phase II/III randomized clinical trial enrolling a total of 40 patients with non-severe food allergies (20 cow's milk allergic children and 20 hen's egg allergic children) to assess the safety and efficacy of a rush/rapid versus a conventional OIT protocol.

Schemes are comparable in terms of the number of doses, the relative increment between doses and the final amount of protein, with one exception: the "rush" regimen includes several doses given the same day over the first week of treatment while in the "conventional" regimen Induction Phase is based upon single doses given every 2 weeks.

There are two different parts in the study, during Induction Phase (Part 1, 1 week up to 7 months), participants in both groups will receive incremental doses of milk/egg, depending on their allergy, until they tolerate 6600 mg or 4680mg of milk or egg protein respectively. The occurrence of adverse events in both groups will result in dose adjustments and delay in completion Induction Phase. During Maintenance Phase (Part 2), patients will ingest the same dose (daily for milk and every 48h for egg) until the end of study, that will last for a total duration of 7 months.

The study features a dual primary outcome. Safety and efficacy variables are primary outcomes, and parents and patient-reported food allergy-related quality of life (HRQoL) are secondary outcomes, as well as burden of treatment and immunological changes. Molecular changes underlying OIT will be studied, and biomarkers of safety and efficacy will be sought

Conditions

See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.

Food Allergy in Children Milk Allergy Egg Allergy

Study Design

Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.

Allocation Method

RANDOMIZED

Intervention Model

PARALLEL

Primary Study Purpose

TREATMENT

Blinding Strategy

NONE

Study Groups

Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.

Rush protocol

Milk and egg allergic children undergoing OIT following a Rush regimen

Group Type EXPERIMENTAL

"Rush" regimen

Intervention Type BIOLOGICAL

The "rush" regimen consists of the administration of several incremental doses daily, every day, over the first week of the Induction Phase (Part 1)

Conventional protocol

Milk and egg allergic children undergoing OIT following a Conventional regimen

Group Type ACTIVE_COMPARATOR

"Conventional" regimen

Intervention Type BIOLOGICAL

The "conventional" regimen consists of the administration of only one incremental dose every 2 weeks, throughout all the Induction Phase (Part 1)

Interventions

Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.

"Rush" regimen

The "rush" regimen consists of the administration of several incremental doses daily, every day, over the first week of the Induction Phase (Part 1)

Intervention Type BIOLOGICAL

"Conventional" regimen

The "conventional" regimen consists of the administration of only one incremental dose every 2 weeks, throughout all the Induction Phase (Part 1)

Intervention Type BIOLOGICAL

Eligibility Criteria

Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.

Inclusion Criteria

* Patients 6 to 16 years old
* sIgE levels to milk 0.35 to 35kUA/L for milk allergic subjects and egg 0.35 to 35kUA/L for egg allergic subjects
* Entry DBPCFC discrete milk eliciting dose (ED)≥ 22.2mg of milk protein and discrete egg ED≥18.5mg of egg protein, that are the population-based reference values for the ED20
* Having a mild to moderate food allergy severity per DEFASE score (\<13 points)

Exclusion Criteria

* sIgE levels to milk \>35kUA/L for milk allergic subjects and egg \> 35kUA/L for milk allergic subjects
* Entry DBPCFC discrete milk ED\<22.2mg of milk protein or discrete egg ED\<18.5mg of egg protein
* Entry DBPCFC discrete ED for milk\>2112mg of milk protein (cumulative amount of 4193,7mg of milk protein) and egg discrete ED\>1560mg of egg protein (cumulative amount of 3110.8mg of egg protein)
* Having severe food allergy per DEFASE score (≥13 points)
Minimum Eligible Age

6 Years

Maximum Eligible Age

16 Years

Eligible Sex

ALL

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Sponsors

Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.

Pablo Rodríguez del Rio

OTHER

Sponsor Role lead

Responsible Party

Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.

Pablo Rodríguez del Rio

Sponsor-Investigator

Responsibility Role SPONSOR_INVESTIGATOR

Principal Investigators

Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.

Dr. Pablo Rodriguez del Río, MD, PhD

Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR

Hospital Infantil Niño Jesús, Instituto de Investigación La Princesa

Locations

Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.

Hospital Infantil Universitario Niño Jesús. Avenida de Menéndez Pelayo, número 65

Madrid, , Spain

Site Status RECRUITING

Countries

Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.

Spain

Central Contacts

Reach out to these primary contacts for questions about participation or study logistics.

Dr. Pablo Rodríguez del Río

Role: CONTACT

+34915035900

Facility Contacts

Find local site contact details for specific facilities participating in the trial.

Dr. Pablo Rodríguez del Río

Role: primary

+34915035900

References

Explore related publications, articles, or registry entries linked to this study.

Eusebio-Cartagena I, Jimenez-Saiz R, Esteban V, Nunez-Borque E, Ruiz-Sanchez A, Escudero C, Sanchez-Garcia S, Trujillo J, Dunn-Galvin A, Ibanez-Sandin MDP, Rodriguez Del Rio P. Comparison Between a Rush and a Conventional Oral Immunotherapy Protocol to Treat Cow's Milk and Hen's Egg Allergy. CompITO Study Methodology. Clin Exp Allergy. 2025 Oct 30. doi: 10.1111/cea.70168. Online ahead of print. No abstract available.

Reference Type RESULT
PMID: 41168926 (View on PubMed)

Other Identifiers

Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.

compITO

Identifier Type: -

Identifier Source: org_study_id

More Related Trials

Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.