Empathy Through Pain Control: Buffered Compared to Unbuffered 1% Lidocaine During IUD Placement

NCT ID: NCT06974019

Last Updated: 2025-05-15

Study Results

Results pending

The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.

Basic Information

Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.

Recruitment Status

NOT_YET_RECRUITING

Clinical Phase

NA

Total Enrollment

68 participants

Study Classification

INTERVENTIONAL

Study Start Date

2025-06-01

Study Completion Date

2028-06-30

Brief Summary

Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.

The goal of this research study is to learn more about how different uses of a numbing medication might affect pain levels while getting an IUD placed. The investigators are also studying patients' opinions of their clinicians' empathy.

The investigators are inviting patients who have never given birth who arrive at their clinic visit seeking an IUD.

Usually, at University of California, San Diego (UCSD), for patients who have never delivered, clinicians numb both the sides of the cervix with a lidocaine-based paracervical block. The purpose of this research study is to compare perceptions of pain between buffered (2 cc of sodium bicarbonate, 18 cc of 1% lidocaine) vs. unbuffered paracervical block (20 cc 1% lidocaine) during IUD placement for nulliparous women.

Detailed Description

Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.

Lidocaine is a drug that has been approved by the Food and Drug Administration (FDA). Sodium bicarbonate is an additive that buffers the acidity of lidocaine. The combination of the two is safe and effective as a paracervical block for pain relief in various OBGYN procedures. At UCSD and other places, it is currently standard practice for people with no prior deliveries to receive a buffered lidocaine paracervical block prior to IUD placement.

Participants who take part in this study, will be randomly assigned to receive an injection of buffered lidocaine OR an injection of unbuffered lidocaine to numb the area before IUD placement.

Throughout the local anesthetic and intrauterine device (IUD) placement procedure, research team members will question participants about their pain levels, their satisfaction with the procedure, and how much empathy they feel the clinician has shown.

Conditions

See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.

Contraception Pain, Acute Anesthesia, Local

Study Design

Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.

Allocation Method

RANDOMIZED

Intervention Model

PARALLEL

Two-armed, single-blind, randomized controlled
Primary Study Purpose

TREATMENT

Blinding Strategy

SINGLE

Participants
Participants will not know their group assignment. The clinicians will know which group the participant is in, because they will be preparing the buffered or unbuffered lidocaine injection.

Study Groups

Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.

Buffered lidocaine paracervical block

Experimental groups: will receive a 20-mL buffered (2 cc of sodium bicarbonate, 18 cc of 1% lidocaine) paracervical block administered before IUD placement.

Group Type EXPERIMENTAL

Buffered Lidocaine

Intervention Type DRUG

To determine if a 20 cc buffered (2 cc of sodium bicarbonate, 18 cc of 1% lidocaine) lidocaine paracervical block decreases pain with IUD placement in nulliparous women

Unbuffered lidocaine paracervical block

Active comparator group: will receive a 20-mL unbuffered (20 cc of 1% lidocaine) paracervical block administered before IUD placement.

Group Type ACTIVE_COMPARATOR

Lidocaine 1% Injectable Solution

Intervention Type DRUG

To determine if the unbuffered 1% lidocaine paracervical block offers any less pain control with IUD placement for nulliparous women

Interventions

Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.

Buffered Lidocaine

To determine if a 20 cc buffered (2 cc of sodium bicarbonate, 18 cc of 1% lidocaine) lidocaine paracervical block decreases pain with IUD placement in nulliparous women

Intervention Type DRUG

Lidocaine 1% Injectable Solution

To determine if the unbuffered 1% lidocaine paracervical block offers any less pain control with IUD placement for nulliparous women

Intervention Type DRUG

Eligibility Criteria

Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.

Inclusion Criteria

1. Ability to provide informed consent
2. Women IUD placement for contraception or heavy menstrual bleeding
3. Ages 18-50
4. English-speaking
5. Participants must not have a past medical history of substance use disorders, pain disorders, use of prescription pain medications or are found to be pregnant
6. Nulliparous (never given birth)

Exclusion Criteria

1. History of ever giving birth
2. Current use of prescription pain medication prior to procedure. Over-the-counter medications such as those containing ibuprofen, aspirin, acetaminophen, or naproxen are allowed.
3. Diagnosed chronic pain condition
4. Current pregnancy
5. Known allergic reactions to components of the local anesthetic
6. History of an IUD placement
7. Current substance use or history of substance use
8. Known contraindications to IUD, such as unexplained vaginal bleeding
Minimum Eligible Age

18 Years

Maximum Eligible Age

50 Years

Eligible Sex

FEMALE

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

Yes

Sponsors

Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.

University of California, San Diego

OTHER

Sponsor Role lead

Responsible Party

Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.

Sheila Mody

Professor

Responsibility Role PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR

Principal Investigators

Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.

Sheila K Mody, MD, MPH

Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR

UC San Diego

Central Contacts

Reach out to these primary contacts for questions about participation or study logistics.

Marisa Hildebrand, MPH

Role: CONTACT

(858) 657-8745

References

Explore related publications, articles, or registry entries linked to this study.

Chin J, Kaneshiro B, Elia J, Raidoo S, Savala M, Soon R. Buffered lidocaine for paracervical blocks in first-trimester abortions: a randomized controlled trial. Contracept X. 2020 Oct 18;2:100044. doi: 10.1016/j.conx.2020.100044. eCollection 2020.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 33196038 (View on PubMed)

Azizkhani R, Forghani M, Maghami-Mehr A, Masomi B. The effects of injections of warmed bicarbonate-buffered Lidocaine as a painkiller for patients with trauma. J Inj Violence Res. 2015 Jul;7(2):87-8. doi: 10.5249/jivr.v7i2.523. Epub 2013 Dec 12. No abstract available.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 24879075 (View on PubMed)

Mody SK, Farala JP, Jimenez B, Nishikawa M, Ngo LL. Paracervical Block for Intrauterine Device Placement Among Nulliparous Women: A Randomized Controlled Trial. Obstet Gynecol. 2018 Sep;132(3):575-582. doi: 10.1097/AOG.0000000000002790.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 30095776 (View on PubMed)

Welch MN, Czyz CN, Kalwerisky K, Holck DE, Mihora LD. Double-blind, bilateral pain comparison with simultaneous injection of 2% lidocaine versus buffered 2% lidocaine for periocular anesthesia. Ophthalmology. 2012 Oct;119(10):2048-52. doi: 10.1016/j.ophtha.2012.05.029. Epub 2012 Jul 6.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 22771049 (View on PubMed)

Narvaez J, Wessels I, Bacon G, Chin VR, Baqai WK, Zimmerman GJ. Prospective randomized evaluation of short-term complications when using buffered or unbuffered lidocaine 1% with epinephrine for blepharoplasty surgery. Ophthalmic Plast Reconstr Surg. 2010 Jan-Feb;26(1):33-5. doi: 10.1097/IOP.0b013e3181b80c13.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 20090482 (View on PubMed)

Hobeich P, Simon S, Schneiderman E, He J. A prospective, randomized, double-blind comparison of the injection pain and anesthetic onset of 2% lidocaine with 1:100,000 epinephrine buffered with 5% and 10% sodium bicarbonate in maxillary infiltrations. J Endod. 2013 May;39(5):597-9. doi: 10.1016/j.joen.2013.01.008. Epub 2013 Mar 20.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 23611375 (View on PubMed)

Harreld TK, Fowler S, Drum M, Reader A, Nusstein J, Beck M. Efficacy of a Buffered 4% Lidocaine Formulation for Incision and Drainage: A Prospective, Randomized, Double-blind Study. J Endod. 2015 Oct;41(10):1583-8. doi: 10.1016/j.joen.2015.06.017. Epub 2015 Aug 4.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 26253800 (View on PubMed)

Maguire K, Davis A, Rosario Tejeda L, Westhoff C. Intracervical lidocaine gel for intrauterine device insertion: a randomized controlled trial. Contraception. 2012 Sep;86(3):214-9. doi: 10.1016/j.contraception.2012.01.005. Epub 2012 Feb 9.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 22325115 (View on PubMed)

Allen RH, Raker C, Goyal V. Higher dose cervical 2% lidocaine gel for IUD insertion: a randomized controlled trial. Contraception. 2013 Dec;88(6):730-6. doi: 10.1016/j.contraception.2013.07.009. Epub 2013 Aug 1.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 24012096 (View on PubMed)

Other Identifiers

Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.

812547

Identifier Type: -

Identifier Source: org_study_id

More Related Trials

Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.