Trial Outcomes & Findings for TARDIS - Photo Elicitation and Intervention (NCT NCT06972251)
NCT ID: NCT06972251
Last Updated: 2025-10-08
Results Overview
Scale used: 17 item Diabetes Distress Scale. Minimum value 1, Maximum value 6 Scoring is: \< 2.0 is little or no distress; 2.0-2.9 is moderate distress; and ≥ 3.0 is high distress. Higher scores indicate higher diabetes distress or worse outcome.
COMPLETED
NA
34 participants
Baseline
2025-10-08
Participant Flow
Participant milestones
| Measure |
Aim 3a - TARDIS Photo Elicitation
To further understand Diabetes Distress (DD) by expanding on what we have learned thus far in cognitive and semi-structured interviews with Veterans. Visual-based qualitative methods will help identify and more robustly describe DD in Veterans.
|
Aim 3b - TARDIS Intervention
Design \& pilot test an innovative, tailored self-management information and supportive services intervention for Veterans with T2D, to promote engagement in self-management behaviors.
|
|---|---|---|
|
Overall Study
STARTED
|
14
|
20
|
|
Overall Study
Completed Baseline
|
13
|
20
|
|
Overall Study
COMPLETED
|
3
|
18
|
|
Overall Study
NOT COMPLETED
|
11
|
2
|
Reasons for withdrawal
| Measure |
Aim 3a - TARDIS Photo Elicitation
To further understand Diabetes Distress (DD) by expanding on what we have learned thus far in cognitive and semi-structured interviews with Veterans. Visual-based qualitative methods will help identify and more robustly describe DD in Veterans.
|
Aim 3b - TARDIS Intervention
Design \& pilot test an innovative, tailored self-management information and supportive services intervention for Veterans with T2D, to promote engagement in self-management behaviors.
|
|---|---|---|
|
Overall Study
Withdrawal by Subject
|
1
|
0
|
|
Overall Study
Lost to Follow-up
|
10
|
2
|
Baseline Characteristics
TARDIS - Photo Elicitation and Intervention
Baseline characteristics by cohort
| Measure |
Aim 3a - TARDIS Photo Elicitation
n=14 Participants
To further understand Diabetes Distress (DD) by expanding on what we have learned thus far in cognitive and semi-structured interviews with Veterans. Visual-based qualitative methods will help identify and more robustly describe DD in Veterans.
|
Aim 3b - TARDIS Intervention
n=20 Participants
Design \& pilot test an innovative, tailored self-management information and supportive services intervention for Veterans with T2D, to promote engagement in self-management behaviors.
|
Total
n=34 Participants
Total of all reporting groups
|
|---|---|---|---|
|
Age, Continuous
|
60.143 Years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 10.918 • n=5 Participants
|
64.4 Years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 7.591 • n=7 Participants
|
62.647 Years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 9.201 • n=5 Participants
|
|
Sex: Female, Male
Female
|
5 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
3 Participants
n=7 Participants
|
8 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
|
Sex: Female, Male
Male
|
9 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
17 Participants
n=7 Participants
|
26 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
|
Race (NIH/OMB)
American Indian or Alaska Native
|
0 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
0 Participants
n=7 Participants
|
0 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
|
Race (NIH/OMB)
Asian
|
0 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
0 Participants
n=7 Participants
|
0 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
|
Race (NIH/OMB)
Native Hawaiian or Other Pacific Islander
|
1 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
0 Participants
n=7 Participants
|
1 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
|
Race (NIH/OMB)
Black or African American
|
7 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
16 Participants
n=7 Participants
|
23 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
|
Race (NIH/OMB)
White
|
4 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
4 Participants
n=7 Participants
|
8 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
|
Race (NIH/OMB)
More than one race
|
2 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
0 Participants
n=7 Participants
|
2 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
|
Race (NIH/OMB)
Unknown or Not Reported
|
0 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
0 Participants
n=7 Participants
|
0 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
|
Ethnicity (NIH/OMB)
Hispanic or Latino
|
2 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
1 Participants
n=7 Participants
|
3 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
|
Ethnicity (NIH/OMB)
Not Hispanic or Latino
|
12 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
19 Participants
n=7 Participants
|
31 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
|
Ethnicity (NIH/OMB)
Unknown or Not Reported
|
0 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
0 Participants
n=7 Participants
|
0 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
|
Region of Enrollment
United States
|
14 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
20 Participants
n=7 Participants
|
34 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
|
Diabetes Distress Scale Score
|
1.979 Total score
STANDARD_DEVIATION 0.781 • n=5 Participants
|
1.824 Total score
STANDARD_DEVIATION 0.784 • n=7 Participants
|
1.888 Total score
STANDARD_DEVIATION 0.775 • n=5 Participants
|
PRIMARY outcome
Timeframe: BaselinePopulation: For Aim 3a, participants did not complete a follow-up survey to assess their Diabetes Distress Scale score as this was not a part of the study design. Only participants in Aim3b (intervention) completed a baseline and follow-up survey to assess their DDS score.
Scale used: 17 item Diabetes Distress Scale. Minimum value 1, Maximum value 6 Scoring is: \< 2.0 is little or no distress; 2.0-2.9 is moderate distress; and ≥ 3.0 is high distress. Higher scores indicate higher diabetes distress or worse outcome.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Aim 3a - TARDIS Photo Elicitation
n=14 Participants
To further understand Diabetes Distress (DD) by expanding on what we have learned thus far in cognitive and semi-structured interviews with Veterans. Visual-based qualitative methods will help identify and more robustly describe DD in Veterans.
|
Aim 3b - TARDIS Intervention
n=20 Participants
Design \& pilot test an innovative, tailored self-management information and supportive services intervention for Veterans with T2D, to promote engagement in self-management behaviors.
|
|---|---|---|
|
Diabetes Distress Scale Score
Baseline
|
1.979 score on a scale
Standard Deviation 0.781
|
1.824 score on a scale
Standard Deviation 0.784
|
|
Diabetes Distress Scale Score
Follow-Up
|
—
|
1.781 score on a scale
Standard Deviation 0.653
|
PRIMARY outcome
Timeframe: BaselineThe HbA1c value is determined from a blood test that measures a patient's average blood glucose level over the past 2 to 3 months.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Aim 3a - TARDIS Photo Elicitation
n=14 Participants
To further understand Diabetes Distress (DD) by expanding on what we have learned thus far in cognitive and semi-structured interviews with Veterans. Visual-based qualitative methods will help identify and more robustly describe DD in Veterans.
|
Aim 3b - TARDIS Intervention
n=20 Participants
Design \& pilot test an innovative, tailored self-management information and supportive services intervention for Veterans with T2D, to promote engagement in self-management behaviors.
|
|---|---|---|
|
HbA1c Value
|
8.464 percentage of glycosylated hemoglobin
Standard Deviation 2.367
|
9.705 percentage of glycosylated hemoglobin
Standard Deviation 1.508
|
PRIMARY outcome
Timeframe: From consent up to 1 monthPopulation: All participants who consent to Aim 3a will participate in this aim only. There is no randomization process or groups for this aim.
Number of semi-structured interviews completed by participants (1 interview per time point per participant)
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Aim 3a - TARDIS Photo Elicitation
n=14 Participants
To further understand Diabetes Distress (DD) by expanding on what we have learned thus far in cognitive and semi-structured interviews with Veterans. Visual-based qualitative methods will help identify and more robustly describe DD in Veterans.
|
Aim 3b - TARDIS Intervention
Design \& pilot test an innovative, tailored self-management information and supportive services intervention for Veterans with T2D, to promote engagement in self-management behaviors.
|
|---|---|---|
|
Photo Elicitation (Aim 3a) Semi-Structured Interviews
Consented
|
14 count of calls completed
|
—
|
|
Photo Elicitation (Aim 3a) Semi-Structured Interviews
Baseline
|
13 count of calls completed
|
—
|
|
Photo Elicitation (Aim 3a) Semi-Structured Interviews
Photo elicitation interview #1
|
5 count of calls completed
|
—
|
|
Photo Elicitation (Aim 3a) Semi-Structured Interviews
Photo elicitation interview #2
|
3 count of calls completed
|
—
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: Coaching calls started two weeks post-baseline to occur up to 3 months after consentPopulation: All participants who consent to Aim 3b will participate in this aim only. There is no randomization process or groups for this aim.
Number of Health Coaching Calls Completed (1 call per participant per time point)
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Aim 3a - TARDIS Photo Elicitation
n=20 Participants
To further understand Diabetes Distress (DD) by expanding on what we have learned thus far in cognitive and semi-structured interviews with Veterans. Visual-based qualitative methods will help identify and more robustly describe DD in Veterans.
|
Aim 3b - TARDIS Intervention
Design \& pilot test an innovative, tailored self-management information and supportive services intervention for Veterans with T2D, to promote engagement in self-management behaviors.
|
|---|---|---|
|
Health Coaching Calls (Aim 3b - TARDIS Intervention)
Health Coaching Call #1
|
20 Count of Calls Completed
|
—
|
|
Health Coaching Calls (Aim 3b - TARDIS Intervention)
Health Coaching Call #2
|
20 Count of Calls Completed
|
—
|
|
Health Coaching Calls (Aim 3b - TARDIS Intervention)
Health Coaching Call #3
|
19 Count of Calls Completed
|
—
|
Adverse Events
Aim 3a - TARDIS Photo Elicitation
Aim 3b - TARDIS Intervention
Serious adverse events
Adverse event data not reported
Other adverse events
Adverse event data not reported
Additional Information
Allison Lewinski, PhD, MPH, RN, FAAN
Health Systems Research Center of Innovation to Accelerate Discovery and Practice Transformation (ADAPT)
Results disclosure agreements
- Principal investigator is a sponsor employee
- Publication restrictions are in place