A Global, Integrated, Personalized, Stage-related, Multimodal Therapeutic Approach for Rectal Adenocarcinoma Based on Organ Sparing and Mininvasivity

NCT ID: NCT06952101

Last Updated: 2025-04-30

Study Results

Results pending

The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.

Basic Information

Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.

Recruitment Status

RECRUITING

Clinical Phase

NA

Total Enrollment

200 participants

Study Classification

INTERVENTIONAL

Study Start Date

2024-04-30

Study Completion Date

2030-12-31

Brief Summary

Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.

A phase II, single-center, non-profit, interventional study on patients affected by rectal adenocarcinoma. Patients will be stratified into three groups based on pre-treatment clinical stage. The study investigates and may propose a comprehensive, stage-specific, multimodal approach to rectal adenocarcinoma, with a focus on organ preservation even in early stages (cT1-2N0). When organ-sparing strategies are not feasible, the approach prioritizes minimally invasive techniques (laparoscopic and robotic) to reduce the physical, psychological, and quality-of-life impact on patients.

Detailed Description

Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.

Patients affected by rectal adenocarcinoma will be stratified into three groups according to pre-treatment clinical stage:

Group 1: pT1cN0M0 tumors may be candidates for Endoscopic Resection (ER), Local Excision (LE), or TransAnal Minimally Invasive Surgery (TAMIS). If final pathology classifies these tumors as "high-risk" pT1, patients are typically candidates for radical rectal resection due to an estimated 20% risk of mesorectal lymph node metastases. However, many patients refuse surgery and opt for direct follow-up despite the increased risk of recurrence. The investigators propose an alternative treatment with experimental chemoradiotherapy (spCRT) to reduce the risk of local relapse in patients unwilling to undergo surgery, followed by an intensive surveillance protocol. Accurate staging with pelvic MRI, CT scan, and whole-body PET must be performed prior to local excision to exclude false-positive mesorectal lymph nodes. A subsequent Watch and Wait (W\&S) strategy may be considered.

Group 2: cT2N0 tumors are typically managed with upfront surgical rectal resection. This study proposes an alternative approach based on spCRT. Literature indicates that the rate of pathological Complete Response (pCR) after CRT is significantly higher than the 25% typically reported for intermediate to advanced rectal tumors. Clinical Complete Response (cCR) or clinical Minimal Residual disease (cMR) will be assessed through multidisciplinary, high-resolution restaging including pelvic MRI, whole-body PET, thoraco-abdominal CT scan, EndoRectal Ultrasound (ERUS), and rectoscopy. In patients achieving cCR or cMR, a W\&S approach or LE/TAMIS may be proposed to minimize the psychological and physical burden of surgery, with subsequent close surveillance.

Group 3: Patients with cT3-4, N+, circumferential resection margin positive (CRM+), or extramural vascular invasion (EMVI+) tumors will initially receive standard chemoradiotherapy (stCRT). Those who achieve cCR or cMR at restaging may be considered for organ-sparing approaches (W\&S/LE/TAMIS) according to established multicenter research protocols.

All patients in Group 1 and Group 2 who do not achieve cCR or cMR will be managed according to the principle of minimal invasiveness. These patients will undergo laparoscopic or robotic rectal resection with preservation of pelvic autonomic nerves, aimed at reducing genitourinary dysfunction and improving short-term outcomes (e.g., reduced postoperative pain, fewer abdominal wall hernias, faster bowel function recovery, and quicker return to daily activities). Recovery will be further optimized through integration with Enhanced Recovery After Surgery (ERAS) protocols.

Conditions

See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.

Rectal Adenocarcinoma Non Metastatic

Keywords

Explore important study keywords that can help with search, categorization, and topic discovery.

Rectal Adenocarcinoma mininvasivity organ sparing surgical rectal resection

Study Design

Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.

Allocation Method

NON_RANDOMIZED

Intervention Model

PARALLEL

Primary Study Purpose

TREATMENT

Blinding Strategy

NONE

Study Groups

Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.

Sparing Approach

Group 1 - Patients with high-risk pT1cN0M0 cancerized adenoma, diagnosed through histological analysis following Endoscopic Resection (ER) or Local Excision (LE).

For patients classified as "high-risk" pT1 at final pathology, an experimental sparing strategy is proposed, consisting of experimental chemoradiotherapy (spCRT) followed by a Watch and Wait (W\&W) approach (also referred to as Organ-Sparing Approach, OSA), in selected cases.

Group Type EXPERIMENTAL

Sparing Approach

Intervention Type PROCEDURE

Accurate staging with Pelvic MRI, CT scan, PET total body have to be performed before local excision in order to exclude false positive mesorectal lymph nodes. Subsequent Wait and See (W\&S) approach could be proposed.

Experimental Chemoradiotherapy: A Path to Conservative Treatment

Group 2 - Patients with cT2N0 tumors, typically candidates for upfront radical rectal resection. An alternative, non-operative approach is proposed based on experimental chemoradiotherapy (spCRT).

According to current literature, the pathologic Complete Response (pCR) rate following CRT significantly exceeds the 25% commonly reported for intermediate to advanced rectal tumors. Clinical Complete Response (cCR) or clinical Minimal Residual disease (cMR) will be assessed through multidisciplinary, high-resolution restaging, including:

Pelvic Magnetic Resonance Imaging (MRI) Positron Emission Tomography (PET) Thoraco-abdominal Computed Tomography (CT) Endorectal Ultrasound (ERUS) Rectoscopy

In patients achieving cCR or cMR, a Watch \& Wait (W\&W) strategy or Local Excision/Transanal Minimally Invasive Surgery (LE/TAMIS) may be proposed to avoid the physical and psychological burden of major surgery. An intensive follow-up protocol will be implemented.

Group Type EXPERIMENTAL

experimental chemoradiotherapy

Intervention Type PROCEDURE

Participants with cT2N0 rectal tumors are typically candidates for upfront surgical resection. The investigators propose an alternative approach based on experimental chemoradiotherapy (spCRT). Literature suggests that pathologic complete response (pCR) rates after CRT are significantly higher than the 25% described for intermediate-advanced tumors. The investigators will assess clinical complete response (cCR) or complete metabolic response (cMR) through a multidisciplinary restaging process, including MRI, PET, thorax-abdomen CT scan, ERUS, and rectoscopy. In participants achieving cCR or cMR, a Watch and Wait (W\&S) strategy or Local Excision/Transanal Minimally Invasive Surgery (LE/TAMIS) may be proposed to avoid the physical and psychological consequences of major surgery, followed by a rigorous surveillance program.

tandard Chemotherapy Approach: Restaging for Conservative Surgery

Group 3 - Patients with cT3-4, N+, CRM-positive, or EMVI-positive tumors will receive standard chemoradiotherapy (stCRT) as the initial treatment.

Patients achieving cCR or cMR at restaging will be evaluated for organ-sparing strategies, including Watch \& Wait (W\&W) or LE/TAMIS, in accordance with existing multicenter clinical research protocols. In cases where a conservative approach is not feasible, standard surgical treatment will follow.

Group Type ACTIVE_COMPARATOR

Standard Chemotherapy

Intervention Type PROCEDURE

Tumors will be initially treated with standard CRT (stCRT). Patients who reach cCR-cMR at restaging they are already candidates to sparing approaches with W\&S/LE/TAMIS according to Multicentric Resarch Study Protocol

Interventions

Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.

Sparing Approach

Accurate staging with Pelvic MRI, CT scan, PET total body have to be performed before local excision in order to exclude false positive mesorectal lymph nodes. Subsequent Wait and See (W\&S) approach could be proposed.

Intervention Type PROCEDURE

experimental chemoradiotherapy

Participants with cT2N0 rectal tumors are typically candidates for upfront surgical resection. The investigators propose an alternative approach based on experimental chemoradiotherapy (spCRT). Literature suggests that pathologic complete response (pCR) rates after CRT are significantly higher than the 25% described for intermediate-advanced tumors. The investigators will assess clinical complete response (cCR) or complete metabolic response (cMR) through a multidisciplinary restaging process, including MRI, PET, thorax-abdomen CT scan, ERUS, and rectoscopy. In participants achieving cCR or cMR, a Watch and Wait (W\&S) strategy or Local Excision/Transanal Minimally Invasive Surgery (LE/TAMIS) may be proposed to avoid the physical and psychological consequences of major surgery, followed by a rigorous surveillance program.

Intervention Type PROCEDURE

Standard Chemotherapy

Tumors will be initially treated with standard CRT (stCRT). Patients who reach cCR-cMR at restaging they are already candidates to sparing approaches with W\&S/LE/TAMIS according to Multicentric Resarch Study Protocol

Intervention Type PROCEDURE

Eligibility Criteria

Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.

Inclusion Criteria

* Patients aged ≥18 yrs old
* Patients able to sign the informed consent
* Patients with High Risk pT1 rectal adenocarcinoma endoscopically excised
* Patients with cT2-3aN0 rectal adenocarcinoma who has complete/major response to EXPERIMENTAL CRT
* Patients with cT3b4N0-1 rectal adenocarcinoma who has complete/major response to STANDARD CRT

Exclusion Criteria

* cT2-4 any NM0 who don't reach cCR or cMR after experimental/standard CRT
* Pregnancy
Minimum Eligible Age

18 Years

Eligible Sex

ALL

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Sponsors

Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.

Fondazione del Piemonte per l'Oncologia

OTHER

Sponsor Role lead

Responsible Party

Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.

Responsibility Role SPONSOR

Principal Investigators

Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.

Felice Borghi, MD

Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR

Fondazione del Piemonte per l'Oncologia

Locations

Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.

Department of Surgical Oncology - FPO-IRCCS Institute for Cancer Research and Treatment

Candiolo, Turin, Italy

Site Status RECRUITING

Countries

Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.

Italy

Central Contacts

Reach out to these primary contacts for questions about participation or study logistics.

Alfredo Mellano, MD

Role: CONTACT

Phone: +390119933445

Email: [email protected]

Annamaria Nuzzo, PHD

Role: CONTACT

Email: [email protected]

Facility Contacts

Find local site contact details for specific facilities participating in the trial.

Alfredo Mellano, MD

Role: primary

Other Identifiers

Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.

001-FPO24

Identifier Type: -

Identifier Source: org_study_id