Study Results
The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.
Basic Information
Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.
NOT_YET_RECRUITING
NA
120 participants
INTERVENTIONAL
2025-08-28
2026-12-30
Brief Summary
Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.
The goal of this research is to:
1. determine which prescribing approach is more effective at lowering blood pressure after 12 weeks (end of study)
2. assess the safety, feasibility and acceptability of the two treatment approaches.
Related Clinical Trials
Explore similar clinical trials based on study characteristics and research focus.
Evaluating Whether Treating Elevated Blood Pressure in the Inpatient Setting Impacts Patient Outcomes
NCT07208669
Evaluating the Use of a Remote Telehome Monitoring Hypertension Program for Patients Receiving Virtual Care
NCT05300503
Etiological Classification-guided Individual Intervention in Primary Hypertension
NCT06941935
Remote Patient Monitoring and Health Coaching vs. Usual Care for the Treatment of Hypertension
NCT05394766
Treating to Target for Patients With Hypertension
NCT01013857
Detailed Description
Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.
Current pharmacological treatment of hypertension involves titration of treatment according to serial BP monitoring. However, BP is intrinsically variable and subject to significant measurement and random error that leads to a notoriously poor signal-to-noise ratio. Accordingly, measurement of BPs within 1 to 2 months of starting BP lowering treatment are not associated with true treatment response, adverse effects or cardiovascular risk reduction. Two contrasting solutions include 1) 'fire and forget' by prescribing BP lowering drugs empirically based on the desired average BP response observed from placebo controlled randomised trials without measuring repeat BP or 2) continue usual care with more intensive BP monitoring to try and improve the signal-to-noise ratio.
OBJECTIVES:
The primary aim is to compare the efficacy of remote empirical prescribing of BP lowering drugs informed by randomised trial data without routine BP monitoring ('fire and forget') versus usual care enhanced with intensive BP monitoring ('intensive BP monitoring').
The secondary aims are to determine if, compared to usual care with intensive BP monitoring, remote empirical treatment of high BP is acceptable to patients, is cost-effective and safe.
PARTICIPANT ELIGIBILITY:
Key Inclusion Criteria:
* Adult aged ≥18 years
* High BP defined as home SBP ≥135 or DBP ≥85 mmHg, either untreated or receiving one or two BP lowering drugs
* Among untreated individuals, indicated for pharmacological treatment of high BP according to 2023 NHF Cardiovascular Risk Management Guidelines
Key Exclusion Criteria:
* Currently receiving three or more BP lowering drugs
* Home SBP ≥155 mmHg for untreated participants
* Home SBP ≥150 mmHg for participants on one BP lowering drug
* Home SBP ≥145 mmHg for participants on two BP lowering drugs
* Baseline eGFR \<45 ml/min/m2
* Any abnormalities on baseline electrolytes that would prevent initiation of BP lowering therapy
* Participants with any other medical condition or taking any other concomitant medication which in the opinion of the investigator would make the participant unsuitable for the trial
TRIAL INTERVENTION \& RANDOMISATION:
All participants who meet the eligibility criteria for the trial will be randomised (1:1) to:
Fire and forget: Remote evidence informed empirical prescribing of BP lowering therapy without serial BP monitoring. Regimen chosen based on the average BP reduction and lowest risk of adverse effects observed in placebo controlled randomised trials Intensive BP monitoring: usual care as per GP prescribing enhanced with intensive BP monitoring
TRIAL OUTCOMES:
Primary: Mean difference in change in home SBP from baseline to 12 weeks
Secondary:
* Efficacy: Proportion achieving home BP control \<135/85 mmHg, difference in change in systolic DBP from baseline to 12 weeks
* Safety: Incidence of adverse events leading to treatment withdrawal, adverse events of special interest such as symptoms of hypotension, and SAEs from baseline to 12 weeks.
* Acceptability: interviews of participants
* Self-reported medication adherence
* Cost-effectiveness: Average total cost per patient achieving BP control
Conditions
See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.
Study Design
Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.
RANDOMIZED
PARALLEL
TREATMENT
NONE
Study Groups
Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.
Fire and forget
Evidence informed empirical prescribing of blood pressure (BP) lowering therapy without serial BP monitoring. Regimen chosen based on the average BP reduction and lowest risk of adverse effects observed in placebo controlled randomised trials. No further blood pressure measurements after baseline until end of study at 12 weeks.
Fire and forget
Evidence informed prescription of BP lowering drugs based on the average observed blood pressure (BP) reduction and risk of treatment discontinuation due to adverse effects in double-blind placebo-controlled randomised clinical trials. Clinicians will prescribe BP treatment regimen using generic, established BP lowering medications that will be expected to achieve at least 80% of future systolic BP values under 130 mmHg. Treatment will be delivered remotely through telehealth consultation. Participants will be asked to avoid routine BP measurements after treatment is commenced to avoid misleading chance fluctuations in BP before 12 weeks. Adverse events will be monitored remotely, and treatments can be adjusted according to adverse events but not according to BP measurements
Usual care with intensive BP monitoring
usual care prescribing by general practitioner enhanced with intensive blood pressure monitoring
Usual care with more intensive BP monitoring
Participants will follow-up with their usual general practitioner, who will treat participants BP according to local practice guidelines. General practitioners will have access to the same BP lowering medications as the "fire and forget" treatment group. Participants will continue to monitor their BP throughout the 12 week period through home BP monitoring with optional 24 hour ambulatory BP monitoring. Participants will maintain a BP diary and present their BP results to their treating physician.
Interventions
Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.
Fire and forget
Evidence informed prescription of BP lowering drugs based on the average observed blood pressure (BP) reduction and risk of treatment discontinuation due to adverse effects in double-blind placebo-controlled randomised clinical trials. Clinicians will prescribe BP treatment regimen using generic, established BP lowering medications that will be expected to achieve at least 80% of future systolic BP values under 130 mmHg. Treatment will be delivered remotely through telehealth consultation. Participants will be asked to avoid routine BP measurements after treatment is commenced to avoid misleading chance fluctuations in BP before 12 weeks. Adverse events will be monitored remotely, and treatments can be adjusted according to adverse events but not according to BP measurements
Usual care with more intensive BP monitoring
Participants will follow-up with their usual general practitioner, who will treat participants BP according to local practice guidelines. General practitioners will have access to the same BP lowering medications as the "fire and forget" treatment group. Participants will continue to monitor their BP throughout the 12 week period through home BP monitoring with optional 24 hour ambulatory BP monitoring. Participants will maintain a BP diary and present their BP results to their treating physician.
Other Intervention Names
Discover alternative or legacy names that may be used to describe the listed interventions across different sources.
Eligibility Criteria
Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.
Inclusion Criteria
* Adult aged ≥18 years
* English proficiency
* High BP defined as home SBP ≥135 or DBP ≥85 mmHg, either untreated or receiving one or two BP lowering drugs
* Among untreated individuals, indicated for pharmacological treatment of high BP according to 2023 Australian Heart Foundation Cardiovascular Risk Management Guidelines
* Willing to receive BP lowering drug treatment remotely if treatment is indicated
* Willing to check BP with home monitoring for 12 weeks
* Willing to participate in telehealth visit at baseline and 12 weeks
* Willing to undergo blood tests
Exclusion Criteria
* Currently receiving an antihypertensive that is not one of the five major antihypertensive drug classes
* Home SBP ≥155 mmHg for untreated participants
* Home SBP ≥150 mmHg for participants on one BP lowering drug
* Home SBP ≥145 mmHg for participants on two BP lowering drugs
* Baseline eGFR \<45 ml/min/m2
* Any abnormalities on baseline electrolytes that would prevent initiation of BP lowering therapy
* Participants with any other medical condition or taking any other concomitant medication which in the opinion of the investigator would make the participant unsuitable for the trial.
* Of childbearing age and not using contraception.
* Planned international travel for next 12 weeks
18 Years
ALL
No
Sponsors
Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.
The George Institute
OTHER
Responsible Party
Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.
Principal Investigators
Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.
Nelson Wang, MD PhD
Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR
The George Institute
Locations
Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.
The George Institute for Global Health
Sydney, New South Wales, Australia
Countries
Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.
Central Contacts
Reach out to these primary contacts for questions about participation or study logistics.
Facility Contacts
Find local site contact details for specific facilities participating in the trial.
Other Identifiers
Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.
P01743
Identifier Type: -
Identifier Source: org_study_id
More Related Trials
Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.