Evaluate the Detection of Retained Gastric Contents and Assess Safety Using the Flower Capsule Endoscopy in Healthy Individuals and GLP-1 Receptor Agonist Users
NCT ID: NCT06927401
Last Updated: 2025-04-15
Study Results
The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.
Basic Information
Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.
NOT_YET_RECRUITING
NA
36 participants
INTERVENTIONAL
2025-04-08
2025-08-30
Brief Summary
Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.
1\. Study Purpose
a. A controlled, prospective, between-participants study design to assess Flower in detecting the presence or absence of retained gastric contents (RGC), using sedated esophagogastroduodenoscopy (EGD) as the ground truth for an empty stomach and known ingested volume as the ground truth for a fed participant.
2\. Study Endpoints
a. Primary i. Visualization of Retained Gastric Contents b. Secondary i. Gastric mucosal visualization of the seven anatomical landmarks of the stomach (fundus, cardia, lesser gastric curvature, greater gastric curvature, angulus, antrum, and pylorus) ii. Gastric Cleanliness iii. Adverse events defined as capsule retention, capsule aspiration, perforation, nausea, and pain iv. Maximum, tolerated water consumed v. Patient tolerance vi. Exploratory attempts for successful swallowing vii. Exploratory minimum and maximum water volume for optimal Flower performance viii. Time required for gastric examination completion by Flower
Related Clinical Trials
Explore similar clinical trials based on study characteristics and research focus.
GLP-1 Receptor Agonist Use and Incidence of Retained Gastric Food on Endoscopy
NCT05875636
Effect of Prolonged Fasting Time on Gastric Residual Volume in Patients Taking GLP1 Receptor Agonists
NCT07006142
The Impact of GLP Medication on Colonoscopy Bowel Preparation Quality
NCT07127354
Gastric Volume in Patients on GLP-1 Medications
NCT05903482
GLP-1 Inhibits Prandial Antro-duodeno-jejunal Motility in Humans
NCT02731664
Detailed Description
Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.
The Flower System is a novel, single-use, wireless capsule endoscopy platform developed to provide real-time gastric imaging at the bedside without the need for sedation or advanced endoscopic infrastructure. The system consists of three key components: (1) the ingestible Flower capsule with an integrated high-resolution camera and software for orientational bias; (2) a wireless Dongle that receives and transmits video data to the physician's computer or smartphone; and (3) a software application with a user interface for image visualization, storage, and interpretation.
This clinical feasibility study evaluates the diagnostic performance and safety of the Flower capsule in two populations: (1) healthy volunteers (Study I), and (2) patients receiving GLP-1 receptor agonists (Study II; not described here). This protocol pertains to Study I only.
Study Design Overview - Study I This is a prospective, controlled, between-participant study comparing the diagnostic capability of the Flower capsule with sedated esophagogastroduodenoscopy (EGD), which serves as the ground truth standard for the presence or absence of gastric contents.
Twenty-four (n=24) healthy volunteers will be randomly assigned to one of two arms:
Group 1 - Empty Stomach Validation: Participants fast for 8 hours from solids and 2 hours from liquids, undergo sedated EGD to confirm an empty stomach, and then undergo Flower capsule evaluation.
Group 2 - Gastric Content Detection: Participants fast identically, undergo EGD to confirm an empty stomach, consume 1.5 mL/kg of a standardized semi-solid meal (post-alertness), and subsequently undergo Flower capsule evaluation.
A gastroenterologist blinded to fasting/fed status will assess the Flower capsule images for RGC and other endpoints.
Study Objectives Primary Objective: To determine the sensitivity and specificity of the Flower capsule in detecting RGC (\>1.5 mL/kg) compared to the known ingested volume (fed group) and EGD (fasted group).
Secondary Objectives: To evaluate visualization of gastric landmarks, gastric cleanliness, safety (adverse events including capsule retention, aspiration, nausea, pain), water tolerance, examination duration, and patient-reported tolerance compared to EGD.
Technical Protocol All participants receive a structured hydration protocol using simethicone to minimize bubbles and improve mucosal visualization. Body position adjustments (supine, right lateral, left lateral, and prone) are used to achieve panoramic gastric visualization. The Flower capsule is orientationally biased to face upward, facilitating gravity-assisted mucosal inspection.
Participants are monitored for adverse events including capsule retention, aspiration, or signs of obstruction. Capsule passage is confirmed by participant-reported expulsion (with photographic evidence incentivized) and mandatory X-ray follow-up at 2 weeks post-procedure. In cases of non-expulsion, endoscopic or surgical retrieval will be arranged.
Evaluation Metrics Retained Gastric Contents: Binary detection (present/absent) based on image review.
Gastric Landmarks Visualized: Seven regions (fundus, cardia, lesser and greater curvatures, angulus, antrum, pylorus).
Mucosal Visualization Quality (4-point scale):
Grade 1: \<50% Grade 2: ≥50% Grade 3: ≥75% Grade 4: ≥90%
Gastric Cleanliness Score (4-point scale):
Grade 1: Large debris/turbidity, no visualization Grade 2: Significant interference Grade 3: Minor interference Grade 4: Clear view Patient Tolerance Score (1-10): Lower scores indicate better experience. Adverse Events: Documented from Day 0 to follow-up (Day 14). Capsule Swallow Attempts and Total Exam Time: Tracked as feasibility markers. Follow-Up and Safety Monitoring
Participants are discharged same-day if stable. Safety surveillance includes:
Night-of follow-up call Daily calls from Day 1 to Day 7 for symptom checks Mandatory Day 14 follow-up with physical exam, vital signs, adverse event reporting, and abdominal X-ray Lost-to-follow-up is defined after three failed phone contact attempts and one certified letter to the last known address. All study-related procedures and follow-up visits are provided at no cost to participants.
Conditions
See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.
Study Design
Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.
RANDOMIZED
CROSSOVER
DIAGNOSTIC
SINGLE
Study Groups
Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.
Group 1-Fasting throughout Evaluation period
In Group 1, participants will fast for 8 hours for food and 2 hours for clear fluids before undergoing a sedated EGD to confirm an empty stomach, serving as the ground truth. The procedure time, patient tolerance, presence or absence of gastric contents, and any adverse events (AEs) will be documented. After the fasting period and EGD, participants will consume 100 mL of water containing 400 mg of simethicone upon regaining full alertness. If necessary, they may engage in light walking and avoid prolonged sitting. After a 10-minute waiting period, they will consume an additional 100 mL of water and attempt to empty their bladder. Another 10-minute waiting period will follow, during which participants will continue drinking until they feel full, with a typical intake ranging from 500 to 1400 mL of water. If gastric distention is insufficient, additional water ingestion will be required, with the total volume documented. A blinded gastroenterologist, unaware of the participant's fasting
Flower
Flower is a single-use capsule endoscope designed for timely visualization of the human stomach. The patient drinks water to fill the stomach before swallowing the Flower capsule, which transmits wireless video, through an external dongle placed near the patient's abdomen, to a physician's computer or smartphone. Flower is weighted to orientationally bias the capsule upward, meaning that with a few simple position adjustments a complete viewing of the stomach can be achieved approximately 10 minutes.
The procedure requires no sedation or equipment other than the Flower System (capsule and dongle). As a simple means of screening, Flower functions equivalent to comparable technologies, but offers advantages of being less invasive and burdensome. Flower has fewer potentially adverse consequences than traditional endoscopy (EGD), and it does not require capital equipment as magnetic endoscopy does. Flower offers the identification and location of bleeding sources in the stomach.
Group 2- Fasting till 8 hours and fed during Evaluation period
In Group 2, participants will follow the same fasting protocol as Group 1, with 8 hours of fasting for food and 2 hours for clear fluids, followed by a sedated EGD to confirm an empty stomach. The procedure time, patient tolerance, presence or absence of gastric contents, and AEs will be documented. After the fasting period and EGD, participants will consume 1.5 mL/kg of a standardized food mixture -representing the minimum volume associated with high aspiration risk-once participants have fully regained alertness. Participants will consume 100 mL of water with 400 mg of simethicone. As in Group 1, if necessary, they may engage in light walking and avoid prolonged sitting. After a 10-minute waiting period, they will consume an additional 100 mL of water and attempt to empty their bladder. Another 10-minute waiting period will follow, during which they will continue drinking until they feel full, with a typical intake ranging from 500 to 1000 mL of water.
Flower
Flower is a single-use capsule endoscope designed for timely visualization of the human stomach. The patient drinks water to fill the stomach before swallowing the Flower capsule, which transmits wireless video, through an external dongle placed near the patient's abdomen, to a physician's computer or smartphone. Flower is weighted to orientationally bias the capsule upward, meaning that with a few simple position adjustments a complete viewing of the stomach can be achieved approximately 10 minutes.
The procedure requires no sedation or equipment other than the Flower System (capsule and dongle). As a simple means of screening, Flower functions equivalent to comparable technologies, but offers advantages of being less invasive and burdensome. Flower has fewer potentially adverse consequences than traditional endoscopy (EGD), and it does not require capital equipment as magnetic endoscopy does. Flower offers the identification and location of bleeding sources in the stomach.
GLP 1 Participants
Participants will continue taking their GLP-1 medication up to the day of the procedure. The participant will arrive at the hospital in the morning after following a 8 hour food fast and 2 hours for clear fluids. Following the fasting period, they will consume 100 mL of water containing 400 mg of simethicone. If necessary, participants should engage in light walking and avoid prolonged sitting. A 10-minute waiting period will then ensue, after which they will consume an additional 100 mL of water and attempt to empty their bladder. Another 10-minute waiting period will follow, during which participants will be instructed to drink at least 500 mL of water, continuing until a sensation of fullness is reached, with a typical total intake ranging from 500 mL to 1400 mL. If gastric distention is insufficient, additional water ingestion will be required, with the total volume documented. The Flower capsule will then be administered.
Flower
Flower is a single-use capsule endoscope designed for timely visualization of the human stomach. The patient drinks water to fill the stomach before swallowing the Flower capsule, which transmits wireless video, through an external dongle placed near the patient's abdomen, to a physician's computer or smartphone. Flower is weighted to orientationally bias the capsule upward, meaning that with a few simple position adjustments a complete viewing of the stomach can be achieved approximately 10 minutes.
The procedure requires no sedation or equipment other than the Flower System (capsule and dongle). As a simple means of screening, Flower functions equivalent to comparable technologies, but offers advantages of being less invasive and burdensome. Flower has fewer potentially adverse consequences than traditional endoscopy (EGD), and it does not require capital equipment as magnetic endoscopy does. Flower offers the identification and location of bleeding sources in the stomach.
Interventions
Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.
Flower
Flower is a single-use capsule endoscope designed for timely visualization of the human stomach. The patient drinks water to fill the stomach before swallowing the Flower capsule, which transmits wireless video, through an external dongle placed near the patient's abdomen, to a physician's computer or smartphone. Flower is weighted to orientationally bias the capsule upward, meaning that with a few simple position adjustments a complete viewing of the stomach can be achieved approximately 10 minutes.
The procedure requires no sedation or equipment other than the Flower System (capsule and dongle). As a simple means of screening, Flower functions equivalent to comparable technologies, but offers advantages of being less invasive and burdensome. Flower has fewer potentially adverse consequences than traditional endoscopy (EGD), and it does not require capital equipment as magnetic endoscopy does. Flower offers the identification and location of bleeding sources in the stomach.
Eligibility Criteria
Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.
Inclusion Criteria
2. Willing and able to sign an IEC-approved informed consent form
3. Willing and able to comply with all study requirements
Exclusion Criteria
2. History of gastroparesis
3. History of prior gastric surgery
4. Swallowing disorders
5. Contraindications to EGD or capsule endoscopy
6. Use of GLP-1 receptor agonists in the last 3 months
7. Diagnosed with diabetes mellitus
8. Classified as obese (based on BMI criteria)
9. Pregnant or lactating
18 Years
65 Years
ALL
Yes
Sponsors
Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.
Endiatx
INDUSTRY
Asian Institute of Gastroenterology, India
OTHER
Responsible Party
Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.
Locations
Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.
Asian Institute of Gastroenterology Hospital
Hyderabad, Telangana, India
Countries
Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.
Central Contacts
Reach out to these primary contacts for questions about participation or study logistics.
Rakesh Kalapala Senior Consultant Gastroenterologist & Therapeutic Endoscopist, MBBS, MD, DNB
Role: CONTACT
Nitin Jagtap Senior Consultant Gastroenterology, MBBS, MD, DNB
Role: CONTACT
Facility Contacts
Find local site contact details for specific facilities participating in the trial.
Rakesh Kalapala Senior Consultant Gastroenterologist & Therapeutic Endoscopist, MBBS, MD, DNB
Role: primary
References
Explore related publications, articles, or registry entries linked to this study.
Khandekar SS, Doctor JR, Awaskar SK, Alex NK, Medha LR, Ranganathan P. Ultrasound-guided estimation of gastric residual volume using Perlas's formula: A validation study in patients. Indian J Anaesth. 2022 Apr;66(4):255-259. doi: 10.4103/ija.ija_783_21. Epub 2022 Apr 20.
Silveira SQ, da Silva LM, de Campos Vieira Abib A, de Moura DTH, de Moura EGH, Santos LB, Ho AM, Nersessian RSF, Lima FLM, Silva MV, Mizubuti GB. Relationship between perioperative semaglutide use and residual gastric content: A retrospective analysis of patients undergoing elective upper endoscopy. J Clin Anesth. 2023 Aug;87:111091. doi: 10.1016/j.jclinane.2023.111091. Epub 2023 Mar 2.
Heckmann ND, Palmer R, Mayfield CK, Gucev G, Lieberman JR, Hong K. Glucagon-Like Peptide Receptor-1 Agonists Used for Medically-Supervised Weight Loss in Patients With Hip and Knee Osteoarthritis: Critical Considerations for the Arthroplasty Surgeon. Arthroplast Today. 2024 Jun 27;27:101327. doi: 10.1016/j.artd.2024.101327. eCollection 2024 Jun.
Chaitra TS, Palta S, Saroa R, Jindal S, Jain A. Assessment of residual gastric volume using point-of-care ultrasonography in adult patients who underwent elective surgery. Ultrasound J. 2023 Feb 8;15(1):7. doi: 10.1186/s13089-023-00307-8.
Warner MA, Meyerhoff KL, Warner ME, Posner KL, Stephens L, Domino KB. Pulmonary Aspiration of Gastric Contents: A Closed Claims Analysis. Anesthesiology. 2021 Aug 1;135(2):284-291. doi: 10.1097/ALN.0000000000003831.
Sharma G, Jacob R, Mahankali S, Ravindra MN. Preoperative assessment of gastric contents and volume using bedside ultrasound in adult patients: A prospective, observational, correlation study. Indian J Anaesth. 2018 Oct;62(10):753-758. doi: 10.4103/ija.IJA_147_18.
Son YG, Shin J, Ryu HG. Pneumonitis and pneumonia after aspiration. J Dent Anesth Pain Med. 2017 Mar;17(1):1-12. doi: 10.17245/jdapm.2017.17.1.1. Epub 2017 Mar 27.
Other Identifiers
Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.
ETX-IND-01
Identifier Type: -
Identifier Source: org_study_id
More Related Trials
Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.