Patient Centered Clinical Decision Support for Hereditary Cancer Syndromes
NCT ID: NCT06914726
Last Updated: 2025-08-05
Study Results
The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.
Basic Information
Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.
ENROLLING_BY_INVITATION
NA
2488 participants
INTERVENTIONAL
2025-07-09
2029-03-31
Brief Summary
Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.
\- Does clinical decision support for participants with hereditary cancer syndromes improve the use of evidence-based cancer prevention care.
Participants being seen in the PC-CDS group are compared to participants being seen in usual care (UC) to see if they are up to date on guideline-based cancer prevention care and to see if participants in the PC-CDS group report more shared decision making and higher rates of self-management of their genetic cancer risks.
Participants will be asked to answer survey questions.
Related Clinical Trials
Explore similar clinical trials based on study characteristics and research focus.
Identifying and Caring for Individuals With Inherited Cancer Syndrome
NCT04494945
Cascade Testing in Families With Newly Diagnosed Hereditary Breast and Ovarian Cancer Syndrome
NCT04009148
Implementation of the Families Accelerating Cascade Testing Toolkit (FACTT) for Hereditary Breast and Ovarian Cancer and Lynch Syndrome
NCT04508764
Clinical Outcomes for Offering Genetic Testing in a Tiered Approach
NCT04902144
Nutritional Intervention and DNA Damage of Patients With HBOC
NCT05306002
Detailed Description
Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.
PCCs provide care to over 80% of patients with HBOC or LS each year and are trained in shared decision making and coordination of care. However, the majority of PCCs are unaware of current recommendations for HBOC and LS and thus often fail to arrange appropriate referrals or procedures, including referrals to genetic counselors. The intervention targets these System and PCC-related barriers such as lack of awareness of the genetic condition, lack of knowledge of current evidence-based variant- specific care recommendations, and lack of timely referral for cancer prevention tests or procedures recommended for these high-risk patients. Both average-risk and high-risk patients are more likely to receive recommended cancer screening procedures when advised by their PCC.
The PC-CDS intervention also targets patient-related barriers to care, such as lack of awareness that certain tests or procedures are due, and lack of awareness of the benefits of certain interventions, tests, or procedures, and facilitates timely referral for access to subspecialists who can provide recommended services and procedures. Screening for CDC Tier 1 genetic conditions is rapidly increasing, but many of those who screen positive for HBOC or LS are not well-informed of evolving evidence-based care options. Current oncology teams are staffed primarily to deal with active management of cancer and have limited capacity to provide long-term care to large numbers of patients without diagnosed cancers. An estimated 33-50% of those diagnosed with these hereditary cancer syndromes do not complete a visit with a genetic counselor, with well-documented disparities in care for individuals with low income, low education, residence in inner city or rural areas, or membership in underserved racial/ethnic groups. Many patients with HBOC or LS are unaware of their risks, and the substantial health benefits obtainable by early detection and intervention; or lack the ability to coordinate their care across multiple subspecialists and care team members.
The PC- CDS provides each patient an updated list of variant-specific recommended care options and encourages and enables patients to have informed discussions of evidence-based care options with their PCCs or other trusted physicians. PCC referrals and suggestions will both directly and indirectly (through attitudes towards genetic conditions and intentions to access care) influence patient actions to adhere to evidence-based guidelines including (i) timely referrals to subspecialists (such as genetic counselors, oncologists, gastroenterologists, gynecologists, urologists, dermatologists, or surgeons) and (ii) engagement in recommended cancer prevention protocols and screening procedures.
This project provides evidence-based cancer prevention care recommendations to patients with HBOC or LS and their PCCs at primary care encounters when a given patient is not up to date on NCCN-recommended cancer prevention referrals and procedures. This specific application of health informatics technology to care of patients with these and other genetic variants is novel, in part because it relies on very recent advances in health informatics, increased rates of genetic screening within healthcare systems, and an accelerating (and rapidly evolving) knowledge base that supports an evidence-based set of variant-specific care recommendations. The intervention takes advantage of these recent developments and is designed to rapidly translate new genetic knowledge into evidence-based patient-specific clinical care. The variant-specific PC-CDS does not yet exist in primary care settings, and this project will provide a much-needed assessment of the impact of a PC-CDS intervention on cancer prevention care, shared decision making, and self-efficacy in managing hereditary cancer risks, as well as PCC knowledge of HBOC and LS cancer prevention care.
The web-based nature of the PC-CDS system, its prior success in improving primary care for a wide range of other chronic conditions, and its high use rates in primary care settings suggest that this approach to care improvement may be an effective strategy to increase appropriate referrals and evidence-based preventive care of adults with these hereditary cancer syndromes.
Conditions
See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.
Study Design
Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.
RANDOMIZED
PARALLEL
HEALTH_SERVICES_RESEARCH
NONE
Study Groups
Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.
Usual Care
All patients and clinicians at UC clinics will continue to receive an existing EHR-linked clinical decision support for management of major uncontrolled cardiovascular risk factors and other selected chronic conditions. The existing CDS displayed at UC clinics does not include patient-specific information on recommended cancer prevention activities for those with HBOC or LS.
No interventions assigned to this group
Patient Centered Clinical Decision Support for Hereditary Genetic Cancer Syndromes
All patients and clinicians at PC-CDS clinics will continue to receive an existing EHR-linked clinical decision support for management of major uncontrolled cardiovascular risk factors and other selected chronic conditions plus patient-specific information on recommended cancer prevention activities for those with HBOC or LS.
Patient Centered Clinical Decision Support (PC-CDS)
The intervention provides patient specific recommendations on managing cancer risk due to hereditary cancer gene variants that is integrated into an existing point of care clinical decision support system that algorithmically identifies study-eligible patients and deploys patient-specific CDS output at an index visit and all subsequent primary care encounters using the most up to date available clinical information.
Interventions
Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.
Patient Centered Clinical Decision Support (PC-CDS)
The intervention provides patient specific recommendations on managing cancer risk due to hereditary cancer gene variants that is integrated into an existing point of care clinical decision support system that algorithmically identifies study-eligible patients and deploys patient-specific CDS output at an index visit and all subsequent primary care encounters using the most up to date available clinical information.
Other Intervention Names
Discover alternative or legacy names that may be used to describe the listed interventions across different sources.
Eligibility Criteria
Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.
Inclusion Criteria
2. Existing genetic testing or problem list evidence of HBOC or LS,
3. Index clinical encounter is with a PCC (family practice, general internal medicine, nurse practitioner, or physician assistant) at a randomized primary care clinic during the accrual period,
4. At the time of the index clinical encounter have EITHER (i) Evidence of having HBOC and not up-to- date on selected variant-specific cancer prevention care OR (ii) Evidence of having LS and not up-to-date on selected variant gene-specific cancer prevention care
Exclusion Criteria
2. Currently receiving active treatment for cancer, OR
3. In long-term care, palliative care, or hospice care.
18 Years
ALL
No
Sponsors
Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.
National Cancer Institute (NCI)
NIH
HealthPartners Institute
OTHER
Responsible Party
Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.
Principal Investigators
Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.
Patrick J. O'Connor, MD, MPH, MA
Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR
HealthPartners Institute
Locations
Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.
HealthPartners Medical Group
Minneapolis, Minnesota, United States
Countries
Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.
References
Explore related publications, articles, or registry entries linked to this study.
Newton K, Green K, Lalloo F, Evans DG, Hill J. Colonoscopy screening compliance and outcomes in patients with Lynch syndrome. Colorectal Dis. 2015 Jan;17(1):38-46. doi: 10.1111/codi.12778.
Halbert CH, Lynch H, Lynch J, Main D, Kucharski S, Rustgi AK, Lerman C. Colon cancer screening practices following genetic testing for hereditary nonpolyposis colon cancer (HNPCC) mutations. Arch Intern Med. 2004 Sep 27;164(17):1881-7. doi: 10.1001/archinte.164.17.1881.
Daly MB, Pilarski R, Yurgelun MB, Berry MP, Buys SS, Dickson P, Domchek SM, Elkhanany A, Friedman S, Garber JE, Goggins M, Hutton ML, Khan S, Klein C, Kohlmann W, Kurian AW, Laronga C, Litton JK, Mak JS, Menendez CS, Merajver SD, Norquist BS, Offit K, Pal T, Pederson HJ, Reiser G, Shannon KM, Visvanathan K, Weitzel JN, Wick MJ, Wisinski KB, Dwyer MA, Darlow SD. NCCN Guidelines Insights: Genetic/Familial High-Risk Assessment: Breast, Ovarian, and Pancreatic, Version 1.2020. J Natl Compr Canc Netw. 2020 Apr;18(4):380-391. doi: 10.6004/jnccn.2020.0017.
Gabai-Kapara E, Lahad A, Kaufman B, Friedman E, Segev S, Renbaum P, Beeri R, Gal M, Grinshpun-Cohen J, Djemal K, Mandell JB, Lee MK, Beller U, Catane R, King MC, Levy-Lahad E. Population-based screening for breast and ovarian cancer risk due to BRCA1 and BRCA2. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2014 Sep 30;111(39):14205-10. doi: 10.1073/pnas.1415979111. Epub 2014 Sep 5.
Manickam K, Buchanan AH, Schwartz MLB, Hallquist MLG, Williams JL, Rahm AK, Rocha H, Savatt JM, Evans AE, Butry LM, Lazzeri AL, Lindbuchler DM, Flansburg CN, Leeming R, Vogel VG, Lebo MS, Mason-Suares HM, Hoskinson DC, Abul-Husn NS, Dewey FE, Overton JD, Reid JG, Baras A, Willard HF, McCormick CZ, Krishnamurthy SB, Hartzel DN, Kost KA, Lavage DR, Sturm AC, Frisbie LR, Person TN, Metpally RP, Giovanni MA, Lowry LE, Leader JB, Ritchie MD, Carey DJ, Justice AE, Kirchner HL, Faucett WA, Williams MS, Ledbetter DH, Murray MF. Exome Sequencing-Based Screening for BRCA1/2 Expected Pathogenic Variants Among Adult Biobank Participants. JAMA Netw Open. 2018 Sep 7;1(5):e182140. doi: 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2018.2140.
Schneider KI, Schmidtke J. Patient compliance based on genetic medicine: a literature review. J Community Genet. 2014 Jan;5(1):31-48. doi: 10.1007/s12687-013-0160-2. Epub 2013 Aug 10.
Related Links
Access external resources that provide additional context or updates about the study.
National Cancer Institute (n.d.), Evidence-Based Cancer Control Programs (EBCCP). Public Health Genomics Evidence-Based Programs Listing.
National Cancer Institute. Cancer Stat Facts: Colorectal Cancer. Surveillance, Epidemiology and End Results Program
Cancerwise
Other Identifiers
Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.
23-400
Identifier Type: -
Identifier Source: org_study_id
More Related Trials
Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.