Sweat Testing in Infants: Comparing Sweat Collection on Upper Vs Lower Limbs

NCT ID: NCT06902363

Last Updated: 2025-03-30

Study Results

Results pending

The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.

Basic Information

Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.

Recruitment Status

NOT_YET_RECRUITING

Clinical Phase

NA

Total Enrollment

20 participants

Study Classification

INTERVENTIONAL

Study Start Date

2025-03-30

Study Completion Date

2025-08-01

Brief Summary

Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.

The goal of this study is to compare the rate of Quantity Not Sufficient (QNS) during sweat collection in infants under 6 months of age, using the Macroduct Advanced device for sweat testing. The main question it aims to answer is:

Does sweat collection from the thigh (lower limb) reduce the QNS rate compared to the forearm (upper limb) in infants? Do chloride concentration levels differ between sweat collected from the forearm and thigh in the same infants?

Detailed Description

Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.

This is a prospective, observational study aimed at evaluating the effectiveness of the Macroduct Advanced device for sweat testing in infants under 6 months of age. The primary goal is to compare the rate of Quantity Not Sufficient (QNS) between two sweat collection sites: the forearm (upper limb) and the thigh (lower limb). The study seeks to determine whether using the thigh as an alternative collection site can reduce the incidence of QNS, a common challenge in sweat testing in infants, where at least 15 microliters of sweat are required for an accurate result.

Study Objectives:

To assess if sweat collection from the thigh results in a lower QNS rate compared to the forearm in infants.

To compare the chloride concentration levels of sweat collected from both the forearm and thigh, in order to evaluate if the collection site affects the chloride measurements.

Study Design:

Participants will undergo sweat collection from both the forearm and thigh, within the same study session, using the Macroduct Advanced device.

The QNS rate will be recorded for each collection site. Chloride levels from the sweat samples will be measured for comparison between the two sites.

The study will involve healthy infants under 6 months of age, and data will be collected to evaluate the feasibility and effectiveness of using the thigh as a collection site for sweat testing.

Primary and Secondary Outcomes:

Primary Outcome: Reduction in the QNS rate when sweat is collected from the thigh compared to the forearm.

Secondary Outcome: Comparison of chloride concentration levels from the forearm and thigh to determine if there is a significant difference in chloride levels depending on the collection site.

This study will provide valuable insights into improving the accuracy and feasibility of sweat testing in infants, especially in cases where QNS is common and may require repeated tests. If successful, using the thigh as a collection site could enhance the overall success rate of sweat tests and reduce the need for retesting, improving clinical care for infants with conditions such as cystic fibrosis.

Conditions

See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.

Cystic Fibrosis (CF)

Study Design

Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.

Allocation Method

NA

Intervention Model

SINGLE_GROUP

Primary Study Purpose

SCREENING

Blinding Strategy

NONE

Study Groups

Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.

Comparison of Sweat Collection Sites: Forearm vs. Thigh

All enrolled infants undergo sweat testing using the Macroduct Advanced device, with simultaneous collection on the forearm (standard site) and thigh (alternative site). The goal is to compare sweat volume and chloride concentration between both anatomical sites, focusing on the rate of quantity not sufficient (QNS) outcomes.

Group Type EXPERIMENTAL

Macroduct Advanced

Intervention Type DEVICE

Sweat stimulation and collection using the Macroduct Advanced system on two anatomical sites (forearm and thigh) in infants under 6 months of age.

Interventions

Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.

Macroduct Advanced

Sweat stimulation and collection using the Macroduct Advanced system on two anatomical sites (forearm and thigh) in infants under 6 months of age.

Intervention Type DEVICE

Eligibility Criteria

Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.

Inclusion Criteria

* minimal 3,000 kg
* after a positive newborn screening (NBS) test. During this test, newborns are screened for rare diseases including CF. In case of a positive NBS test for CF, a sweat test is routinely performed to confirm or withdraw the diagnosis.
* after clinical assessment for CF, with ST as diagnostic step
* siblings of patients with CF in order to exclude CF
* CF patients who are willing to participate
* Healthy infants, born at the maternity unit of UZ Brussel, of which parents are willing to participate

Exclusion Criteria

* chromosome abnormalities
* metabolic abnormalities
* cardiopathies
* eczema
* important skin lesions on the limbs
* use of systemic corticosteroids
* critically ill patients (for example hemodynamically unstable)
Minimum Eligible Age

10 Days

Maximum Eligible Age

6 Months

Eligible Sex

ALL

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

Yes

Sponsors

Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.

EliTechGroup

UNKNOWN

Sponsor Role collaborator

Universitair Ziekenhuis Brussel

OTHER

Sponsor Role lead

Responsible Party

Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.

Responsibility Role SPONSOR

Principal Investigators

Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.

Elke De Wachter, Prof. Dr.

Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR

Universitair Ziekenhuis Brussel

Locations

Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.

UZ Brussel

Jette, Brussels Capital, Belgium

Site Status

Countries

Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.

Belgium

Central Contacts

Reach out to these primary contacts for questions about participation or study logistics.

Jarne De Maeyer, Bachelor of Sc in Medicine

Role: CONTACT

+32476782165

Elke De Wachter, Prof. Dr.

Role: CONTACT

Facility Contacts

Find local site contact details for specific facilities participating in the trial.

Elke De Wachter, Prof. Dr.

Role: primary

+3224776061

References

Explore related publications, articles, or registry entries linked to this study.

McColley SA, Elbert A, Wu R, Ren CL, Sontag MK, LeGrys VA. Quantity not sufficient rates and delays in sweat testing in US infants with cystic fibrosis. Pediatr Pulmonol. 2020 Nov;55(11):3053-3056. doi: 10.1002/ppul.25027. Epub 2020 Aug 25.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 32797669 (View on PubMed)

Taylor NA, Machado-Moreira CA. Regional variations in transepidermal water loss, eccrine sweat gland density, sweat secretion rates and electrolyte composition in resting and exercising humans. Extrem Physiol Med. 2013 Feb 1;2(1):4. doi: 10.1186/2046-7648-2-4.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 23849497 (View on PubMed)

Vermeulen F, Lebecque P, De Boeck K, Leal T. Biological variability of the sweat chloride in diagnostic sweat tests: A retrospective analysis. J Cyst Fibros. 2017 Jan;16(1):30-35. doi: 10.1016/j.jcf.2016.11.008. Epub 2016 Dec 22.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 28017620 (View on PubMed)

Massie J, Greaves R, Metz M, Wiley V, Graham P, Shepherd S, Mackay R. Australasian Guideline (2nd Edition): an Annex to the CLSI and UK Guidelines for the Performance of the Sweat Test for the Diagnosis of Cystic Fibrosis. Clin Biochem Rev. 2017 Nov;38(3):115-130. No abstract available.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 29332976 (View on PubMed)

LeGrys VA, Briscoe D, McColley SA. Sweat testing: specimen collection and quantitative chloride analysis. CLSI Guideline 2019;C34

Reference Type BACKGROUND

Cirilli N, Southern KW, Barben J, Vermeulen F, Munck A, Wilschanski M, Nguyen-Khoa T, Aralica M, Simmonds NJ, De Wachter E; ECFS Diagnostic Network Working Group. Standards of care guidance for sweat testing; phase two of the ECFS quality improvement programme. J Cyst Fibros. 2022 May;21(3):434-441. doi: 10.1016/j.jcf.2022.01.004. Epub 2022 Jan 19.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 35063396 (View on PubMed)

Related Links

Access external resources that provide additional context or updates about the study.

Other Identifiers

Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.

24147_Zweetteststudi

Identifier Type: -

Identifier Source: org_study_id

More Related Trials

Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.

Sweat Evaporimeter Measurement
NCT01708655 COMPLETED NA