Eccentric Cycling Vs. Standard Rehabilitation for Post-ICU Recovery in COVID-19 Survivors

NCT ID: NCT06895850

Last Updated: 2025-03-26

Study Results

Results pending

The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.

Basic Information

Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.

Recruitment Status

COMPLETED

Clinical Phase

NA

Total Enrollment

20 participants

Study Classification

INTERVENTIONAL

Study Start Date

2021-10-30

Study Completion Date

2022-07-30

Brief Summary

Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.

We performed a longitudinal crossover clinical study on survivors of COVID-19. We compared a standard rehabilitation protocol using elastic bands versus a novel eccentric cycling training protocol in individuals who have been discharged after being hospitalized due to COVID-19. We assessed the effects of these two rehabilitation modalities on physical performance, quality of life, and cognitive function parameters. We found that both protocols induced significant improvements in all variables. However, eccentric cycling induced such improvements involving less time per session. These findings could significantly impact strategies to treat COVID-19 survivors, which is a novel and impactful contribution to the body of knowledge.

Detailed Description

Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.

Twenty patients (9 men, 11 women) between the ages of 30 and 60 years who had been hospitalized for COVID-19 in an ICU volunteered for this study. Participants were hospital-discharged at least 6 months before the start of the study and had not undergone rehabilitation after hospital discharge.

This study utilized a two-treatment crossover design. Each treatment was eight weeks in duration, with a two-week washout period. The order of treatments was randomized and counterbalanced. Twenty participants were recruited and completed this study. This sample was deemed sufficient as an a-priori power analysis (G\*Power 3.1.9, Germany) estimated that 18 patients were required to test the anticipated effect, considering a statistical power of 0.8 and alpha \<0.05. This effect was estimated based on the 18.7% increase in the 6-minute walking test observed after 12 weeks of eccentric training \[10\]. Considering a 10% dropout, we recruited 20 participants for this study.

Condition order was randomly arranged as either ECC then STD REHAB (n=10) or STD REHAB then ECC (n=10) to account for a potential order effect of treatments. Both interventions lasted eight weeks, and assessments were performed before and after the interventions. As shown in Fig. 1A, during the ECC participant performed eccentric cycling using an arm-and-leg motorized cycle ergometer (Model ABJ-107-2, Medical Technology Co LTD, China) while during the STD REHAB condition participants performed functional rehabilitation using strengthening exercises with elastic bands (Fig. 1B). During the 2-week wash-out period, the participants refrained from training in preparation for their second intervention.

2.3 Interventions The exercise intensity was matched between conditions throughout the intervention period using the 6-20 point rating of perceived exertion (RPE; Borg“s Scale) \[10\]. For both groups, RPE progressively increased during the first two weeks from 9 (very light) to 11 (fairly light), and then over the next five weeks from 13 (somewhat hard) to 15 (hard). Additionally, heart rate (HR) and blood pressure (Omron Serie 5/7156, USA), and oxygen saturation (Heal Force A3, CHOICEMMED, China) were measured immediately after all training sessions to quantify the cardiovascular demands of training, which were averaged between training sessions.

The training protocol for the ECC consisted of a 5-minute warm-up on a stationary ergometer (RS1 Go, Life fitness, USA) before completion of the prescribed workout. In the first two weeks, participants completed two sets of 10 minutes of eccentric cycling at an RPE between 9-11 with 2 minutes of inter-set rest. Then, during weeks 3-8, participants completed two sets of 15 min of eccentric cycling at an RPE between 13-15 with 2 min inter-set rest.

The training protocol for STD REHAB consisted of the same 5 min warm-up protocol used in ECC, followed by three sets of 8 repetitions of bicep curls, triceps extensions, shoulder abduction, bodyweight squats, deadlifts, and leg abductions with an elastic band with 2 min inter-set rest. The resistance of the elastic band tension was progressively increased according to the participant's tolerance based on RPE. ECC training was programmed for \~20-30 min, while STD REHAB lasted \~60 min per session.

Conditions

See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.

COVID 19

Study Design

Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.

Allocation Method

RANDOMIZED

Intervention Model

CROSSOVER

This study utilized a two-treatment crossover design. Each treatment was eight weeks in duration, with a two-week washout period. The order of treatments was randomized and counterbalanced.
Primary Study Purpose

TREATMENT

Blinding Strategy

SINGLE

Participants

Study Groups

Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.

Intervention

Participants performed the eccentric cycling training for 8 weeks (experimental group)

Group Type EXPERIMENTAL

Eccentric cycling training

Intervention Type OTHER

The training protocol for the ECC consisted of a 5-minute warm-up on a stationary ergometer (RS1 Go, Life fitness, USA) before completion of the prescribed workout. In the first two weeks, participants completed two sets of 10 minutes of eccentric cycling at an RPE between 9-11 with 2 minutes of inter-set rest. Then, during weeks 3-8, participants completed two sets of 15 min of eccentric cycling at an RPE between 13-15 with 2 min inter-set rest.

Standard Rehabilitation

The training protocol for STD REHAB consisted of the same 5 min warm-up protocol used in ECC, followed by three sets of 8 repetitions of bicep curls, triceps extensions, shoulder abduction, bodyweight squats, deadlifts, and leg abductions with an elastic band with 2 min inter-set rest. The resistance of the elastic band tension was progressively increased according to the participant's tolerance based on RPE. ECC training was programmed for \~20-30 min, while STD REHAB lasted \~60 min per session.

Group Type ACTIVE_COMPARATOR

Standar Rehabilitation

Intervention Type OTHER

The training protocol for STD REHAB consisted of the same 5 min warm-up protocol used in ECC, followed by three sets of 8 repetitions of bicep curls, triceps extensions, shoulder abduction, bodyweight squats, deadlifts, and leg abductions with an elastic band with 2 min inter-set rest. The resistance of the elastic band tension was progressively increased according to the participant's tolerance based on RPE. ECC training was programmed for \~20-30 min, while STD REHAB lasted \~60 min per session.

Interventions

Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.

Eccentric cycling training

The training protocol for the ECC consisted of a 5-minute warm-up on a stationary ergometer (RS1 Go, Life fitness, USA) before completion of the prescribed workout. In the first two weeks, participants completed two sets of 10 minutes of eccentric cycling at an RPE between 9-11 with 2 minutes of inter-set rest. Then, during weeks 3-8, participants completed two sets of 15 min of eccentric cycling at an RPE between 13-15 with 2 min inter-set rest.

Intervention Type OTHER

Standar Rehabilitation

The training protocol for STD REHAB consisted of the same 5 min warm-up protocol used in ECC, followed by three sets of 8 repetitions of bicep curls, triceps extensions, shoulder abduction, bodyweight squats, deadlifts, and leg abductions with an elastic band with 2 min inter-set rest. The resistance of the elastic band tension was progressively increased according to the participant's tolerance based on RPE. ECC training was programmed for \~20-30 min, while STD REHAB lasted \~60 min per session.

Intervention Type OTHER

Eligibility Criteria

Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.

Inclusion Criteria

* Participants were hospital-discharged at least 6 months before the start of the study and had not undergone rehabilitation after hospital discharge.

Exclusion Criteria

* Patients who did not pass the medical check-up before the study (patients with myocarditis and/or abnormal troponins or electrocardiograms from the last three months), oxygen-dependent patients, those with musculoskeletal injuries, bedridden patients, disoriented patients, or those with severe mental disabilities were excluded due to being unsafe to exercise.
Eligible Sex

ALL

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Sponsors

Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.

Universidad Nacional Andres Bello

OTHER

Sponsor Role lead

Responsible Party

Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.

Luis Penailillo

Head of the Exercise and Rehabilitation Science Lab

Responsibility Role PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR

Locations

Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.

Universidad Andres Bello

Santiago, Santiago Metropolitan, Chile

Site Status

Countries

Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.

Chile

References

Explore related publications, articles, or registry entries linked to this study.

Inostroza M, Valdes O, Tapia G, Nunez O, Kompen MJ, Nosaka K, Penailillo L. Effects of eccentric vs concentric cycling training on patients with moderate COPD. Eur J Appl Physiol. 2022 Feb;122(2):489-502. doi: 10.1007/s00421-021-04850-x. Epub 2021 Nov 20.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 34799753 (View on PubMed)

Other Identifiers

Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.

1

Identifier Type: -

Identifier Source: org_study_id

More Related Trials

Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.

COVID-19, Chronic Adaptation and Response to Exercise (COVID-CARE)
NCT04595773 ACTIVE_NOT_RECRUITING PHASE1/PHASE2