Involvement of CDA and/or dCK Metabolizing Enzymes in the Response to Azacytidine Treatment of Patients With Hematologic Malignancies

NCT ID: NCT06886425

Last Updated: 2025-03-20

Study Results

Results pending

The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.

Basic Information

Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.

Recruitment Status

RECRUITING

Clinical Phase

NA

Total Enrollment

70 participants

Study Classification

INTERVENTIONAL

Study Start Date

2021-06-14

Study Completion Date

2028-06-14

Brief Summary

Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.

Until now, the development of personalized medicine in oncology has relied on the use of somatic biomarkers to help therapists choose the right molecule(s) to administer, based on the genetic and molecular profile of each hematological disease. In this project, investigators propose to extend the strategy of therapeutic individualization to the field of dosage targeting. Today, azacytidine is a standard treatment for patients with acute myeloid leukemia (AML) and/or myelodysplastic syndromes (MDS), usually as monotherapy. According to the treatment regimen, azacytidine is prescribed at a standard dose (DS=75mg/m²/d), administered subcutaneously every day for 7 days. The treatment cycle is repeated every 28 days.

No study has evaluated the relevance of "a priori" dose adjustment on an individual basis, according to each patient's pharmacogenetic data. In current practice, doses are adapted a posteriori, and reduced empirically, following the occurrence of observed toxicity (6 to 71% of patients) (Schuck A et al. 2017). This ex-post adjustment in the face of grade 3-4 toxicity is a loss of chance for the patient. Similarly, under-dosing patients for fear of toxicity is another loss of chance. Investigator's hypothesis is that the optimal dose of azacytidine depends not only on the characteristics of the patient's pathology (risk groups including cytogenetic and molecular biology data), but also on the patient's individual characteristics (genetic status of metabolic enzymes and transporters). A mathematical model of the PK/PD type could, on the basis of early observations of circulating levels, be capable of rapidly predicting the pharmacodynamic repercussions in each patient, thus enabling rapid individualization of dosages. In the future, such a tool could make it possible to propose dosage adjustments rapidly after treatment initiation, before toxicity occurs, by predicting azacytidine exposure levels, themselves correlated with the patient's clinical condition.

Study design: In this open-label, paucicentric, non-randomized study, patients with AML and/or MDS, all of whom are receiving azacytidine-based chemotherapy as part of their standard treatment regimen, will be included. Each patient will be monitored for toxicities (EORTC), treatment response and progression-free survival. In addition to the standard care described above, each patient will undergo a series of constitutional genetic investigations conducted by NGS on markers linked to azacytidine pharmacokinetics (CDA, dCK). Another series of blood samples will be taken to calculate individual azacytidine pharmacokinetic parameters using a Bayesian approach.

Expected results: This study should make it possible to correlate pharmacogenetics with patient plasma exposure, and ultimately improve the molecule's efficacy/toxicity balance by personalizing dosage regimens, which until now have been carried out on an empirical basis.

Prospects: If the data are validated, a pre-therapeutic ADC assay could predict azacytidine pharmacodynamics and enable individual dose and/or dosage adjustment, as is the case with 5-FU and DPD.

Detailed Description

Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.

Conditions

See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.

Myelodysplastic Syndromes (MDS) Leukemia Acute Myeloid - AML

Study Design

Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.

Allocation Method

NA

Intervention Model

SINGLE_GROUP

Primary Study Purpose

OTHER

Blinding Strategy

NONE

Study Groups

Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.

Blood sampling

Blood sampling through the differents cures of the patients

Group Type EXPERIMENTAL

genetic study

Intervention Type OTHER

Blood sampling :

Cure 1 before starting treatment Cure 3 before starting treatment Cure 6 after completion of treatment

Pharmacokinetic study

Intervention Type OTHER

Cure 1: after completion of subcutaneous administration of azacytidine A total of 5 samples in the induction phase.

Cure 3: after completion of subcutaneous administration of azacytidine A total of 5 samples in the induction phase.

Cure 6: after completion of subcutaneous administration of azacytidine A total of 5 samples in the induction phase.

Study of phenotypic activity of cytidine deaminase

Intervention Type OTHER

Blood sampling :

Cure 1 before starting treatment Cure 3 before starting treatment Cure 6 after completion of treatment

Interventions

Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.

genetic study

Blood sampling :

Cure 1 before starting treatment Cure 3 before starting treatment Cure 6 after completion of treatment

Intervention Type OTHER

Pharmacokinetic study

Cure 1: after completion of subcutaneous administration of azacytidine A total of 5 samples in the induction phase.

Cure 3: after completion of subcutaneous administration of azacytidine A total of 5 samples in the induction phase.

Cure 6: after completion of subcutaneous administration of azacytidine A total of 5 samples in the induction phase.

Intervention Type OTHER

Study of phenotypic activity of cytidine deaminase

Blood sampling :

Cure 1 before starting treatment Cure 3 before starting treatment Cure 6 after completion of treatment

Intervention Type OTHER

Eligibility Criteria

Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.

Inclusion Criteria

* Patients over 18 years of age
* Patients with acute myeloid leukemia
* Patient with myelodysplastic syndrome
* Person who has given non-opposition
* Patient who has signed an authorization to perform a constitutional genetic analysis (in the context of care)
* Need for effective contraception in patients of childbearing age

Exclusion Criteria

* Failure to obtain non-opposition
* Adults under guardianship or safeguard of justice
* Persons deprived of their liberty
* Patient participating in another research project
* Pregnancy in progress
Minimum Eligible Age

18 Years

Eligible Sex

ALL

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Sponsors

Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.

Assistance Publique Hopitaux De Marseille

OTHER

Sponsor Role lead

Responsible Party

Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.

Responsibility Role SPONSOR

Locations

Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.

Hôpital de la Conception

Marseille, , France

Site Status RECRUITING

Countries

Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.

France

Central Contacts

Reach out to these primary contacts for questions about participation or study logistics.

Geoffroy Venton

Role: CONTACT

0491435817 ext. 33

Facility Contacts

Find local site contact details for specific facilities participating in the trial.

Geoffroy Venton

Role: primary

0491435817 ext. 33

Other Identifiers

Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.

2020-A02042-37

Identifier Type: OTHER

Identifier Source: secondary_id

RCAPHM19_0333

Identifier Type: -

Identifier Source: org_study_id

More Related Trials

Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.