Assessing Functional Outcomes and User Experience of the Lexie B3 Pro Powered by Bose Over-the-counter Self-Fitting Hearing Aid
NCT ID: NCT06878300
Last Updated: 2025-11-20
Study Results
The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.
Basic Information
Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.
WITHDRAWN
NA
INTERVENTIONAL
2025-07-01
2025-08-31
Brief Summary
Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.
One critique of past studies is that they often compare OTC hearing aids to audiologist-fitted devices using the same hardware, with differences primarily in programming methods. While much research has focused on fitting methods, this study aims to evaluate a new OTC hearing aid with its proprietary fitting algorithm against a marketed competitor. This randomized controlled trial (RCT) forms part of a larger validation study that follows a phased approach. Phase 1 validates an in-situ hearing test against a standard audiometer and Phase 2 assesses user experience. This RCT (Phase 3) will compare two OTC devices-the Lexie B3 Pro and a competitor already on the market-to evaluate self-reported benefit, user experience, and satisfaction. The hypothesis is that both devices provide comparable outcomes.
Related Clinical Trials
Explore similar clinical trials based on study characteristics and research focus.
Comparing Self-Fitting Strategies in the Lexie Powered by Bose Hearing Aids
NCT05782153
Performance and Effectiveness of a Self-fitting Over-the-counter Hearing Aid
NCT06942325
Evaluation of In-lab Benefit for Speech-in-noise Intelligibility With Device for Adults With Mild to Moderate Hearing Loss
NCT07074769
Clinical Validation of the Lexie Lumen Hearing Aid
NCT05337748
Perimodiolar Implant Performance in Adults With Low-Frequency Residual Hearing
NCT04741009
Detailed Description
Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.
Barriers to hearing aid adoption include cost, accessibility, stigma, and the traditional requirement for professional fitting. In many countries, hearing aids are expensive, and access to hearing healthcare professionals is limited, particularly in rural or underserved areas. Even in regions with well-established audiological services, individuals may face challenges such as lengthy appointment wait times, insurance limitations, or the perception that hearing aids are not necessary until hearing loss is severe.
To address accessibility challenges, the U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA) introduced regulations in 2022 allowing the sale of over-the-counter (OTC) hearing aids. These devices are designed for adults with perceived mild-to-moderate hearing loss and can be purchased without the need for a professional hearing assessment or fitting. OTC hearing aids aim to lower barriers by providing a more affordable, convenient, and consumer-driven option. Among OTC hearing aids, self-fitting models offer additional benefits, as users can fine-tune their settings using built-in hearing tests or app-based adjustments, potentially achieving outcomes comparable to those of audiologist-fitted hearing aids.
Emerging research suggests that OTC hearing aids can be effective in improving speech recognition and self-reported hearing outcomes, with some studies indicating that self-fitting devices perform similarly to traditional, professionally fitted hearing aids. However, there is ongoing debate regarding the best methods for fitting and personalizing these devices. Previous research has often compared OTC hearing aid fitting methods to audiologist fittings using the same hardware, with the primary difference being the programming approach rather than the device itself. This approach has drawn criticism because it does not fully reflect real-world consumer decisions, where individuals must choose between different OTC models with varying features, fitting algorithms, and user interfaces.
This study aims to address this gap by directly comparing two distinct OTC hearing aids: the Lexie B3 Pro, which features a proprietary self-fitting algorithm, and a competing marketed device. The goal is to assess whether both devices offer comparable outcomes in terms of self-reported benefit, user experience, and satisfaction.
Conditions
See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.
Study Design
Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.
RANDOMIZED
CROSSOVER
TREATMENT
NONE
Study Groups
Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.
OTC SF (Lexie)
Participants in this group will be provided with a Lexie self-fitting OTC hearing aid that features a proprietary fitting algorithm designed to optimize amplification settings based on user input. Participants will independently set up and adjust the device without professional assistance, following the manufacturer's instructions, as would be the standard use case for self-fitting hearing aids. They will use the device for a two-week take-home field trial before crossing over to the alternative study arm.
Over the counter hearing aid (Lexie)
The study will compare user perceptions of two over-the-counter (OTC) hearing aids, with the Lexie B3 Pro serving as the reference device. Participants will be fitted with each device for a predetermined period in a randomized order to ensure balanced exposure.
OTC SF Competitor
Participants in this group will receive a different self-fitting OTC hearing aid that utilizes its own manufacturer-specific fitting approach. As in the experimental arm, participants will complete the setup independently without professional guidance, adjusting the device based on the available self-fitting process. They will use this device for a two-week take-home field trial before switching to the experimental arm.
Comparator over the counter hearing aid
The comparator OTC hearing aid will undergo the same evaluation process as the Lexie B3 Pro, ensuring an equivalent and unbiased comparison. Participants will be provided with the comparator device along with its standard user instructions, including any mobile applications or self-fitting guidance designed for independent setup.
Interventions
Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.
Over the counter hearing aid (Lexie)
The study will compare user perceptions of two over-the-counter (OTC) hearing aids, with the Lexie B3 Pro serving as the reference device. Participants will be fitted with each device for a predetermined period in a randomized order to ensure balanced exposure.
Comparator over the counter hearing aid
The comparator OTC hearing aid will undergo the same evaluation process as the Lexie B3 Pro, ensuring an equivalent and unbiased comparison. Participants will be provided with the comparator device along with its standard user instructions, including any mobile applications or self-fitting guidance designed for independent setup.
Eligibility Criteria
Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.
Inclusion Criteria
* The outer ear must be free from excessive cerumen, outer or middle ear disease.
* The participant must have bilateral self-perceived mild-moderate hearing loss.
* Baseline pure tone evaluations should fall within a 4-frequency PTA (0.5, 1.0, 2.0, 4.0 kHz) of 65 dB HL or less.
* The participant must have an adequate level of English proficiency as measured objectively using an English proficiency test (EF SET).
* The participant must present with Type A or As or Ad tympanogram as measured by tympanometry.
* Must be in possession of a smartphone compatible with the Lexie App (Android OS 8)
Exclusion Criteria
* Severe or greater hearing loss
* Outer or middle ear abnormality
* Have any of the following as per FDA (21 CFR 801.420) reg-flag conditions as contraindications to OTC hearing aid use :
(i) Visible congenital or traumatic deformity of the ear preventing insertion of the receiver wire and dome into the ear.
(ii) History of sudden active drainage (i.e. blood or pus) from the ear within the previous 6 months.
(iii) Painful or uncomfortable feeling in your ear (iv) Visible evidence of significant cerumen accumulation or a foreign body in the ear canal.
(v) History of sudden or rapidly progressive hearing loss within the previous 6 months.
(vi) Acute or chronic dizziness. (vii) Unilateral hearing loss. (viii) Fluctuating hearing loss (ix) Unilateral tinnitus
* Low English proficiency - \<51% of EF-SET
* No access or in possession of an Android smartphone, compatible with the Lexie App (minimum Android OS 8)
18 Years
105 Years
ALL
Yes
Sponsors
Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.
HearX SA
INDUSTRY
Responsible Party
Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.
Principal Investigators
Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.
Karina C De Sousa, PhD
Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR
hearX Group
Other Identifiers
Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.
LexieB3Pro
Identifier Type: -
Identifier Source: org_study_id
More Related Trials
Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.