Study Results
The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.
Basic Information
Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.
RECRUITING
PHASE3
300 participants
INTERVENTIONAL
2025-03-14
2037-12-31
Brief Summary
Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.
However, new research suggests that IVT might be safe for these patients. Some studies even show that stroke patients on FXa inhibitors who receive IVT do not have a higher risk of brain bleeding than other stroke patients. But because these studies were not designed as full medical trials, doctors still avoid IVT for this group.
The SIFT trial will compare two groups of stroke patients who take FXa inhibitors:
One group will receive IVT to see if it helps them recover better. One group will not receive IVT, which is the current standard. Doctors will check if IVT helps with recovery and if it causes any serious bleeding. If IVT is found to be safe and effective, this study could change stroke treatment guidelines and help more patients get life-saving care.
Right now, some guidelines say that stroke patients on FXa inhibitors should have a blood test before getting IVT, to measure how much of the drug is in their system. But these tests are not available in most hospitals, and waiting for results could delay important treatment. The SIFT trial will not require this test before giving IVT.
More and more people use FXa inhibitors to prevent strokes, but right now, they are being denied IVT based on old rules. If this study proves that IVT is safe for them, it could help doctors give better care to thousands of stroke patients.
Related Clinical Trials
Explore similar clinical trials based on study characteristics and research focus.
Intravenous Thrombosis and Patients with Prior Ischemic Stroke Within 3 Months
NCT06841978
Clinical Trial to Evaluate the Safety of Continuous IV Tirofiban in Acute Ischemic Stroke
NCT04818944
Endovascular Thrombectomy With and Without Intravenous Thrombolysis in Extended Time Window
NCT05634382
Platelet Function in Patients With Ischemic Stroke Treated With Anti-thrombotic or Thrombolytic
NCT05415150
Intravenous Thrombolysis Combined With Tirofiban in Acute Ischemic Stroke
NCT07290751
Detailed Description
Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.
All treatment and monitoring routines in the study follow hospital standard operating procedures (SOPs), and both alteplase (ALP) and tenecteplase (TNK) are approved drugs for AIS, with similar efficacy and safety profiles. IVT is known to be an effective treatment for disabling AIS, improving functional outcomes when administered within 4.5 hours of symptom onset. FXa inhibitors have largely replaced warfarin due to their better safety profile, reducing the risk of hemorrhagic complications by 50% compared to VKAs. The concern over sICH remains a major reason why patients on FXa inhibitors are often excluded from IVT, yet research suggests that the net benefit of IVT outweighs the risks, even with an sICH rate of up to 8%.
The primary objective of the study is to compare early neurological improvement (ENI) in patients treated with IVT versus those receiving standard care. Secondary objectives include assessing clinical neurological improvement, infarct volume changes on imaging, functional outcomes, rates of sICH, any intracranial hemorrhage (ICH) after IVT, and overall mortality. The study has a planned recruitment of 300 patients, with a 2:1 allocation favoring IVT. The sample size is designed to provide sufficient power for primary and secondary analyses, including the safety assessment of sICH rates. The study will be conducted across emergency departments and acute stroke units in Norway.
Eligibility criteria include patients aged 18 or older who have ingested an FXa inhibitor within 48 hours before symptom onset (or have an ongoing prescription if the exact timing of last ingestion is unknown). Patients must have a clinical diagnosis of AIS with disabling neurological deficits and present within 4.5 hours of symptom onset or after awakening with symptoms, confirmed by imaging. Informed consent is required. Patients with contraindications to alteplase or tenecteplase, those planned for endovascular treatment due to isolated large vessel occlusion (LVO) in the internal carotid artery (ICA) or middle cerebral artery (MCA) with expected rapid intervention, those using dabigatran, or those deemed at high risk by their treating physician are excluded.
Participants randomized to the IVT arm will receive either alteplase (0.9 mg/kg with a 10% bolus and 90% infusion over 60 minutes) or tenecteplase (0.25 mg/kg single bolus) according to local SOPs. The control group will receive 300 mg of aspirin and no IVT, in line with current practice guidelines. The study duration is planned from 2025 to 2029, with termination by December 2030 unless safety concerns necessitate earlier closure. The estimated duration of patient follow-up is 90 days.
The study follows an open-label, blinded-endpoint design, with patient randomization handled via a computerized system (Viedoc). Randomization is stratified by age and baseline NIH Stroke Scale (NIHSS) score. The primary outcome measure is early neurological improvement, defined as an NIHSS reduction of ≥8 points or an NIHSS score of 0-1 at 24 hours. Secondary outcomes include percentage change in NIHSS from baseline, infarct volume at 24 hours, functional outcomes at 90 days, and the incidence of sICH and any ICH within 36 hours. Death within 90 days is also assessed.
The primary analysis will use a logistic regression model, adjusting for age, NIHSS score, and time to treatment. Safety monitoring will be continuous, with an early stopping mechanism in place if the sICH rate in the IVT arm is deemed unacceptably high. The study's impact could be substantial; if IVT is proven safe and effective in AIS patients on FXa inhibitors, it would significantly influence stroke management, enabling more patients to receive IVT and reducing post-stroke disability. These findings would contribute to international discussions and could lead to guideline changes worldwide, allowing all IVT-capable centers to offer immediate, effective treatment to a growing patient population.
Conditions
See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.
Study Design
Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.
RANDOMIZED
PARALLEL
TREATMENT
SINGLE
Study Groups
Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.
IVT
Intravenous Thrombolysis (IVT) with Alteplase or Tenecteplase
thrombolysis therapy
All treatment and monitoring routines are according to the hospitals' standard operating procedures (SOP), and both drugs (Alteplase (ALP) and Tenecteplase (TNK)) are approved drugs for the indication AIS with similar efficacy and safety profile. SIFT is designed to test the hypothesis that intravenous thrombolysis (IVT) (tenecteplase 0.25 mg/kg or alteplase 0.9 mg/kg intravenously) is efficient and safe in acute ischemic stroke patients (AIS) with recent ingestion (last 48 hours) of an Factor Xa (FXa) inhibitor who otherwise are eligible for IVT.
NO IVT
Standard Care Without Thrombolysis
No interventions assigned to this group
Interventions
Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.
thrombolysis therapy
All treatment and monitoring routines are according to the hospitals' standard operating procedures (SOP), and both drugs (Alteplase (ALP) and Tenecteplase (TNK)) are approved drugs for the indication AIS with similar efficacy and safety profile. SIFT is designed to test the hypothesis that intravenous thrombolysis (IVT) (tenecteplase 0.25 mg/kg or alteplase 0.9 mg/kg intravenously) is efficient and safe in acute ischemic stroke patients (AIS) with recent ingestion (last 48 hours) of an Factor Xa (FXa) inhibitor who otherwise are eligible for IVT.
Other Intervention Names
Discover alternative or legacy names that may be used to describe the listed interventions across different sources.
Eligibility Criteria
Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.
Inclusion Criteria
2. Ingestion of FXa inhibitors within the last 48 hours of symptom onset (or ongoing prescription of FXa inhibitor if unknown)
3. Clinical diagnosis of AIS with disabling neurological deficit
4. Presenting within 4.5 h of symptom onset or after awakening with symptoms of AIS with FLAIR-DWI mismatch on MRI as judged by the (neuro-) radiologist.
5. Informed consent
Exclusion Criteria
2. Systolic BP \>185 mmHg or diastolic BP \>110 mmHg despite antihypertensive treatment.
3. Known bleeding diathesis; manifest or recent severe bleeding; significant bleeding disorder last 6 months.
4. Arterial puncture at a non-compressible site; biopsy or lumbar puncture \<7 days; major surgery, traumatic external heart massage, obstetrical delivery or serious trauma \<14 days; history of intracranial haemorrhage; stroke \<2 months, CNS neurosurgery \<2 months; serious head trauma \<2 months; pericarditis; sepsis; bacterial endocarditis; pericarditis; acute pancreatitis; neoplasm with increased bleeding risk; any serious medical illness likely to interact with treatment (i.e. aortic dissection); confounding pre-existent neurological or psychiatric disease.
5. Any condition that, in the opinion of the treating physician, puts a patient at risk if treated with thrombolysis (i.e. signs of cerebral hemorrhage, known cerebral amyloid angiopathy, CT with signs of early ischemia greater than one-third of the middle cerebral artery territory).
Prior/Concomitant Therapy
6. Use of a) direct thrombin (II) inhibitor (Dabigatran) or b) warfarin with an INR ≥1.8; c) heparin \<48 h; d) treatment dose of LMWH \<24 h.
Prior/Concurrent Clinical Study Experience
7. Hypersensitivity to Alteplase or Tenecteplase
18 Years
ALL
No
Sponsors
Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.
Klinbeforsk
OTHER
Clinical Trial Unit (CTU), Oslo University Hospital
UNKNOWN
Guri Hagberg
OTHER
Responsible Party
Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.
Guri Hagberg
MD, PhD
Principal Investigators
Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.
Håkon Ihle-Hansen, MD, PhD
Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR
Dept. of Medicine, Baerum Hospital
Locations
Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.
Dept. of Medicine, Baerum Hospital
Bærum, Gjettum, Norway
Dept of Medicine, Helse More and Romsdal Health Trust, Aalesund Hospital
Ålesund, , Norway
Dept of Medicine, Haraldsplass deaconal Hospital
Bergen, , Norway
Dept. Of Neurology, Haukeland University Hopsital
Bergen, , Norway
Dept of Neurology, Drammen Hospital Trust
Drammen, , Norway
Dept of Neurology, Ostfold Hospital Trust, Kalnes
Grålum, , Norway
Dept of Neurology, Hospital of Southern Norway, SSHF
Kristiansand, , Norway
Dept of Neurology, Innlandet Hospital Trust, Lillehammer
Lillehammer, , Norway
Dept. of Neurology, Oslo University Hospital
Oslo, , Norway
Dept of Neurology, Stavanger University Hospital
Stavanger, , Norway
Dept. of Neurology, Tromso University Hospital
Tromsø, , Norway
Dept. Of Medicine, St.Olav Hospital, Trondheim
Trondheim, , Norway
Dept of Neurology, Vesfold Hospital Trust, Tonsberg
Tønsberg, , Norway
Countries
Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.
Central Contacts
Reach out to these primary contacts for questions about participation or study logistics.
Facility Contacts
Find local site contact details for specific facilities participating in the trial.
Related Links
Access external resources that provide additional context or updates about the study.
CTIS Portal where the primary trial protocol and references are accessible
Other Identifiers
Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.
2023-509907-34-01
Identifier Type: CTIS
Identifier Source: secondary_id
2023-509907-34-01
Identifier Type: -
Identifier Source: org_study_id
More Related Trials
Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.