Canada-wide Implementation of a Virtual Sexual Health and Rehabilitation eClinic (SHAReClinic) for Prostate Cancer Patients and Their Partners
NCT ID: NCT06877598
Last Updated: 2025-12-11
Study Results
The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.
Basic Information
Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.
RECRUITING
575 participants
OBSERVATIONAL
2025-06-01
2027-12-31
Brief Summary
Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.
The primary objective is to evaluate SHAReClinic's effectiveness across participating sites and determine its role in supporting long-term sexual health and well-being.
As part of usual care, newly enrolled SHAReClinic patients will receive guided education modules and access to sexual health counselling at key recovery milestones.
SHAReClinic seeks to expand access to sexual health care for prostate cancer patients across Canada by providing evidence-based, virtual sexual rehabilitation. Findings from this study will inform best practices in survivorship care and contribute to the development of a national standard for oncology sexual health interventions.
Related Clinical Trials
Explore similar clinical trials based on study characteristics and research focus.
Sexual Health and Rehabilitation eClinic (SHAReClinic)
NCT03396848
A Bio-psychosocial Sexual Health Intervention for Prostate Cancer Survivors and Partners: a Feasibility Study
NCT02640131
Sexual Health and Rehabilitation Online (SHAREonline)
NCT06458049
Efficacy of a Couple-Focused mHealth Symptom Self-management Program
NCT03489057
Virtual Rehabilitation for Cancer Survivors
NCT05898789
Detailed Description
Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.
Unfortunately, none of the empirically-based, comprehensive interventions reported in the literature have been implemented into clinical settings in Canada. The lack of translation from research evidence to clinical implementation is common across healthcare provision. It is known that most research, even positive full-scale studies, do not result in practice-change or take years to do so. A key aspect contributing to this lack of knowledge translation is the complexity of transitioning an "experimental intervention" to "real world" clinical settings. In sexual healthcare in oncology, ineffective knowledge translation is ubiquitous and includes several unique complexities that impair the implementation, integration, and sustainability of empirically-based treatment.
The recent advent of virtual care in healthcare offers an opportunity to address many of the barriers to implementing sexual recovery programs within PCa treatment facilities. Virtual care provides greater accessibility for patients not proximal to cancer centres, or who are unable to travel due to financial constraints or physical limitations. Encouragingly, examples of internet-delivered interventions exist for men with PCa and their partners. Schover and colleagues found that a digitally-based intimacy enhancement intervention was as effective as a brief in-person sex therapy intervention in improving sexual outcomes in couples after PCa. Although these advances in models of care provision are inspiring, the majority of Canadian PCa patients and their partners have yet to benefit from virtual care innovations.
In an effort to advance evidence-based survivorship programming in the treatment of SD post-PC, a team of expert Canadian healthcare practitioners and patient/partner advocates developed the Sexual Health and Rehabilitation eClinic (SHAReClinic). SHAReClinic is a web-based, bio-psychosocial SD intervention specifically for patients/couples who have undergone treatment for PCa. A pilot study evaluating the acceptability and engagement of SHAReClinic achieved significant patient activity on the platform and 80% patient engagement at 1-year follow-up. Additionally, evaluation of the effectiveness of SHAReClinic showed non-inferior sexual health outcomes when compared to a "best practice" in-person sexual health clinic.
Rationale Sexual dysfunction after PCa treatment has significant adverse impacts on patient/partner health-related quality of life. Few Cancer Centres in Canada offer comprehensive care for SD post-PCa treatment, resulting in significant barriers to care equity and access. SHAReClinic is established as effective virtual care programming for SD post-PCa.
The goal of this research is to evaluate the SHAReClinic in 2 cancer centres currently using it as usual care and 9 cancer centres which has newly implemented SHAReClinic as part of their usual care. The SHAReClinic will be offered to 1. Newly diagnosed patients at who are scheduled to undergo active treatment for localized prostate cancer, 2. patients currently undergoing active treatment for prostate cancer and 3. patients who have undergone prostate cancer treatment within the last 6 months. Active treatment can include any of the following options surgical, radiation, and/or ADT. The SHAReClinic goals are to re-establish optimal sexual function, satisfaction and to support the maintenance of intimacy following prostate cancer treatment. These goals are addressed through two complementary components: 1) a bio-medical component (erectile rehabilitation), focused on the long term penile health or short-term erectile function as per patient preference, and 2) a psychological component (intimacy maintenance), involving the maintenance or restoration of couples' intimacy and sexual activity (penetrative or non-penetrative). Both physical and psychological factors can affect patients' sexual satisfaction after cancer treatment; resultantly, interventions should incorporate a bio-psychosocial approach to rehabilitation.
Study Design This is a prospective observational evaluation of a virtual sexual health and rehabilitation intervention program. As part of patient standard care, facilitated web-based clinic visits will be provided to patients once before treatment, 6 weeks, 10 weeks, 4 months, 6 months and 12 months post cancer treatment. Patients who opt-in to the SHAReClinic will also be invited to register for this study. The study involves no additional requirements from patients, as all questionnaires (baseline, 6-weeks, 6 months, and 12 months) are completed as part of their enrolment in the SHAReClinic.
Patients experience in the SHAReClinic involves the following: Upon registration, patients will be paired with a sexual health coach from their center and asked about their availability to receive a phone/video call from their sexual health coach. At the beginning of the first clinic visit, participants will be asked to complete a set of questionnaires. The questionnaires take around 10-15 minutes to complete. Patients are also asked to complete the same questionnaires at 6 week, 6 months and 12 months. The topics covered in each clinic visit vary and are based on the treatment schedules of the participants. A Q\&A session on the web page will be available for participants to leave any questions or concerns regarding their sexual health, rehabilitation process and the content of the portal. Participants are free to request for a check-in call with their sexual health coach if they want to chat about their concerns by phone. Each clinic visit will last approximately 30 minutes. If participants miss their clinic visit, they will get a notification from the platform and then a reminder call from their sexual health coach. At the end of their final SHAReClinic clinic visit, participants will be asked to fill out a satisfaction questionnaire, including questions about the ease of access to the website, their experience with SHAReClinic portals and communication with their sexual health coach. The satisfaction questionnaire takes about 10 minutes to complete.
Conditions
See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.
Study Design
Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.
OTHER
PROSPECTIVE
Eligibility Criteria
Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.
Inclusion Criteria
* Patients currently undergoing active treatment for prostate cancer OR
* Patients who have undergone cancer treatment in the past 6 months
* Patients who are hormone and/or chemotherapy-naïve
* Patients who have access to a computer or smartphone with internet access
* Patients who are 18 years of age or older
Exclusion Criteria
* Patients who lack English proficiency
* Patients on nitrate therapy or have other contra-indications to phosphodiesterase type 5 inhibitors (PDE5i's)
* Patients with medical conditions that would preclude safe sexual activity
* Patients who have had previous treatment for PCa
18 Years
MALE
No
Sponsors
Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.
University Health Network, Toronto
OTHER
Responsible Party
Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.
Principal Investigators
Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.
Andrew Matthew, PhD. C.Psych
Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR
Princess Margaret Cancer Centre
Locations
Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.
Vancouver Coastal Health Authority
Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada
Men's Health Clinic Manitoba
Winnipeg, Manitoba, Canada
Royal Victoria Regional Health Centre
Barrie, Ontario, Canada
Dianne & Irving Kipnes Urology Centre
Edmonton, Ontario, Canada
Kingston Health Sciences Centre
Kingston, Ontario, Canada
St. Joseph's Health Care London
London, Ontario, Canada
Trillium Health Partners
Mississauga, Ontario, Canada
Grass Family Men's Health Center
Ottawa, Ontario, Canada
University Health Network
Toronto, Ontario, Canada
St. Paul's Hospital
Saskatoon, Saskatchewan, Canada
Countries
Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.
Central Contacts
Reach out to these primary contacts for questions about participation or study logistics.
Facility Contacts
Find local site contact details for specific facilities participating in the trial.
Other Identifiers
Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.
708251
Identifier Type: -
Identifier Source: org_study_id
More Related Trials
Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.