Role of 2 Stages Brachiobasilic Arteriovenous Fistula in Patients Having Central Venous Stenosis with Exhausted Options of Dialysis Access

NCT ID: NCT06846580

Last Updated: 2025-02-26

Study Results

Results pending

The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.

Basic Information

Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.

Recruitment Status

NOT_YET_RECRUITING

Total Enrollment

30 participants

Study Classification

OBSERVATIONAL

Study Start Date

2025-04-01

Study Completion Date

2027-12-31

Brief Summary

Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.

Central venous stenosis (CVS) is a common problem facing the hemodialysis patients planning to receive dialysis through arteriovenous fistula.

The causes for Central venous stenosis are Subclavian and internal jugular catheters which is related mostly to the frequency and the duration of catheters placement. (5) Also, Smaller caliber central venous catheters (such as peripherally inserted central \[PICC\] and triple-lumen catheters) can also be associated with thrombus formation and Central venous stenosis over a short term.(6) Pacemakers can be a cause which is associated with a 50% prevalence of subclavian vein stenosis.(7) Subclavian catheter placement is a particularly high risk, with the development of subclavian vein stenosis in approximately 25%-50% of patients in various studies.(8,9) The problem now is there is a hemodialysis patient with exhausted options for AVF and a patent basilic vein but the patient has ipsilateral Central venous stenosis. In previous studies, when creating an AVF over central venous stenosis , the investigators preferred to create a Radiocephalic AVF or Brachiocephalic AVF if Radiocephalic AVF is not available. (10) our study proposing the 2 stage brachiobasilic fistula for patients otherwise have no other option for arteriovenous fistula.

Staging the Brachiobasilic procedure will avoid larger incision with the need for general anesthesia until functioning fistula is ensured and central venous stenosis has been delt with.

Detailed Description

Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.

Central venous stenosis (CVS) is a common problem facing the hemodialysis patients planning to receive dialysis through arteriovenous fistula. The true incidence and prevalence of Central venous stenosis in the ESRD population is unknown because most studies of Central venous stenosis are limited to symptomatic patients. Central venous stenosis may remain asymptomatic because clinical symptoms and signs of Central venous stenosis often develop only after an AVF is placed in the ipsilateral extremity and the impediment to increased blood flow is unmasked. (1) Retrospective investigations of symptomatic HD patients with various accesses using duplex ultrasonography or angiography have reported Central venous stenosis prevalences of 19%-41%. (2-4) The causes for Central venous stenosis are Subclavian and internal jugular catheters which is related mostly to the frequency and the duration of catheters placement. (5) Also, Smaller caliber central venous catheters (such as peripherally inserted central \[PICC\] and triple-lumen catheters) can also be associated with thrombus formation and Central venous stenosis over a short term.(6) Pacemakers can be a cause which is associated with a 50% prevalence of subclavian vein stenosis.(7) Subclavian catheter placement is a particularly high risk, with the development of subclavian vein stenosis in approximately 25%-50% of patients in various studies.(8,9) The problem now is there is a hemodialysis patient with exhausted options for AVF and a patent basilic vein but the patient has ipsilateral Central venous stenosis. In previous studies, when creating an AVF over central venous stenosis , the investigators preferred to create a Radiocephalic AVF or Brachiocephalic AVF if Radiocephalic AVF is not available. (10) our study proposing the 2 stage brachiobasilic fistula for patients otherwise have no other option for arteriovenous fistula.

Staging the Brachiobasilic procedure will avoid larger incision with the need for general anesthesia until functioning fistula is ensured and central venous stenosis has been delt with.

our Aims are : Evaluates the efficacy and safety of creation of a Brachiobasilic fistula in hemodialysis patients with central venous stenosis Evaluate the outcomes of Superficialization of the basilic vein after percutaneous transluminal angioplasty of the central venous stenosis

Conditions

See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.

Brachiobasilic Arteriovenous Fistula

Study Design

Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.

Observational Model Type

COHORT

Study Time Perspective

PROSPECTIVE

Interventions

Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.

brachiobasilic AVF

perform 2 stage brachiobasilic AVF in hemodialysis patients with central venous stenosis

Intervention Type PROCEDURE

Eligibility Criteria

Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.

Inclusion Criteria

* Haemodialysis patients with asymptomatic central venous stenosis that have only basilic vein feasible for creating AVF in one upper limb with exhausted other options for AVF
* Age \> 18
* Patent brachial artery by duplex with PSV \> 45 cm/s
* Patent Basilic vein with diameter \> 3 mm

Exclusion Criteria

* Patient with other arteriovenous access options
* Patient not fit for surgery
* Patient with Peripheral arterial disease at Upper limb
* Patient with history of DVT in upper limb
* Hemodynamically unstable patients
Minimum Eligible Age

18 Years

Eligible Sex

ALL

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Sponsors

Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.

Assiut University

OTHER

Sponsor Role lead

Responsible Party

Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.

Islam Hussein Hassan Ibrahim

Dr.

Responsibility Role PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR

Central Contacts

Reach out to these primary contacts for questions about participation or study logistics.

Islam HH Ibrahim

Role: CONTACT

+201016114026

References

Explore related publications, articles, or registry entries linked to this study.

Jennings WC, Maliska CM, Blebea J, Taubman KE. Creating arteriovenous fistulas in patients with chronic central venous obstruction. J Vasc Access. 2016 May 7;17(3):239-42. doi: 10.5301/jva.5000507. Epub 2016 Feb 5.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 26847733 (View on PubMed)

Agarwal AK. Central vein stenosis: current concepts. Adv Chronic Kidney Dis. 2009 Sep;16(5):360-70. doi: 10.1053/j.ackd.2009.06.003.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 19695504 (View on PubMed)

Barrett N, Spencer S, McIvor J, Brown EA. Subclavian stenosis: a major complication of subclavian dialysis catheters. Nephrol Dial Transplant. 1988;3(4):423-5. doi: 10.1093/oxfordjournals.ndt.a091691.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 3140128 (View on PubMed)

Schwab SJ, Quarles LD, Middleton JP, Cohan RH, Saeed M, Dennis VW. Hemodialysis-associated subclavian vein stenosis. Kidney Int. 1988 Jun;33(6):1156-9. doi: 10.1038/ki.1988.124.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 2969991 (View on PubMed)

Sticherling C, Chough SP, Baker RL, Wasmer K, Oral H, Tada H, Horwood L, Kim MH, Pelosi F, Michaud GF, Strickberger SA, Morady F, Knight BP. Prevalence of central venous occlusion in patients with chronic defibrillator leads. Am Heart J. 2001 May;141(5):813-6. doi: 10.1067/mhj.2001.114195.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 11320371 (View on PubMed)

Grove JR, Pevec WC. Venous thrombosis related to peripherally inserted central catheters. J Vasc Interv Radiol. 2000 Jul-Aug;11(7):837-40. doi: 10.1016/s1051-0443(07)61797-7.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 10928518 (View on PubMed)

Agarwal AK. Central vein stenosis. Am J Kidney Dis. 2013 Jun;61(6):1001-15. doi: 10.1053/j.ajkd.2012.10.024. Epub 2013 Jan 3.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 23291234 (View on PubMed)

MacRae JM, Ahmed A, Johnson N, Levin A, Kiaii M. Central vein stenosis: a common problem in patients on hemodialysis. ASAIO J. 2005 Jan-Feb;51(1):77-81. doi: 10.1097/01.mat.0000151921.95165.1e.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 15745139 (View on PubMed)

Clark DD, Albina JE, Chazan JA. Subclavian vein stenosis and thrombosis: a potential serious complication in chronic hemodialysis patients. Am J Kidney Dis. 1990 Mar;15(3):265-8. doi: 10.1016/s0272-6386(12)80772-4.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 2305766 (View on PubMed)

Related Links

Access external resources that provide additional context or updates about the study.

Other Identifiers

Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.

BBAVF with CVS

Identifier Type: -

Identifier Source: org_study_id

More Related Trials

Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.

Outcome of BCF Access in Hemodialysis Patients
NCT01693263 ACTIVE_NOT_RECRUITING