Prevention of Carbapenemase-producing Enterobacteriaceae Epidemics: Evaluation of a Simplified Contact Screening Policy (CADECO)

NCT ID: NCT06839911

Last Updated: 2025-02-21

Study Results

Results pending

The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.

Basic Information

Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.

Recruitment Status

ACTIVE_NOT_RECRUITING

Total Enrollment

150 participants

Study Classification

OBSERVATIONAL

Study Start Date

2025-02-01

Study Completion Date

2025-04-30

Brief Summary

Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.

In France, carbapenemase-producing Enterobacteriaceae (CPE) are a significant concern due to their emergence. Efforts to limit their spread focus on reducing antibiotic selection pressure and preventing patient-to-patient transmission. The recommendations issued by the High Council for Public Health in 2010, updated in 2013 and 2019, emphasize the importance of identifying high-risk patients (those who have been hospitalized abroad in the past year) and implementing contact precautions, including single-room isolation and the use of protective clothing. Additional measures include assigning dedicated staff to CPE carriers when possible and conducting systematic weekly screening of all individuals exposed to the same medical or paramedical team, known as contact patient monitoring.

Despite their importance, these recommendations are challenging to implement. Firstly, they require significant resources due to the human and material constraints faced by healthcare systems. Secondly, a large number of contact patients are lost to follow-up and are not screened. The increasing prevalence of CPE carriers has further exacerbated these difficulties.

Epidemic outbreaks, defined by at least one secondary case of CPE carriage among contact patients, require additional control measures. French recommendations for managing an epidemic situation include halting patient transfers between departments, stopping new admissions, and organizing different sectors (CPE carriers, contact patients, and new patients) with dedicated staff for each sector until the outbreak is controlled (with three weeks without a new positive test among contact patients). These measures are even more costly and require time for discussions with hospital management, service reorganization, and hiring additional staff. The difficulties in implementing these measures can have negative effects, such as reduced quality of care and increased staff fatigue.

To address these challenges, some hospitals have adapted their strategies by replacing dedicated teams with a "forward movement" approach and conducting selective screening for only a subset of patients exposed to carriers, based on assessments by infection prevention and control (IPC) specialists. The simplified CPE management protocol was developed in late 2017 at our center. Before that date, French national recommendations for managing carriers and identifying outbreaks were followed. All contacts of a CPE carrier were screened weekly. In 2017, a CPE cohorting unit was implemented at the hospital level for a short period of approximately six months before being discontinued due to difficulties in maintaining continuity of care. In 2018, the selection of a subset of contact patients for screening during each CPE carrier's stay was gradually introduced, without a corresponding change in the definition of an epidemic.

The screening sample is determined by the IPC team based on the duration of contact with the CPE carrier, risk assessment, and geographical proximity. In case of an outbreak, screening is then expanded, and additional measures are implemented as previously described.

This is a retrospective cohort study including adult patients carrying carbapenemase-producing Enterobacteriaceae and comparing stays that resulted in outbreaks to those without outbreaks at Brest University Hospital in the medicine, surgery, or obstetrics departments.

Detailed Description

Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.

Conditions

See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.

Carbapenemase-Producing Enterobacteriaceae

Study Design

Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.

Observational Model Type

CASE_CONTROL

Study Time Perspective

RETROSPECTIVE

Eligibility Criteria

Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.

Inclusion Criteria

* Adult patient
* Patient carrying CPE according to HCSP definitions (2010)
* Hospitalized for more than 24 hours at Brest University Hospital in a medicine, surgery, or obstetrics department between 2012 and 2023
* Patient affiliated with a social security system

Exclusion Criteria

* Patients under legal protection (guardianship, curatorship)
* Deceased patients
* Refusal to participate
Minimum Eligible Age

18 Years

Eligible Sex

ALL

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Sponsors

Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.

University Hospital, Brest

OTHER

Sponsor Role lead

Responsible Party

Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.

Responsibility Role SPONSOR

Locations

Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.

Chu Brest

Brest, , France

Site Status

Countries

Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.

France

Other Identifiers

Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.

29BRC25.0003 - CADECO

Identifier Type: -

Identifier Source: org_study_id

More Related Trials

Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.