Comparison of Intermittent Bolus Vs. Continuous Infusion PENG Block for Postoperative Pain in Hip Surgery

NCT ID: NCT06834243

Last Updated: 2025-02-20

Study Results

Results pending

The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.

Basic Information

Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.

Recruitment Status

COMPLETED

Total Enrollment

82 participants

Study Classification

OBSERVATIONAL

Study Start Date

2023-11-15

Study Completion Date

2024-11-15

Brief Summary

Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.

This retrospective study evaluates the effects of two different administration methods of the Pericapsular Nerve Group (PENG) Block on postoperative pain control, opioid consumption, and recovery in patients undergoing hip surgery.

All patients in the study received:

* PENG block via a catheter
* Patient-Controlled Analgesia (PCA) with tramadol
* Multimodal analgesia, including IV paracetamol and nonsteroidal anti inflammatory drugs (NSAIDs) as rescue analgesia

The study compares two groups:

1. Intermittent Bolus Group: A researcher administered 20 mL of 0.25% bupivacaine every 4 hours.
2. Continuous Infusion Group: A pump delivered 5 mL/hour of 0.25% bupivacaine continuously.

Both groups received the same total volume of local anesthetic over 24 hours. All PENG blocks were performed under ultrasound guidance at the end of surgery. This study aims to determine whether intermittent bolus or continuous infusion PENG block administration leads to better pain control, lower opioid consumption, and improved recovery outcomes.

Detailed Description

Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.

Postoperative pain management after hip surgery remains a critical factor in recovery quality, opioid consumption, and overall patient outcomes. Among regional anesthesia techniques, the PENG Block is increasingly utilized for pain control due to its ability to provide effective analgesia while minimizing systemic opioid use. However, the optimal administration method of PENG block remains unclear.

This retrospective cohort study evaluates the effectiveness of two different PENG block administration techniques in patients undergoing hip surgery:

1. Intermittent Bolus Group: A researcher manually administered 20 mL of 0.25% bupivacaine every 4 hours via a catheter placed under ultrasound guidance at the end of surgery.
2. Continuous Infusion Group: A pump delivered 5 mL/hour of 0.25% bupivacaine continuously via a catheter placed under ultrasound guidance at the end of surgery.

Total local anesthetic volume over 24 hours was equal in both groups.

Study Objectives:

The primary objective is to compare intermittent bolus vs. continuous infusion PENG block administration in terms of:

* Postoperative pain control (Visual Analog Scale) (VAS scores)
* Total opioid consumption (morphine equivalent)
* Time to first rescue analgesia
* Quality of recovery (QoR-15 at 24 hours postoperative)

Secondary outcomes include:

* Postoperative nausea and vomiting (PONV)
* Incidence of complications (hematoma, infection, nerve injury)

This study aims to provide evidence on whether intermittent bolus or continuous infusion leads to better pain relief, reduced opioid consumption, and improved recovery in hip surgery patients.

Conditions

See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.

Hip Surgery Postoperative Pain Management Pericapsular Nerve Group Block (PENG Block) Regional Anesthesia

Study Design

Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.

Observational Model Type

COHORT

Study Time Perspective

RETROSPECTIVE

Study Groups

Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.

Intermittent Bolus Group

Patients in this group received intermittent bolus administration of the Pericapsular Nerve Group (PENG) Block via a catheter placed under ultrasound guidance at the end of surgery. A researcher manually administered 20 mL of 0.25% bupivacaine every 4 hours over a 24-hour period.

* Total bupivacaine volume: 120 mL of 0.25% bupivacaine over 24 hours
* Additional analgesia: All patients received PCA with tramadol, IV paracetamol, and rescue NSAIDs as per protocol.

Intermittent Bolus PENG Block

Intervention Type PROCEDURE

Patients received intermittent bolus administration of the Pericapsular Nerve Group (PENG) Block via a catheter. A researcher manually administered 20 mL of 0.25% bupivacaine every 4 hours over a 24-hour period.

Continuous Infusion Group

Patients in this group received continuous infusion of the Pericapsular Nerve Group (PENG) Block via a catheter placed under ultrasound guidance at the end of surgery. A pump delivered 5 mL/hour of 0.25% bupivacaine continuously over a 24-hour period.

* Total bupivacaine volume: 120 mL of 0.25% bupivacaine over 24 hours
* Additional analgesia: All patients received PCA with tramadol, IV paracetamol, and rescue NSAIDs as per protocol.

Continuous Infusion PENG Block

Intervention Type PROCEDURE

Patients received continuous infusion of the Pericapsular Nerve Group (PENG) Block via a catheter. A pump delivered 5 mL/hour of 0.25% bupivacaine continuously over a 24-hour period.

Interventions

Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.

Intermittent Bolus PENG Block

Patients received intermittent bolus administration of the Pericapsular Nerve Group (PENG) Block via a catheter. A researcher manually administered 20 mL of 0.25% bupivacaine every 4 hours over a 24-hour period.

Intervention Type PROCEDURE

Continuous Infusion PENG Block

Patients received continuous infusion of the Pericapsular Nerve Group (PENG) Block via a catheter. A pump delivered 5 mL/hour of 0.25% bupivacaine continuously over a 24-hour period.

Intervention Type PROCEDURE

Eligibility Criteria

Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.

Inclusion Criteria

Participants must meet all of the following criteria to be included in the study:

1. Patients who underwent hip surgery between November 15, 2023 - November 15, 2024.
2. Patients who received Pericapsular Nerve Group (PENG) Block via a catheter for postoperative analgesia.
3. Patients who received Patient-Controlled Analgesia (PCA) with tramadol.
4. Patients aged 18 to 65 years.
5. ASA I - III classification.

Exclusion Criteria

Participants who meet any of the following criteria will be excluded from the study:

1. Patients who received analgesia with techniques other than PENG block.
2. Patients with incomplete or missing medical records.
3. Patients with a psychiatric illness diagnosis that may interfere with pain perception or reporting.
4. Patients with coagulation disorders (e.g., INR \>1.5, thrombocytopenia).
5. Patients with hepatic or renal failure (Creatinine clearance \<30 mL/min or AST/ALT \>3x normal).
6. Patients with chronic opioid use before surgery.
Minimum Eligible Age

18 Years

Maximum Eligible Age

65 Years

Eligible Sex

ALL

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Sponsors

Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.

Namik Kemal University School of Medicine, Tekirdag

OTHER

Sponsor Role collaborator

Onur Baran

OTHER

Sponsor Role lead

Responsible Party

Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.

Onur Baran

Asst. Prof.

Responsibility Role SPONSOR_INVESTIGATOR

Principal Investigators

Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.

Cavidan Arar, Prof. Dr.

Role: STUDY_CHAIR

Medical Faculty of Tekirdağ Namık Kemal University

Locations

Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.

Tekirdağ Namık Kemal University Research Hospital

Tekirdağ, , Turkey (Türkiye)

Site Status

Countries

Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.

Turkey (Türkiye)

References

Explore related publications, articles, or registry entries linked to this study.

Huda AU, Ghafoor H. The Use of Pericapsular Nerve Group (PENG) Block in Hip Surgeries Is Associated With a Reduction in Opioid Consumption, Less Motor Block, and Better Patient Satisfaction: A Meta-Analysis. Cureus. 2022 Sep 6;14(9):e28872. doi: 10.7759/cureus.28872. eCollection 2022 Sep.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 36105907 (View on PubMed)

Kukreja P, Uppal V, Kofskey AM, Feinstein J, Northern T, Davis C, Morgan CJ, Kalagara H. Quality of recovery after pericapsular nerve group (PENG) block for primary total hip arthroplasty under spinal anaesthesia: a randomised controlled observer-blinded trial. Br J Anaesth. 2023 Jun;130(6):773-779. doi: 10.1016/j.bja.2023.02.017. Epub 2023 Mar 22.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 36964012 (View on PubMed)

Other Identifiers

Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.

TNKU-PENG-Retro

Identifier Type: -

Identifier Source: org_study_id

More Related Trials

Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.

'The Effect of Adding LFCN Block to PENG
NCT06226675 ACTIVE_NOT_RECRUITING NA