High-Tech Rehabilitation Pathway for Acute Adult Neuromuscular Diseases - Fit4MedRob-Acute MND Project
NCT ID: NCT06822231
Last Updated: 2025-06-11
Study Results
The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.
Basic Information
Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.
RECRUITING
NA
124 participants
INTERVENTIONAL
2025-05-28
2026-02-28
Brief Summary
Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.
Are high-tech rehabilitation interventions, including robotic systems, virtual reality, and stabilometric platforms, more effective than traditional rehabilitation methods in improving balance, motor function, fatigue levels, sarcopenia, cognitive engagement, and overall quality of life in patients with acute neuromuscular diseases (NMDs)? Researchers will compare a robotic treatment group, that consists in an high-tech rehabilitation, with a control group, that will receive the traditional rehabilitative treatment.
Related Clinical Trials
Explore similar clinical trials based on study characteristics and research focus.
Motor Function Assessment System Based on Video Tracking and Artificial Intelligence Technique
NCT06242054
Multimodal Exercises to Improve Leg Function After Spinal Cord Injury
NCT01740128
Safety and Usability of the EXPLORER Exoskeleton in Adults With Neuromuscular Diseases
NCT06894160
Rehabilitation and Cortical Remodeling After Surgical Intervention for Spinal Cord Injury
NCT04041063
A Clinical Trial of Cognitive Multisensory Rehabilitation for Sensory and Motor Recovery in Adults With Spinal Cord Injury
NCT05167032
Detailed Description
Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.
Background: NMDs affect muscle function and are directly controlled by the nervous system. Traditional rehabilitation often falls short in addressing the multifaceted needs of NMD patients. This gap underscores the necessity for innovative rehabilitation approaches that can significantly enhance the quality of life and optimize recovery outcomes following acute events.
Methods: The protocol integrates advanced technologies to address the rehabilitation needs of patients with acute NMDs. It utilizes robotic systems to ensure consistent and precise movement, virtual reality for immersive and engaging therapy, and stabilometric platforms to enhance balance training. The focus is on acute NMDs such as Guillain-Barré Syndrome (GBS), Critical illness myopathy (CIM) and polyneuropathy (CIP), either individually or in combination (CIP/CIM). The approach emphasizes rapid rehabilitation to maximize recovery outcomes.
Study Design: An interventional, randomized, superiority case-control study with a parallel assignment. The trial aims to compare the efficacy of high-tech rehabilitation methods against conventional treatments in improving patient outcomes.
Outcome Measures: To assess the improvement at least 10 points in balance measured using the Berg Balance Scale (BBS) from baseline to the end of the treatment period comparing the high-tech rehabilitation circuit with standard rehabilitation protocol.
Conclusion: This protocol seeks to determine if high-tech rehabilitation interventions can outperform traditional methods in acute NMDs. By doing so, it aims to potentially establish a new global standard for the care of patients with NMD care.
Conditions
See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.
Study Design
Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.
RANDOMIZED
PARALLEL
OTHER
DOUBLE
Study Groups
Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.
Robotic treatment group
In this arm, patients will be divided into 3 treatment types based on their Berg Balance Scale (BBS) score at the time of randomization. Phase 1 (BBS \<= 20) involves treatment with a robotic verticalization system (ERIGO) and action observation training with a virtual reality device.
Phase 2 (21 \< BBS \< 40) involves treatment with a robotic verticalization system (ERIGO), action observation training with a virtual reality device, and proprioceptive exercises on robotic platforms (e.g. GEA MASTER or PROKIN Technobody).
Phase 3 (BBS \>= 41) involves motor and cognitive exercises using virtual reality device, proprioceptive exercises on robotic platforms (e.g. GEA MASTER or PROKIN Technobody), and aerobic exercises on a robotic treadmill (e.g. Walkerview Technobody).
High-tech rehabilitative treatment
Robotic Verticalization System (e.g., Erigo): Assists in regaining upright posture and mobility.
Virtual Reality (e.g., VRRS Evo): Provides an engaging and immersive environment for cognitive and motor exercises.
Stabilometric Platform (e.g., Gea Master or Prokin Technobody): Used for balance and postural control training.
Treadmill System (e.g., Walkerview Technobody): Used for aerobic exercises with gait analysis and feedback
Control group
The patients will receive the traditional rehabilitative treatment according to the good clinical practice according to the Diagnostic, Therapeutic and Care Pathways of each center involved
Rehabilitation
Traditional rehabilitative treatment
Interventions
Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.
High-tech rehabilitative treatment
Robotic Verticalization System (e.g., Erigo): Assists in regaining upright posture and mobility.
Virtual Reality (e.g., VRRS Evo): Provides an engaging and immersive environment for cognitive and motor exercises.
Stabilometric Platform (e.g., Gea Master or Prokin Technobody): Used for balance and postural control training.
Treadmill System (e.g., Walkerview Technobody): Used for aerobic exercises with gait analysis and feedback
Rehabilitation
Traditional rehabilitative treatment
Eligibility Criteria
Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.
Inclusion Criteria
* Patients with a confirmed diagnosis of acute/subacute neuromuscular diseases (e.g. GBS, CIM, CIP)
* Time of onset ranging from 15 to 30 days
* Patients with lower limb strength (Medical Research Council or MRC) \>=2 in at least two of the flexor and extensor muscles of the following joints: hip, knee and ankle
* Possibility of obtaining informed consent
Exclusion Criteria
* Patients currently participating in other clinical trials that could interfere with this study.
* Pregnant or breastfeeding women.
18 Years
80 Years
ALL
No
Sponsors
Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.
Azienda Ospedaliero-Universitaria di Modena
OTHER
Fondazione Don Carlo Gnocchi Onlus
OTHER
Ospedale Policlinico San Martino
OTHER
Istituti Clinici Scientifici Maugeri SpA
OTHER
Responsible Party
Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.
Locations
Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.
Istituti Clinici Scientifici Maugeri
Bari, , Italy
IRCCS Azienda Ospedaliera Universitaria San Martino - Genova
Genova, , Italy
Istituti Clinici Scientifici Maugeri IRCCS, Milan Institute
Milan, , Italy
Azienda Ospedaliero-Universitaria di Modena
Modena, , Italy
Istituti Clinici Scientifici Maugeri
Montescano, , Italy
Istituti Clinici Scientifici Maugeri
Pavia, , Italy
Fondazione Don Carlo Gnocchi Onlus
Roma, , Italy
Istituti Clinici Scientifici Maugeri
Telese Terme, , Italy
Countries
Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.
Central Contacts
Reach out to these primary contacts for questions about participation or study logistics.
Facility Contacts
Find local site contact details for specific facilities participating in the trial.
Other Identifiers
Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.
PNC0000007
Identifier Type: OTHER_GRANT
Identifier Source: secondary_id
2024_0053110
Identifier Type: -
Identifier Source: org_study_id
More Related Trials
Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.