Spinal Cord Stimulation for Parkinson's Disease Rehabilitation

NCT ID: NCT06804642

Last Updated: 2025-02-03

Study Results

Results pending

The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.

Basic Information

Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.

Recruitment Status

RECRUITING

Clinical Phase

NA

Total Enrollment

20 participants

Study Classification

INTERVENTIONAL

Study Start Date

2024-12-12

Study Completion Date

2035-12-31

Brief Summary

Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.

This study explores the use of multifunctional, non-invasive spinal cord transcutaneous stimulation (scTS) to address axial motor symptoms, particularly gait dysfunction, in Parkinson's disease (PD). These symptoms, resistant to levodopa and inadequately managed by deep brain stimulation (DBS), arise from maladaptive spinal network changes. A non-invasive approach like scTS could overcome limitations associated with invasive spinal cord stimulation (SCS), which requires surgical implantation and lacks adaptability in stimulation site adjustments.

Gait dysfunction in PD stems from disrupted interactions between spinal and supraspinal networks. scTS provides a non-invasive alternative, shown to enhance locomotor functions in conditions such as spinal cord injury, stroke, and cerebral palsy. This study hypothesizes that scTS applied at multiple spinal levels-cervical (C3-C4), thoracic (T11-T12), and lumbar (L1, L2-L3)-can synergistically activate locomotor central pattern generators (CPGs) and improve gait and postural control in PD. Additionally, it is hypothesized that proprioceptive input, combined with scTS, can counteract disruptions in spinal networks and restore voluntary movement.

The primary goal is to evaluate the effects of scTS on stepping performance, postural control, and locomotor recovery in PD. Specific objectives include:

1. Enhancing Locomotor Networks

* Determine optimal scTS parameters for inducing rhythmic stepping in PD patients.
* Assess interactions between spinal and supraspinal networks during imagined stepping under scTS in a gravity-neutral setting.
2. Improving Postural Networks

o Evaluate the effectiveness of scTS in restoring postural control and integrating postural-locomotor functions.
3. Facilitating Neuroplasticity for Movement Recovery o Combine scTS with activity-based recovery training to promote adaptive plasticity in spinal and cortical networks, reducing freezing of gait (FOG).

The research will measure scTS's capacity to generate coordinated stepping and postural movements, integrate proprioceptive feedback, and induce long-term improvements in gait parameters. By targeting spinal locomotor and postural systems, scTS offers a novel, non-invasive approach to addressing gaps in the management of PD gait dysfunction. This work has the potential to significantly enhance the quality of life for individuals with PD, providing a safe, adaptable, and patient-centered therapeutic solution.

Detailed Description

Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.

Background:

Particular motor symptoms of Parkinson's disease (PD) are currently managed using electrical stimulation of deep structures in the brain. While deep brain stimulation effectively improves tremor, rigidity, bradykinesia, and medication-induced dyskinesias, it does not address axial gait symptoms. Gait symptoms are a late-developing phenomenon in the progression of PD and represent a therapeutic challenge given their poor response to levodopa therapy and deep brain stimulation. This problem, related to spinal maladaptive disorganization as part of pathophysiological changes associated with PD (Tisch et al., 2007), can be approached by electrical spinal cord stimulation (SCS) for alleviation of levodopa-resistant motor symptoms of PD (de Andrade et al., 2016). Thus far, only invasive SCS has been investigated for Parkinsonian gait, with paddle electrodes proving to be the most successful method of stimulation (Milekovic et al., 2023).

While few studies have probed spinal cord stimulation for axial PD symptoms, the optimal location(s) to stimulate the spinal cord are currently unknown (Sarica et al., 2023). Invasive SCS with paddle placement is suboptimal in addressing this gap due to three considerable drawbacks: (i) only one location of the spinal cord can be stimulated with each paddle, (ii) the stimulated location cannot be changed after the SCS paddle is placed, and (iii) paddle SCS placement requires surgery with a laminectomy, which harbors significant risks. To address this gap, a non-invasive stimulation paradigm is needed that permits concomitant stimulation of multiple spinal cord sites to map out the effects on gait during daily life activities and allows altering the stimulation location without the need for surgical intervention.

Previous research suggests that non-invasive multifunctional spinal cord transcutaneous stimulation (scTS) is an effective tool for initiating locomotion in healthy individuals (Gerasimenko et al., 2018) as well as for initiation and rehabilitation of locomotor functions in individuals with motor deficits, including spinal cord injury (SCI) (Gerasimenko et al., 2018; Gerasimenko et al., 2015), stroke (Moon et al., 2024), and cerebral palsy (CP) (Singh et al., 2023).

It is hypothesized that scTS applied to cervical (e.g., C3-C4), thoracic (e.g., T11-T12), and lumbar (e.g., L1, L2-L3) levels, activating locomotor CPGs of upper and lower limbs, as well as postural CPGs, will synergistically facilitate locomotor performance in individuals with PD. Additionally, proprioceptive input is required for gait initiation and locomotion (Zemmar et al., 2024, In Review). Based on these observations, it is hypothesized that concomitant stimulation of (i) multiple motor sites and (ii) proprioceptive feedback tracts activating brain stem nuclei, thalamic nuclei, and the cerebral cortex is required to effectively address gait in individuals with PD.

Therefore, activation of spinal locomotor-related systems in combination with activation of lemniscal and brainstem systems is proposed to promote disruption of anti-kinetic oscillatory synchronization in cortico-basal ganglia circuits, resulting in improved voluntary control of movements in individuals with PD.

Objectives:

The main goal of this project is to determine how multifunctional non-invasive spinal cord stimulation affects stepping performance in individuals with Parkinson's disease (PD). The basic premise is that if the spinal locomotor network is maladaptively affected in PD, then spinal neuromodulation of this network using scTS will be sufficient to correct Parkinsonian gait. One of the most classical features of individuals with PD is the very short and rapid stride length during stepping and the inability to initiate and terminate stepping in a timely manner. The hypothesis is that it will be possible to take advantage of the spinal locomotor-related network to overcome disruptive signals generated in Parkinsonian individuals that disrupt the spinal locomotor network. It is currently unknown whether the spinal locomotor network of individuals with PD has sufficient automaticity potential to generate postural control and rhythmic, coordinated weight-bearing stepping with the aid of multi-site scTS stimulation. It is further hypothesized that the sensory input derived from postural and stepping movements, combined with neuromodulation provided by scTS, can overcome disruptive supraspinal descending signals in individuals with Parkinsonian gait.

The first objective is to determine whether a novel multimodal scTS strategy can transform the spinal locomotor networks of individuals with PD to a functional state enabling rhythmic voluntary movement. Specifically, the goal is to define the specificity of site, frequency, and intensity of scTS required to induce stepping movements and volitionally oscillate leg movements in individuals with PD in a gravity-neutral condition. Interactions between spinal and supraspinal networks in facilitating locomotor movements will be examined when individuals with PD imagine rhythmic stepping movements in the presence of scTS in a gravity-neutral condition.

The second objective is to determine whether a novel multimodal scTS strategy can transform the spinal postural networks of individuals with PD to a functional state enabling postural ability. Specifically, the effectiveness of multimodal scTS to control postural stability will be defined, and the effectiveness of multimodal scTS for the regulation of postural-locomotor integration in individuals with PD will be evaluated.

Lastly, the third objective is to determine whether a novel multimodal scTS strategy, combined with activity-based recovery training, can promote adaptive plasticity of the spinal and cortical locomotor-related networks of individuals with PD to recover voluntary control of movement, particularly by reducing freezing of gait (FOG).

Study Design and Research Procedures:

The overall strategy outlined in this proposal is based on previous data reporting gait improvement in individuals with spinal cord injury (SCI) through activation of spinal locomotor networks located in the lumbosacral region, which are capable of generating full weight-bearing stepping when epidural stimulation is combined with transcutaneous stimulation of the cervical spinal cord (Angeli \& Gerasimenko, 2023). Building on knowledge from SCI studies, the approach in this study will be to modulate ascending proprioceptive fibers, important for feedback and posture control, and to overcome disruptive signals from descending systems, which presumably occur in individuals with PD (Sarica et al., 2023). This will be achieved by leveraging the intrinsic abilities of the lumbosacral spinal network to generate stepping. This is a prospective non-blinded, non-randomized study. All data will be stored for offline analysis.

Participants will be identified as individuals with Parkinson's disease and Parkinsonian gait symptoms who consent to participate in the study. Participants will take part in multiple assessment and intervention sessions over a 9-12 month period to track gait and postural improvements over time. Each participant will undergo a detailed medical evaluation prior to baseline assessment. Assessments will last up to 4 hours. Following the completion of baseline assessments, participants will begin the first study intervention period. Post-intervention assessments will be performed approximately 1 week between intervention periods. Each intervention training session will last approximately 2 hours. Participants will train 3 days per week during the intervention periods to achieve at least 12 sessions (1-month intervention period) or 24 sessions (2-month intervention periods). The study timeline, descriptions of assessments, and interventions are outlined below:

Initial Visit:

* Medical Evaluation: Includes a review of medical history, discussion of current medical status, and current medications. A study physician may also complete a physical examination.
* Baseline Assessments: Performed prior to interventions.

Months 1-2:

* Intervention 1: Step-scTS in a gravity-neutral device (GND), 3 sessions per week for 1 month.
* Post-Intervention 1 Assessments: Conducted following the intervention.

Months 2-4:

* Intervention 2: Combination of Step-scTS and locomotor training. Includes 2 sessions per week of Step-scTS with body-weight support treadmill training (BWS) and 1 session per week of Step-scTS with overground locomotor training using an assistive device, for a total of 3 sessions per week over 2 months.
* Post-Intervention 2 Assessments: Conducted following the intervention.

Months 4-6:

* Intervention 3: Step-scTS combined with overground locomotor training using an assistive device, 3 sessions per week for 2 months.
* Post-Intervention 3 Assessments: Conducted following the intervention

Conditions

See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.

Parkinson Disease

Study Design

Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.

Allocation Method

NA

Intervention Model

SINGLE_GROUP

Primary Study Purpose

TREATMENT

Blinding Strategy

NONE

Study Groups

Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.

Non-invasive spinal neuromodulation training

The overall strategy outlined in this proposal is based on previous data from our own group reporting gait improvement in SCI individuals through activation of spinal locomotor networks located in the lumbosacral region that bear the capability of generating full weight-bearing stepping when epidural stimulation is combined with transcutaneous stimulation of the cervical spinal cord (Angeli \& Gerasimenko, 2023). Building on our knowledge from SCI patients, the approach in the present study will be to modulate the ascending proprioceptive fibers important for feedback and posture control and to overcome disruptive signals from descending systems, which presumably occur in PD individuals (Sarica et al., 2023), by taking advantage of the intrinsic abilities of the lumbosacral spinal network to generate stepping. This is a prospective non-blinded non-randomized study. All data will be stored for off-line analysis.

Group Type EXPERIMENTAL

Spinal cord transcutaneous stimulation (scTS)

Intervention Type DEVICE

scTS mapping: Each intervention session will be approximately 2 hours each which includes time to place the scTS stimulating pads and other sensors as needed. Participants will be asked to train 3 days per week during the intervention periods so that they achieve at least 12 sessions. In instances in which availability is limited or they must cancel a session, the intervention period will need to be extended slightly (up to a maximum of four weeks) so that they can achieve at least 12 sessions (1-month intervention period) or 24 sessions (2-month intervention periods) of training. The main study interventions are described below.

Step-scTS:

Step-scTS is spinal cord transcutaneous stimulation (scTS) targeted for stepping function. The scTS mapping assessment(s) will assist the study team in determining optimized stimulation parameters for each body and f

Interventions

Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.

Spinal cord transcutaneous stimulation (scTS)

scTS mapping: Each intervention session will be approximately 2 hours each which includes time to place the scTS stimulating pads and other sensors as needed. Participants will be asked to train 3 days per week during the intervention periods so that they achieve at least 12 sessions. In instances in which availability is limited or they must cancel a session, the intervention period will need to be extended slightly (up to a maximum of four weeks) so that they can achieve at least 12 sessions (1-month intervention period) or 24 sessions (2-month intervention periods) of training. The main study interventions are described below.

Step-scTS:

Step-scTS is spinal cord transcutaneous stimulation (scTS) targeted for stepping function. The scTS mapping assessment(s) will assist the study team in determining optimized stimulation parameters for each body and f

Intervention Type DEVICE

Eligibility Criteria

Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.

Inclusion Criteria

* Diagnosis of Parkinson's disease;
* Adults aged 18 to 80 years;
* Competent to give informed consent for the research protocol;
* Able to understand instructions;
* Able to ambulate 10-meters.

Exclusion Criteria

* Co-morbidities affecting gait;
* Clinically significant cognitive dysfunction;
* Clinically significant depression or major active psychiatric illness such as schizophrenia, bipolar disorder, or major depressive disorder;
* Terminal illness associated with \<12-month survival;
* Have a current diagnosis or condition such as major cardiac insufficiency, determined clinically by the study doctors;
* Current alcohol or substance abuse that is uncontrolled or unmanageable;
* Individuals unable to communicate with the investigator and study staff; and/or
* Individuals with any illness that, in the study doctors' opinion, may preclude them from spinal cord transcutaneous stimulation, activity-based recovery training, or participation in study assessments.
Minimum Eligible Age

18 Years

Maximum Eligible Age

80 Years

Eligible Sex

ALL

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Sponsors

Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.

University of Louisville

OTHER

Sponsor Role lead

Responsible Party

Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.

Alexander V Ovechkin, MD, PhD

Associate Professor

Responsibility Role PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR

Principal Investigators

Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.

Alexander Ovechkin, MD, Ph.D.

Role: STUDY_DIRECTOR

University of Louisville

Locations

Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.

Frazier Rehab Institute

Louisville, Kentucky, United States

Site Status RECRUITING

Countries

Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.

United States

Central Contacts

Reach out to these primary contacts for questions about participation or study logistics.

Andrea Wilhite, MS

Role: CONTACT

5025874871

Kristin Benton, MS

Role: CONTACT

5025874871

Facility Contacts

Find local site contact details for specific facilities participating in the trial.

Alexander Ovechkin, MD, Ph.D.

Role: primary

502-581-8675

Andrea Wilhite, MS

Role: backup

5025874871

Other Identifiers

Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.

24-0700

Identifier Type: -

Identifier Source: org_study_id

More Related Trials

Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.

Spinal Cord Stimulation and Training
NCT05472584 RECRUITING NA
Non-Invasive Spinal Cord Stimulation After Injury
NCT03998527 ACTIVE_NOT_RECRUITING NA
Epidural Stimulation for Upper Extremity Function
NCT06437548 NOT_YET_RECRUITING NA