RAdiology Consultation Effectiveness

NCT ID: NCT06762665

Last Updated: 2025-03-20

Study Results

Results pending

The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.

Basic Information

Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.

Recruitment Status

RECRUITING

Clinical Phase

NA

Total Enrollment

270 participants

Study Classification

INTERVENTIONAL

Study Start Date

2025-02-12

Study Completion Date

2027-09-01

Brief Summary

Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.

Performing a consultation with the radiologist before a spinal invasive procedure serves to foster a trusting physician-patient relationship. It also provides an opportunity for the comprehensive explanation of the procedure, its aftermath, and any patient inquiries. We believe that this proactive approach has the potential to alleviate pre-procedure anxiety, thereby contributing to an enhanced overall experience of the intervention and its outcomes. Despite these potential benefits, it is noteworthy that such consultations are not systematically implemented, and their impact on the intervention effictness remains unexplored in existing literature.

The hypothesis is grounded in the belief that patients who perform a consultation preceding their spinal intervention are likely to witness improvements in both the overall experience of the procedure and its effectiveness.

Detailed Description

Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.

Conditions

See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.

Radiology Interventional Spinal Injections Back Pain

Study Design

Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.

Allocation Method

RANDOMIZED

Intervention Model

PARALLEL

Primary Study Purpose

SUPPORTIVE_CARE

Blinding Strategy

NONE

Study Groups

Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.

Physical Consultation (PC)

These patients have a consultation with the radiologist prior to the intervention, including an interview about their medical history and symptoms, a clinical examination, a review of the imaging file, an explanation of the procedure, and the opportunity to ask questions.

Group Type ACTIVE_COMPARATOR

Spinal injection

Intervention Type PROCEDURE

Patients underwent a spinal injection procedure under CT scan

pre-operative consultation

Intervention Type OTHER

Pre-operative consultation, in person or by teleconsultation, consists of an interview about the patient's history and symptoms. This is followed by a clinical examination and consultation of the patient's imaging file, to confirm the request for paraspinal infiltration and its location. In addition, the radiologist explains the procedure to the patient, supplementing the explanatory documents already provided at the time of the appointment, and outlines the results that may be expected and any complications.

Teleconsultation (TC)

These patients have a teleconsultation with the radiologist prior to the intervention, including an interview about their medical history and symptoms, a review of the imaging file, an explanation of the procedure, and the opportunity to ask questions.

Group Type ACTIVE_COMPARATOR

Spinal injection

Intervention Type PROCEDURE

Patients underwent a spinal injection procedure under CT scan

pre-operative consultation

Intervention Type OTHER

Pre-operative consultation, in person or by teleconsultation, consists of an interview about the patient's history and symptoms. This is followed by a clinical examination and consultation of the patient's imaging file, to confirm the request for paraspinal infiltration and its location. In addition, the radiologist explains the procedure to the patient, supplementing the explanatory documents already provided at the time of the appointment, and outlines the results that may be expected and any complications.

No Consultation (NC)

These patients not have a consultation prior to the procedure: The radiologist reviews the imaging file remotely. The explanation of the procedure is provided through documents, and questions are answered only on the day of the intervention.

Group Type ACTIVE_COMPARATOR

Spinal injection

Intervention Type PROCEDURE

Patients underwent a spinal injection procedure under CT scan

Interventions

Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.

Spinal injection

Patients underwent a spinal injection procedure under CT scan

Intervention Type PROCEDURE

pre-operative consultation

Pre-operative consultation, in person or by teleconsultation, consists of an interview about the patient's history and symptoms. This is followed by a clinical examination and consultation of the patient's imaging file, to confirm the request for paraspinal infiltration and its location. In addition, the radiologist explains the procedure to the patient, supplementing the explanatory documents already provided at the time of the appointment, and outlines the results that may be expected and any complications.

Intervention Type OTHER

Eligibility Criteria

Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.

Inclusion Criteria

* Patient 18 years of age or older
* Referred to the imaging department for a peri-spinal injection under CT guidance.
* Low back pain, dorsal pain, or neck pain with an average pain intensity of ≥ 5/10 on NPRS.

Exclusion Criteria

* Patient unable to read and/or write French
* Patient unable to condut a teleconsultation (no phone, no internet connection)
* Current pregnancy, breastfeeding, or lack of effective contraception for women of childbearing age
* Lack of consent
* Legally protected population:

* Adults protected by law (guardianship, curatorship, or judicial protection)
* Non-emancipated minors
* Individuals unable to express consent (research conducted in emergency situations)
* Individuals deprived of liberty (by judicial or administrative decision, or involuntary hospitalization)
* Not affiliated with a social security scheme or not benefiting from such a scheme
* Participation in another research study with an ongoing exclusion period
Minimum Eligible Age

18 Years

Eligible Sex

ALL

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Sponsors

Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.

University Hospital, Montpellier

OTHER

Sponsor Role lead

Responsible Party

Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.

Responsibility Role SPONSOR

Principal Investigators

Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.

Maxime PASTOR, MD

Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR

University Hospital, Montpellier

Locations

Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.

University Hospital of Montpellier

Montpellier, Occitnaie, France

Site Status RECRUITING

Countries

Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.

France

Central Contacts

Reach out to these primary contacts for questions about participation or study logistics.

Maxme PASTOR, MD

Role: CONTACT

06 72 32 79 83 ext. +33

Catherine CYTEVAL, MD PhD

Role: CONTACT

Facility Contacts

Find local site contact details for specific facilities participating in the trial.

Céline ENGRAND, PhD

Role: primary

0467338607 ext. +33

Other Identifiers

Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.

RECHMPL24_0113

Identifier Type: -

Identifier Source: org_study_id

More Related Trials

Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.