ImpRovEd Care After eSophageCtomy Using an Algorithm for postoperativE Complications - RESCUE Trial

NCT ID: NCT06762652

Last Updated: 2025-01-07

Study Results

Results pending

The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.

Basic Information

Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.

Recruitment Status

NOT_YET_RECRUITING

Clinical Phase

NA

Total Enrollment

1050 participants

Study Classification

INTERVENTIONAL

Study Start Date

2025-06-01

Study Completion Date

2028-07-01

Brief Summary

Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.

The objective of the RESCUE-trial is to investigate whether implementation of a consensus-based clinical care algorithm to standardize diagnosis and management of postoperative complications reduces 90-day mortality, ICU (re)admission and surgical interventions after esophagectomy for esophageal cancer.

Detailed Description

Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.

Conditions

See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.

Diagnosis and Treatment of Complications After Esophagectomy

Study Design

Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.

Allocation Method

NA

Intervention Model

CROSSOVER

Stepped-wedge cluster-randomized superiority trial.
Primary Study Purpose

OTHER

Blinding Strategy

NONE

Study Groups

Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.

Usual Care

During the control period, (participating) patients will receive usual postoperative care. Postoperative care, including diagnosis and management of postoperative complications, will be performed in line with local standards and/or protocols. For diagnosis of complications, physicians may perform laboratory tests such as CRP or leucocyte count, and diagnostic imaging such as CT-scan, X-ray or endoscopy. For treatment of complications, conservative, radiological, endoscopic and surgical treatments are often applied.

Group Type ACTIVE_COMPARATOR

Wash-in period

Intervention Type OTHER

The goal of the wash-in period between the control and intervention period is to intensively educate and train physicians to use the algorithm as intended during daily postoperative care. The coordinating investigator along with the local principal investigator will be responsible for this training. Training will be performed in a standardized approach in order to guarantee uniformity across centres.

Algorithm-based care

Intervention Type DIAGNOSTIC_TEST

During the intervention period, (participating) patients will receive algorithm-based care. The RESCUE algorithm is a consensus-based clinical care algorithm developed to standardize postoperative care. The algorithm includes the same modalities as applied in usual care, and does not include novel/experimental modalities, but rather offers a novel, standardized approach to guide the use of common modalities during postoperative care. The daily objective evaluation of patients' condition, vital signs and biochemical parameters is thought to aid early diagnosis of complications after esophagectomy which enables treatment before systemic symptoms become apparent and prevent development of sepsis. Physicians are always allowed to deviate from the RESCUE, but reasons for deviating will be recorded.

Interventions

Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.

Wash-in period

The goal of the wash-in period between the control and intervention period is to intensively educate and train physicians to use the algorithm as intended during daily postoperative care. The coordinating investigator along with the local principal investigator will be responsible for this training. Training will be performed in a standardized approach in order to guarantee uniformity across centres.

Intervention Type OTHER

Algorithm-based care

During the intervention period, (participating) patients will receive algorithm-based care. The RESCUE algorithm is a consensus-based clinical care algorithm developed to standardize postoperative care. The algorithm includes the same modalities as applied in usual care, and does not include novel/experimental modalities, but rather offers a novel, standardized approach to guide the use of common modalities during postoperative care. The daily objective evaluation of patients' condition, vital signs and biochemical parameters is thought to aid early diagnosis of complications after esophagectomy which enables treatment before systemic symptoms become apparent and prevent development of sepsis. Physicians are always allowed to deviate from the RESCUE, but reasons for deviating will be recorded.

Intervention Type DIAGNOSTIC_TEST

Eligibility Criteria

Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.

Inclusion Criteria

In order to be eligible to participate in this study, a subject must meet all of the following criteria:

1. Age ≥ 18 years
2. Histologically proven esophageal or gastro-esophageal junction carcinoma (cT1-4aN0-3M0)
3. Scheduled to undergo curatively-intended esophagectomy with gastric tube reconstruction. All techniques (i.e. minimally invasive, robotic, hybrid, open) and approaches (i.e. transthoracic, transcervical, transhiatal) of esophagectomy are suitable for inclusion.
4. Ability to provide written informed consent

Exclusion Criteria

A potential subject who meets any of the following criteria will be excluded from participation in this study:

1. Emergency resection
2. Patients who underwent (additional) total gastrectomy
3. Patients who underwent reconstruction using colonic or jejunal interposition
4. Patients in whom no anastomosis is created during resection
5. Secondary malignancy which determines prognosis
Minimum Eligible Age

18 Years

Eligible Sex

ALL

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Sponsors

Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.

Catharina Ziekenhuis Eindhoven

OTHER

Sponsor Role collaborator

Erasmus Medical Center

OTHER

Sponsor Role collaborator

University Medical Center Groningen

OTHER

Sponsor Role collaborator

Hospital Group Twente (ZGT)

UNKNOWN

Sponsor Role collaborator

Antoni van Leeuwenhoek Hospital

OTHER

Sponsor Role collaborator

Leiden University Medical Center

OTHER

Sponsor Role collaborator

Elisabeth-TweeSteden Ziekenhuis

OTHER

Sponsor Role collaborator

medical center leeuwarden

UNKNOWN

Sponsor Role collaborator

Zuyderland Medical Centre

OTHER

Sponsor Role collaborator

Academisch Medisch Centrum - Universiteit van Amsterdam (AMC-UvA)

OTHER

Sponsor Role collaborator

Reinier de Graaf Groep

OTHER

Sponsor Role collaborator

Gelre Hospitals

OTHER

Sponsor Role collaborator

UMC Utrecht

OTHER

Sponsor Role collaborator

Radboud University Medical Center

OTHER

Sponsor Role lead

Responsible Party

Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.

Responsibility Role SPONSOR

Central Contacts

Reach out to these primary contacts for questions about participation or study logistics.

Jobbe M.G. Lemmens, MD

Role: CONTACT

0652331762

Gijs van Dongen, MD

Role: CONTACT

Other Identifiers

Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.

10390032310024

Identifier Type: OTHER_GRANT

Identifier Source: secondary_id

2024-17562

Identifier Type: -

Identifier Source: org_study_id

More Related Trials

Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.

Better in Better Out Cystectomy.
NCT06694649 NOT_YET_RECRUITING