Node Positive Cervical Cancer Treated by Neoadjuvant Chemotherapy Plus Radical Surgery: a Single Center Experience

NCT ID: NCT06752135

Last Updated: 2024-12-30

Study Results

Results pending

The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.

Basic Information

Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.

Recruitment Status

TERMINATED

Total Enrollment

97 participants

Study Classification

OBSERVATIONAL

Study Start Date

2024-04-10

Study Completion Date

2024-12-06

Brief Summary

Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.

This clinical study focuses on the treatment of high-risk locally advanced cervical cancer (LACC) in women with lymph node involvement (stages IIIC1 and IIIC2). Cervical cancer (CC) is a significant health concern worldwide, particularly for women, with high rates of diagnosis and mortality. While there have been advances in prevention and treatment, a substantial number of patients are still diagnosed with advanced-stage disease, which often involves cancer spread to nearby lymph nodes.

In standard practice, patients with LACC are usually treated with chemoradiation plus brachytherapy (cCRT-B). However, this approach can have considerable side effects and doesn't always provide a long-term cure. The study explores an alternative treatment regimen involving neoadjuvant chemotherapy (NACT) followed by radical surgery (RS) to evaluate its potential in improving survival outcomes and reducing recurrence. Neoadjuvant chemotherapy, a treatment given before surgery to shrink tumors, is often used for different types of cancer, and this study examines its benefits in cervical cancer patients with nodal involvement.

The main goal of this study is to determine whether NACT combined with radical surgery can offer survival rates and progression-free survival comparable to the standard treatment of chemoradiation. Additionally, the study aims to assess patterns of recurrence after treatment and to explore how these patients responded to further treatment options.

Study hypotheses: NACT + RS as a viable alternative: The hypothesis is that the combination of NACT followed by radical surgery may lead to survival outcomes comparable to those achieved by the standard cCRT-B treatment, particularly in patients with node-positive cervical cancer.

Improved recurrence management: Another key hypothesis is that the recurrence patterns in patients treated with NACT + RS are different, and a significant proportion of recurrent cases may be treated successfully with curative approaches such as surgery or radiotherapy.

Quality of life considerations: This treatment approach may offer better quality of life compared to chemoradiation by avoiding some of the severe side effects of radiotherapy, such as vaginal stenosis and other complications.

The study follows 97 patients who were treated at the Gynecologic Oncology Unit of Policlinico Umberto I, Sapienza University of Rome, between 2012 and 2022. The patients were diagnosed with cervical cancer and were in stages IIIC1 or IIIC2, meaning they had lymph node involvement. These patients received three cycles of chemotherapy (cisplatin and paclitaxel) followed by radical surgery, with further treatment depending on the surgical outcomes. After surgery, patients underwent a follow-up program to monitor for disease recurrence and overall survival.

Detailed Description

Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.

This study is a retrospective observational investigation aimed at evaluating the treatment outcomes of neoadjuvant chemotherapy (NACT) followed by radical surgery (RS) in patients with high-risk locally advanced cervical cancer (LACC) exhibiting positive lymph nodes (FIGO IIIC1-2 stage). The study analyzes recurrence patterns, subsequent treatments, and survival outcomes in a cohort of patients treated over a 10-year period at the Gynecologic Oncology Unit of Policlinico Umberto I, Sapienza University of Rome.

Study objectives and hypotheses: the primary hypothesis of this study is that the combination of NACT and radical surgery can offer survival outcomes and patterns of recurrence comparable to the standard chemoradiotherapy (cCRT-B) for LACC patients with nodal involvement (FIGO IIIC1-2). The secondary hypothesis suggests that a significant proportion of patients with recurrent disease can benefit from curative interventions (surgery, chemotherapy, or chemoradiotherapy), improving overall survival (OS) and progression-free survival (PFS) rates.

Study design and methodology: this study involved 97 patients diagnosed with locally advanced cervical cancer, all treated with NACT followed by RS from January 2012 to December 2022. The study's inclusion criteria were: patients aged 18-75 years with histologically confirmed cervical squamous cell carcinoma or adenocarcinoma, positive lymph nodes (FIGO IIIC1-2), and no prior oncological treatments. The treatment protocol involved three cycles of platinum-based NACT (cisplatin or carboplatin plus paclitaxel), followed by imaging assessments to evaluate the response to chemotherapy. Only patients with complete or partial responses according to RECIST criteria were considered for subsequent radical surgery.

The study also assessed the pattern of recurrence, treatments for recurrence, and survival outcomes, with data collection including clinical examination, imaging (CT, MRI, PET-CT), and histopathological analyses. The main measures of success were OS and PFS, with statistical analyses conducted using Kaplan-Meier methods.

Quality assurance and data management: the study adhered to a rigorous quality assurance plan that ensured accurate data collection, validation, and analysis. Data were sourced from an institutional database and reviewed by an expert panel. To ensure consistency, data were cross-verified with external sources such as medical records, and discrepancies were resolved through audit procedures. A detailed data dictionary was maintained to ensure consistency in variable definitions, coding (e.g., WHO drug dictionary), and reporting standards.

Atatistical analysis: the statistical analysis involved the Fisher exact test for categorical data, t-tests for parametric continuous variables, and the Mann-Whitney U test for non-parametric data. Survival data were analyzed using the Kaplan-Meier method, estimating OS and PFS for all patients and subgroups, including comparisons based on FIGO stage IIIC1 versus IIIC2. Survival outcomes were also analyzed in relation to the recurrence sites (e.g., pelvic nodes, central pelvis).

Conditions

See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.

Cervical Carcinoma

Keywords

Explore important study keywords that can help with search, categorization, and topic discovery.

cervical carcinoma neoadjuvant chemotherapy. observational study retrospective radiological prognostic factors imaging methodologies MRI TC scan PFS OS pathological parameters radiological parameters clinical parameters

Study Design

Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.

Observational Model Type

CASE_ONLY

Study Time Perspective

RETROSPECTIVE

Study Groups

Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.

Cervical squamous cell carcinoma or adenocarcinoma (FIGO IIIC1-2)

The study cohort included women aged 18-75 years with histologically confirmed cervical squamous cell carcinoma or adenocarcinoma, positive lymph nodes (FIGO IIIC1-2), no prior oncological treatments, no pregnancy, a performance status of 0-2 (WHO), life expectancy of at least 3 months, and no evidence of distant metastasis or concomitant cancers.

cervical biopsies/conization,

Intervention Type PROCEDURE

Diagnostic laparoscopy was used in selected cases to evaluate potential peritoneal spread.

imaging tests (TCTB, TC-PET, MRI)

Intervention Type DIAGNOSTIC_TEST

The staging procedures included imaging such as chest CT, abdomino-pelvic MRI, and PET-CT to assess tumor spread and lymph node involvement.

neoadjuvant chemotherapy (cisplatin or carboplatin plus paclitaxel)

Intervention Type DRUG

Patients received three cycles of platinum-based neoadjuvant chemotherapy (cisplatin or carboplatin plus paclitaxel), followed by imaging to assess treatment response.

hysterectomy, salpingo-oophorectomy, and lymphadenectomy

Intervention Type PROCEDURE

Eligible patients underwent radical surgery, including hysterectomy, salpingo-oophorectomy, and lymphadenectomy, with adjuvant therapy administered as needed based on surgical findings. Follow-up included regular clinical exams, imaging, and tests to monitor for recurrence.

brachytherapy

Intervention Type RADIATION

alternative to cCRT-B.

Interventions

Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.

cervical biopsies/conization,

Diagnostic laparoscopy was used in selected cases to evaluate potential peritoneal spread.

Intervention Type PROCEDURE

imaging tests (TCTB, TC-PET, MRI)

The staging procedures included imaging such as chest CT, abdomino-pelvic MRI, and PET-CT to assess tumor spread and lymph node involvement.

Intervention Type DIAGNOSTIC_TEST

neoadjuvant chemotherapy (cisplatin or carboplatin plus paclitaxel)

Patients received three cycles of platinum-based neoadjuvant chemotherapy (cisplatin or carboplatin plus paclitaxel), followed by imaging to assess treatment response.

Intervention Type DRUG

hysterectomy, salpingo-oophorectomy, and lymphadenectomy

Eligible patients underwent radical surgery, including hysterectomy, salpingo-oophorectomy, and lymphadenectomy, with adjuvant therapy administered as needed based on surgical findings. Follow-up included regular clinical exams, imaging, and tests to monitor for recurrence.

Intervention Type PROCEDURE

brachytherapy

alternative to cCRT-B.

Intervention Type RADIATION

Eligibility Criteria

Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.

Inclusion Criteria

* Women aged ≥ 18 years attending the AOU Policlinico Umberto I
* histological diagnosis of cervical squamous cell carcinoma or adenocarcinoma; presence of positive lymph nodes at imaging (FIGO IIIC1-2 stage);
* ECOG performance status 0 or 1;
* No previous oncological treatments;
* No actual pregnancy;
* Life expectancy of at least 3 months;
* Ability to understand and willingness of the subject to participate in the trial confirmed by the signature of the written informed consent.
* No of distant metastasis or concomitant neoplasms.

Exclusion Criteria

* Patients who have a clinical diagnosis different from advanced cervical cancer stages IB2-IVA
* Patients who have not received neoadjuvant chemotherapy
* Systemic diseases or immunodeficiencies
* Patients who are HCV+, HBV+, or HIV+
Minimum Eligible Age

18 Years

Eligible Sex

FEMALE

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Sponsors

Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.

University of Roma La Sapienza

OTHER

Sponsor Role collaborator

Azienda Policlinico Umberto I

OTHER

Sponsor Role lead

Responsible Party

Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.

Innocenza Palaia

Professor

Responsibility Role PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR

Locations

Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.

AOU Policlinico Umberto I - Roma

Roma, , Italy

Site Status

Countries

Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.

Italy

Other Identifiers

Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.

Cx - Prot.0330/2024|Rif. 7350

Identifier Type: OTHER

Identifier Source: secondary_id

AOU Umberto I

Identifier Type: -

Identifier Source: org_study_id